Home

In that connexion, the representative of Colombia thought that the Organization had a perfect right to protect its officials in the per- formance of their duties, The Organization was carrying out important functions; it was there- fore necessary that it should have appropriate means at its disposal. (...) That proposal called for consultation of the International Court of Justice on the com- petence of the United Nations to obtain repara- tions for bodily injuries sufîered by its agents. He therefore asked the Committee to discuss the second solution which had been proposed by the Syrian delegation and which requested the International Law Commission to prepare a draft convention on reparation for bodily injuries suf- fered by the Organization's agents in the per- formance of their duties. (...) He paid tribute to the spirit which had inspired the Syrian delegation; in the belief that existing international law did not allow aState to be held responsible to the United Nations for cases of bodily injury suffered by the agents of the Organi- zation in the performance of their duties or their mission, that delegation wished to create legisla- tion providing for the compensation of such in- juries.

The International Court of Justice should be consulted first, because its function was to give advice on questions of that kind. (...) Such a link was clearly lacking between the United Nations and its offi- cials; there was, however, another link between them, that of function. It could not be stated a priori that such a bond did not provide an ade- quate basis on which to present a claim for com- pensation.

The CC prescribes certain criminal offences where the motive “out of hatred” is integral part of the legal description of the criminal offence (such as, for example Aggravated Murder, Bodily Injury, Serious Bodily Injury…) and a more severe punishment is explicitly prescribed by the CC. (...) By Act on Amendments to the Criminal Code (2019) a number of criminal offences containing the motive “out of hatred” had their prescribed sentences made stricter (for example Bodily Injury, Serious Bodily Injury). More strict sentences were also prescribed for criminal offences Domestic Violence (Article 179a), Rape (Article 153), Sexual Harassment (Article 156), Lewd Acts (Article 155), Serious Criminal Offences against Sexual Freedom (Article 154). Also, the A/HRC/46/16/Add.1 12 GE.21-02165 concept of the criminal offence Rape was changed in a way that any non-consensual sexual intercourse or sexual act equated with it shall be considered a criminal offense of Rape, even when there is no use of force or threat to the life and body of the raped or other person. 7 It is provided by prescribing a range of criminal offences, such as: Stalking (Article 140), Bodily Injury (Article 117), Serious Bodily Injury (Article 118) and Particularly Serious Bodily Injury (Article 119).

PCM-027-2011 on the Law of the Organization, Functions and Competences of the Executive Power 20. (...) PCM-027-2011 on the Law of the Organization, Functions and Competences of the Executive Power (Reglamento de Organización, Funcionamiento y Competencias del Poder Ejecutivo) establishes in its article 87-D and E the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, and specifies its functions. (...) The Deputy Minister for Defence pointed out that the military was entrusted with autonomous functions in public order enforcement, in accordance with a constitutional amendment passed in November 2011.

The revision of the Criminal Code, which entered into force in February 2019, included domestic violence as an aggravating circumstance in homicides, bodily injuries, abduction, unlawful imprisonment, coercion and death threats, and also the criminalization of stalking. 24. (...) In the Criminal Code, bodily harm is further categorized according to the level of severity as severe, average and light (arts. 128–135). (...) Article 161 regulates the cases in which criminal prosecution is initiated upon complaint of the victim, namely for light and medium bodily harm. Paragraph 2 of the same article, amended in February 2019, provides that for average bodily harm caused to an ascendant, descendant, spouse, brother or sister, the prosecution is private-public, which means that a criminal prosecution of a general nature will be instituted upon a complaint of the aggrieved person to the prosecution and it cannot be 7 Criminal Code, art. 93 (31). 8 Information provided by the Office of the Prosecutor.

GE.12-40585 (EXT) Comité des droits de l’enfant Examen des rapports soumis par les États parties en application du paragraphe 1 de l'article 12 du Protocole facultatif à la Convention

(a) Killing members of the group ; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to membors of the groug ; (c) Deliborately inflicting on tho group conditions of lifa calculate to bring about its pliysical destruction in wholo or ip part ; (cl) Imposing measures intendod to prevont births within the group ; (e) Forcibly trsnsfcrring childron of thc group to anothor group," -M-w.. . .

GE.08-42274 (F) 100708 140708 NATIONS UNIES CRC Convention relative aux droits de l’enfant Distr. GÉNÉRALE CRC/C/OPAC/USA/Q/1/Add.1/Rev.1 2 juin 2008 FRANÇAIS

GE.08-41892 (F) 210508 220508 NATIONS UNIES CRC Convention relative aux droits de l’enfant Distr. GÉNÉRALE CRC/C/OPAC/USA/Q/1/Add.1 15 mai 2008 FRANÇAIS Original:

A/HRC/32/36/Add.1 8 GE.16-18420 immediate threat to the life of or grave bodily injuries to a police officer or another person (self-defence). (...) More importantly, the Special Rapporteur emphasizes that, even when some protesters engage in violence during an assembly, thus losing the protection of the right to peaceful assembly, they still retain all other rights, including the right to life and right to bodily integrity.18 44. Therefore, violent elements should be extracted from the protest and dealt with in accordance with the rule of law. (...) The police force maintained the police officer in his functions until January 2013 when he was dismissed following repeated criticism from civil society.