Home

  ICLS-R-[2008-12-0006-6]-En.pdf

Hours actually worked applies to all types of jobs (within and beyond the SNA production boundary) and is not linked to administrative or legal concepts. (2) Hours actually worked measured within the SNA production boundary includes time spent directly on, and in relation to, productive activities; down time; and resting time. (...) Other household-based data collection exercises may be used to provide statistics on working time. (1) Time-use surveys are able to produce good-quality statistics of hours actually worked, absence from work hours and on the length and timing of working-time arrangements. (...) In order to analyse changes in hours actually worked over time and across States, it may be useful to produce indices in addition to level estimates.

Score: 925482.5 - https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/gro...tiveinstrument/wcms_112455.pdf

  Slide 1

AND – Arrangement of working time • Organization and scheduling of working time ILO Department of Statistics 5 Measured over a given reference period, in respect to a specific job/work activity Working time 7 concepts & measures – Hours actually worked – Hours paid for – Normal hours of work – Contractual hours of work – Hours usually worked – Overtime hours of work – Absence from work hours ILO Department of Statistics 6 -Not all are relevant to all jobs or work activities 4 Main working time concepts measured in household surveys • Hours actually worked – Basis for computation of estimates of labour input into production – Used in computation of labour productivity indicators • Hours usually worked – Relevant for assessments of working conditions • Excessive working time (persons working 48+ hours per week) • Structural situations of time-related underemployment ILO Department of Statistics 7 Requires measurement using continuous LFS (every week) Else, need adjustments for possible working-time variations in the year Hours actually worked Definition Time spent in a job (or work activity) in the performance of activities that contribute to the production of goods and services during a specified reference period Para. 11, Resol. I (18th ICLS, 2008) Includes: • Direct hours, related hours, down time, resting time Excludes: • Annual leave, public holidays, sick leave, any other leave paid or unpaid • Commuting time between work–home if no productive activity performed • Time spent in educational activities ILO Department of Statistics 8 5 Hours actually worked: 4 components 1. (...) Resting time – Time spent on short periods of rest, relief or refreshment generally practiced by custom or contract according to norms / context e.g. tea / coffee break, prayer breaks ILO Department of Statistics 9 Illustration: Hours actually worked in reference period Botswana 2005/6 LFS ILO Department of Statistics 10 Excludes temporary absence Thus can be “0” for persons employed, not at work in the reference period 6 Hours usually worked: Definition Typical value of hours actually worked in a job / work activity per short reference period (e.g. week), over a long observation period (e.g. month, season) Para. 11, Resol.

Score: 922599 - https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/gro...ts/publication/wcms_413778.pdf

  Microsoft Word - ICLS-Report II_[2008-08-0063-1]-En.doc

What is important with statistics of working time is to be able to observe the hours actually worked compared with the legal, normal hours. (...) Hours actually worked Operational definition 49. Hours actually worked is the time persons spend in the performance of activities that contribute to the production of goods and services during a specified reference period. (...) Hours actually worked is the aggregate of time spent on the performance of the job directly and the time spent in relation to productive activity, which (i) enables (ii) facilitates or (iii) enhances production. 51.

Score: 920679.9 - https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/gro...ts/publication/wcms_099576.pdf

  KPI Overview - ICAO GANP Portal

/Europe (September 2016) China / Europe benchmarking study (CAUC - EUROCONTROL, 2017) KPI02 Taxi-out additional time Definition Actual taxi-out time compared to an unimpeded/reference taxi-out time. (...) Select departing flights, exclude helicopters 2. Compute actual taxi-out duration: ATOT minus AOBT 3. Compute additional taxi-out time: actual taxi-out duration minus unimpeded taxi-out time At aggregated level: 4. (...) Data Requirement For each flight: Actual landing time (ALDT) Actual take-off time (ATOT).

Score: 899136.2 - https://www.icao.int/NACC/Docu...1/AIDC4/D04-AIDC-NAM-IDC04.pdf

  Page 101 - ITU Journal - ICT Discoveries - Volume 1, No. 2, December 2018 - Second special issue on

