Home

Results 1 - 10 of 294,804 for conducting. Search took 1.252 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
(h) An “offender” is a person who has engaged in prohibited conduct. An “alleged offender” is a person who is alleged to have engaged in prohibited conduct. (...) Staff members who are alleged to have engaged in prohibited conduct may be subject to disciplinary or other administrative action in accordance with the Administrative Instruction on Unsatisfactory Conduct and Disciplinary Proceedings. (...) All services of the Court’s Ombudsperson are tailored to the specific circumstances of the case and nothing is done without agreement. 5.11 An unsuccessful attempt to resolve the matter informally does not preclude it from being formally reported. 14 Section 6 Submission, Receipt and Handling of Formal Reports of Suspected Prohibited Conduct Formal reporting of suspected prohibited conduct 6.1 Formal reports of suspected prohibited conduct may be made by persons who consider that they are affected individuals or by persons who have knowledge of suspected prohibited conduct, including individuals who are not employed by the Court. 6.2 Formal reports of suspected prohibited conduct shall be made in accordance with section 4 of the Administrative Instruction on Investigations of Unsatisfactory Conduct. 6.3 Formal reports of suspected prohibited conduct, including any suspected prohibited conduct having taken place prior to the entry into force of the present Administrative Instruction, are not subject to time limits. 6.4 Formal reports of suspected prohibited conduct may be made anonymously.
Language:English
Score: 532831.8 - https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/...D%20ABUSE%20OF%20AUTHORITY.pdf
Data Source: un
Objectives of the Code of Conduct 2-3 3 III. Other Codes of Conduct 4-5 3 IV. (...) III. Other Codes of Conduct 4. The United Nations has promoted a large number of codes of conduct, in a variety of fields. It has also developed various framework documents that operate similar to a code of conduct. Here are a few examples of UN codes of conduct and framework documents that seek to establish international norms of conduct: (1) UN International Code of Conduct for Public Officials, GA Res. 51/59 Annex (12 December 1996). (2) Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials, G.A.
Language:English
Score: 530842.7 - https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-...14/10/3STM_EC18_2007_CRP17.pdf
Data Source: un
PowerPoint Presentation CORSIA Implementation ICAO Secretariat ICAO Seminar on CORSIA 2 © ICAO 2017 a) Assessment of States’ Current Readiness b) Timeline for CORSIA Implementation c) Assistance and Capacity Building Activities Outline of the Presentation 3 © ICAO 2017 a) Assessment of States’ Current Readiness b) Timeline for CORSIA Implementation c) Assistance and Capacity Building Activities 4 © ICAO 2017 • State participants to the ICAO Regional Seminars 2017 were asked to answer a questionnaire related to the CORSIA implementation • The questionnaire is available on the ICAO webpage: http://www.icao.int/Meetings/RS2017/Pages/RS17Questionnaire.aspx • Responses to this questionnaire are used to assess the levels of States’ experience and readiness in the MRV of aviation CO2 emissions, and better plan the ICAO’s capacity building and assistance to States for the CORSIA implementation 180 total questionnaires were received by end of ICAO Regional Seminars 2017  94 States have submitted a questionnaire  States that submitted questionnaires represent > 93% of international RTK (2015) Questionnaire to State Participants in Regional Seminars http://www.icao.int/Meetings/RS2017/Pages/RS17Questionnaire.aspx 5 © ICAO 2017 Questionnaire to State Participants in Regional Seminars 6 © ICAO 2017 States’ Current Readiness - Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) Current data as of 25 April 2017, including updates based on inputs during ICAO Regional Seminars 2017 55 29% 43 22% 53 28% 40 21% All ICAO Member States State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has a State Action Plan but no MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has no State Action Plan and no MRV State without Aircraft Operators conducting international flights 191 States 7 © ICAO 2017 States’ Current Readiness - Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) Current data as of 25 April 2017, including updates based on inputs during ICAO Regional Seminars 2017 3 23% 3 23% 5 39% 2 15% South America State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has a State Action Plan but no MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has no State Action Plan and no MRV State without Aircraft Operators conducting international flights 13 States 8 © ICAO 2017 States’ Current Readiness - Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) Current data as of 25 April 2017, including updates based on inputs during ICAO Regional Seminars 2017 4 19% 8 38% 2 10% 7 33% North America / Central America / Caribbean State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has a State Action Plan but no MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has no State Action Plan and no MRV State without Aircraft Operators conducting international flights 21 States 9 © ICAO 2017 States’ Current Readiness - Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) Current data as of 25 April 2017, including updates based on inputs during ICAO Regional Seminars 2017 32 57% 11 20% 8 14% 5 9% Europe / North Atlantic State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has a State Action Plan but no MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has no State Action Plan and no MRV State without Aircraft Operators conducting international flights 56 States 10 © ICAO 2017 States’ Current Readiness - Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) Current data as of 25 April 2017, including updates based on inputs during ICAO Regional Seminars 2017 6 16% 9 24% 15 39% 8 21% Asia and Pacific State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has a State Action Plan but no MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has no State Action Plan and no MRV State without Aircraft Operators conducting international flights 38 States 11 © ICAO 2017 States’ Current Readiness - Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) Current data as of 25 April 2017, including updates based on inputs during ICAO Regional Seminars 2017 3 12% 3 13% 10 42% 8 33% Eastern and Southern Africa State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has a State Action Plan but no MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has no State Action Plan and no MRV State without Aircraft Operators conducting international flights 24 States 12 © ICAO 2017 States’ Current Readiness - Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) Current data as of 25 April 2017, including updates based on inputs during ICAO Regional Seminars 2017 6 25% 4 17% 5 21% 9 37% Western and Central Africa State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has a State Action Plan but no MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has no State Action Plan and no MRV State without Aircraft Operators conducting international flights 24 States 13 © ICAO 2017 States’ Current Readiness - Monitoring, Reporting, Verification (MRV) Current data as of 25 April 2017, including updates based on inputs during ICAO Regional Seminars 2017 1 7% 5 33% 8 53% 1 7% Middle East State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has a State Action Plan but no MRV State with Aircraft Operators conducting international flights, that has no State Action Plan and no MRV State without Aircraft Operators conducting international flights 15 States 14 © ICAO 2017 a) Assessment of States’ Current Readiness b) Timeline for CORSIA Implementation c) Assistance and Capacity Building Activities 15 © ICAO 2017 CORSIA SARPs and Guidance Development Timeline We are here!
Language:English
Score: 530204.5 - https://www.icao.int/Meetings/...ORSIA%20Implementation_V04.pdf
Data Source: un
Legend: My country regularly conducts food safety assessment of GM food. My country does not regularly conduct food safety assessment of GM food, but has conducted at least once in the past. My country has never conducted food safety assessment of GM food but is planning to conduct such assessment in the near future. My country has never conducted safety assessment of GM food and will not (be able to) conduct such assessment in the near future.    
