Home

  RGS WG/4-WP/19 15/10

Airports Al Najaf/Al Najaf Intl (ORNI), BASRAH/Basra h Intl (ORMM), MOUSL/Mousl Intl (ORBM), SULYMANIYA H/Sulaymaniyah Intl (ORSU ) Implementation of Certification of Aerodromes used for international operations Nov, 2006 - F H O Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Iraq Dec, 2018 A RGS WG/4-WP/19 APPENDIX A A-5 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the AOP Field JORDAN Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action 1 MID eANP VOL II Table AOP II-1 Queen Alia Airport Runway 08L/26R Runway is not operational and closed since long time Dec, 2014 construction handing over F Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Jordan Dec, 2018 B 2 ANNEX 14 VOL I: Para. 1.4 Marka Intl Airport AMMAN/Mark a Intl (OJAM) Implementation of Certification of Aerodromes used for international operations May, 2015 - F H Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Jordan Dec, 2017 A RGS WG/4-WP/19 APPENDIX A A-6 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the AOP Field KUWAIT Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action No Deficiencies Reported RGS WG/4-WP/19 APPENDIX A A-7 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the AOP Field LEBANON Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action 1 ANNEX 14 VOL I: Para. 1.4 Hariri. (...) Airports - Nyala/Nyala (HSNN) Implementation of Certification of Aerodromes used for international operations May, 2015 - F H Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Sudan Dec, 2018 A RGS WG/4-WP/19 APPENDIX A A-13 (1) Rationale for non-elimination: “F”= Financial “H”= Human Resources “S”= State (Military/political) “O”= Other unknown causes Deficiencies in the AOP Field SYRIA Item No Identification Deficiencies Corrective Action Requirement Facilities/ Services Description Date First Reported Remarks/ Rationale for Non-elimination Description Executing Body Date of Completion Priority for Action 1 MID eANP VOL II Table AOP II-1 Damascus int`l Airport Apron lighting inadequate Sep, 2003 - F H Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Syria Dec, 2018 A 2 MID eANP VOL II Table AOP II-1 Damascus int`l Airport Runway surface rough and damaged. Runway markings unsatisfactory Sep, 2003 - F H Corrective Action Plan has not been formally provided by the State Syria Dec, 2018 A 3 ANNEX 14 VOL I: Para. 1.4 Damascus, Aleppo, Bassel Al-Assad Int`l.

Score: 657272.56 - https://www.icao.int/MID/Docum...7/RGS%20WG4/RGS%20WG4-WP19.pdf

  Implementor's Guide for the ITU-T H

The changes, clarifications and corrections defined herein are expected to be included in future versions of affected H.324-series Recommendations. (...) The changes, clarifications and corrections defined herein are expected to be included in future versions of affected H.324-series Recommendations. (...) [End Correction] Identifies the end of revision marked text based on extractions from the published Recommendations affected by the correction being described. ...

Score: 656913.13 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...toseguro/TDImpl_H324(0601).doc

  Question(s):

[End Correction] Identifies the end of revision marked text based on extractions from the published Recommendations affected by the correction being described. ... (...) Technical and editorial corrections 7.1 Technical and editorial corrections to ITU-T Recommendation H.324 7.1.1 Addition of new references The following references are being added to Clause 2. (...) [Begin Correction] 6.5.2.1 Channel muting Logical channels may be temporarily inactive.

Score: 656737.35 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...1_Geneva/TDImpl_H324(1104).doc

  Proposed H.224 Corrigendum 1: Corrections to the CME client list message (Figure 3)