 Page 101 - ITU Journal - ICT Discoveries - Volume 1, No. 2, December 2018 - Second special issue on Data for Good           Basic HTML Version Table of Contents View Full Version Page 101 - ITU Journal - ICT Discoveries - Volume 1, No. 2, December 2018 - Second special issue on Data for Good P. 101 ITU JOURNAL: ICT Discoveries, Vol. 1(2), December 2018 * +RXUO\ 'RZQOLQN 'DWD 7UDIILF 1500000 Actual Data Traffic (kbps) 500000 1 36 71 106 141 176 211 246 281 316 351 386 421 456 491 526 561 596 631 666 701 736 771 806 841 876 911 946 CANFIS 1000000 0 Time (Hours) Fig. 3 – Actual and predicted 3G hourly traffic using the CANFIS (5-2-5) model * 'DLO\ 'RZQOLQN 'DWD 7UDIILF Actual 4000000 CANFIS Data Traffic (Kbps) 2000000 1 27 53 79 105 131 157 183 209 235 261 287 313 339 365 391 417 443 469 495 521 547 573 599 625 651 677 703 3000000 1000000 0 Time (Days) Fig. 4 – Actual and predicted 3G daily traffic using the CANFIS (5-2-5) model * :HHNO\ 'RZQOLQN 'DWD 7UDIILF 3000000 Actual Data Traffic (kbps) 1000000 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134 141 148 155 162 169 176 CANFIS 2000000 0 Time (Weeks) Fig. 5 – Actual and predicted 3G weekly traffic using the CANFIS (5-2-5) model * 0RQWKO\ 'RZQOLQN 'DWD 7UDIILF 15000000 Actual Data Ttraffic (kbps) 5000000 0 1 4 7 101316192225283134374043464952555861646770 CANFIS 10000000 Time (Monthly) Fig. 6 – Actual and predicted 3G monthly traffic using the CANFIS (5-2-5) model © International Telecommunication Union, 2018 79     96     97     98     99     100     101     102     103     104     105     106          

Score: 896056.4 - https://www.itu.int/en/publica.../files/basic-html/page101.html

