Home

  ST/SG/AC.10/C.3/2009/51

POSSIBLE USE OF FLEXIBLE BULK CONTAINERS (FBCS) FOR THE TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS / TRANSMITTED BY THE INTERNATIONAL DANGEROUS GOODS AND CONTAINERS ASSOCIATION (IDGCA)

Score: 1468890 - daccess-ods.un.org/acce...ST/SG/AC.10/C.3/2009/51&Lang=E

  World Summit on the Information Society - Group of Friends of the Chair (GFC)

World Summit on the Information Society - Group of Friends of the Chair (GFC)             home  |  français  |  español   search | site map  |  contact  |  text only     Your browser does not support script    SECOND PHASE, TUNIS : PREPARATORY PROCESS : GROUP OF FRIENDS OF THE CHAIR (GFC) Quick links: GFC - Preparation of PrepCom-3 GFC - Preparation of PrepCom-2 Report on the Work of the GFC during the Inter-Sessional Period Political Chapeau and Operational Part (chapters 1 to 4) Compilations of comments to the Political Chapeau and Operational Part List of Members of the Group     GFC - Preparation of PrepCom-3 In accordance with the Decision of PrepCom 2 , the Group of Friends of the Chair (GFC) will continue to draft proposals for chapters one (Implementation Mechanism) and four (The Way Ahead) of the Operational Part. (...) The contributions can cover the political chapeau and/or chapters 1, 2 and 4 of the operational part . (...) For the third meeting , contributions should cover the draft political chapeau , chapters 1 and 4 of the Operational Part and, if possible, chapter 2 on financial mechanisms.

Score: 1380264.3 - https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/gfc/

  World Summit on the Information Society - Group of Friends of the Chair (GFC)

World Summit on the Information Society - Group of Friends of the Chair (GFC)             home  |  français  |  español   search | site map  |  contact  |  text only     Your browser does not support script    SECOND PHASE, TUNIS : PREPARATORY PROCESS : GROUP OF FRIENDS OF THE CHAIR (GFC) Quick links: GFC - Preparation of PrepCom-3 GFC - Preparation of PrepCom-2 Report on the Work of the GFC during the Inter-Sessional Period Political Chapeau and Operational Part (chapters 1 to 4) Compilations of comments to the Political Chapeau and Operational Part List of Members of the Group     GFC - Preparation of PrepCom-3 In accordance with the Decision of PrepCom 2 , the Group of Friends of the Chair (GFC) will continue to draft proposals for chapters one (Implementation Mechanism) and four (The Way Ahead) of the Operational Part. (...) The contributions can cover the political chapeau and/or chapters 1, 2 and 4 of the operational part . (...) For the third meeting , contributions should cover the draft political chapeau , chapters 1 and 4 of the Operational Part and, if possible, chapter 2 on financial mechanisms.

Score: 1380264.3 - https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/gfc/index.html

  Allocation process | OCHA

The project cycle management process for the YHF is done through an online platform allowing for better management and institutional memory: https://cbpf.unocha.org/   Resources YHF 2021 Second Standard Allocation Chapeau YHF 2021 First Standard Allocation Chapeau YHF 2021 Second Standard Allocation Strategy YHF 2021 First Standard Allocation Strategy YHF 2020 First Standard Allocation Strategy YHF 2020 Second Reserve Allocation Strategy YHF 2019 Third Reserve Allocation Strategy YHF 2019 Third Reserve Allocation Chapeau YHF 2019 First Standard Allocation Strategy YHF 2019 First Reserve Allocation Strategy YHF 2019 First Standard Allocation Chapeau YHF 2019 First Reserve Allocation Chapeau YHF 2018 First Standard Allocation Strategy YHF 2018 First Reserve Allocation Strategy YHF 2018 First Reserve Allocation Overview YHF 2018 Second Reserve Allocation Strategy YHF 2018 Second Reserve Allocation Overview   Resources About OCHA Yemen About the YHF Donor Contributions Allocation process Eligibility Governance, Policy and Guidance Contacts YHF Stories Information Products Latest Annual Report Yemen Humanitarian Fund Annual Report 2021 News & Updates 30 Sep 2022 Daily Noon Briefing Highlights: Ukraine, Ethiopia, DRC, Yemen, CERF, Burkina Faso More News & Updates Subscribe to receive OCHA's information products Subscribe Contact us OCHA Sites Follow us Facebook UNOCHA Twitter UNReliefChief Twitter LinkedIn Instagram YouTube Support us Governments, corporations and foundations: ocha.donor.relations@un.org Individuals can donate here: DONATE Copyright Terms of Use Privacy Notice © United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

