Microsoft Word - APIRG 17 WP 7 Appendix I-6 PBN Imp Tools - Approach Phase Action Plan - Long Term
APIRG 17 WP7 APPENDIX I-6
PBN IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS
_________________ (State)
NATIONAL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES AND ACTION PLAN
OPTIMIZATION OF THE ATS ROUTE STRUCTURE IN TERMINAL AIRSPACE
PERIOD: Long Term (2016 +) APPLICATION: Approach Phase
Benefits
Environment:
Efficiency :
Strategy
PROCESS TASKS INPUT SOURCE OUTPUT TARGET DATE ACTION
PERSON/GROUP STATUS
Preliminary
• Review AFI PBN Implementation Plan Key Targets
(Terminal-Approach)
AFI PBN Implementation Plan Long Term: 2016 + [Ch. 25-26]
• Review State PBN Implementation Plan Key Targets
(Terminal Approach)
State PBN Implementation Plan Long Term: 2016 + [Ch. 5.3]
APIRG 17 WP7 APPENDIX I-6
PROCESS TASKS INPUT SOURCE OUTPUT TARGET DATE
ACTION PERSON/GROUP STATUS
Terminal Applications
Implementation
Process 1
Determine Requirements
Step 1- Formulate airspace concept
PBN Manual, Vol. 1B Ch. (...) B 4.3.4
Step 5- Implementation decision
PBN Manual, Vol. 1B Ch. B 4.3.5
Step 6- Flight inspection and flight validation
PBN Manual, Vol. 1B Ch.
Language:English
Score: 1433560.3
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...IRG/APIRG17/Docs/wp7_appi6.pdf
Data Source: un
Microsoft Word - APIRG 17 Wp 7 Appendix I-4 PBN Imp Tools - Approach Phase Action Plan - Near Term
APIRG 17 WP7 APPENDIX I-4
PBN IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS
_________________ (State)
NATIONAL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES AND ACTION PLAN
OPTIMIZATION OF THE ATS ROUTE STRUCTURE IN TERMINAL AIRSPACE
PERIOD: Near Term (2008-2012) APPLICATION: Approach Phase
Benefits
Environment:
Efficiency :
Strategy
PROCESS TASKS INPUT SOURCE OUTPUT TARGET DATE ACTION
PERSON/GROUP STATUS
Preliminary
• Review AFI PBN Implementation Plan Key Targets
(Terminal- Approach)
AFI PBN Implementation Plan Near Term: 2008-2012 [Ch. 10-14]
• Review State PBN Implementation Plan Key Targets
(Terminal-Approach)
State PBN Implementation Plan Near Term: 2008-2012 [Ch. 5.1.2-5.1.3]
APIRG 17 WP7 APPENDIX I-4
PROCESS TASKS INPUT SOURCE OUTPUT TARGET DATE
ACTION PERSON/GROUP STATUS
Terminal Applications
Implementation
Process 1
Determine Requirements
Step 1- Formulate airspace concept
PBN Manual, Vol. 1B Ch. (...) B 4.3.4
Step 5- Implementation decision
PBN Manual, Vol. 1B Ch. B 4.3.5
Step 6- Flight inspection and flight validation
PBN Manual, Vol. 1B Ch.
