Home

ORDER ON THE APPLICANT’S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Counsel (...) 2020, the Applicant filed a motion for production of documents. In the said motion, the Applicant (...) seeks the production of all documents related to the disciplinary sanction imposed on three other

ON PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Counsel for Applicant: George Irving Counsel for Respondent: Susan (...) expired, claiming, in effect, that she had been constructively dismissed. The production of documents (...) the Tribunal to order production of evidence for either party at any time and require any person to disclose

review of the information (including attorney work product) could be taken away from the secure (...) found to be most instructive, and following the Respondent’s production to the Applicant of some (...) to reaching an agreement on the Applicant’s request for production of the remainder of the Further

ORDER ON APPLICANT’S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE Counsel for the Applicant: Monika (...) to make three orders requiring the production of additional evidence. 5. In light of the Tribunal’s (...) . In addition the Tribunal may order the production of evidence from either party at any time and may require

OF THE UNITED NATIONS RULING ON PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Counsel for applicant: Francois (...) were privileged from production. I gave a comprehensive explanation as to why these submissions were (...) without merit and ordered production in the following terms – 1 The respondent is to produce

ON THE APPLICANT’S APPLICATION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE Counsel for Applicant: Adolph Bishanga (...) dated 18 May 2010, the Applicant requests the Tribunal to order the production of the following (...) ) There is nothing in the Request for Production to suggest that the documents sought are relevant to any issue

requesting leave of the Tribunal to file a 16-page motion for production of evidence by the Respondent (...) the Applicant's motion for production of evidence in abeyance until further notice. 6. Following an extension (...) . The Tribunal also notes that in the ordinary course of proceedings, matters of production of evidence

ORDER ON APPLICANT’S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND CASE MANAGEMENT (...) to the Respondent’s reply. Background 3. The Applicant on 4 October 2012 filed a motion for production (...) March 2013, the Respondent filed a response. 4. In his motion the Applicant requested the production

or UNDT) had the right to order the production of any document if it was relevant for the purposes (...) sufficient grounds to order the production of documents withheld by the Administration concerning (...) to verify the confidentiality of the document whose production may be relevant for the settlement

or UNDT) had the right to order the production of any document if it was relevant for the purposes (...) sufficient grounds to order the production of documents withheld by the Administration concerning (...) to verify the confidentiality of the document whose production may be relevant for the settlement