Proposed H.224 Corrigendum 1: Corrections to the CME client list message (Figure 3) - 2 - TD 453 (WP 2/16) INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION STUDY GROUP 16 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR STUDY PERIOD 2005-2008 TD 453 (WP 2/16) English only Original: English Question(s): 1/16 Geneva, 26 June - 6 July 2007 TEMPORARY DOCUMENT Source: Rapporteur Q1/16 Title: Proposed H.224 Corrigendum 1: Corrections to the CME client list message (Figure 3) Introduction This document is a corrigendum to the text of ITU-T Recommendation H.224. (...) This Corrigendum provides a correction to the CME client list message defined in Figure 3/H.224. ITU-T Recommendation H.224 Corrigendum 1 A Real Time Control protocol for simplex applications using the H.221 LSD/HSD/MLP channels: Corrections to the CME client list message (Figure 3) Corrections to Figure 3/H.224 The brace in Figure 3 is corrected to no longer include the number of clients parameter as shown: [Begin Correction] Figure 3/H.224 ( CME client list message [End Correction] __________________________ clients only non-standard 4 octets for client For each Lower country, upper lower Manufacturer, Client ID (Optional Extended Client ID | Upper Country) (Standard Client ID or 0x7E or 0x7F) number of clients (or 0x00) Response Code (0x00) Client List code (0x01) CAPS EX T1515170-99 Contact: Patrick Luthi Tandberg Norway Tel: +47 67 125 125 Fax: +47 67 125 234 Email: patrick.luthi@tandberg.com Attention: This is not a publication made available to the public, but an internal ITU-T Document intended only for use by the Member States of ITU, by ITU-T Sector Members and Associates, and their respective staff and collaborators in their ITU related work.

Score: 656196 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...0706_Geneva/td_H224Corr1R1.doc

  Annex 6 to AVC-553R

Annex 6 to AVC-553R - 28 - Annex 6 to AVC-553R Annex 6 to AVC-553R Source: Experts Group for ATM Video Coding in SG15 Title: Cell loss correction method for AAL Type 1 to support H.320 terminals in B-ISDN Contact: Sakae OKUBO Visual Media Laboratory (Room 922A) NTT Human Interface Laboratories 1-2356 Take, Yokosuka-shi 238-03 Japan Phone : +81 468 59 2814 Fax : +81 468 59 2829/3573 E-mail : okubo@nttvdt.ntt.jp At the twelfth meeting of the SG15 Experts Group for ATM Video Coding held during 7-9 July in Boston, we reviewed the following two contributions regarding the subject matter; AVC-521 Correction method for cell loss and bit error in AAL Type 1 (Japan) AVC-538 Method for the correction of cell losses for low bit-rate signals transport with the AAL Type 1 (France) Our fundamental position is that a sufficient level of network performance (cell loss ratio) should be available to allow simple terminal implementation. Before deciding adoption of the cell loss correction technique under discussion, we would like to confirm that this additional functionality of AAL Type 1 is really necessary The attached material is summary of the discussion, comparing the following two methods in delay, cell loss correction capability and some other aspects; • separable FEC interleaving matrix as contained in AVC-521, • its modification to the non-separable matrix as proposed in AVC-538. (...) END * SEPARABLE MATRIX: AVC-459(521) RS(4844)FEC frame x 16 <=> 16 cells (Closed form of Error Correction Matrix) - Each cell Contains only one sector of each FEC frame. - First sector of each FEC frame is also first sector of each cell. * NON-SEPARABLE MATRIX : AVC-459(521)+AVC-538 RS(48,44) FEC frame x 16 ~16cells (Open form of Error Correction Matrix) * COMPARISON - Correction Capability RS(48,44) corrects B\LC\{(\A\HS10(1 cell/16 cells (cell loss),or,2 Bytes/48 Bytes (random error))) In both cases....

Score: 655030.6 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a.../Report_texts/AVC-0553R_a6.rtf

  TEMPORARY DOCUMENT: Draft new Rec. H.272 (ex H.Gamma) “Procedures and values for video gamma correct

If the terminal’s video display has a gamma other than 1/0.45 (approximately 2.2), a gamma correction functional module may be inserted between the video decoder and the display to correct the video signal gamma to a value of 1/(display gamma) before display, as illustrated in Figure 1. (...) In the case of display of locally captured video, the gamma of the camera output and display input should also be corrected as described above. NOTE 2: The method used for gamma pre-correction by the gamma correction function is left to implementers, but in many cases a look-up table with 256 or 1024 values for each of the R , G , and B channels of video will be sufficient. (...) In practice, some terminals will not fully correct gamma. If only one terminal corrects gamma, only partial gamma correction will be achieved.

Score: 654785.5 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/av-a...611_Geneva/TD_draftH.gamma.doc

  Microsoft Word - 2015-UNAT-497 Chaaban

Chaaban is seeking correction and revision of Judgment No. 2013-UNAT-363. (...) The Commissioner-General’s Comments Correction 10. Mr. Chaaban may not use the correction procedure as a vehicle to challenge the receivability findings of the Appeals Tribunal in his case. (...) The applications for correction and revision are dismissed. 3 Al-Mulla v.

