Home

  ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group Document

We assume that the setup signaling which assigns the appropriate error correction capability to each logical channel is provided by external means, such as H.245. (...) An example of the configuration file is as follows: error/3-64.bin ..Errorpatternfile foreman_out.26l ..Inputfile foreman_in.26l ..Outputfile foreman.msg ..Messagefile 64000 ..Totalbitrate 0 ..startposition in Errorpatternfile 1 ..assemble SDU until first lost of SDU* (0=off 1=on) 0 ..no errors in sync and header (0=errors possible, 1=no errors) 64 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 0 38 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 1 25 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 2 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 3 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 4 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 5 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 6 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 7 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 8 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 9 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 10 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 11 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 12 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 13 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 14 0 ..Reed-Solomon-Correction ability of logical channel 15 Description of the configuration file: · Errorpatternfile (string): Error patterns are binary-format files in which the least-significant bit of the first byte signifies the error state of the temporally first bit on the channel. · Inputfile (string): Input packets are read from one input file according to the file format given in Figure 1. (...) Note that the number of correctable bytes t determines the amount of redundancy bytes r=2t+1 and the maximum payload length including CRC as kmax=255-r=254-2t .

Score: 662928.37 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...video-site/0008_Por/q15k16.doc

  ITU - Telecommunication Standardization Sector_Temporary Document

[End Correction] Identifies the end of revision marked text based on extractions from the published Recommendations affected by the correction being described. ... (...) Editorial corrections are made to the existing text to synchronize it with the values of table A.1/H.221. (...) The editorial corrections needed are described below. 7.5.1 Editorial corrections to section 5.5/H.243 In section 5.5 of H.243, there is a reference to Q.939, but it should read Q.931.

Score: 661831.64 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...202_Geneva/Impl_H320(0202).doc

  03

TABLE No. 1 AGA DEFICIENCIES – “A” PRIORITY Deficiency ID Priority Date of completion Remarks AGA-60-S A COMPLETED 2013 Corrective action plan implemented 100% AGA-269-S A COMPLETED DEC 2009 Corrective action plan implemented 100% AGA-270-S A COMPLETED MARCH 2013 Corrective action plan implemented 100% AGA-271-S A COMPLETED JUNE 2013 The basic regulatory documentation was developed and approved. (...) The deficiencies were reviewed, the corrective action updated, and one deficiency was corrected. (...) Deficiency ID Priority Date of completion Remarks MET-45-S A DECEMBER 2014 RVR operations are foreseen to start at Asunción and Ciudad del Este MET-90-S A COMPLETED March 2012 Corrective action plan implemented 100% MET-91-S A COMPLETED March 2012 Corrective action plan implemented 100% MET-92-S B COMPLETED October 2006 Corrective action plan implemented 100% 3.

Score: 661622 - https://www.icao.int/SAM/Docum...%20Deficiencies%20AN%20PAR.pdf

  Implementor's Guide for the ITU-T H

The changes, clarifications and corrections defined herein are expected to be included in future versions of the affected V.140 Recommendation. (...) [End Correction] Identifies the end of revision marked text based on extractions from the published Recommendations affected by the correction being described. ... (...) Technical and editorial corrections 7.1 Technical and editorial corrections to ITU-T Recommendation V.140 7.1.1 Figure 11/V.140 – FCS mapping convention The description in the 3rd paragraph of Section 8.5.1 is not aligned with Figure11 to which it refers.

Score: 661598.9 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...Geneva/TDImpl_V140r1(0200).doc

  INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION

Gary Sullivan - PictureTel/USA) TITLE: Editorial corrections to H.263v2 (H.263+) as distributed (COM-16-26) for decision ________ 1. (...) A description of these deficiencies and precise corrective instructions are provided herein. We ask for these corrections to be incorporated into the text for decision. (...) Section 3 describes certain difficulties in the publication process and asks for these to also be rectified. 2. Editorial Corrections and Clarifications 2.1. Editorial Corrections Editorial Correction Item 1: In the last paragraph of Annex D, there is an example of an encoding of a binary string which states that the correct encoding is “0 11 11 01 10”.

Score: 661564.1 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...o-site/9801_Gen/H263pEdits.doc

