Home

  Decision on the request for leave to appeal the Decision on the Prosecutor’s Second Request to Postp

Decision on the request for leave to appeal the Decision on the Prosecutor’s Second Request to Postpone the Confirmation Hearing and Requests for Variation of Disclosure Related Time Limit | International Criminal Court Skip to main content Trying individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression EN FR Main navigation Home About The Court Organization Presidency Judicial Divisions Office of the Prosecutor Defence Victims Witnesses Registry State Parties Cooperation Outreach Trust Fund for Victims Office of the Prosecutor Situations and Cases Cases Defendants Investigations Uganda Democratic Republic of the Congo Darfur, Sudan Central Afican Republic Kenya Libya Côte d'Ivoire Mali Central African Republic II Georgia Burundi Bangladesh/Myanmar Afghanistan State of Palestine Republic of the Philippines Venezuela I Ukraine Preliminary Examinations Nigeria Venezuela II ... ⋯ News Documents Court Records All Records Judgments, Decisions and Orders Matter Outside Situations Core Legal Texts Reports Factsheets Official Journal Administrative Issuances Resource Library Library Legal Tools Practical Information Court Calendar Contact Us Visit Us Vendors Get Involved #JusticeMatters #MoreJustWorld #AccessToJustice #SDG16 Share Stories Resources For Academics and Researches Diplomats Legal professionals Media NGOs Teachers and high school students Vacancies Search Breadcrumb Home Court Record Icc 02 05 01 Decision on the request for leave to appeal the Decision on the Prosecutor’s Second Request to Postpone the Confirmation Hearing and Requests for Variation of Disclosure Related Time Limit Decision on the request for leave to appeal the Decision on the Prosecutor’s Second Request to Postpone the Confirmation Hearing and Requests for Variation of Disclosure Related Time Limit ICC-02/05-01/20-266 25 January 2021 | Pre-Trial Chamber II | Decision Case: The Prosecutor v. (...) Report an error Social Media Links Twitter Facebook Instagram Youtube Flickr Tumblr About The Court How the Court works Organization State Parties Cooperation Outreach Trust Fund for Victims Situations and Cases Cases Defendants Investigations Preliminary examinations Documents Core Legal Texts Reports Factsheets Official Journal Administrative Issuances Resource Library Library All records Judgments, Decisions and Orders Practical information Vacancies Court calendar Contact us Visit us Vendors Get Involved Footer menu Terms and conditions of use Privacy Policy

Score: 907860.7 - https://www.icc-cpi.int/court-record/icc-02/05-01/20-266

  Decision on the Prosecution’s witness order and variation of time limit for filing applications for

Decision on the Prosecution’s witness order and variation of time limit for filing applications for in-court protective measures | International Criminal Court Skip to main content Trying individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression EN FR Main navigation Home About The Court Organization Presidency Judicial Divisions Office of the Prosecutor Defence Victims Witnesses Registry State Parties Cooperation Outreach Trust Fund for Victims Office of the Prosecutor Situations and Cases Cases Defendants Investigations Uganda Democratic Republic of the Congo Darfur, Sudan Central Afican Republic Kenya Libya Côte d'Ivoire Mali Central African Republic II Georgia Burundi Bangladesh/Myanmar Afghanistan State of Palestine Republic of the Philippines Venezuela I Ukraine Preliminary Examinations Nigeria Venezuela II ... ⋯ News Documents Court Records All Records Judgments, Decisions and Orders Matter Outside Situations Core Legal Texts Reports Factsheets Official Journal Administrative Issuances Resource Library Library Legal Tools Practical Information Court Calendar Contact Us Visit Us Vendors Get Involved #JusticeMatters #MoreJustWorld #AccessToJustice #SDG16 Share Stories Resources For Academics and Researches Diplomats Legal professionals Media NGOs Teachers and high school students Vacancies Search Breadcrumb Home Court Record Icc 01 12 01 Decision on the Prosecution’s witness order and variation of time limit for filing applications for in-court protective measures Decision on the Prosecution’s witness order and variation of time limit for filing applications for in-court protective measures ICC-01/12-01/18-968 22 July 2020 | Trial Chamber X | Decision Case: The Prosecutor v. (...) Report an error Social Media Links Twitter Facebook Instagram Youtube Flickr Tumblr About The Court How the Court works Organization State Parties Cooperation Outreach Trust Fund for Victims Situations and Cases Cases Defendants Investigations Preliminary examinations Documents Core Legal Texts Reports Factsheets Official Journal Administrative Issuances Resource Library Library All records Judgments, Decisions and Orders Practical information Vacancies Court calendar Contact us Visit us Vendors Get Involved Footer menu Terms and conditions of use Privacy Policy

