/Industry)
ARST (Annual Safety Report Team)
RAST (Regional Aviation
Safety Team)
SST (Safety Support
Team)
Annual Safety Report Annual Safety Report
RGS IFD LOC-I CFIT
RGS IFD LOC-I CFIT
RGS WG (Runway &
Ground Safety
Working Group)
SSP AAI ROSO Summit
SSP AAI ROSO Summit
States Nominated
Coordinators
Industry as required
Safety Enhancement Initiatives &
Detailed Implementation Plans
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Traffic Millions of Departures
World
MID Region
Source: ICAO-iSTARS
Number of Accidents in the World Categorized by Risk Factor
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
F-NI TURB LOC-I Runway Safety Other CFIT Unknown SCF
Source: ICAO-iSTARS
Number of Accidents in the MID Region Categorized by Risk Factor
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: ICAO-iSTARS
Runway Safety Accidents per Million Departures
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
World Average 2.1
MID Region Average 4.1
Source: ICAO-iSTARS
Accidents by Phase of Flight
Source: IATA GSIC
Accident Category Breakdown for MID Operators
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CFIT LOC-I Gear-up Landing / Gear Collapse
Hard Landing Ground Damage In-Fl ight Damage Runway/tax iway excursion
Undershoot Tailstrike
Source: RASG-MID Annual Safety Report – First Edition 2012
Source: RASG-MID Annual Safety Report – First Edition 2012
Accidents Reported between 2006 and 2010
Runway Safety Accidents Other Accidents59%
41%
61%
39%
Current
Uncertified Aerodromes Certified Aerodromes
50%50%
Target by 2015
Uncertified Aerodromes Certified Aerodromes
25%
75%
Target by 2017
Uncertified Aerodromes Certified Aerodromes
Source: RGS WG/1-WP/6
MID Region Aerodrome Certification
MID Region RGS Safety Indicators and Safety Targets
Number of Runway excursion related accidents as a percentage
of all accidents
Number of Runway excursion related accidents as a percentage
of all accidents
Number of Runway incursion related accidents as a percentage
of all accidents
Number of Runway incursion related accidents as a percentage
of all accidents
Number of Runway Safety related accidents per million
departures
Reduce the related accidents up to 50% by the end of 2017
Reduce the related accidents up to 50% by the end of 2017
Reduce the Runway Safety related accidents to be below the global rate
Safety Targets regarding Runway Incursions
Safety Targets regarding Runway Excursions
Combining the Safety Indicators
Reduce the Runway Safety related accidents to be less than 1 accident per million
departures by end of 2017Source: RGS WG/1-WP/6
MID Region RGS Safety Enablers
Effective reporting system to exchange and analyze safety information
Runway Safety Seminar/Workshop
Establishment of Regional RST GO-Team
Adopt specific regulations related to runway safety
Establishment and support of local Runway Safety Teams
Identify hazards and mitigation measures on runway excursions/incursions and un-stabilized approach, and develop guidance material and specific training
Source: RGS WG/1-WP/6
GROUPING OF CATEGORIES BY ICAO HQ
ARCARC
USOSUSOSCTOLCTOL
WILDWILDRIRI
BIRDBIRD
RAMPRAMP
RERE
ADRMADRM
GCOLGCOL
LOC-GLOC-G
Runway Safety (RS)
Accordingly the meeting resolved to change the safety theme as per following…
Runway and Ground Safety (RGS)Runway and Ground Safety (RGS) Runway Safety (RS)
Source: RGS WG/1-WP/6
Six Initiatives for Runway & Ground Safety
Local Runway Safety Teams
Infra- structure
Safe- guarding Wildlife Lasers
Unstable Approach
MID-RAST–RG - Safety Enhancement Initiative - 1
RISK REDUCTION OF UN-STABILIZED APPROACH
States would provide information on runway ends with reported Un-Stabilized approaches
IATA will distribute a request to Airlines to identify specific Aerodrome runway ends with Un-Stabilized approaches
Data received from the States and IATA will be reviewed by the RGS Working Group
RGS/WG/1- DRAFT CONCLUSION 1/1 States that have not yet done so be urged to minimize
risk of Unstable Approaches through:
Training of pilots, air traffic controllers, and aerodrome operators
Development of relevant Guidance materials
Mandatory reporting of un-stabilized approaches
Review of Standards Operation Procedures
Language:English
Score: 775337.06
-
https://www.icao.int/MID/Docum...ay%20and%20Ground%20Safety.pdf
Data Source: un
With regard to RWY Incursions and RWY Excursions the Safety Targets RGS are to reduce the related accidents by 50% by the end of 2017.