  FAO SDG Progress Rep

This distance measure is 0 for indicators having already reached the target (at the time of the assessment). The distance of a generic region g to the target is 𝑑𝑔𝑡 = { 𝑥∗ − 𝑥𝑔𝑡 , when the desired direction is an increase over time 𝑥𝑔𝑡 − 𝑥 ∗, when the desired direction is a decrease over time This distance can be easily interpreted if the indicators are expressed as proportions. (...) Assuming a geometric growth over time, we can derive the following two mathematical expressions: Actual growth: (setting 𝑡0 as baseline year) 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 = ( 𝑥𝑡 𝑥𝑡0 ) 1 𝑡−𝑡0 − 1 Required growth: 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑟 = ( 𝑥∗ 𝑥𝑡0 ) 1 2030−𝑡0 − 1 where 𝑥∗ is the numerical target to be reached by 2030. (...) This is justified also on theoretical grounds, given the measurement errors associated with the SDG indicator estimation process, and the objective increasing difficulties for the policy measures to completely eradicate a developmental problem, obtaining an estimate of the SDG indicator equal to 0. Ratio actual vs. required: 𝐶𝑅 = 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑟 Indicators expressed as scores ranging from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) require a separate approach that basically consists in a categorization of all the possible combinations between the latest score and the score in the baseline year: Criteria for judging the trend by comparing the latest score with the previous score Rule Color Assessment category baseline>=1 AND latest=5 Dark green Target already met (TAM) (latest-baseline)>=2 AND latest<5 Green Improvement (>>) (latest-baseline)=1 AND latest<5 Light green Slight improvement (>) baseline=latest (both NOT equal to 5) Orange No improvement (stagnation) since baseline (=) Latest < baseline Red Deterioration/movement away from the target (<<) 4 | P a g e 2.2 Indicators without a numerical target In case of indicators without a numerical target, it is only possible to assess the actual growth (𝑡0 denotes the baseline year): 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 = ( 𝑥𝑡 𝑥𝑡0 ) 1 𝑡−𝑡0 − 1 Different criteria can be used to assess the CAGR, depending on the sign of the normative direction and also on the fact that for some indicators a situation that remains unchanged over time (not increase or not decrease) can be judged positively. 2.3 Legend and interpretation of symbols related to trend assessment Symbol Meaning General outcome Note TAM Target already met Positive ONLY for indicators having a numerical target explicitly defined by the 2030 Agenda >> Significant improvement Positive > Slight improvement Positive >= Slight or no improvement Positive Needed only for indicator where the no-change over time is a positive outcome (normative direction of the indicator is “NOT increase” or “NOT decrease” over time, i.e. the target of the indicator include terms like “maintain” etc.) = No improvement (stagnation) Negative < Slight deterioration Negative << Significant deterioration negative 5 | P a g e SDG 2.1.1 Target value: 2.5% Normative direction: decrease Last available data refer to 2019 for regions, 2018 for countries (3-year average 2017-2019) Assessment of the current status (last available data): distance to the target Criteria for judging the current distance from the target Bounds Group Symbol 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 0 Target already met +++ 0 < 𝑑𝑖𝑡 ≤ 0.05 Very close to the target ++ 0.05 < 𝑑𝑖𝑡 ≤ 0.10 Close to the target + 0.10 < 𝑑𝑖𝑡 ≤ 0.25 Far from the target - 𝑑𝑖𝑡 > 0.25 Very far from the target -- Assessment of the trend from 2015 (baseline year): actual growth compared to the required growth to reach the target (CR) Criteria for judging the trend by comparing actual with the required growth Level or ratio CR Color Assessment category x ≤ x∗ Dark green Target already met (TAM) CR ≥ 0.95 Green On-track to achieve the target (>>) 0.10 < 𝐶𝑅 < 0.95 Yellow On-path, but too slow to achieve the target (>) −0.10 ≤ 𝐶𝑅 ≤ 0.10 Orange No improvement (stagnation) since baseline (=) 𝐶𝑅 < −0.10 Red Deterioration/movement away from the target (<<) 6 | P a g e SDG 2.1.2 Target value: 5% Normative direction: decrease Last available data refer to 2019 Assessment of the current status (last available data): distance to the target Criteria for judging the current distance from the target Bounds Group Symbol 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 0 Target already met +++ 0 < 𝑑𝑖𝑡 ≤ 0.05 Very close to the target ++ 0.05 < 𝑑𝑖𝑡 ≤ 0.10 Close to the target + 0.10 < 𝑑𝑖𝑡 ≤ 0.25 Far from the target - 𝑑𝑖𝑡 > 0.25 Very far from the target -- Assessment of the trend from 2015 (baseline year): actual growth compared to the required growth to reach the target (CR) Criteria for judging the trend by comparing actual with the required growth Level or ratio CR Color Assessment category x ≤ x∗ Dark green Target already met (TAM) CR ≥ 0.95 Green On-track to achieve the target (>>) 0.10 < 𝐶𝑅 < 0.95 Yellow On-path, but too slow to achieve the target (>) −0.10 ≤ 𝐶𝑅 ≤ 0.10 Orange No improvement (stagnation) since baseline (=) 𝐶𝑅 < −0.10 Red Deterioration/movement away from the target (<<) 7 | P a g e SDG 2.5.1a Target value: NA Normative direction: not decrease Last available data refer to 2019 Assessment of the current status (last available data): quintiles of the distribution of country values (no assessment at regional level) Assessment of trend from 2016 (baseline year): actual growth (CAGR) Criteria to judge the actual growth (CAGR) Values of actual growth rate Color Assessment category 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 > 0.01 Dark green Improvement since baseline-year (>>) −0.005 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.01 Light green Slight or no-improvement since baseline-year (>=) −0.01 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.005 Orange Slight deterioration since baseline-year (<) 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.01 Red Deterioration since baseline-year (<<) SDG 2.a.1 Target value: NA Normative direction: increase Last available data refer to 2018 Assessment of the current status (last available data): quintiles of the distribution of country values (no assessment at the regional level) Assessment of the trend from 2015 (baseline year): actual growth (CAGR) Criteria to judge the actual growth (CAGR) Values of actual growth rate Color Assessment category 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 > 0.01 Dark green Improvement since baseline-year (>>) 0.005 < 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.01 Light green Slight improvement since baseline-year (>) −0.005 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.005 yellow