Home

Results 1 - 10 of 205,073 for accepted. Search took 0.509 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
Figure XX.1: Feasibility as a function of Effectiveness, Cost-Efficiency, and Acceptability 2.1. The importance of acceptance/acceptability 2. (...) How exposure to policy tools transforms the mechanisms behind public acceptability and acceptance—The case of the Gothenburg congestion tax. (...) Explaning differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm.
Language:English
Score: 547604.74 - https://www.un.org/development...cAcceptability_22ndSession.pdf
Data Source: un
To provide full TE Acceptability updates, please use this  TE Acceptability Form . To provide CVR TE Acceptability updates ONLY, please use this abbreviated CVR TE Acceptability Form . (...) Accepts all TEs authorized by another State; 2. Does not accept TEs authorized by another State 3.
Language:English
Score: 541187.65 - https://www.icao.int/safety/OP...mal/Pages/TEAcceptability.aspx
Data Source: un
This website responds to frequently asked questions about the acceptance procedure, and provides a model instrument of acceptance that Members may wish to follow in preparing their instruments of acceptance.   (...) Copies in electronic or paper form are not acceptable. When must the instrument of acceptance be deposited? For an instrument of acceptance of the Protocol to be valid, it must be deposited within the period of acceptance.
Language:English
Score: 540796.9 - https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/accept_e.htm
Data Source: un
On 27 November 2014, the General Council adopted the Protocol and opened it for acceptance by Members. According to the WTO Agreement, a Member formally accepts the Protocol by depositing what is referred to as an “instrument of acceptance” for the Protocol with the WTO. (...) This website responds to frequently asked questions about acceptance procedures and provides a model instrument of acceptance that Members may wish to follow in preparing their instruments of acceptance.    (...) What must be stated in an instrument of acceptance? There is no single, uniform approach for drawing up an instrument of acceptance for the Protocol; each individual Member may have its own practice for accepting international treaties and treaty amendments.
Language:English
Score: 539275.93 - https://www.wto.org/english/tr...radfa_e/tradfa_agreement_e.htm
Data Source: un
The problem is fixed. 7.4.2.1 JNB E D31 Accepted 7.4.2.1 JNB E P32 Accepted 7.4.2.2 JNB E D33 Accepted 7.4.2.2 JNB E D34 Proponent requested to provide diagrams for consideration by editor. 7.4.2.2 JNB E S/D35 Accepted 7.4.2.2 JNB E D36 Accepted with changes to the proposed text 7.4.2.2 JNB E D37 Accepted 7.4.2.2 JNB T P38 Accepted 7.4.2.2 JNB T P39 Accepted 7.4.2.2 JNB E D40 Accepted 7.4.2.3.1 JNB E S41 Accepted 7.4.3 JNB T P42 Accepted 7.4.3 JNB T P43 Accepted 7.4.3 JNB T S44 It is specified in the text. 7.4.3 JNB E D45 Not accepted. (...) The problem is fixed. 8.4.1.4.1 JNB E D63 Accepted 8.4.2.3.2 JNB E P64 Accepted. Wording may somewhat differ. 8.4.2.3.2 JNB E D65 Accepted 8.4.2.3.2 JNB E P66 Fixed 8.7 JNB E S67 Accepted 8.7.1 JNB E S68 Accepted 8.7.1 JNB E S69 Accepted. Also will clarify "has a difference" 8.7.2 JNB E S70 Accepted 8.7.3 JNB E S71 Accepted 9.2.2.1 JNB E D72 Agree to clarify. 9.2.3.2 JNB E D73 Fixed 9.3.1.1 JNB M S74 Accepted 9.3.3.1 JNB M S75 Agreed to specify 9.3.3.1 JNB M S76 Accepted 9.3.3.1.1 JNB M S77 Fixed 9.3.3.1.1 JNB M S78 Accepted 9.3.3.2.3 JNB E S79 Accepted B.1.1 JNB E D80 Accepted C.1.1.1 JNB E D81 Accepted C.1.2.2.1 JNB E D82 Accepted D2.10 JNB T D83 Accepted.
Language:English
Score: 537376.17 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...e/2003_03_Pattaya/JVT-G049.doc
Data Source: un
Which WTO instruments are currently open for acceptance? There are a number of multilateral and plurilateral instruments that are currently open for formal acceptance by members. (...) What is a valid instrument of acceptance/accession? There is no single, uniform approach for drawing up an instrument of acceptance/accession for a particular protocol; each member may have its own practice for accepting international agreements and amendments. (...) Unsigned instruments in the form of notes verbales , even bearing the seal of the ministry or of the presidency, are not sufficient for accepting a protocol.   How is the instrument of acceptance/accession deposited with the WTO?