Language:English
Score: 1433560.3
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...IRG/APIRG17/Docs/wp7_appi4.pdf
Data Source: un
Microsoft Word - APIRG 17 WP 7 Appendix I-5 PBN Imp Tools - Approach Phase Action Plan- Mid Term
APIRG 17 WP7 APPENDIX I-5
PBN IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS
_________________ (State)
NATIONAL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES AND ACTION PLAN
OPTIMIZATION OF THE ATS ROUTE STRUCTURE IN TERMINAL AIRSPACE
PERIOD: Mid Term (2013-2016) APPLICATION: Approach Phase
Benefits
Environment:
Efficiency :
Strategy
PROCESS TASKS INPUT SOURCE OUTPUT TARGET DATE ACTION
PERSON/GROUP STATUS
Preliminary
• Review AFI PBN Implementation Plan Key Targets
(Terminal- Approach)
AFI PBN Implementation Plan Mid Term: 2013-2016 [Ch. 20-24]
• Review State PBN Implementation Plan Key Targets
(Terminal Approach)
State PBN Implementation Plan Mid Term: 2013-2016 [Ch. 5.2.2-5.2.3]
APIRG 17 WP7 APPENDIX I-5
PROCESS TASKS INPUT SOURCE OUTPUT TARGET DATE
ACTION PERSON/GROUP STATUS
Terminal Applications
Implementation
Process 1
Determine Requirements
Step 1- Formulate airspace concept
PBN Manual, Vol. 1B Ch. (...) B 4.3.4
Step 5- Implementation decision
PBN Manual, Vol. 1B Ch. B 4.3.5
Step 6- Flight inspection and flight validation
PBN Manual, Vol. 1B Ch.
Language:English
Score: 1433560.3
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...IRG/APIRG17/Docs/wp7_appi5.pdf
Data Source: un
This may include: Data and Information Management Static Data Output Dynamic Data Output Additional Products, Pre- and Post-Flight Information, and ATS Reporting Office (ARO).
(...) The competency unit for dynamic data output include competencies related to NOTAM, Checklist of Valid NOTAM, SNOWTAM, and ASHTAM.
Pre and Post Flight Information
The competencies addresses pre-flight and post-flight information provided by Aerodrome AIS Units as outlined in Annex 15 and other related documents.
Pre- and post-flight information is stated in Annex 15 as one of the AIS functions; however, it has been separated because it is often executed by ARO.
Language:English
Score: 1432366
-
https://www.icao.int/NACC/Docu...AIS-AIMTrainingDevelopment.pdf
Data Source: un
Strategic Objectives:
This working paper relates to Strategic Objectives A and D with regard to all phases of flight, and especially in the approach through widespread implementation of approach procedures with vertical guidance. (...) PBN brings together, under one umbrella, a number of diverse RNAV and RNP applications encompassing all regimes of flight, from enroute to approach. PBN provides a framework of harmonized modern navigation operational approval requirements that make use of available navigation systems and aircraft capability. (...) STATE RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1 States are ultimately responsible for the safe and efficient operation of their national airspace systems including the provision for safe instrument flight procedures and safety oversight of their service providers and operators.
Language:English
Score: 1432151.1
-
https://www.icao.int/Meetings/...2036th%20Session/wp029c_en.pdf
Data Source: un
significant change in data quality requirements (accuracy, resolution and integrity)
4
7Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Need for quality assurance
Quality of an IFP is flight critical
The en-route structure, departure, arrival, holding and approach procedures are derived from an IFP process which covers various steps from collection of user requirements to State publication to the integration into airborne systems
Lots of steps and actors
8Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Need for quality assurance
5
9Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Answer to the need of quality assurance
10Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Answer to the need of quality assurance
PANS-OPS, Volume II, Part I, Section 2, Chapter 4 Quality Assurance
Requirements for quality assurance in flight procedure design
Need of a systemic quality assurance process (often part of a SMS)
Each State shall take measures to “control”’ the quality of the processes associated with the construction of instrument flight procedures.