No improvement since baseline-year (=) −0.01 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.005 Orange Slight deterioration since baseline-year (<) 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.01 Red Deterioration since baseline-year (<<) 8 | P a g e SDG 6.4.1 Target value: NA Normative direction: increase Last available data refer to 2017 Assessment of the current status (last available data): quintiles of the distribution of country values (no assessment at the regional level) Assessment of the trend from 2015 (baseline year): actual growth (CAGR) Criteria to judge the actual growth (CAGR) Values of actual growth rate Color Assessment category 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 > 0.01 Dark green Improvement since baseline-year (>>) 0.005 < 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.01 Light green Slight improvement since baseline-year (>) −0.005 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.005 yellow No improvement since baseline-year (=) −0.01 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.005 Orange Slight deterioration since baseline-year (<) 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.01 Red Deterioration since baseline-year (<<) SDG 6.4.2 Target value: NA Normative direction: Decrease if baseline value >25% Last available data refer to 2017 Assessment of the current status (last available data): quintiles of the distribution of country values (no assessment at regional level) Assessment of the trend from 2015 (baseline year): actual growth (CAGR) (no assessment of the trend if the baseline value is below 25%) Criteria to judge the actual growth (CAGR) if baseline value <25% Values of actual growth rate Color Assessment category 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 > 0.01 Dark green Improvement since baseline-year (>>) 0.005 < 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.01 Light green Slight improvement since baseline-year (>) −0.005 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.005 Yellow No improvement since baseline-year (=) −0.01 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.005 Orange Slight deterioration since baseline-year (<) 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.01 Red Deterioration since baseline-year (<<) 9 | P a g e SDG 14.4.1 Target value: NA Normative direction: increase Last available data refer to 2017 Assessment of the current status (last available data): Not Applicable (data available only for global and marine zones) Assessment of the trend from 2015 (baseline year): actual growth (CAGR) Criteria to judge the actual growth (CAGR) Values of actual growth rate Color Assessment category 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 > 0.01 Dark green Improvement since baseline-year (>>) 0.005 < 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.01 Light green Slight improvement since baseline-year (>) −0.005 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.005 Yellow No improvement since baseline-year (=) −0.01 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.005 Orange Slight deterioration since baseline-year (<) 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.01 red Deterioration since baseline-year (<<) 10 | P a g e SDG 14.6.1 Target value: 5 (score) Normative direction: increase Last available data refer to: 2020 Assessment of the current status (last available data): distance to the target (𝑥∗ = 5) Criteria for judging the current distance from the target Bounds Group Symbol 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 𝑥 ∗ − 𝑥𝑖,2020 = 0 Target already met +++ 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 𝑥 ∗ − 𝑥𝑖,2020 = 1 Very close to the target ++ 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 𝑥 ∗ − 𝑥𝑖,2020 = 2 Close to the target + 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 𝑥 ∗ − 𝑥𝑖,2020 = 3 Far from the target - 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 𝑥 ∗ − 𝑥𝑖,2020 > 3 Very far from the target -- Assessment of the trend from 2018 (baseline year): comparison of scores Criteria for judging the trend by comparing the latest score with the previous score Rule Color Assessment category Baseline=1 to 5 Latest=5 Dark green Target already met (TAM) (latest-baseline)>=2 AND latest<5 Green Improvement (>>) (latest-baseline)=1 AND latest<5 Light green Slight improvement (>) baseline=latest (both NOT equal to 5) Orange No improvement (stagnation) since baseline (=) Latestactual growth (CAGR) Criteria to judge the actual growth (CAGR) Values of actual growth rate Color Assessment category 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 > 0.01 Dark green Improvement since baseline-year (>>) 0.005 < 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.01 Light green Slight improvement since baseline-year (>) −0.005 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.005 Yellow No improvement since baseline-year (=) −0.01 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.005 Orange Slight deterioration since baseline-year (<) 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.01 red Deterioration since baseline-year (<<) 12 | P a g e SDG 14.b.1 Target value: 5 (score) Normative direction: increase Last available data refer to: 2020 Assessment of the current status (last available data): distance to the target (𝑥∗ = 5) Criteria for judging the current distance from the target Bounds Group Symbol 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 5 − 𝑥𝑖,2020 = 0 Target already met +++ 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 5 − 𝑥𝑖,2020 = 1 Very close to the target ++ 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 𝑥 ∗ − 𝑥𝑖,2020 = 2 Close to the target + 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 𝑥 ∗ − 𝑥𝑖,2020 = 3 Far from the target - 𝑑𝑖𝑡 = 𝑥 ∗ − 𝑥𝑖,2020 > 3 Very far from the target -- Criteria for judging the trend by comparing the latest score with the previous score Rule Color Assessment category Baseline >= AND latest=5 Dark green Target already met (TAM) (latest-baseline)>=2 AND latest<5 Green Improvement (>>) (latest-baseline)=1 AND latest<5 Light green Slight improvement (>) baseline=latest (both NOT equal to 5) Orange No improvement (stagnation) since baseline (=) Latestactual growth (CAGR) Criteria to judge the actual growth (CAGR) Values of actual growth rate Color Assessment category 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 > 0.001 Dark green Improvement since baseline-year (>>) −0.0005 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 ≤ 0.001 Light green Slight or no-improvement since baseline-year (>=) −0.001 ≤ 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.0005 Orange Slight deterioration since baseline-year (<) 𝐶𝐴𝐺𝑅𝑎 < −0.001 red Deterioration since baseline-year (<<)

