Home

Le CNDH note également avec satisfaction la concordance de sa démarche, de ses programmes et de ses plans d’actions avec les recommandations formulées dans le rapport, notamment en ce qui concerne les mesures à prendre pour améliorer la protection juridique et le cadre institutionnel et politique. Le CNDH dispose des mécanismes et outils juridiques et institutionnels adé- quats pour contribuer à la mise en œuvre de ces recommandations.

L’accès a la justice et le droit à un procès équitable La gratuité de la justice La loi dispose que la justice est gratuite sous réserve des dispositions fiscales relati- ves notamment au timbre et à l’enregistrement. (...) Le droit au travail et à la sécurité sociale Le Cameroun dispose d’un cadre juridique et institutionnel de protection du droit au travail et à la sécurité sociale.

The Working Group received consistent and recurring reports that complaints submitted by the victims are not properly investigated and the defendants are not prosecuted, which has resulted in the loss of public confidence in the judicial system. (...) Any refusal to do so would be based on their distrust in the police and the justice system and the fear that they might destroy the evidence or would not properly investigate the case. Secondly, the Public Prosecutor’s Office also identified the lack of direct contact with the victims and witnesses as one of the factors impeding its ability to prosecute crimes.

It should be noted that the issues of security of the people of Artsakh, protection of historical-cultural and religious heritage were properly highlighted in the resolution. It is crucial that the European Parliament expressed its position of providing unhindered humanitarian assistance to Artsakh.

Although the reality of older persons are hostile, they are not properly protected at home and abroad under the current judicial system due to lack of relevant legislation.

The endangered cultural and religious heritage of Artsakh requires urgent international attention in order to properly preserve it and prevent the cases of vandalism.

ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ ОБЪЕДИНЕННЫХ НАЦИЙ Совет Безопасности Distr. GENERAL S/18221 11 July 1986 RUSSIAN ORIGINAL: SPANISH ПИСЬМО ПОСТОЯННОГО

A/HRC/35/G/5 4 GE.17-11181 Indeed, throughout its analysis of the section of “Accountability and access to justice”, the Report willfully ignores the legal reality which is thoroughly described in publicly sourced information.2 For instance, the Report castigates Israel for its low conviction rate for IHL violations (para. 19-20) but fails to properly consider the practical and legal challenges that Israel faces in conducting investigations in the context of armed conflicts, which are outlined succinctly in Israel’s comprehensive report about the 2014 Gaza Conflict.3 Even when Israeli concerns are briefly mentioned in the Addendum, they are summarily dismissed and not taken into consideration, and are certainly not reflected in the main body of the Report. (...) The Report’s failure to engage in any serious discussion of the ongoing terrorist threat which Israel faces, or to even mention the fundamental role that Palestinian incitement and terrorism play in shaping the reality on the ground is not merely a failure to properly frame and analyze the status of the implementation of recommendations as this report purports to do.

These are serious acts that are tantamount to enforced disappearances and should be properly investigated and sanctioned in accordance with international standards. (...) The Commission referred to the State responsibility to properly investigate these disappearances and to bring perpetrators to justice and made specific reference to the prosecution of military personnel involved in the disappearance of persons who had surrendered to the armed forces. (...) According to several sources, the authorities — in particular the prosecution services — try to discredit disappeared persons by claiming that they have been involved with LTTE, without properly substantiating these allegations. In several cases, the relatives of the victims of enforced disappearance have been subjected to intimidation, threats and reprisals because they insisted that a proper investigation be carried out.