Score: 1376111.5 - https://www.unocha.org/yemen/allocation-process

  Allocation process | OCHA

The project cycle management process for the YHF is done through an online platform allowing for better management and institutional memory: https://cbpf.unocha.org/   Resources YHF 2021 Second Standard Allocation Chapeau YHF 2021 First Standard Allocation Chapeau YHF 2021 Second Standard Allocation Strategy YHF 2021 First Standard Allocation Strategy YHF 2020 First Standard Allocation Strategy YHF 2020 Second Reserve Allocation Strategy YHF 2019 Third Reserve Allocation Strategy YHF 2019 Third Reserve Allocation Chapeau YHF 2019 First Standard Allocation Strategy YHF 2019 First Reserve Allocation Strategy YHF 2019 First Standard Allocation Chapeau YHF 2019 First Reserve Allocation Chapeau YHF 2018 First Standard Allocation Strategy YHF 2018 First Reserve Allocation Strategy YHF 2018 First Reserve Allocation Overview YHF 2018 Second Reserve Allocation Strategy YHF 2018 Second Reserve Allocation Overview   Resources About OCHA Yemen About the YHF Donor Contributions Allocation process Eligibility Governance, Policy and Guidance Contacts YHF Stories Information Products Latest Annual Report Yemen Humanitarian Fund Annual Report 2021 News & Updates 30 Sep 2022 Daily Noon Briefing Highlights: Ukraine, Ethiopia, DRC, Yemen, CERF, Burkina Faso More News & Updates Subscribe to receive OCHA's information products Subscribe Contact us OCHA Sites Follow us Facebook UNOCHA Twitter UNReliefChief Twitter LinkedIn Instagram YouTube Support us Governments, corporations and foundations: ocha.donor.relations@un.org Individuals can donate here: DONATE Copyright Terms of Use Privacy Notice © United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