Language:English
Score: 536447.85 - https://www.wto.org/english/do...legal_e/depositary_guide_e.htm
Data Source: un
Paris, France - 14 December 1960 1 Andorra 13/03/2018 Acceptance 2 Afghanistan 25/01/2010 Acceptance 3 Albania 21/11/1963 Ratification 4 Armenia 05/09/1993 Notification of succession 5 Argentina 30/10/1963 Ratification 6 Australia 29/11/1966 Acceptance 7 Bosnia and Herzegovina 12/07/1993 Notification of succession 8 Barbados 24/06/1975 Notification of succession 9 Burkina Faso 04/09/2012 Ratification 10 Bulgaria 04/12/1962 Acceptance 11 Benin 09/07/1963 Acceptance 12 Brunei Darussalam 25/01/1985 Notification of succession 13 Bolivia (Plurinational State 17/08/2017 Ratification 14 Brazil 19/04/1968 Ratification 15 Belarus 12/12/1962 Ratification 16 Belize 01/12/1982 Notification of succession 17 Central African Republic 22/02/1962 Acceptance 18 Congo 16/09/1968 Ratification 19 Côte d'Ivoire 24/11/1999 Ratification 20 Chile 26/10/1971 Ratification 21 Costa Rica 10/09/1963 Ratification 22 Cuba 02/11/1962 Ratification 23 Cyprus 09/06/1970 Acceptance 24 Czechia 26/03/1993 Notification of succession 25 Germany 17/07/1968 Ratification 26 Denmark 04/10/1963 Ratification 27 Dominica 14/03/1983 Notification of succession 28 Dominican Republic 30/08/1977 Ratification 29 Algeria 24/12/1968 Acceptance 30 Ecuador 05/03/1979 Acceptance 31 Egypt 28/03/1962 Acceptance 32 Spain 20/08/1969 Acceptance 33 Finland 18/10/1971 Ratification 34 France 11/09/1961 Ratification 35 United Kingdom of Great 14/03/1962 Acceptance 36 Georgia 04/11/1992 Notification of succession 37 Equatorial Guinea 11/12/1964 Acceptance * - some text ** - next some text 06 February 2022 Convention against Discrimination in Education. Paris, France - 14 December 1960 38 Guatemala 04/02/1983 Ratification 39 Honduras 05/09/2013 Ratification 40 Croatia 06/07/1992 Notification of succession 41 Hungary 16/01/1964 Ratification 42 Indonesia 10/01/1967 Acceptance 43 Iraq 28/06/1977 Ratification 44 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 17/07/1968 Acceptance 45 Iceland 06/07/2021 Acceptance 46 Italy 06/10/1966 Ratification 47 Jamaica 16/03/2006 Ratification 48 Jordan 06/04/1976 Acceptance 49 Kyrgyzstan 03/07/1995 Acceptance 50 Kuwait 15/01/1963 Acceptance 51 Kazakhstan 15/04/2016 Ratification 52 Lebanon 27/10/1964 Ratification 53 Sri Lanka 11/08/1983 Acceptance 54 Liberia 17/05/1962 Ratification 55 Luxembourg 20/01/1970 Ratification 56 Latvia 16/06/2009 Acceptance 57 Libya 09/01/1973 Ratification 58 Morocco 30/08/1968 Acceptance 59 Monaco 28/08/2012 Acceptance 60 Republic of Moldova 17/03/1993 Notification of succession 61 Montenegro 26/04/2007 Notification of succession 62 Madagascar 21/12/1964 Ratification 63 North Macedonia 30/04/1997 Notification of succession 64 Mali 07/12/2007 Ratification 65 Mongolia 04/11/1964 Ratification 66 Malta 05/01/1966 Notification of succession 67 Mauritius 20/08/1970 Notification of succession 68 Niger 16/07/1968 Acceptance 69 Nigeria 18/11/1969 Acceptance 70 Nicaragua 28/09/1981 Ratification 71 Netherlands 25/03/1966 Ratification 72 Norway 08/01/1963 Ratification 73 New Zealand 12/02/1963 Ratification 74 Panama 10/08/1967 Acceptance * - some text ** - next some text 06 February 2022 Convention against Discrimination in Education. Paris, France - 14 December 1960 75 Peru 19/12/1966 Ratification 76 Philippines 19/11/1964 Acceptance 77 Poland 15/09/1964 Ratification 78 Palestine 24/04/2018 Ratification 79 Portugal 08/01/1981 Ratification 80 Romania 09/07/1964 Ratification 81 Russian Federation 01/08/1962 Ratification 82 Rwanda 28/12/2000 Acceptance 83 Saudi Arabia 17/08/1973 Ratification 84 Solomon Islands 19/03/1982 Notification of succession 85 Seychelles 27/07/2010 Acceptance 86 Sweden 21/03/1968 Ratification 87 Slovenia 05/11/1992 Notification of succession 88 Slovakia 31/03/1993 Notification of succession 89 Sierra Leone 02/06/1967 Ratification 90 San Marino 11/03/2020 Ratification 91 Senegal 25/09/1967 Ratification 92 South Sudan 20/12/2019 Ratification 93 Eswatini 08/10/1970 Acceptance 94 Togo 03/04/2012 Ratification 95 Tajikistan 28/08/1992 Notification of succession 96 Tunisia 29/08/1969 Ratification 97 United Republic of 03/01/1979 Ratification 98 Ukraine 19/12/1962 Ratification 99 Uganda 09/09/1968 Acceptance 100 Uruguay 03/05/2004 Acceptance 101 Uzbekistan 08/12/1997 Ratification 102 Saint Vincent and the 22/01/1985 Notification of succession 103 Venezuela (Bolivarian 16/12/1968 Ratification 104 Serbia 11/09/2001 Notification of succession 105 South Africa 09/03/2000 Ratification 106 Zimbabwe 30/05/2006 Acceptance 107 Israel 22/09/1961 Ratification Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) * - some text ** - next some text 06 February 2022 http://www.tcpdf.org