Language:English
Score: 529571.73 - https://www.fao.org/food/food-.../conduct-safety-assessment/en/
Data Source: un
If an applicant within ten (10) days term after receiving decision does not inform on its intentions to conduct correcting measures, activity on conducting certification shall stop. (...) Quality systems certification shall be conducted by bodies accredited in the System with the right to conduct such activity. (...) In cases if measures mentioned in requisites have not been conducted, the following note shall be made: "is not conducted", "is not marked", "is not drawn". 4.11.3.
Language:English
Score: 529505.2 - https://www.wto.org/english/th...c_e/ukr_e/WTACCUKR44_LEG_9.pdf
Data Source: un
Data Indicator SeriesID SeriesDescription GeoAreaCode GeoAreaName TimePeriod Value Time_Detail Source FootNote Nature Units Reporting Type Observation Status ISOalpha3 Type SeriesCode 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 4 Afghanistan 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O AFG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 8 Albania 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ALB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 12 Algeria 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O DZA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 16 American Samoa 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O ASM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 20 Andorra 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O AND Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 24 Angola 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O AGO Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 28 Antigua and Barbuda 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ATG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 31 Azerbaijan 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O AZE Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 32 Argentina 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ARG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 36 Australia 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A AUS Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 40 Austria 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A AUT Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 44 Bahamas 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BHS Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 48 Bahrain 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BHR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 50 Bangladesh 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BGD Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 51 Armenia 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O ARM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 52 Barbados 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BRB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 56 Belgium 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BEL Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 60 Bermuda 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O BMU Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 64 Bhutan 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BTN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 68 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BOL Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 70 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BIH Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 72 Botswana 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BWA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 76 Brazil 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting. C NUMBER G V BRA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 84 Belize 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BLZ Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 86 Chagos Archipelago 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O IOT Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 90 Solomon Islands 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A SLB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 92 British Virgin Islands 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O VGB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 96 Brunei Darussalam 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BRN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 100 Bulgaria 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BGR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 104 Myanmar 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A MMR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 108 Burundi 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BDI Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 112 Belarus 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BLR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 116 Cambodia 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O KHM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 120 Cameroon 2018 1 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CMR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 124 Canada 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CAN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 132 Cabo Verde 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CPV Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 136 Cayman Islands 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O CYM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 140 Central African Republic 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O CAF Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 144 Sri Lanka 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A LKA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 148 Chad 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O TCD Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 152 Chile 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CHL Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 156 China 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting. (...) C NUMBER G V COM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 175 Mayotte 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O MYT Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 178 Congo 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O COG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 180 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O COD Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 184 Cook Islands 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O COK Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 188 Costa Rica 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O CRI Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 191 Croatia 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A HRV Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 192 Cuba 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CUB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 196 Cyprus 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CYP Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 203 Czechia 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CZE Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 204 Benin 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BEN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 208 Denmark 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A DNK Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 212 Dominica 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O DMA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 214 Dominican Republic 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A DOM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 218 Ecuador 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ECU Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 222 El Salvador 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A SLV Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 226 Equatorial Guinea 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O GNQ Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 231 Ethiopia 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O ETH Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 232 Eritrea 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting.
