Home

Option 1: The SBSTA [and the SBI ]also noted the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the adverse impacts of policies and measures, and that understanding of this could be achieved through: a) Assessments of potential impacts and observed impacts carried out by, inter alia, relevant national institutions and international organizations; b) Information from work being carried out by other UNFCCC bodies that may be relevant in considering potential impacts. (...) Option 3: Noting the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the potential impacts of response measures.

The SBSTA [and the SBI] noted that national communications under Article 12, paragraph 1, of the Convention would be an appropriate means for sharing the information referred to in paragraph 3 above. 5 bis [Noting the [complexities] of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures] 6. (...) The SBSTA [and the SBI] requested the secretariat to compile the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above into a miscellaneous document for [their] consideration. 9. [Noting the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures,] the SBSTA [and the SBI] agreed to continue its [their] consideration of these issues at its [their] XX session, including consideration of the need for a [joint] workshop to share further information among Parties and relevant experts and the information contained in the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above. 10.

The SBI [and the SBSTA] noted that national communications under Article 12, paragraph 1, of the Convention would be an appropriate means for sharing the information referred to in paragraph 3 above. 5 bis [Noting the [complexities] of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures] 6. (...) The SBI [and the SBSTA] requested the secretariat to compile the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above into a miscellaneous document for [their] consideration. 9. [Noting the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures,] the SBI [and the SBSTA] agreed to continue its [their] consideration of these issues at its [their] XX session, including consideration of the need for a [joint] workshop to share further information among Parties and relevant experts and the information contained in the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above. 10.

Option 1: The SBI [and the SBSTA ]also noted the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the adverse impacts of policies and measures, and that understanding of this could be achieved through: a) Assessments of potential impacts and observed impacts carried out by, inter alia, relevant national institutions and international organizations; b) Information from work being carried out by other UNFCCC bodies that may be relevant in considering potential impacts. (...) FCCC/SBI/2010/L.14 4 GE.10-70283 Option 3: The SBI [and the SBSTA ]noted the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the potential impacts of response measures.

The SBI [and the SBSTA] acknowledged related discussions under other UNFCCC bodies such as the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention and the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol, and encouraged Parties to ensure coordination of activities and information across the bodies in order [to ensure a coherent and consistent approach] to better address the issues mentioned in paragraph 2 above. 3 bis The SBI and the SBSTA noted the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures. 4.

The SBSTA [and the SBI] requested the secretariat to compile the submissions referred to in paragraph 5 above into a miscellaneous document for their consideration. 7. [Noting the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures,] the SBSTA [and the SBI] agreed to continue its consideration of these issues at its XX session, including consideration of the need for a [joint] workshop to share further information among Parties and relevant experts and the information contained in the submissions referred to in paragraph 5 above. 7 bis The SBSTA requested the secretariat to organize, before the [sixth session] of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol, a workshop to explore tools and methodologies, including modelling tools, to help analyse and assess the adverse impact of policies and measures undertaken by Parties included in Annex I to the Convention, involving guidance by relevant experts.] -----

The SBSTA [and the SBI] noted that national communications under Article 12, paragraph 1, of the Convention would be an appropriate means for sharing the information referred to in paragraph 3 above. 5.bis [Noting the [complexities] of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures.] 6. (...) The SBSTA [and the SBI] requested the secretariat to compile the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above into a miscellaneous document for [their] consideration. 9. [Noting the complexities of assessing the attribution and causation of the [adverse] impacts of policies and measures,] the SBSTA [and the SBI] agreed to continue its [their] consideration of these issues at its [their] XX session, including consideration of the need for a [joint] workshop to share further information among Parties and relevant experts and the information contained in the submissions referred to in paragraph 7 above. 10.

A/HRC/14/NI/8 GE.10-13586 3 Further the Commission will use the Inquiry to consider and develop a clear understanding on the extent of the complexities in human trafficking in Scotland with learning for Great Britain and beyond.

Applications under this scheme were accepted up to 30 June 2005. 27. This complex legal regime was twinned with a similarly complex administrative apparatus, with differing and changing competencies at national, regional and local levels concerning implementation and administration of the relevant laws. (...) Internal displacement stirs up numerous difficult legal issues, amongst which the most complex often involve resolution of property issues, including reconstruction, repossession and return. While the complexities of these issues will inevitably complicate to a certain extent legislation adopted to respond to the issues, it is at the same time vital that legislation is of a comprehensive, accessible nature.

Coordinating the mobilization of multiple research fields favours the identification of associations between technical solutions in the scope of water supply and sanitation services, different management structures, institutional structures, financial considerations, power relations, social complexities and other constraints, and the realization of the rights.