Score: 1376111.5 - https://www.unocha.org/node/947919

  WTO | Appellate Body Repertory of Reports and Awards 1995-2010

WTO | Appellate Body Repertory of Reports and Awards 1995-2010 WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION Home   |  About WTO   |  News & events   |  Trade topics   |  WTO membership   |  Documents & resources   |  External relations Contact us   |  Site map   |  A-Z   |  Search español     français home > trade topics > dispute settlement > appellate body > repertory > index u-z SUBJECT INDEX BY CASE: ARBITRATION AWARDS UNDER ARTICLE 21.3(c) OF THE DSU U-Z   Index:  A-B    C-D   E-H   I   J   K-T   U-Z ON THIS PAGE: >  US — 1916 Act >  US — Gambling >  US — Hot-Rolled Steel >  US — Offset Act (Byrd Amendment) >  US — Oil Country Tubular Goods Sunset Reviews >  US — Section 110(5) Copyright Act >  US — Stainless Steel (Mexico)   US — 1916 Act ( WT/DS136/11 , WT/DS162/14 )     back to top burden of proof, “reasonable” period for compliance with DSB recommendations and rulings ARB.6 .4 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” burden of proof ARB.6 .4 complexity of implementation process ARB.5 .4.4-5 complexity of implementing measures ARB.5 .3.1 flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.5 .12.1 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.5 .1.8 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5 .1.8   US — Gambling ( WT/DS285/13 )     back to top implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) choice of means at Member’s discretion ARB.1 .12 legislative/administrative action ARB.5 .6.15-17 developing countries and (DSU 21.2) implementing Members, applicability to ARB.5 .10.8-9 “particular circumstance” (DSU 21.3(c)), whether ARB.5 .10.8-9 “reasonable period” ARB.5 .10.7-9 developing countries and (DSU 21.7 and DSU 27.8) ARB.5 .10.8 mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1 .12 , ARB.5 .6.15-17 prompt compliance (DSU 21.1), as key consideration ARB.4 .3.13 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” burden of proof ARB.6 .8 complexity of implementing measures ARB.5 .3.5 EU procedures and ARB.5 .12.4 flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.5 .12.4 legislative action on other measures, relevance ARB.5 .13.1-3 legislative schedule, relevance ARB.5 .11.2 multiple periods, possibility of ARB.4 .4.1 “reasonableness” as key consideration ARB.4 .3.13 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4 .3.13   US — Hot-Rolled Steel ( WT/DS184/13 )     back to top implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) consistency with WTO obligations, responsibility for determining ARB.1 .9 mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1 .9 , ARB.5 .3.3 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) ARB.4 .1.3-4 “reasonable period” administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB.5 .5.8 , ARB.5 .6.5 complexity of implementing measures ARB.5 .3.3 contentiousness, relevance ARB.5 .5.8 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4 .2.7   US — Offset Act (Byrd Amendment) ( WT/DS217/14 , WT/DS234/22 ) ARB.2 .9      back to top burden of proof developing countries and ARB.5 .10.5 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time, “reasonable period” ARB.6.5 -6 prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB.2 .9 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) choice of means at Member’s discretion ARB.3 .1.4 , ARB.3 .2.1 withdrawal or modification options ARB.3 .1.3 developing countries and (DSU 21.2) ARB.5 .10.5 mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1 .10 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB.5 .6.9 burden of proof ARB.6 .5-6 complexity of implementation process ARB.5 .4.10 , ARB.5 .6.10 complexity of implementing measures ARB.5 .3.4 “complexity” as legal criterion ARB.5 .5.10 contentiousness, relevance ARB.5 .5.10 economic harm likely to accrue to nationals of other Members, relevance ARB.5 .9.2 legislative schedule, relevance ARB.5 .11.1 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4 .3.8-9 , ARB.5 .9.2 , ARB.6 .5-6 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4 .1.5 , ARB.4 .2.9   US — Oil Country Tubular Goods Sunset Reviews ( WT/DS268/AB/R )     back to top implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) choice of means at Member’s discretion ARB.5 .6.14 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process, developing countries and ARB.5 .10.6 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” complexity of implementation process ARB.5 .6.13-14 flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.2.10, ARB.4 .3.12 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4 .3.12 , ARB.5 .6.14 , ARB.5 .10.6   US — Section 110(5) Copyright Act ( WT/DS160/12 )     back to top AB reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 17.14), as critical date for determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5 .2.1 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB.2 .6 actions taken since DSB adoption of report, relevance ARB.5 .2.1 discretion and ARB.2 .6 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” contentiousness, relevance ARB.5 .5.4 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4 .3.5 panel reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 16.4), as critical date for determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5 .2.1   US — Stainless Steel (Mexico) ( WT/DS344/AB/R )     back to top implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) choice of means at Member’s discretion legislative/administrative action ARB.5 .13.4-5 withdrawal or modification options ARB.1 .18 mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1 .17-18 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB.5 .13.4-5 complexity of implementing measures ARB.5 .3.6 contentiousness, relevance ARB.5 .5.12 relevant factors ARB.1 .17 precedent, implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), “reasonable period” ARB.5 .14.1   The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.        