Language:English
Score: 535988.53 - https://en.unesco.org/conventions/pdf/297948
Data Source: un
Judge whether the risk in the local situation can be considered acceptable Finally, after an assessment is made about the risk of the pesticide in the local situation, the registration authority should judge whether or not it considers that the risk is acceptable. (...) Acceptability of the risk in the reference assessment     Risk acceptable Risk not acceptable Risk in the local situation when compared to the reference risk assessment Higher Acceptability of risk in local situation unclear Risk also unacceptable in local situation Similar Risk also acceptable in local situation Risk also unacceptable in local situation Lower Risk also acceptable in local situation Acceptability of risk in local situation unclear If the risk was considered acceptable in the reference country, and the risk in the local situation is lower or similar to the reference, then the risk in the local situation can also be considered acceptable. (...) In such cases, further risk assessment is needed for the local situation. Accepting a decision about the acceptability of a risk by the reference country is based on the assumption that the acceptability criteria of the reference country are applicable to the local situation.
Language:English
Score: 535002.25 - https://www.fao.org/pesticide-...n-be-considered-acceptable/ru/
Data Source: un
Judge whether the risk in the local situation can be considered acceptable Finally, after an assessment is made about the risk of the pesticide in the local situation, the registration authority should judge whether or not it considers that the risk is acceptable. (...) Acceptability of the risk in the reference assessment     Risk acceptable Risk not acceptable Risk in the local situation when compared to the reference risk assessment Higher Acceptability of risk in local situation unclear Risk also unacceptable in local situation Similar Risk also acceptable in local situation Risk also unacceptable in local situation Lower Risk also acceptable in local situation Acceptability of risk in local situation unclear If the risk was considered acceptable in the reference country, and the risk in the local situation is lower or similar to the reference, then the risk in the local situation can also be considered acceptable. (...) In such cases, further risk assessment is needed for the local situation. Accepting a decision about the acceptability of a risk by the reference country is based on the assumption that the acceptability criteria of the reference country are applicable to the local situation.
Language:English
Score: 535002.25 - https://www.fao.org/pesticide-...n-be-considered-acceptable/ar/
Data Source: un
Judge whether the risk in the local situation can be considered acceptable Finally, after an assessment is made about the risk of the pesticide in the local situation, the registration authority should judge whether or not it considers that the risk is acceptable. (...) Acceptability of the risk in the reference assessment     Risk acceptable Risk not acceptable Risk in the local situation when compared to the reference risk assessment Higher Acceptability of risk in local situation unclear Risk also unacceptable in local situation Similar Risk also acceptable in local situation Risk also unacceptable in local situation Lower Risk also acceptable in local situation Acceptability of risk in local situation unclear If the risk was considered acceptable in the reference country, and the risk in the local situation is lower or similar to the reference, then the risk in the local situation can also be considered acceptable. (...) In such cases, further risk assessment is needed for the local situation. Accepting a decision about the acceptability of a risk by the reference country is based on the assumption that the acceptability criteria of the reference country are applicable to the local situation.
Language:English
Score: 535002.25 - https://www.fao.org/pesticide-...n-be-considered-acceptable/en/
Data Source: un