Score: 654105.03 - https://www.un.org/en/internal...at/judgments/2015-UNAT-497.pdf

  Banking Concentration and Financial Crises

Lerner(-1) 2.669 0.355 URW_(-1) -0.303381 0.143294 -2.1172 0.0342 URW_(-1) -0.267395 0.121881 -2.193902 0.0282 URW_(-1) -0.258462 0.123532 -2.092276 0.0364 URW_(-1) -0.248859 0.121974 -2.040252 0.0413 Lerner -2.816 -2.296 -2.032 RRHPG_(-3) 15.05243 4.929786 3.053363 0.0023 RRHPG_(-3) 14.29347 4.875007 2.931989 0.0034 RRHPG_(-3) 15.35146 4.98456 3.079802 0.0021 RRHPG_(-3) 14.93972 4.882185 3.060047 0.0022 0.015 0.019 0.031 Boone(-1) 0.795 0.195 Boone -1.327 -0.791 0.114 0.289 _5BANK(-1) -0.027754 0.009823 -2.825503 0.0047 _5BANK(-1) -0.030247 0.009238 -3.274005 0.0011 _5BANK(-1) -0.026335 0.009577 -2.749887 0.006 _5BANK(-1) -0.026837 0.009456 -2.838001 0.0045 Area Under Curve (AUC) LERNER(-1) 2.669226 2.886136 0.924844 0.355 BOONE(-1) 0.79459 0.613244 1.295715 0.1951 LERNER -2.29624 0.981724 -2.338987 0.0193 LERNER -2.032165 0.942478 -2.156193 0.0311 Direct Call Ratio (DCR) 10 of 13 9 of 13 9 of 13 9 of 13 LERNER -2.815504 1.156062 -2.435426 0.0149 BOONE -1.327243 0.839931 -1.580181 0.1141 BOONE -0.79118 0.745733 -1.060943 0.2887 False Call Ratio % (FCR) 23.08 30.7 27.66 28.27 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 S.E. of regression 0.190344 Akaike info criterion 0.313 S.E. of regression 0.187729 Akaike info criterion 0.316544 S.E. of regression 0.189146 Akaike info criterion 0.311182 S.E. of regression 0.189216 Akaike info criterion 0.310503 Sum squared resid 12.20982 Schwarz criterion 0.369064 Sum squared resid 11.87664 Schwarz criterion 0.372608 Sum squared resid 12.05663 Schwarz criterion 0.367247 Sum squared resid 12.10135 Schwarz criterion 0.355354 Log likelihood -48.52294 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.335334 Log likelihood -49.12897 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.338878 Log likelihood -48.21217 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.333517 Log likelihood -49.09595 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.32837 Deviance 97.04589 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 98.25794 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 96.42434 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 98.19191 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Avg. log likelihood -0.14188 Avg. log likelihood -0.143652 Avg. log likelihood -0.140971 Avg. log likelihood -0.143555 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Equation: T3C1 Equation: T3C2 Equation: T3C3 Equation: T3C4 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:00 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:03 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:05 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:08 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total P(Dep=1)<=C 229 3 232 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 228 4 232 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 238 4 242 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 236 4 240 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)>C 100 10 110 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 101 9 110 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 91 9 100 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 93 9 102 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 229 10 239 0 13 13 Correct 228 9 237 0 13 13 Correct 238 9 247 0 13 13 Correct 236 9 245 0 13 13 % Correct 69.6 76.92 69.88 0 100 3.8 % Correct 69.3 69.23 69.3 0 100 3.8 % Correct 72.34 69.23 72.22 0 100 3.8 % Correct 71.73 69.23 71.64 0 100 3.8 % Incorrect 30.4 23.08 30.12 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 30.7 30.77 30.7 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 27.66 30.77 27.78 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 28.27 30.77 28.36 100 0 96.2 Total Gain* 69.6 -23.08 66.08 Total Gain* 69.3 -30.77 65.5 Total Gain* 72.34 -30.77 68.42 Total Gain* 71.73 -30.77 67.84 Percent Gain** 69.6 NA 68.69 Percent Gain** 69.3 NA 68.09 Percent Gain** 72.34 NA 71.12 Percent Gain** 71.73 NA 70.52 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total E(# of Dep=0) 317 11.94 328.94 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 316.97 11.75 328.72 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 317.12 11.88 329 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 317 11.96 328.96 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=1) 12 1.06 13.06 