Score: 876409.4 - https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/...ss-report/2020/pdf/methods.pdf

  Slide 1

AND – Arrangement of working time • Organization and scheduling of working time ILO Department of Statistics 5 Measured over a given reference period, in respect to a specific job/work activity Working time 7 concepts & measures – Hours actually worked – Hours paid for – Normal hours of work – Contractual hours of work – Hours usually worked – Overtime hours of work – Absence from work hours ILO Department of Statistics 6 -Not all are relevant to all jobs or work activities 4 Main working time concepts measured in household surveys • Hours actually worked – Basis for computation of estimates of labour input into production – Used in computation of labour productivity indicators • Hours usually worked – Relevant for assessments of working conditions • Excessive working time (persons working 48+ hours per week) • Structural situations of time-related underemployment ILO Department of Statistics 7 Requires measurement using continuous LFS (every week) Else, need adjustments for possible working-time variations in the year Hours actually worked Definition Time spent in a job (or work activity) in the performance of activities that contribute to the production of goods and services during a specified reference period Para. 11, Resol. (...) Wanted to work additional hours • In same, other or additional jobs 2. Working time in all jobs < threshold • Hours actually or usually worked in all jobs, depending on objective • Threshold(s): full/part-time boundary OR median/modal value of hours usually worked by all/specified persons in employment 3. (...) Persons in TRU, who in reference period were – Not at work or had reduced working time (i.e. < hours’ threshold) – Due to reduced economic activity • Temporary layoff or slack work, disorganization / suspension of work due to mechanical, electrical breakdown, shortage of raw materials, clients – Based on hours actually worked, requires also knowing the reasons. 3.

Score: 875153.1 - https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/gro...ts/publication/wcms_413779.pdf

  UIT-T Rec. Z.120 (11/1999) Message sequence chart (msc)

This Recommendation is a natural continuation of its 1996 version, adding concepts for: • data; • time; • control flow; • object orientation on MSC document. (...) An asterisk indicates that the group is optional and can be further repeated any number of times; a plus sign indicates that the group must be present and can be further repeated any number of times. (...) Small variations on the actual shapes of the graphical terminal symbols are allowed.

Score: 873387.5 - https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/2001...com17/languages/Z.120_1199.pdf

  Shop.un.org : Official Source for United Nations Books and More - Law of the Sea Bulletin

Shop.un.org : Official Source for United Nations Books and More - Law of the Sea Bulletin Shop.un.org : Official Source for United Nations Books and More - Law of the Sea Bulletin The Law of the Sea Bulletin provides cogent and timely information on important issues related to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Issued three times a year, it provides legal material relevant to the Law of the Sea including national legislation, bilateral agreements and multilateral treaties as well as information on decisions of the International Court of Justice, arbitration tribunals and other dispute settlement procedures. LAW OF THE SEA BULLETIN #32 Language English Add to cart Add to cart PDF File:  elos32_9789210580922.pdf$15.00Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the SeaPage Count: 112OECD iLibrary FinalInternational Law and JusticeLaw of the Sea Bulletin, No. 32Issued three times a year, the Bulletin provides cogent and timely information on issues related to the Convention on the Law of the Sea - 'the constitution for the ocean' and contains the most recent legal materials relevant to the law of the sea.

Score: 859905.6 - https://shop.un.org/taxonomy/term/833/feed

  Shop.un.org : Official Source for United Nations Books and More - Law of the Sea Bulletin

Shop.un.org : Official Source for United Nations Books and More - Law of the Sea Bulletin Shop.un.org : Official Source for United Nations Books and More - Law of the Sea Bulletin The Law of the Sea Bulletin provides cogent and timely information on important issues related to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Issued three times a year, it provides legal material relevant to the Law of the Sea including national legislation, bilateral agreements and multilateral treaties as well as information on decisions of the International Court of Justice, arbitration tribunals and other dispute settlement procedures. LAW OF THE SEA BULLETIN #32 Language English Add to cart Add to cart PDF File:  elos32_9789210580922.pdf$15.00Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the SeaPage Count: 112OECD iLibrary FinalInternational Law and JusticeLaw of the Sea Bulletin, No. 32Issued three times a year, the Bulletin provides cogent and timely information on issues related to the Convention on the Law of the Sea - 'the constitution for the ocean' and contains the most recent legal materials relevant to the law of the sea.

Score: 859905.6 - https://shop.un.org/es/taxonomy/term/833/feed