Score: 907860.7 - https://www.icc-cpi.int/court-record/icc-01/12-01/18-968

  Public redacted version of Decision on the Prosecution requests for variation of the time limit for

Public redacted version of Decision on the Prosecution requests for variation of the time limit for disclosure of certain documents | International Criminal Court Skip to main content Trying individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression EN FR Main navigation Home About The Court Organization Presidency Judicial Divisions Office of the Prosecutor Defence Victims Witnesses Registry State Parties Cooperation Outreach Trust Fund for Victims Office of the Prosecutor Situations and Cases Cases Defendants Investigations Uganda Democratic Republic of the Congo Darfur, Sudan Central Afican Republic Kenya Libya Côte d'Ivoire Mali Central African Republic II Georgia Burundi Bangladesh/Myanmar Afghanistan State of Palestine Republic of the Philippines Venezuela I Ukraine Preliminary Examinations Nigeria Venezuela II ... ⋯ News Documents Court Records All Records Judgments, Decisions and Orders Matter Outside Situations Core Legal Texts Reports Factsheets Official Journal Administrative Issuances Resource Library Library Legal Tools Practical Information Court Calendar Contact Us Visit Us Vendors Get Involved #JusticeMatters #MoreJustWorld #AccessToJustice #SDG16 Share Stories Resources For Academics and Researches Diplomats Legal professionals Media NGOs Teachers and high school students Vacancies Search Breadcrumb Home Court Record Icc 02 11 01 Public redacted version of Decision on the Prosecution requests for variation of the time limit for disclosure of certain documents Public redacted version of Decision on the Prosecution requests for variation of the time limit for disclosure of certain documents ICC-02/11-01/15-183-Red 18 August 2015 | Trial Chamber I | Decision Case: The Prosecutor v. (...) Report an error Social Media Links Twitter Facebook Instagram Youtube Flickr Tumblr About The Court How the Court works Organization State Parties Cooperation Outreach Trust Fund for Victims Situations and Cases Cases Defendants Investigations Preliminary examinations Documents Core Legal Texts Reports Factsheets Official Journal Administrative Issuances Resource Library Library All records Judgments, Decisions and Orders Practical information Vacancies Court calendar Contact us Visit us Vendors Get Involved Footer menu Terms and conditions of use Privacy Policy

