Home

Naciones Unidas A/CN.9/WG.IV/WP.165 Asamblea General Distr. limitada 30 de septiembre de 2020 Español Original: inglés V.20-05631 (S) 131020 131020 *2005631*

Brazil also believes that the mandate and terms of reference of the Consultative Group of Experts shall be reviewed at its sixteenth session (...) EU believes that the CGE, as a process under the FCCC, has shown itself to be a valuable tool and a good model for cooperation among Parties. (...) Uruguay also believes that the mandate and terms of reference of the Consultative Group of Experts shall be reviewed at its sixteenth session

"If it was a mistake, I believe that we, the Congress, must face up to the question of whether or not the owners of the plant, Mr. (...) They have also said publicly that they do not consider Idris a terrorist or believe that he has any links to bin Laden. P.J. (...) Brogan, a partner at Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue. "Nobody believes this was a chemical weapons plant. The government made a classical blunder--and under these circumstances, it should do the right thing.

The Member States, stressing that acts of terrorism and extremism cannot be justified, believe it important to take comprehensive measures to intensify efforts against terrorism and its ideology, as well as to determine and eliminate the factors and conditions that promote terrorism and extremism. (...) They advocate further improvement of the legal and regulatory framework for cooperation in these areas. The Member States believe that one of the key factors of preserving and enhancing security and stability in the SCO space is a prompt settlement of the situation in Afghanistan. (...) In this context, ongoing efforts to develop the analytical component of the SCO’s economic activities found support. The Member States believe that the development of the service industry and trade in services are essential for the growth and transformation of the economy.

They advocate further practical implementation of the documents adopted in this area and believe it is important to take measures to further improve the SCO's legal and regulatory framework in the field of security. (...) The Member States firmly believe that depriving terrorism of its social basis, including by eliminating poverty, unemployment and illiteracy, should become an important direction in the global fight against terrorism. (...) Economic cooperation The Member States believe that their primary goal is to develop trade and economic cooperation, to create favourable conditions for trade and investment based on the principles of equality, fair competition, mutual respect and mutual benefit.

In this regard, Japan believes that the framework of the abovementioned extended programme should be elaborated, building upon the current framework provided by the New Delhi Work Programme. (...) Structure of the new programme The European Union believes that the general structure of the NDWP has served well, and that it can be maintained in the future work programme. (...) The U.S. further believes that extending the New Delhi Work Programme into the future, with some appropriate changes, would avoid drafting a new work program which we believe would be substantively the same as the one developed five years ago in New Delhi, losing much time, energy and effort that can be instead turned toward Article 6 activities.

However, the Commission does not believe that this statement is sufficient in itself and remains concerned itself about the allegations and believes that not enough has been done by the UK to reassure the Commission and the public following these allegations. (...) However, none of these mechanisms deal with all the allegations or do so in a comprehensive manner and there are concerns that many in civil society believe that at least some of the allegations are true and that they are not isolated incidents. The Commission believes that only its recommended review will ensure that the public will have confidence in the government's response.

It is an honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the A Status National Human Rights Commission of Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “NHRCK” or “the Commission”). The NHRCK believes that the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) has made tremendous contributions through its process of regular reporting and review of human rights situations of the Member States. (...) In fact, the recent third UPR process of the Republic of Korea, following up on its first and second UPR processes, had been a valuable opportunity to paint the overarching picture of human rights situations, and face pending human rights issues. The Commission believes this process gives us an good opportunity to enhance the domestic human rights situation for the Republic of Korea one step forward as well. (...) In this regards, the Commission believes that the Korean government should actively pursue and review recommendations made on the ratification of the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty, the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; the adoption of comprehensive anti- discrimination law; the repeal of article 92-6 of the Military Criminal Act; the formulation of comprehensive legislation and measure on hate speech; and the decriminalization of conscientious objectors who refused to perform military service and the introduction of alternative service.

The Special Rapporteur believes that the effective enjoyment of the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association is particularly important and timely in Zimbabwe, in light of the most recent political changes. (...) The Special Rapporteur firmly believes that the exercise of this right should not be subjected to prior authorization by the regulating authority, including when it amounts to a de facto authorization as stipulated by section 7. (...) The Special Rapporteur believes that signing a memorandum of understanding should not be used to undermine an organization’s independence or create additional obstructions in their operations.