6
11Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Answer to the need of quality assurance
ICAO Doc 9906 (quality assurance manual for flight procedure design) published to answer this need (publication started in 2009)
Guidance material for quality assurance supplementing provisions in PANS-OPS
Verification of all obstacle and navigation data, and assessment of flyability of the procedure
12Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Answer to the need of quality assurance
The Quality Assurance Manual for Flight Procedure Design (Doc 9906) consists of six volumes:
Volume 1 – Flight Procedure Design Quality Assurance System;
Volume 2 – Flight Procedure Designer Training; Volume 3 – Flight Procedure Design Software Validation; Volume 4 – Flight Procedures Design Construction (to be
developed); Volume 5 – Validation of Instrument Flight Procedures; and Volume 6 – Flight Validation Pilot Training and Evaluation
7
13Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance
14Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol1
Volume 1 – Flight Procedure Design Quality Assurance System:
Guidance for quality assurance in the procedure design processes, such as procedure design documentation, verification and validation methods, guidelines about the acquisition/processing of source information/data
It also provides a generic process flow diagram for the design and the implementation of flight procedures
8
15Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol1
ICAO Doc 9906 covers the entire lifespan of an IFP
16Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol1
Outcomes conceptual design, including planned implementation
dates, and resources needed to achieve the task; the FPD, including the procedure layout, the relevant
calculation outputs, coordinates and a textual description of the intended procedure;
validation and verification reports for the IFP; approval of the procedure by the regulatory authority; documentation throughout the various stages from the
input through the publication process; and finally, the released AIP publication (charts, texts,
coordinates, path terminators and any other pertinent information relevant to the procedure).
9
17Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol2
Volume 2 – Flight Procedure Designer Training:
guidance for the establishment of flight procedure designer training
Training is the starting point for any quality assurance programme
18Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol2
To ensure quality it is essential to provide competency-based training and assessment to all contributors to the flight procedure development process
The activities of flight procedure designers are considered critical to the safety of aviation. The provision of erroneous, incomplete or badly designed flight procedures and associated minima has direct consequences for the users
10
19Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol2
Recently, procedure design work has become more critical due to:
increasing complexity; increased importance of data integrity,
especially for modern area navigation (RNAV) and satellite-based navigation; and
introduction of new avionics
20Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol2
manual can be used as a guideline: - to establish approval/ certification criteria of a training course / programme - to develop its own training course/ programme
manual can be used as a guideline: - to evaluate potential
courses - develop their own training
courses/programmes
manual can be used as a guideline to develop their own training courses/programmes
Relationships among State authority, procedure design service provider and training provider
11
21Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol3
Volume 3 – Flight Procedure Design Software Validation:
guidance for the validation (not certification) of procedure design tools, notably with regard to criteria
22Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol3
Procedure design tools are increasingly being used by designers with the goal of quality control and integrity enhancement in the procedure design domain
Conventional and/or area navigation (RNAV) procedures for the departure, en-route, arrival, terminal and/or approach phases
12
23Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol3
Automation in calculations contributes to the improvement of data integrity
Use of automation is not intended to replace the procedure designer’s expertise
24Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol3
Procedure design tools can be misleading if they contain errors, or if procedure design criteria compliance is not ensured through all the functions provided by such tools.
Significant need to define a validation process for procedure design tools
Additionally, the validation is a means for users to gain confidence in a tool
13
25Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol5
Volume 5 – Validation of Instrument Flight Procedures:
guidance for conducting validation of instrument flight procedures, including safety, flyability and design accuracy
26Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol5
Purpose of validation to ensure safety, data accuracy and integrity and
flyability of the instrument flight procedure applies to fixed wing and helicopter instrument flight
procedures
Validation One of the final quality assurance steps in the
procedure design process for instrument flight procedures
Essential before the procedure design documentation is issued as part of the integrated aeronautical information package.