  MET SG/7-WP/10 20/10

The non-implementation of QMS for MET represents more than 75% of these deficiencies. 1.2 MIDANPIRG/16 also noted with concern that the majority of deficiencies listed in the MANDD still did not have any specific Corrective Action Plan (CAP). The MIDANPIRG/16 urged States to implement the provisions of MIDANPIRG Conclusion 15/35 related to eliminating Air Navigation Deficiencies, and in particular, providing a specific CAP for each deficiency. 2. (...) ACTION BY THE MEETING 3.1 The meeting is invited to: a) review and update the list of deficiencies in the MET field; and b) urge States to take necessary follow-up actions to implement MIDANPIRG/15 Conclusion 15/35, in particular submission of a specific Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for each deficiency. ------------------ MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A APPENDIX A (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field BAHRAIN Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action No Deficiencies Reported MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-2 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field EGYPT Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action No Deficiencies Reported MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-3 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field IRAN Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action No Deficiencies Reported MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-4 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field IRAQ Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action 1 Annex 3; Para 2.2 QMS Implementation Lack of Implementation of QMS Sep 2014 - O Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Iraq Dec 2018 A MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-5 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field JORDAN Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action No Deficiencies Reported MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-6 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field KUWAIT Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action No Deficiencies Reported MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-7 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field LEBANON Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action 1 Annex 3; Para 2.2 QMS Implementation Lack of Implementation of QMS Sep 2014 (USOAP – CMA finding) O Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Lebanon Dec 2018 A 2 Annex 3; Para 9.1.4, 9.3.1, 9.4.1 and Appendix 2, 2.1.1 WAFS forecasts required for briefing and flight documentation SADIS FTP not available May 2016 - O Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Lebanon Dec 2018 A MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-8 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field LIBYA Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action 1 Annex 3; Para 2.2 QMS Implementation Lack of Implementation of QMS Sep 2014 (USOAP – CMA finding) O Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Libya Dec 2018 A MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-9 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field OMAN Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action 1 Annex 3; Para 2.2 QMS Implementation Lack of Implementation of QMS Sep 2014 (USOAP-CMA finding) O Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Oman Dec 2018 A MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-10 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field QATAR Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action No Deficiencies Reported MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-11 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field SAUDI ARABIA Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action No Deficiencies Reported MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-12 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field SUDAN Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action No Deficiencies Reported MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-13 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field SYRIA Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action 1 MID eANP VOL II, MET Table II-2 OSAP METAR and 24-hour TAF OSAP METAR and 24-hour TAF not available internationally Nov 2013 - O Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Syria Dec 2018 A 2 Annex 3; Para 2.2 QMS Implementation Lack of Implementation of QMS Sep 2014 (USOAP – CMA finding) O Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Syria Dec 2018 A MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-14 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field UAE Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action No Deficiencies Reported MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-15 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the MET Field YEMEN Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action 1 Annex 3; Para 2.2 QMS Implementation Lack of Implementation of QMS Sep 2014 - O Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Yemen Dec 2018 A MET SG/7-WP/10 APPENDIX A A-16 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Note:* Priority for action to remedy a deficiency is based on the following safety assessments: 'U' priority = Urgent requirements having a direct impact on safety and requiring immediate corrective actions.

Score: 661550.8 - https://www.icao.int/MID/Docum...nts/2017/MET%20SG7/WP%2010.pdf

  Implementor's Guide for the ITU-T H

The changes, clarifications and corrections defined herein are expected to be included in future versions of affected H.320-series Recommendations. (...) [End Correction] Identifies the end of revision marked text based on extractions from the published Recommendations affected by the correction being described. ... (...) Technical and editorial corrections 7.1 Technical and editorial corrections to ITU-T Recommendation H.221 To support G.722.1 in H.320 systems, new BAS capability and command codes need to be added in Recommendation H.221.

Score: 661529.4 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...Geneva/TDImpl_H320r1(0200).doc

  ITU Normal.dot

This Corrigendum is proposed for Consent by Study Group 16 at this meeting to formally incorporate the corrections and clarifications identified. Draft new Corrigendum 1 to ITU-T Recommendation H.263 (1998; 2000; 2004) Video coding for low bit rate communication Summary This Corrigendum introduces changes and corrections into H.263 and its Annexes that were previously identified in Implementors Guides. (...) [End Correction] Identifies the end of revision marked text based on extractions from the published Recommendation affected by the correction being described. ... (...) However, encoders should not use macroblock-layer stuffing in this manner (for interoperability with decoders that may have been designed before the need for decoders to support this was clarified). [End Correction] 2.4 Correction of Figure H.1/H.263 [GARY: THIS DOES NOT SEEM TO BE AN ERROR IN THE PUBLISHED VERSION!!!]

Score: 660533.74 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...deo-site/0410_Pal/VCEG-X12.doc

  Question(s):

[End Correction] Identifies the end of revision marked text based on extractions from the published Recommendations affected by the correction being described. ... (...) Editorial corrections are made to the existing text to synchronize it with the values of table A.1/H.221. (...) The editorial corrections needed are described below. 7.5.1 Editorial corrections to section 5.5/H.243 In section 5.5 of H.243, there is a reference to Q.939, but it should read Q.931.

Score: 660472.07 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...Geneva/TDImpl_H320(0503)r2.doc

  C.N.268.2021.TREATIES-XI.A.16

C.N.268.2021.TREATIES-XI.A.16 Reference: C.N.268.2021.TREATIES-XI.A.16 (Depositary Notification) CUSTOMS CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT OF GOODS UNDER COVER OF TIR CARNETS (TIR CONVENTION) GENEVA, 14 NOVEMBER 1975 CORRECTIONS TO ANNEX 11 1 The Secretary-General of the United Nations, acting in his capacity as depositary, and with reference to depositary notification C.N.158.2021.TREATIES-XI.A.16 of 3 June 2021 by which corrections were proposed to the English, French and Russian texts of Annex 11 of the TIR Convention (doc. ECE/TRANS/WP.30/AC.2/147/Corr.1), communicates the following: By 1 September 2021, the date on which the period specified for the notification of objections to the proposed corrections expired, no objection had been notified to the Secretary-General. Consequently, the Secretary-General has effected the required corrections to the Convention. The corresponding procès-verbal of corrections is transmitted herewith. 8 September 2021 1 Refer to depositary notification C.N.158.2021.TREATIES-XI.A.16 of 3 June 2021 (Proposal of corrections to Annex 11). ….

Score: 660314.8 - https://unece.org/sites/defaul...es/2021-09/CN.268.2021-Eng.pdf