Language:English
Score: 528523.83 - https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/...ing_to_combat_IUU_fishing.xlsx
Data Source: un
ITU-R 91-2 1 OPINION ITU-R 91-2 World Atlas of Ground Conductivities (1993-1997-2007) The ITU Radiocommunication Assembly, considering a) the need for ground conductivity data when planning radiocommunication services, including those concerning navigation, in the VLF, LF and MF bands; b) that the World Atlas of Ground Conductivities is published as Recommendation ITU-R P.832; c) the desirability for the World Atlas to contain ground conductivity data for all countries of the world; d) that there have been many changes of the borders between countries; e) that the effective conductivity for ground-wave propagation depends on the frequency being used; f) that the effective conductivity can only be measured by using suitable techniques which take account of the penetration depth of the radio waves into the ground; g) that for some types of geological ground structure and ground cover there may be a seasonal and inter-annual change in effective conductivity; h) that the ITU-R can revise the data in the World Atlas of Ground Conductivities only on the basis of information from individual countries, is of the opinion 1 that administrations should check and, if necessary, revise the information given in the World Atlas, noting that in some cases seasonal changes may need to be included; 2 that new administrations should check that their needs are covered in the current World Atlas of Ground Conductivities and contribute to revisions of the data; 3 that for those countries for which no conductivity data are contained in the World Atlas, the administrations concerned should collect and provide data in accordance with the information given in Recommendation ITU-R P.832. OPINION ITU-R 91-2 - World Atlas of Ground Conductivities
Language:English
Score: 528431.45 - https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/it.../op/R-OP-R.91-2-2007-PDF-E.pdf
Data Source: un
Microsoft Word - taxation-code of conduct (2) United Nations E/C.18/2006/6/Add.3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 1 September 2006 Original: English Committee of Experts on International Cooperation Advance copy in Tax Matters Second session Geneva, 30 October-3 November 2006 Developing a Code of Conduct on Promoting Tax Compliance* Summary A code of conduct governing international tax cooperation in combating tax evasion and capital flight can serve three important functions. (...) The OECD, however, is not in a position to promote a code of conduct for the many non-members of that rather exclusive club. (...) I do not think that the time has yet arrived for the Expert Committee to draft a code of conduct. My understanding from the discussion in Geneva in December of 2005 is that the first steps are to discuss a possible code of conduct, to pull together materials of interest on the topic, to give some information on the likely content of a code of conduct, and to research the procedures that would need to be followed for the Expert Committee to recommend a code of conduct for consideration by ECOSOC.
Language:English
Score: 527883.25 - https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-...-of-conduct-EC1820066Add.3.pdf
Data Source: un
Donor contributions during the preparation and conduct of the 2020 Population and Housing Census 3. (...) Temporary staff trained in the methodology and conduct of the 2020 Population and Housing Census; Preparation and conduct of the 2020 Population and Housing Census 10. (...) Donor contributions during the preparation and conduct of the 2020 Population and Housing Census 1.
Language:English
Score: 527571.83 - https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/WS_TJK_ENG.pdf
Data Source: un
The Panel of Experts on Pesticide Management (Panel of Experts) was created in 2004 by the Director-General of FAO following the adoption of the revised version of the International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides (Code of Conduct). (...) The Code of Conduct is the worldwide guidance document on pesticide management. (...) It addressed possible overlaps between the Code of Conduct and SAICM, and expressed its concerns about duplication of efforts.
Language:English
Score: 527482.28 - https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/...Pesticides/Code/SAICMPanel.pdf
Data Source: un