Score: 1329663 - https://www.wto.org/english/tr...pertory_e/index_arbit_uz_e.htm

  WTO | Appellate Body Repertory of Reports and Awards 1995-2010

WTO | Appellate Body Repertory of Reports and Awards 1995-2010 WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION Home   |  About WTO   |  News & events   |  Trade topics   |  WTO membership   |  Documents & resources   |  External relations Contact us   |  Site map   |  A-Z   |  Search español     français home > trade topics > dispute settlement > appellate body > repertory > index c-d SUBJECT INDEX BY CASE: ARBITRATION AWARDS UNDER ARTICLE 21.3(c) OF THE DSU C-D   Index:  A-B    C-D   E-H   I   J   K-T   U-Z ON THIS PAGE: >  Canada — Autos >  Canada — Patent Term >  Canada — Pharmaceutical Patents >  Chile — Alcoholic Beverages >  Chile — Price Band System >  Colombia — Ports of Entry (Article 21.3(c))   Canada — Autos ( WT/DS139/12 ; WT/DS142/12 )     back to top implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB.2 .5 discretion and ARB.2 .5 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.5 .1.7 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4 .2.6 , ARB.5 .1.7   Canada — Patent Term ( WT/DS170/10 )     back to top implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” contentiousness, relevance ARB.5 .5.5-7 economic harm likely to accrue to nationals of other Members, relevance ARB.5 .9.1 flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.5 .12.2 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.5 .1.9 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5 .1.9 TRIPS, patents, term of protection (TRIPS 33), economic consequences of termination of non-WTO consistent measure, relevance ARB.5 .9.1   Canada — Pharmaceutical Patents ( WT/DS114/13 )     back to top burden of proof, “reasonable” period for compliance with DSB recommendations and rulings ARB.5 .6.4 , ARB.6 .2-3 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) consistency with WTO obligations, responsibility for determining ARB.1 .4-8 mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1 .4-8 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) ARB.4 .1.1-2 “reasonable period” administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB.5 .6.3 burden of proof ARB.5 .6.4 , ARB.6 .2-3 complexity of implementing measures ARB.5 .3.2 , ARB.5 .5.2 contentiousness, relevance ARB.5 .5.2-3 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4 .3.4 , ARB.5 .1.5-6 structural adjustment, relevance of need for ARB.5 .7.2 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4 .2.5 , ARB.5 .1.5-6   Chile — Alcoholic Beverages ( WT/DS87/15 ; WT/DS110/14 )     back to top implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) developing countries and (DSU 21.2), “reasonable period” ARB.5 .10.2-3 prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB.2 .4 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” contentiousness, relevance ARB.5 .5.1 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4 .3.3 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4 .2.4 , ARB.5 .1.4   Chile — Price Band System ( WT/DS207/13 )     back to top AB reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 17.14), as critical date for determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5 .2.2 compliance, WTO obligations, good faith / pacta sunt servanda principle ARB.5 .4.9 good faith (including pacta sunt servanda principle (VCLT 26)) compliance with WTO obligations ARB.5 .4.9 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) ARB.5 .4.9 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) developing countries and (DSU 21.2), “reasonable period” ARB.5 .10.4 good faith obligation ARB.5 .4.9 prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB.2 .8 actions taken since DSB adoption of report, relevance ARB.5 .2.2 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) ARB.2 .8 “reasonable period” administrative measures as means of implementation, relevance ARB.5 .5.9 complexity of implementation process ARB.5 .4.6-9 , ARB.5 .6.6-8 contentiousness, relevance ARB.5 .5.9 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4 .3.6-7 , ARB.5 .1.10 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4 .2.8 , ARB.5 .1.10 panel reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 16.4), as critical date for determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5 .2.2   Colombia — Ports of Entry (Article 21.3(c)) ( WT/DS366/13 )    back to top burden of proof, implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time, “reasonable” period ARB.6 .12 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) choice of means at Member’s discretion withdrawal or modification options ARB.1 .19 , ARB.3 .1.6 withdrawal of WTO-inconsistent measure as first objective ARB.3 .1.6 , ARB.3.1. 19 developing countries and (DSU 21.2) ARB.5 .10.13 mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1 .19 prompt compliance (DSU 21.1), actions taken since DSB adoption of report, relevance ARB.5 .2.4 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” burden of proof ARB.6 .12 complexity of implementing measures ARB.5 .3.7 contentiousness, relevance ARB.5 .5.13 flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.4 .3.16 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4 .3.17 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5 .1.12 panel reports, adoption by DSB (DSU 16.4), as critical date for determining prompt compliance (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.5 .2.4   The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.        

