Home

Results 1 - 10 of 1,322,626 for Products International. Search took 1.883 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
The Dispute Tribunal, it alleges, erred on a question of law when, in disregard of the jurisprudence of the former United Nations Administrative Tribunal and that of the International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal (ILOAT), it ordered the production of documents without first having assured that those documents concerning the deliberations of selection bodies were not confidential, in which case their disclosure would have been barred. 18. (...) Article 9, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the UNDT reads as follows: “The Dispute Tribunal may order production of documents or such other evidence as it deems necessary.” (...) The Tribunal is entitled to order the production of any document relevant to that end. 40.
Language:English
Score: 532828.5 - www.un.org/en/internalj...tucci) English Translation.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The Dispute Tribunal, it alleges, erred on a question of law when, in disregard of the jurisprudence of the former United Nations Administrative Tribunal and that of the International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal (ILOAT), it ordered the production of documents without first having assured that those documents concerning the deliberations of selection bodies were not confidential, in which case their disclosure would have been barred. 18. (...) Article 9, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the UNDT reads as follows: “The Dispute Tribunal may order production of documents or such other evidence as it deems necessary.” (...) The Tribunal is entitled to order the production of any document relevant to that end. 40.
Language:English
Score: 532828.5 - www.un.org/en/internalj...t/judgments/2011-unat-121e.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 23 June 2015, before the reply was filed, the Applicant filed a motion requesting leave of the Tribunal to file a 16-page motion for production of evidence by the Respondent, attaching the said 16-page motion. 5. (...) On 7 July 2015, the Tribunal issued Order No. 133 (NY/2015) directing that the Applicant file a response to the Respondent's reply by 6 August 2015, and placing the Applicant's motion for production of evidence in abeyance until further notice. 7. (...) Furthermore, the Applicant's motions for production and for discovery and disclosure, shall be deferred to be dealt with by the Judge assigned the case in due course.
Language:English
Score: 532825.73 - www.un.org/en/internalj...es/undt/orders/ny-2015-221.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The Applicant’s principal contentions regarding circumstances for the production of the Further Information may be summarized as follows: a. (...) Arrangements will be made for the secure and in-person transmittal of the final work product to OHRM at Headquarters in New York; l. (...) An order concerning the production of any document over which confidentiality is sought Case No.
Language:English
Score: 527395 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2011-069.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 23 June 2015, before the reply was filed, the Applicant filed a motion requesting leave of the Tribunal to file a 16-page motion for production of evidence by the Respondent, attaching the said 16-page motion. 4. (...) On 7 July 2015, the Tribunal issued Order No. 133 (NY/2015) directing that the Applicant file a response to the Respondent’s reply by 6 August 2015, and placing the Applicant’s motion for production of evidence in abeyance until further notice. 6. (...) UNDT/NY/2015/031 Order No. 224 (NY/2015) Page 5 of 6 production of any document, may order the production of evidence for either party at any time, and may require any person to disclose any document or provide any information it deems necessary. 15.
Language:English
Score: 517465.7 - www.un.org/en/internalj...es/undt/orders/ny-2015-224.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 23 June 2015, before the reply was filed, the Applicant filed a motion requesting leave of the Tribunal to file a 16-page motion for production of evidence by the Respondent, attaching the said 16-page motion. 4. (...) On 7 July 2015, the Tribunal issued Order No. 133 (NY/2015) directing that the Applicant file a response to the Respondent's reply by 6 August 2015, and placing the Applicant's motion for production of evidence in abeyance until further notice. 6. (...) Furthermore, the Applicant's motions for production and for discovery and disclosure, shall be deferred to be dealt with by the Judge assigned the case in due course.
Language:English
Score: 515331.3 - www.un.org/en/internalj...es/undt/orders/ny-2015-223.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Dhanjee access to documents filed ex parte by the Secretary-General or to order production of further evidence. The Dispute Tribunal further considered that given Mr. (...) The Dispute Tribunal erred in procedure in not calling witnesses or ordering production of further evidence given that such information would have affected the decision in the case. (...) Nor was there any evidence that the UNDT exercised its discretion unreasonably in disallowing further testimony and production of evidence. 50. Mr. Dhanjee’s request to remand the case to the UNDT is denied.
Language:English
Score: 511717 - www.un.org/en/internalj...at/judgments/2015-UNAT-527.pdf
Data Source: oaj
SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS ORDER ON APPLICANT’S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE Counsel for the Applicant: Monika Bileris Counsel for the Respondent: Susan Maddox, ALS/OHRM Case No. (...) The first request is for the Tribunal to order the production of evidence from Mr. Michael Stefanovic, Director of Investigation, Investigation Division of the Office of Internal Oversight Services (ID/OIOS) where he requested both Chiefs of the Conduct and Discipline Team (CDT) and OIOS at UNMISS to separately launch an investigation into the Applicant’s case. 10. (...) As its probative value is unclear the Tribunal will order its production, initially on an ex parte basis for the Tribunal to evaluate and make a final decision on its admissibility. 16.
Language:English
Score: 510707.9 - www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2015-309.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 29 April 2021, the Applicant filed a motion for production of evidence. 5. On 5 May 2021, the Respondent filed its response objecting to the forementioned motion. 6. (...) In addition, the parties are instructed to provide a list of potential witnesses explaining the relevance of each testimony for the determination of the issues in dispute. Motion for production of evidence 10. In his submission dated 29 April 2021, the Applicant requests the production of a “0019/020 investigation report” prepared by the Office of Internal Oversight Services (“OIOS”). (...) The Applicant is instructed to provide by Monday, 13 June 2022, a detailed justification for the production of the “0019/020 investigation report” by OIOS pursuant to para. 15 above.
Language:English
Score: 507163.3 - www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/gva-2022-060.pdf
Data Source: oaj
However, this concern can be addressed – as conventionally occurs in domestic jurisdictions – by production of the documents in question to the court, so that the judge can inspect the material and determine whether it is capable of assisting the party seeking its production. (...) Objection was also taken to production of the material in (d) upon the basis that it was confidential and added nothing to what the complainant already knew. (...) It is not altogether clear whether the respondent argues in this case that the privilege against production, formulated as an absolute rule against production even to the Tribunal, applies to all appointment or promotion cases or only those of ASG and USG.
Language:English
Score: 505320.4 - www.un.org/en/internalj...es/undt/orders/ny-2010-040.pdf
Data Source: oaj