14
27Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol5
Validation process is subdivided into ground validation and flight validation
Ground validation is a systematic review of the steps and calculations involved in the procedure design as well as the impact on flight operations by the procedure
Flight validation is concerned with factors other than the performance of the navigation aid or system that may affect the suitability of the procedure for publication
Flight validation is different from Flight inspection • Flight inspection is conducted with the purpose of confirming
the ability of the navigation aid(s)/system upon which the procedure is based, to support the procedure
28Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol5
Ground validation is mandatory Independent IFP design review and a pre-flight
validation Flight validation Flight simulator evaluation and evaluation flown in
an aircraft If the State can verify through ground validation the
accuracy and completeness of all obstacle and navigation data considered in the procedure design, and any other factors normally considered in the flight validation, then the flight validation requirement may be dispensed with
15
29Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol5
Flight validation is required under the following conditions:
a) the flyability of a procedure cannot be determined by other means;
b) the procedure requires mitigation for deviations from design criteria;
c) the accuracy and/or integrity of obstacle and terrain data cannot be determined by other means;
d) if new procedures differ significantly from existing procedures; and
e) helicopter PinS procedures
Chapter
30Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol6
Volume 6 – Flight Validation Pilot Training and Evaluation:
Guidance for the establishment of flight procedure validation pilot training
As for procedure designers, training is the starting point for any quality assurance system
16
31Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol6
Each State should: Establish standards for the required competency level
for flight validation pilots Ensure that flight validation pilots acquire and maintain
this competency level through initial training, recurrent/refresher training and supervised on-the-job training
As for procedure designers, it is essential to provide competency-based training and assessment to flight validation pilots
32Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Details on quality assurance – Vol6 Chapter
Relationships among State Authority, Flight Validation Service Provider and Training Provider
- State Authority - ANSP - Third Party
manual can be used as a guideline for training courses/programmes approval conducted by FVSP
manual can be used by FVSP to ensure compliance
manual can be used as a guideline to develop training courses/programmes
17
33Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Conclusion
34Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Conclusion
Based on the requirements from PANS-OPS (Doc 8168), the quality assurance manual for flight procedure design is a complete guidance material adressing of the life cycle from procedure design to validation steps
Volume 4 (Flight Procedures Design Construction) only is missing at this stage
18
35Safety Case 26 / 03 / 2014
Anne-Laure VOGEL Anne-laure.vogel@egis.fr Tel: +33 5 16 57 00 61 Mob: +33 6 46 44 88 76
Contact
Language:English
Score: 1431612.8
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...FI-FPP/Quality%20Assurance.pdf
Data Source: un
He is participating in ICAO Instrument Flight Procedure Panel (IFPP) meetings as advisor to the French member.He was instructor for previous ICAO PBN course in India, Hong Kong, Middle-East region and Africa.
(...) Terminal objective 1: Conditions of performance
Given maps and other documents containing validated data,
Expected Behaviour The trainee will design a Basic-RNP 1 or RNAV 1 SID procedure based on use of GNSS sensor
Standard In accordance with PANS OPS, Doc 8168
Terminal objective 2: Conditions of performance
Given maps and other documents containing validated data,
Expected Behaviour The trainee will design a Basic-RNP 1 or RNAV 1 STAR procedure based on use of GNSS sensor
Standard In accordance with PANS OPS, Doc 8168
Terminal objective 3: Conditions of performance
Given maps and other documents containing validated data,
Expected Behaviour The trainee will design an RNP Approach procedure (APV Baro- VNAV), based on RNP APCH operations
Standard In accordance with PANS OPS, Doc 8168
Terminal objective 4: Conditions of performance
Given maps and other documents containing validated data,
Expected Behaviour The trainee will design an RNP approach procedure (NPA), based on RNP APCH operations
Standard In accordance with PANS OPS, Doc 8168
Terminal objective 5: Conditions of performance
Given completed procedure design with all associated documents and data
Expected Behaviour The trainee will document a Basic-RNP 1 or RNAV-1 SID and STAR, an RNP approach procedure (NPA), and an RNP approach procedure (APV Baro-VNAV), for validation, publication and traceability
Standard Accurately, in a reasonable time, and in accordance with PANS OPS, Doc 8168, Annex 4, Annex 15, Quality Assurance Manual for Flight Procedure Design and other guidance
PBN Course
3
PARTICIPANTS
People involved in procedure design or with serious background in procedure design.