Score: 1310196.1 - https://www.wto.org/english/tr...pertory_e/index_arbit_cd_e.htm

  WTO | Appellate Body Repertory of Reports and Awards 1995-2010

WTO | Appellate Body Repertory of Reports and Awards 1995-2010 WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION Home   |  About WTO   |  News & events   |  Trade topics   |  WTO membership   |  Documents & resources   |  External relations Contact us   |  Site map   |  A-Z   |  Search español     français home > trade topics > dispute settlement > appellate body > repertory > index e-h SUBJECT INDEX BY CASE: ARBITRATION AWARDS UNDER ARTICLE 21.3(c) OF THE DSU E-H   Index:  A-B    C-D   E-H   I   J   K-T   U-Z ON THIS PAGE: >  EC — Bananas III >  EC — Chicken Cuts >  EC — Export Subsidies on Sugar >  EC — Hormones >  EC — Hormones >  EC — Tariff Preferences   EC — Bananas III ( WT/DS27/15 )     back to top implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau), “reasonable period”, complexity of implementation process ARB.5 .4.1   EC — Chicken Cuts ( WT/DS269/13 , WT/DS286/15 )     back to top implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) choice of means at Member’s discretion ARB.1 .13 legislative/administrative action ARB.5 .6.23-4 developing countries and (DSU 21.2) Member other than implementing Member, applicability to ARB.5 .10.12 “reasonable period” ARB.5 .10.12 developing countries and (DSU 21.7 and DSU 27.8) ARB.5 .10.11 mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1 .13-14 prompt compliance (DSU 21.1), actions taken since DSB adoption of report, relevance ARB.5 .2.3 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” burden of proof ARB.4 .2.10 , ARB.6 .10 dependence on decision of organ outside WTO Member’s own legal system, relevance ARB.4 .1.8 , ARB.5 .6.22 EU procedures and ARB.5 .6.22-4 flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.4 .3.14 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4 .1.8   EC — Export Subsidies on Sugar ( WT/DS265/33 , WT/DS266/33 , WT/DS283/14 )     back to top burden of proof, implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time ARB.5 .6.21 good faith (including pacta sunt servanda principle (VCLT 26)), implementation of recommendations and rulings of DSB (DSU 21) ARB.5 .6.18 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) choice of means at Member’s discretion ARB.5 .6.18 developing countries and (DSU 21.2) consultation with, relevance of need for ARB.5 .10.10 Member other than implementing Member, applicability to ARB.5 .10.11 “reasonable period” ARB.5 .10.10-11 good faith obligation ARB.5 .6.18 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” burden of proof ARB.5 .6.21 , ARB.6 .9 EU procedures and ARB.5 .6.18-21 flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.4 .1.7 , ARB.5 .6.20 , ARB.5 .12.5 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4 .1.7 , ARB.5 .6.19-22 structural adjustment, relevance of need for ARB.5 .7.4 “time … shorter or longer, depending on the particular circumstances” (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4 .1.7   EC — Hormones ( WT/DS26/15 , WT/DS48/13 )     back to top burden of proof, “reasonable” period for compliance with DSB recommendations and rulings ARB.6 .1 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21) choice of means at Member’s discretion ARB.1 .1 consistency with WTO obligations, responsibility for determining ARB.1 .1 mandate of arbitrator, limitation to determination of reasonable period of time for implementation (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.1 .1 prompt compliance (DSU 21.1) ARB.2 .2-3 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) “reasonable period” 15-month guideline (DSU 21.3(c)) ARB.4 .2.1 burden of proof ARB.6 .1 complexity of implementation process ARB.5 .4.2-3 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4 .3.1 time to conduct studies, exclusion ARB.2 .2-3 , ARB.5 .4.3 risk assessment, need for (SPS 5.1-5.3 and Annex A, para. 4), compliance with DSB recommendation and ARB.2 .3 , ARB.5 .4.3   EC — Hormones ( WT/DS26/AB/R , WT/DS48/AB/R )     back to top interpretation of covered agreements, ordinary meaning, “should not exceed” ARB.4 .2.1   EC — Tariff Preferences ( WT/DS246/14 )     back to top burden of proof, “reasonable” period for compliance with DSB recommendations and rulings ARB.4 .2.10 , ARB.6 .7 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), choice of means at Member’s discretion ARB.1 .11 implementation of DSB recommendations and rulings (DSU 21), impracticality of immediate compliance / reasonable period of time (DSU 21.3, chapeau) ARB.4 .1.6 “reasonable period” burden of proof ARB.4 .2.10 , ARB.6 .7 complexity of implementation process ARB.5 .4.11-12 , ARB.5 .6.11-12 contentiousness, relevance ARB.5 .5.11 EU procedures and ARB.5.4.11-12 , ARB.5 .5.11 , ARB.5 .6.11-12 flexibility of legislative process, obligation to use ARB.5 .12.3 shortest period possible within Member’s normal legislative process ARB.4 .3.10-11   The texts reproduced here do not have the legal standing of the original documents which are entrusted and kept at the WTO Secretariat in Geneva.        