Score: 907860.7 - https://www.icc-cpi.int/court-record/icc-02/11-01/15-183-red

  Presentación de PowerPoint

Sum of Guayaquil, Ecuador; El Callao, Peru; Arica, Iquique, Antofagasta, San Antonio, Talcahuano, Valparaíso, Chile 2.4% -1.8% -8.7% -7.8% -9.5% -8.0% -4.2% -3.0% -8.9% -10.7% -10.9% -11.6% -15.7% -17.1% -16.4% -16.6% -20.0% -15.0% -10.0% -5.0% 0.0% 5.0% jan-feb jan-mar jan-apr jan-may jan-jun jan-jul jan-aug jan-sep Variation Exports 2020/2019 Variation Imports 2020/2019 Linear (Variation Exports 2020/2019) Linear (Variation Imports 2020/2019) Total trade Guayaquil, Ecuador Source: Autoridad Portuaria de Guayaquil; Notes: Variations of TEU; In 2019, Guayaquil represented 91.4% of the national container throughput. 1.1% 0.9% -3.8% -1.8% -3.9% -3.4% 0.8% 0.1% 5.3% -0.4% 2.3% -1.2% -3.5% -5.6% -8.7% -12.3% -14.0% -12.0% -10.0% -8.0% -6.0% -4.0% -2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% jan-feb jan-mar jan-apr jan-may jan-jun jan-jul jan-aug jan-sep Variation Exports 2020/2019 Variation Imports 2020/2019 Linear (Variation Exports 2020/2019) Linear (Variation Imports 2020/2019) Total trade El Callao, Peru Source: Autoridad Portuaria Nacional de Perú; Notes: Variations of TEU; In 2019, El Callao represented 86.4% of the national container throughput. -7.9% -11.2% -17.9% -18.3% -20.1% -15.3% -8.9% -6.2% 0.5% -4.6% -5.1% -6.9% -13.2% -14.5% -13.3% -12.7% -25.0% -20.0% -15.0% -10.0% -5.0% 0.0% 5.0% jan-feb jan-mar jan-apr jan-may jan-jun jan-jul jan-aug jan-sep Variation Exports 2020/2019 Variation Imports 2020/2019 Linear (Variation Exports 2020/2019) Linear (Variation Imports 2020/2019) Total trade Chile Source: Ministerio de Transportes y Telecomunicaciones de Chile; Notes: Variations of TEU; Only the public ports of Chile were considered: Arica, Iquique, Antofagasta, San Antonio, Talcahuano, Valparaíso. 9.6% 2.5% -5.6% -4.6% -6.1% -5.8% -3.4% -2.4% -17.7% -16.7% -16.9% -16.6% -19.3% -20.6% -19.9% -20.1%-21.0% -16.0% -11.0% -6.0% -1.0% 4.0% 9.0% jan-feb jan-mar jan-apr jan-may jan-jun jan-jul jan-aug jan-sep Variation Exports 2020/2019 Variation Imports 2020/2019 Linear (Variation Exports 2020/2019) Linear (Variation Imports 2020/2019) Ricardo J.

Score: 902202.1 - https://www.cepal.org/sites/de...iles/2020_3q_ports_wcsa_en.pdf

  Compare the pesticide products | Boîte à outils pour l’homologation des pesticides | Organisation de

If this is the case, acceptable variations in the a.i. concentration are indicated in Table 1. (...) Indicative acceptable variations in hazardous constituents of a pesticide product Variation in the concentration of hazardous constituents of a pesticide formulation (i.e. the active ingredient and hazardous co-formulants) which are considered to not significantly affect the hazard of that formulation. Concentration range (C) of the hazardous constituent Acceptable variation in concentration C <= 0.5 % 100 % 0.5 < C <= 1.0 % 50 % 1.0 < C <= 2.5 % 30 % 2.5 < C <= 10 % 20 % 10 < C <= 25 % 10 % 25 < C <= 100 % 5 % Sources: EU (2008) & EC (2012) Relevant impurities in the active ingredient should always be below the maximum limits set in manufacturing specifications, both for the local and the reference product.

Score: 902191.6 - https://www.fao.org/pesticide-...are-the-pesticide-products/fr/

  Compare the pesticide products | Pesticide Registration Toolkit | 联合国粮食及 农业组织

If this is the case, acceptable variations in the a.i. concentration are indicated in Table 1. (...) Indicative acceptable variations in hazardous constituents of a pesticide product Variation in the concentration of hazardous constituents of a pesticide formulation (i.e. the active ingredient and hazardous co-formulants) which are considered to not significantly affect the hazard of that formulation. Concentration range (C) of the hazardous constituent Acceptable variation in concentration C <= 0.5 % 100 % 0.5 < C <= 1.0 % 50 % 1.0 < C <= 2.5 % 30 % 2.5 < C <= 10 % 20 % 10 < C <= 25 % 10 % 25 < C <= 100 % 5 % Sources: EU (2008) & EC (2012) Relevant impurities in the active ingredient should always be below the maximum limits set in manufacturing specifications, both for the local and the reference product.