2.2 From the 2nd ASR we have trends provided by IATA related only to the RWY Excursions as follows:
Runway Excursion Trend 2008 to 2012
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
MID Accident Nr. 1 2 1 3 1 Accident Rate 1.01 1.81 0.80 2.34 0.71
World Rate 0.81 0.69 0.58 0.48 0.58
2.3 However, starting with the 3rd ASR, ICAO data (iSTARS) will be used where the following data has been extracted:
RGS WG/1-WP/6
-2-
Number of Accidents in MID by Risk category and by Year of occurrence, limited to Scheduled Commercial Air Transport on aircraft above 2250kg between 2006 and 2012
2.4 In this regard, the meeting may wish to note that ICAO HQ has grouped the categories ARC, CTOL, USOS, ADRM, BIRD, GCOL, RAMP, LOC-G, RE, RI and WILD in RS (Runway Safety).
2.5 Based on the above, the meeting may wish to agree to the following:
2.5.1 change the safety theme “Runway and Ground Safety (RGS)” to “Runway Safety” to be in line with ICAO HQ; and
2.5.2 combine the two safety indicators “Number of Runway excursion related
accidents as a percentage of all accidents” and “Number of Runway incursion related accidents as a percentage of all accidents” to “ Number of Runway Safety related accidents as a percentage of all accidents.
2.6 With respect to the number of Certified International Aerodromes, the safety target is to have 50% of the International Aerodromes Certified by the end of 2015 and 80% by the end of 2016. (...) In this respect, it is to be highlighted that the accidents rate in the MID Region for 2012 was (2.13 accidents per million departures) which is slightly above the world rate (2.06) for the same year. (...) Number of Runway incursion related accidents as a percentage of all accidents.
Reduce Runway Incursions related accidents by 50% by the end of 2017.
Language:English
Score: 775337.06
-
https://www.icao.int/MID/Documents/2014/RGS%20WG1/WP6.pdf
Data Source: un
Analysis of the problem 2.1 The accidents category related to runway safety (RS) is still one of the three high‐risk accident categories with the highest accident rate worldwide according to ICAO 2016 safety report. (...) Excursion at the left side of the Runway 01 (Veer off).
Figure 1 - SAM-RE accidents rate
2.4 Considering the aforesaid, RE occurrences are still a high‐risk trend in South America, thus it is necessary to address this problem based on the events that occurred in 2016, allowing the ARCM to establish preventive measures to enhance safety in its member States. 2.5 In order to carry out this project, it will be necessary to identify the root causes and to study the contributing factors of the RE accidents and incidents (accidents and incidents that occurred during take‐off, accidents and incidents that occurred during landing, and accidents and incidents that occurred when an aircraft overran the sides of the runway). (...) Dissemination of safety preventive measures 3.1 At any time in an accident or incident investigation process, the State investigative authority carrying out the investigation will recommend the preventive measures considered to be promptly adopted to strengthen aviation safety. 3.2 Aircraft accidents prevention mostly depends on the information arising from accident investigations, their causes and factors contributing to the occurrence of accidents.
Language:English
Score: 774723.2
-
https://www.icao.int/NACC/Docu...2016/PARAST26/PARAST26WP03.pdf
Data Source: un
The Fukushima Daiichi power plant accident following the 2011 tsunami - a well-known example of a Natech accident - while nuclear energy facilities are not covered by the Industrial Accidents Convention.
(...) Natech risk falls within the scope of the Industrial Accidents Convention. More specifically, the Convention applies to “ the prevention of, preparedness for and response to industrial accidents capable of causing transboundary effects, including the effects of such accidents caused by natural disasters… ”
The Convention aims to protect human beings and the environment against industrial accidents by preventing such accidents to the extent possible. (...) Following this workshop, the OECD Working Group on Chemical Accidents developed the addendum number 2 to the OECD guiding principles for chemical accident prevention, preparedness and response (2 nd edition) to address natural hazards triggering technological accidents (Natechs).
Language:English
Score: 774685.64
-
https://unece.org/industrial-a...n-and-natural-disasters-natech
Data Source: un
7/11/2017
2
…not always so simple
UNECE Average
2003 2008 2013
Road accident injuries per million inhabitants
Country A
Country B
UNECE Average
0
50
00
50
00
50
00
2003 2008 2013
Road accident fatalities per million inhabitants
Country A
Country B
• Higher accident severity in Country B? (...) Multi-vehicle collisions are counted as only one accident provided that any successive collisions happen within a very short time period. Injury accidents exclude accidents incurring only material damage.