Score: 1296292.3 - https://www.wto.org/english/tr...pertory_e/index_arbit_eh_e.htm

  WTO | Appellate Body Repertory of Reports and Awards 1995-2013 - Regional Trade Agreements

Thus, the purpose set forth in paragraph 4 informs the other relevant paragraphs of Article XXIV, including the chapeau of paragraph 5. For this reason, the chapeau of paragraph 5, and the conditions set forth therein for establishing the availability of a defence under Article XXIV, must be interpreted in the light of the purpose of customs unions set forth in paragraph 4. The chapeau cannot be interpreted correctly without constant reference to this purpose.   R.1.2   Article XXIV:5 — Chapeau    back to top R.1.2.1   Turkey — Textiles , para. 45 ( WT/DS34/AB/R )   First, in examining the text of the chapeau to establish its ordinary meaning, we note that the chapeau states that the provisions of the GATT 1994 “ shall not prevent ” the formation of a customs union.

Score: 1293705.7 - https://www.wto.org/english/tr...e/dispu_e/repertory_e/r1_e.htm

  WTO | Appellate Body Repertory of Reports and Awards 1995-2013 - General Exceptions: Article XIV of

As a result, there was no need for the Panel to have analyzed evidence relating to the supply of gambling services specifically from Antigua , and we see no error in the Panel’s decision not to make an assessment of the Antiguan industry.   G.4.5   Chapeau of Article XIV    back to top G.4.5.1   US — Gambling , para. 339 ( WT/DS285/AB/R , WT/DS285/AB/R/Corr.1 )   … The focus of the chapeau, by its express terms, is on the application of a measure already found by the Panel to be inconsistent with one of the obligations under the GATS but falling within one of the paragraphs of Article XIV. (...) Such an assessment is inadequate, the United States argues, because the chapeau also requires a determination of whether differential treatment, or discrimination, is “arbitrary” or “unjustifiable”.   The United States based its defence under the chapeau of Article XIV on the assertion that the measures at issue prohibit the remote supply of gambling and betting services by any supplier , whether domestic or foreign.

Score: 1269214.9 - https://www.wto.org/english/tr...e/dispu_e/repertory_e/g4_e.htm