Score: 902191.6 - https://www.fao.org/pesticide-...are-the-pesticide-products/zh/

  Compare the pesticide products | مجموعة أدوات تسجيل مبيدات الآفات | منظمة الأغذية والزراعة للأمم الم

If this is the case, acceptable variations in the a.i. concentration are indicated in Table 1. (...) Indicative acceptable variations in hazardous constituents of a pesticide product Variation in the concentration of hazardous constituents of a pesticide formulation (i.e. the active ingredient and hazardous co-formulants) which are considered to not significantly affect the hazard of that formulation. Concentration range (C) of the hazardous constituent Acceptable variation in concentration C <= 0.5 % 100 % 0.5 < C <= 1.0 % 50 % 1.0 < C <= 2.5 % 30 % 2.5 < C <= 10 % 20 % 10 < C <= 25 % 10 % 25 < C <= 100 % 5 % Sources: EU (2008) & EC (2012) Relevant impurities in the active ingredient should always be below the maximum limits set in manufacturing specifications, both for the local and the reference product.

Score: 902191.6 - https://www.fao.org/pesticide-...are-the-pesticide-products/ar/

  Compare the pesticide products | Pesticide Registration Toolkit | Food and Agriculture Organization

If this is the case, acceptable variations in the a.i. concentration are indicated in Table 1. (...) Indicative acceptable variations in hazardous constituents of a pesticide product Variation in the concentration of hazardous constituents of a pesticide formulation (i.e. the active ingredient and hazardous co-formulants) which are considered to not significantly affect the hazard of that formulation. Concentration range (C) of the hazardous constituent Acceptable variation in concentration C <= 0.5 % 100 % 0.5 < C <= 1.0 % 50 % 1.0 < C <= 2.5 % 30 % 2.5 < C <= 10 % 20 % 10 < C <= 25 % 10 % 25 < C <= 100 % 5 % Sources: EU (2008) & EC (2012) Relevant impurities in the active ingredient should always be below the maximum limits set in manufacturing specifications, both for the local and the reference product.

Score: 902191.6 - https://www.fao.org/pesticide-...are-the-pesticide-products/en/

  Compare the pesticide products | Вебсайты с инструментарием регистрации пестицидов | Продовольственн

If this is the case, acceptable variations in the a.i. concentration are indicated in Table 1. (...) Indicative acceptable variations in hazardous constituents of a pesticide product Variation in the concentration of hazardous constituents of a pesticide formulation (i.e. the active ingredient and hazardous co-formulants) which are considered to not significantly affect the hazard of that formulation. Concentration range (C) of the hazardous constituent Acceptable variation in concentration C <= 0.5 % 100 % 0.5 < C <= 1.0 % 50 % 1.0 < C <= 2.5 % 30 % 2.5 < C <= 10 % 20 % 10 < C <= 25 % 10 % 25 < C <= 100 % 5 % Sources: EU (2008) & EC (2012) Relevant impurities in the active ingredient should always be below the maximum limits set in manufacturing specifications, both for the local and the reference product.

Score: 902191.6 - https://www.fao.org/pesticide-...are-the-pesticide-products/ru/

  Compare the pesticide products | Kit de Herramientas para el Registro de Plaguicidas | Organización

If this is the case, acceptable variations in the a.i. concentration are indicated in Table 1. (...) Indicative acceptable variations in hazardous constituents of a pesticide product Variation in the concentration of hazardous constituents of a pesticide formulation (i.e. the active ingredient and hazardous co-formulants) which are considered to not significantly affect the hazard of that formulation. Concentration range (C) of the hazardous constituent Acceptable variation in concentration C <= 0.5 % 100 % 0.5 < C <= 1.0 % 50 % 1.0 < C <= 2.5 % 30 % 2.5 < C <= 10 % 20 % 10 < C <= 25 % 10 % 25 < C <= 100 % 5 % Sources: EU (2008) & EC (2012) Relevant impurities in the active ingredient should always be below the maximum limits set in manufacturing specifications, both for the local and the reference product.

Score: 902191.6 - https://www.fao.org/pesticide-...are-the-pesticide-products/es/