Home

Option 1: The SBSTA [and the SBI ]also noted the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the adverse impacts of policies and measures, and that understanding of this could be achieved through: (a) Assessments of potential impacts and observed impacts carried out by, inter alia, relevant national institutions and international organizations; (b) Information from work being carried out by other UNFCCC bodies that may be relevant in considering potential impacts. (...) Option 3: Noting the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the potential impacts of response measures.

FCCC/SBSTA/2009/L.18 3 GE.09-71160 5 bis [Noting the [complexities] of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures] 6. (...) The SBSTA [and the SBI] requested the secretariat to compile the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above into a miscellaneous document for [their] consideration. 9. [Noting the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures,] the SBSTA [and the SBI] agreed to continue its [their] consideration of these issues at its [their] XX session, including consideration of the need for a [joint] workshop to share further information among Parties and relevant experts and the information contained in the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above. 10.

The SBI [and the SBSTA] noted that national communications under Article 12, paragraph 1, of the Convention would be an appropriate means for sharing the information referred to in paragraph 3 above. 5 bis [Noting the [complexities] of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures] 6. (...) The SBI [and the SBSTA] requested the secretariat to compile the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above into a miscellaneous document for [their] consideration. 9. [Noting the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures,] the SBI [and the SBSTA] agreed to continue its [their] consideration of these issues at its [their] XX session, including consideration of the need for a [joint] workshop to share further information among Parties and relevant experts and the information contained in the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above. 10.

Option 1: The SBI [and the SBSTA ]also noted the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the adverse impacts of policies and measures, and that understanding of this could be achieved through: (a) Assessments of potential impacts and observed impacts carried out by, inter alia, relevant national institutions and international organizations; (b) Information from work being carried out by other UNFCCC bodies that may be relevant in considering potential impacts. (...) Option 3: The SBI [and the SBSTA ]noted the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the potential impacts of response measures.

The SBSTA [and the SBI] requested the secretariat to compile the submissions referred to in paragraph 5 above into a miscellaneous document for their consideration. 7. [Noting the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures,] the SBSTA [and the SBI] agreed to continue its consideration of these issues at its XX session, including consideration of the need for a [joint] workshop to share further information among Parties and relevant experts and the information contained in the submissions referred to in paragraph 5 above. 7 bis The SBSTA requested the secretariat to organize, before the [sixth session] of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol, a workshop to explore tools and methodologies, including modelling tools, to help analyse and assess the adverse impact of policies and measures undertaken by Parties included in Annex I to the Convention, involving guidance by relevant experts

Instead, it depicts the complex situation in the territories in an over-simplified manner, while omitting the systematic pattern of Palestinian violations that trigger the use of imperative defensive security measures. 7. (...) Remarks made by the Special Rapporteur, such as his call upon Israel to end “the regime of closures and curfews”(para. 62), demonstrate that he is detached from any basic and realistic understanding of the complexities and the daily terrorist threats in these areas. 22. (...) It makes no effort to understand or to accurately convey the complexities of the issues it raises. It merely presents uncorroborated reports and reiterates partisan political views without question or criticism.

No measures can fully capture individuals’ complex experiences of social justice; however, the indicators suggested in the present paper highlight the sectors that are most vital to social justice and provide a means of concretely evaluating change and progress in the Arab region. (...) However, comparing urban to rural areas, men to women in labour markets and higher education, and income differences by education level highlights several complexities and compounded vulnerabilities in those measures.

A/HRC/14/NI/8 3 GE.10-13581 Further the Commission will use the Inquiry to consider and develop a clear understanding on the extent of the complexities in human trafficking in Scotland with learning for Great Britain and beyond.

The SBSTA [and the SBI] noted that national communications under Article 12, paragraph 1, of the Convention would be an appropriate means for sharing the information referred to in paragraph 3 above. 5.bis [Noting the [complexities] of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures.] 6. (...) The SBSTA [and the SBI] requested the secretariat to compile the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above into a miscellaneous document for [their] consideration. 9. [Noting the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures,] the SBSTA [and the SBI] agreed to continue its [their] consideration of these issues at its [their] XX session, including consideration of the need for a [joint] workshop to share further information among Parties and relevant experts and the information contained in the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above. 10.

Further distinctions were also effected with respect to areas formerly under UNTAES control. Additional complexities were introduced by legislation dealing specifically with property rights deriving from tenancy/occupancy regimes applicable in the former Yugoslavia. (...) Applications under this scheme were accepted up to 30 June 2005. 27. This complex legal regime was twinned with a similarly complex administrative apparatus, with differing and changing competencies at national, regional and local levels concerning implementation and administration of the relevant laws. (...) While the complexities of these issues will inevitably complicate to a certain extent legislation adopted to respond to the issues, it is at the same time vital that legislation is of a comprehensive, accessible nature.