(...) Performance – notion of accuracy , precision , continuity , availability
GNSS concept: Aircraft based augmentation system (ABAS) Satellite based augmentation system (SBAS) in a PBN context Ground based augmentation system (GBAS) in a PBN context
Quality assurance (Quality Assurance Manual for Flight Procedure Design) Document and store procedure for traceability Data origination Procedure design process
Procedure design criteria (Pans-Ops, Volume II, Part III, Sections 1, 2): Underlying criteria General criteria such as
o Minimum length of segments o Turn protection o T and Y concept o TAA
Procedure construction (Pans-Ops, Volume II, Part III, Section 3 and proposed amendments) Departure criteria applicable for Basic-RNP 1 and RNAV 1 /2 Standard arrival for Basic-RNP 1 and RNAV 1/2 Approach procedure for RNP APCH operations APV baroVNAV procedure Document procedure for validation and publication (Pans-Ops, Volume II, Part III,
Section 5) Charting and coding
PBN Course
5
MEANS
Theoretical lectures : Presentation and explanation of the rules and principles described in PANS OPS, Doc 8168-OPS/611
Laboratory exercises Lectures are followed by practical exercises, scheduled on a daily basis, that illustrate the elementary application of criteria in a simplified environment, in order to reinforce theoretical input.
Comprehensive On-the-Job Training (OJT) Project: Part of the second week is devoted to an OJT project.
Language:English
Score: 1429659.6
-
https://www.icao.int/safety/pb...N%20PD%20Course%20syllabus.pdf
Data Source: un
THE NEED FOR eTOD INFORMATION FROM AN INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE, Presented by Jeppesen 09-Sep-2013 12:07, English only
- IP/06 Agenda Item 5: Assessment of operational requirements in order to determine the implementation of communications, navigation, and surveillance (CNS) capabilities improvement for en-route and terminal area operations. EXPANDING FUTURE AIR NAVIGATI..., Presented by Boeing 09-Sep-2013 12:07, English only
- IP/07 Agenda Item 7: Implementation of the new flight plan format. FOLLOW UP TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW FLIGHT PLAN FORMAT, Presented by Secretariat 09-Sep-2013 12:07
08. (...) FOLLOW-UP TO IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES OF PROJECT AUTOMATION, Presented by Secretariat 09-Sep-2013 12:07
- WP/11 Agenda Item 7: Implementation of the new flight plan format. FOLLOW-UP TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW FLIGHT PLAN FORMAT, Presented by Secretariat 09-Sep-2013 12:07
- WP/12 Agenda Item 8: Other business.
Language:English
Score: 1428530.7
-
https://www.icao.int/SAM/Pages/SAMIG11.aspx
Data Source: un
Main Performance Impact KPA-03 – Cost-effectiveness; KPA-04 – Efficiency; KPA-09 - Predictability
Operating Environment/Phases of Flight
Approach/Arrivals and En-Route.
Global Concept Component(s) AOM – Airspace Organisation and Management
AO – Aerodrome Operations TS – Traffic Synchronisation, AOM Global Plan Initiatives (GPI) GPI-10- Terminal Area Design and Management;
GPI-11- RNP and RNAV Standard instrument Departures (SIDS)and Standard Terminal Arrivals (STARS);
Pre-Requisites NIL Global Readiness Checklist Status
Standards Readiness Ready Avionics Availability Ready Ground System Availability Ready Procedures Available Ready Operations Approvals Ready
3
• Varies from one State/region to the next.
• Some aspects of the movement to PBN have already been subject of local improvements in areas
ICAO SIP 2012-ASBU Workshop.Block Upgrades N° B0-05
Module N° B0-05 - Baseline
4
• Element 1 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO)
– CDO is enabled by airspace design, procedure design and facilitation by ATC
– An optimum CDO starts from the top-of-descent (TOD) and uses descent profiles that reduce controller-pilot communications and segments of level flight.
