Home

CMP required the relocation of a significant number of staff from the Headquarters Complex to other buildings, including rental space, such as the Albano building. 7. (...) Despite the renovations, a number of issues with the Albano building remain (see Gatti et al.). 8. The Applicant was relocated to the Albano building in July 2009. (...) UNDT/NY/2013/088 Order No. 130 (NY/2013) Page 5 of 15 DGACM staff members to the Albano building; to relocate staff already in the Albano building elsewhere within the building; and to deny DGACM staff the right to return to the renovated Secretariat building). 12.

CPM required the relocation of a significant number of staff from the Headquarters Complex to other buildings, including rental space, such as the building rented by the United Nations at 380 Madison Avenue in New York (“Madison building”) and the Albano building. 21. (...) The air quality of the building had been tested more often than any other building. (...) While there are ongoing issues identified with the Albano building, at no time has the building not met the required occupancy standards.

On 26 March 2014, Staff Assistant/Building Focal Point, Office of the Director of the Documentation Division, DGACM, sent an email to the staff members working in the Albano building, stating: Dear Colleagues, You may be hearing some construction noise around the building. (...) The following day, on 27 March 2014, Staff Assistant/Building Focal Point sent a further email to the staff members working in the Albano building, stating: Case No. (...) On 15 April 2014, Staff Assistant/Building Focal Point sent an email to the staff members working in the Albano building, informing them of the installation of storm windows starting 23 April 2014.

The Respondent states that staff members in the Madison Building enjoy access to the cafeteria facilities located at the United Nations Secretariat building as well as several other United Nations building in the area that are within walking distance of the Madison Building. Further, staff members may also access the cafeterias through a complimentary shuttle service that travels between the Madison Building and the United Nations Secretariat building. (...) During the summer of 2009, a number of staff members from the Secretariat building and other locations were relocated to the Madison Building in order to Case No.

Johnson, he observed “any items or packages on the counter in the rear of the screening building”, he replied, “No. I relieved him at front of the screening building.” (...) (b) There were some 22 CCTV cameras installed in the North Screening Building, of which two were located at the end of the building closest to the Holding Area and were specifically focused on the Holding Area. (...) As indicated in my earlier email, the cameras in the Screening Building are specifically positioned for different functions.

Johnson, he observed “any items or packages on the counter in the rear of the screening building”, he replied, “No. I relieved him at front of the screening building.” (...) (b) There were some 22 CCTV cameras installed in the North Screening Building, of which two were located at the end of the building closest to the Holding Area and were specifically focused on the Holding Area. (...) As indicated in my earlier email, the cameras in the Screening Building are specifically positioned for different functions.

On 13 February 2014, the Applicant tried to access the UN City Building in order to attend a written test held by the World Health Organization (“WHO”) in the context of a job opening for which she had applied. She was, however, denied access to the building by the UN Security, following which she asked UNFPA to clarify that incident. 10. (...) As regards the decisions challenged in the application under lit. c) and d), namely the fact that the Applicant was denied access to the UN City Building on Case No. UNDT/GVA/2014/028 Judgment No.

The Applicant’s TORs included capacity building of national IM staff so that the IM services could be handed over to them at the end of her assignment. 41. (...) It was therefore impossible for the Applicant to engage in any capacity building that would lead to a handover of functions to national professionals. 55. (...) Managerial competencies in this Organization are recognized to include building trust and managing performance. In building trust, a manager is expected Case No.

It was established that the Applicant participated in the removal of certain building materials and other property belonging to the Organization without authorization. (...) Also, irrelevant is whether any efforts were made to hide the building materials in the truck. 39. The Applicant’s actions in not only permitting but assisting Mr. Parakiti to remove unauthorized building materials from the POC Site was reckless or grossly negligent in his duty as a Security Assistant. 40.

—AD (via Zoom from Conference Room 8 in the Secretariat building); Case No. UNDT/NY/2021/048/T Order No. 022 (NY/2022) Page 4 of 4 ii. (...) —TK (via Zoom from Conference Room 8 in the Secretariat building); iii. From 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.—BM (via Teams from the offices of the Dispute Tribunal in New York); c. (...) —MY (via Zoom from Conference Room 8 in the Secretariat building); ii. From 10:30 a.m. to 11:30 p.m.—HR (via Teams from the offices of the Dispute Tribunal in New York); iii.