– Excluded are terrorist acts.
7/11/2017
4
B.VII-05 Person killed
Any person killed immediately or dying within 30 days as a result of an injury accident, excluding suicides.
– A killed person is excluded if the competent authority declares the cause of death to be suicide, i.e. a deliberate act to injure oneself resulting in death.
Language:English
Score: 774538.53
-
https://unece.org/DAM/trans/doc/2018/SafeFITS/S3_Menton.pdf
Data Source: un
An Agency investigative report of the accident, dated 16 January 2002, found
Mr. Hushiyeh was “75% at fault in th[e] accident”. (...) Hushiyeh advised the Agency of the automobile accident, stating:
On Sept. 2nd, 2001, I had a serious car accident while driving an UNRWA vehicle
which was assigned to me on a full time user/driver basis. The accident resulted in a
comminuted fracture in my left leg.
Language:English
Score: 774535.16
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...at/judgments/2014-UNAT-435.pdf
Data Source: oaj
They are directly related to specific hazards and, beyond, to potential accident scenarios. We will not elaborate about the “Mitigation barriers” as they are very limited regarding LOC accidents.
(...) Taking a better advantage of it is less expensive than the costs induced by catastrophic accidents.
As said before, pilots are not the only actors involved in LOC accident risk. (...) To conclude,
I would say that we have the ambition to erase LOC accidents from the statistics, worldwide.
But even without accident, the risks will remain anyway, on every flight.
Language:English
Score: 774492
-
https://www.icao.int/Meetings/...20of%20LOC%20I%20Accidents.pdf
Data Source: un
Review of the proposed revisions to the gasp
APAC-AIG/2-WP/4
Agenda Item 3
International Civil Aviation Organization
Second Meeting of the Asia Pacific Accident Investigation Group
(APAC-AIG/2)
(Hong Kong, China, 27-28 May 2014)
Agenda Item 3: Independence of accident/incident investigation system
INVESTIGATION ARRANGEMENT FOR A BRITISH OVERSEAS TERRITORY
(Presented by Singapore)
SUMMARY
This paper highlights the arrangement for the investigation of air accidents and
incidents in Montserrat, a British Overseas Territory.
1. (...) DISCUSSION
2.1 Under the Montserrat legislation, the Governor of Montserrat is required to carry out investigation and appoint persons as Inspectors of Air Accidents for the investigation of accidents and
incidents occurring in Montserrat. (...) In the
case of Montserrat, it is worth noting that the UK AAIB has trained a locally based Accident Investigation
Manager (AIM) to manage accidents and incidents pending the arrival of AAIB inspectors from the UK.
1 ICAO has issued State Letter 2013/55 dated 19 July 2013 [Ref.
Language:English
Score: 774004.05
-
https://www.icao.int/APAC/Meet...ish%20Overseas%20Territory.pdf
Data Source: un
The Fukushima Daiichi power plant accident following the 2011 tsunami - a well-known example of a Natech accident - while nuclear energy facilities are not covered by the Industrial Accidents Convention.
(...) Natech risk falls within the scope of the Industrial Accidents Convention. More specifically, the Convention applies to “ the prevention of, preparedness for and response to industrial accidents capable of causing transboundary effects, including the effects of such accidents caused by natural disasters… ”
The Convention aims to protect human beings and the environment against industrial accidents by preventing such accidents to the extent possible. (...) Following this workshop, the OECD Working Group on Chemical Accidents developed the addendum number 2 to the OECD guiding principles for chemical accident prevention, preparedness and response (2 nd edition) to address natural hazards triggering technological accidents (Natechs).
Language:English
Score: 774001.76
-
https://unece.org/es/node/237811
Data Source: un
The Fukushima Daiichi power plant accident following the 2011 tsunami - a well-known example of a Natech accident - while nuclear energy facilities are not covered by the Industrial Accidents Convention.
(...) Natech risk falls within the scope of the Industrial Accidents Convention. More specifically, the Convention applies to “ the prevention of, preparedness for and response to industrial accidents capable of causing transboundary effects, including the effects of such accidents caused by natural disasters… ”
The Convention aims to protect human beings and the environment against industrial accidents by preventing such accidents to the extent possible. (...) Following this workshop, the OECD Working Group on Chemical Accidents developed the addendum number 2 to the OECD guiding principles for chemical accident prevention, preparedness and response (2 nd edition) to address natural hazards triggering technological accidents (Natechs).
Language:English
Score: 774001.76
-
https://unece.org/fr/node/237811
Data Source: un