• Element 2 Performance -based Navigation (PBN)
– The PBN concept encompasses two types of navigation specifications RNAV/RNP:
– PBN STARs
ICAO SIP 2012-ASBU Workshop.Block Upgrades N° B0-05
Module N° B0-05 – Change brought by the Module
5ICAO SIP 2012-ASBU Workshop.Block Upgrades N° B0-05
Module N° B0-05 – Intended Performance Operational Improvement
Efficiency reduced fuel burn authorization of operations where noise limitations would
otherwise result in operations being curtailed or restricted reduction in the number of required radio transmissions optimal management of the top-of-descent in the en-
route airspace
Environme nt
Reduction on CO2 through reduced fuel burn
Safety more consistent flight paths and stabilized approach paths reduction in the incidence of controlled flight into terrain
(CFIT) reduction in the number of conflicts.
CBA If implemented within the ICAO CDO manual framework, it is envisaged that the benefit/cost ratio (BCR) will be positive.
6
• ICAO Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Manual (Document 9931)
– Provides guidance on the airspace design, instrument flight procedures, ATC facilitation and flight techniques necessary to enable continuous descent profiles.
• ICAO Performance-based Navigation Manual (ICAO Document 9613)
– Provides general guidance on PBN implementation.
• ICAO PBN operational approval guidance material will be available by June 2012
ICAO SIP 2012-ASBU Workshop.Block Upgrades N° B0-05
Module N° B0-05 – Necessary Procedures (Air & Ground)
7
• Avionics
– CDO does not require specific air/ground technology.
– CDO is an aircraft operating technique aided by appropriate airspace and procedure design, and appropriate ATC clearances
• Ground Systems
– RNP AR Approaches requires significant investment, ANSPs should work closely with airlines
ICAO SIP 2012-ASBU Workshop.Block Upgrades N° B0-05
Module N° B0-05 – Necessary System Capability
8
• Training in the operational standards and procedures are required for this module
• Likewise, the qualifications requirements are identified in the regulatory requirements
ICAO SIP 2012-ASBU Workshop.Block Upgrades N° B0-05
Module N° B0-05 – Training and Qualification Requirements
9
• Regulatory/Standardization: Use current published requirements
• Approval Plans: Must be in accordance with application requirements e.g. airspace design, air traffic operations, PBN requirements for fixed radius transitions, radius-to-fix legs, Required Time of Arrival (RTA), parallel offset, etc
ICAO SIP 2012-ASBU Workshop.Block Upgrades N° B0-05
Module N° B0-05 – Regulatory/standardization needs and Approval Plan (Air and Ground)
10
• Standards – For flight plan requirements in Amendment 1, ICAO Document 4444;
PANS/ATM v15
• Procedures
• Guidance Material – ICAO Doc 9613, Performance-based Navigation (PBN) Manual; ICAO Doc 9931,
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Manual;.
– FAA Advisory Circular, AC 90-105, Approval Guidance for RNP Operations and Barometric Vertical Navigation in the U.S.
Language:English
Score: 1428480
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...etings/2012/abu/docs/wp28a.pdf
Data Source: un
Departing passengers
The inspection team will verify:
(a) that appropriate signage is in place at the entrances to the airport terminal,
warning passengers that anyone considered a risk for SARS will not be allowed to board any flight.
(...) Passengers found to be possible SARS cases will not be allowed to board any flight. The most common symptoms of SARS are fever, cough, and shortness of breath”.
(...) Disembarking passengers
The inspection team will verify:
(a) that a questionnaire is being distributed to passengers arriving from affected
areas: • in flight prior to arrival, or • immediately upon disembarkation, or • before entry into any common transit or arrival areas; and • always before clearing immigration
Page 3 of 4
(b) that the questionnaire is reviewed at the time of disembarkation and before the passenger enters any common transit or arrival areas.
Language:English
Score: 1426465.2
-
https://www.icao.int/safety/av...SARS/Inspectors_Guidelines.pdf
Data Source: un