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 12.03 1.25 13.28 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 11.88 1.12 13 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 12 1.04 13.04 12.51 0.49 13 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 317 1.06 318.06 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 316.97 1.25 318.23 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 317.12 1.12 318.24 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 317 1.04 318.04 316.49 0.49 316.99 % Correct 96.35 8.13 93 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.34 9.63 93.05 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.39 8.6 93.05 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.35 7.99 92.99 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Incorrect 3.65 91.87 7 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.66 90.37 6.95 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.61 91.4 6.95 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.65 92.01 7.01 3.8 96.2 7.31 Total Gain* 0.15 4.33 0.31 Total Gain* 0.15 5.83 0.36 Total Gain* 0.19 4.8 0.37 Total Gain* 0.15 4.19 0.31 Percent Gain** 4.05 4.5 4.28 Percent Gain** 3.83 6.06 4.95 Percent Gain** 5 4.99 4.99 Percent Gain** 4.04 4.36 4.2 *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation newtab3 nt3c1 nt3c2 t2c3 t2c3 Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV 0.0380116959 Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Sample: 1999 2016 Base Concentration Preferred No Capital 0.0380116959 Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:05 Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:11 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:49 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:53 Capital(-1) -0.668 -0.284 -0.266 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 0.000 0.023 0.026 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Real House Price Growth (-3) 10.990 14.441 14.454 12.300 Convergence achieved after 9 iterations Convergence achieved after 9 iterations Convergence achieved after 7 iterations Convergence achieved after 8 iterations 0.013 0.003 0.002 0.006 Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Bank Concentration 0.035 (5 bank) 0.479 Variable Coefficient Std. (...) Bank Concentration(-1) -0.063 -0.030 -0.047 0 (5 bank) 0.191 0.001 0.000 URW_(-1) -0.667718 0.075199 -8.87939 0 URW_(-1) -0.284358 0.125173 -2.271712 0.0231 URW_(-1) -0.266372 0.119928 -2.221097 0.0263 Area Under Curve (AUC) 0.702 0.747 0.714 0.681 RRHPG_(-3) 10.99034 4.417768 2.487758 0.0129 RRHPG_(-3) 14.44131 4.785363 3.017809 0.0025 RRHPG_(-3) 14.45436 4.760918 3.036045 0.0024 RRHPG_(-3) 12.29988 4.513267 2.725273 0.0064 Direct Call Ratio (DCR) 9 of 13 9of 13 9 of 13 7 of 13 _5BANK 0.034631 0.048918 0.707945 0.479 False Call Ratio % (FCR) 39.82 31.61 31.31 29.79 _5BANK(-1) -0.063204 0.048275 -1.309236 0.1905 _5BANK(-1) -0.029544 0.00902 -3.275292 0.0011 _5BANK(-1) -0.046886 0.00527 -8.896317 0 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 S.E. of regression 0.192644 Akaike info criterion 0.333824 S.E. of regression 0.189964 Akaike info criterion 0.317133 S.E. of regression 0.189496 Akaike info criterion 0.312737 S.E. of regression 0.193902 Akaike info criterion 0.327353 Sum squared resid 12.61797 Schwarz criterion 0.356249 Sum squared resid 12.19713 Schwarz criterion 0.361985 Sum squared resid 12.17304 Schwarz criterion 0.346376 Sum squared resid 12.78331 Schwarz criterion 0.349779 Log likelihood -55.08383 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.342757 Log likelihood -50.22973 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.335001 Log likelihood -50.47801 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.326138 Log likelihood -53.97745 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.336287 Deviance 110.1677 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 100.4595 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 100.956 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 107.9549 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Avg. log likelihood -0.161064 Avg. log likelihood -0.146871 Avg. log likelihood -0.147597 Avg. log likelihood -0.157829 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Equation: NT3C1 Equation: NT3C2 Equation: T2C3 Equation: T2C4 Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:07 Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:13 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:51 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:54 Success cutoff: C = 0.038012 Success cutoff: C = 0.038012 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total P(Dep=1)<=C 226 4 230 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 198 4 202 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)<=C 225 4 229 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 103 9 112 329 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 231 6 237 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)>C 131 9 140 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)>C 104 9 113 0 0 0 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 98 7 105 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 226 9 235 0 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 198 9 207 329 0 329 Correct 225 9 234 329 0 329 % Correct 68.69 69.23 68.71 0 13 13 Correct 231 7 238 0 13 13 % Correct 60.18 69.23 60.53 100 0 96.2 % Correct 68.39 69.23 68.42 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 31.31 30.77 31.29 100 100 3.8 % Correct 70.21 53.85 69.59 0 100 3.8 % Incorrect 39.82 30.77 39.47 0 100 3.8 % Incorrect 31.61 30.77 31.58 0 100 3.8 Total Gain* 68.69 -30.77 64.91 0 96.2 % Incorrect 29.79 46.15 30.41 100 0 96.2 Total Gain* -39.82 69.23 -35.67 Total Gain* -31.61 69.23 -27.78 Percent Gain** 68.69 NA 67.48 Total Gain* 70.21 -46.15 65.79 Percent Gain** NA 69.23 -938.46 Percent Gain** NA 69.23 -730.77 Percent Gain** 70.21 NA 68.39 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total 316.65 12.02 328.66 316.49 E(# of Dep=0) 314.49 11.99 326.48 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 316.6 11.98 328.58 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=1) 12.35 0.98 13.34 12.51 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 314.48 11.86 326.34 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=1) 14.51 1.01 15.52 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 12.4 1.02 13.42 12.51 0.49 13 Total 329 13 342 329 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 14.52 1.14 15.66 12.51 0.49 13 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 316.65 0.98 317.63 316.49 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 314.49 1.01 315.5 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 316.6 1.02 317.62 316.49 0.49 316.99 % Correct 96.25 7.56 92.87 96.2 0.49 316.99 Correct 314.48 1.14 315.62 316.49 0.49 316.99 % Correct 95.59 7.74 92.25 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.23 7.84 92.87 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Incorrect 3.75 92.44 7.13 3.8 3.8 92.69 % Correct 95.59 8.75 92.29 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Incorrect 4.41 92.26 7.75 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.77 92.16 7.13 3.8 96.2 7.31 Total Gain* 0.05 3.76 0.19 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 4.41 91.25 7.71 3.8 96.2 7.31 Total Gain* -0.61 3.94 -0.44 Total Gain* 0.03 4.04 0.18 Percent Gain** 1.22 3.91 2.57 Total Gain* -0.61 4.95 -0.4 Percent Gain** -16.03 4.1 -5.96 Percent Gain** 0.85 4.2 2.52 Percent Gain** -16.12 5.15 -5.48 *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation new2 Dependent Variable: _5BANK Dependent Variable: LERNER Dependent Variable: BOONE Method: Panel Least Squares Method: Panel Least Squares Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 06/09/19 Time: 11:49 Date: 05/05/19 Time: 17:30 Date: 05/05/19 Time: 17:28 Sample (adjusted): 1995 2016 Sample (adjusted): 1995 2016 Sample (adjusted): 1995 2016 Periods included: 22 Periods included: 22 Periods included: 20 Cross-sections included: 19 Cross-sections included: 19 Cross-sections included: 19 Total panel (balanced) observations: 418 Total panel (balanced) observations: 418 Total panel (balanced) observations: 380 Variable Coefficient Std. (...) Lerner(-1) 2.669 0.355 URW_(-1) -0.303381 0.143294 -2.1172 0.0342 URW_(-1) -0.267395 0.121881 -2.193902 0.0282 URW_(-1) -0.258462 0.123532 -2.092276 0.0364 URW_(-1) -0.248859 0.121974 -2.040252 0.0413 Lerner -2.816 -2.296 -2.032 RRHPG_(-3) 15.05243 4.929786 3.053363 0.0023 RRHPG_(-3) 14.29347 4.875007 2.931989 0.0034 RRHPG_(-3) 15.35146 4.98456 3.079802 0.0021 RRHPG_(-3) 14.93972 4.882185 3.060047 0.0022 0.015 0.019 0.031 Boone(-1) 0.795 0.195 Boone -1.327 -0.791 0.114 0.289 _5BANK(-1) -0.027754 0.009823 -2.825503 0.0047 _5BANK(-1) -0.030247 0.009238 -3.274005 0.0011 _5BANK(-1) -0.026335 0.009577 -2.749887 0.006 _5BANK(-1) -0.026837 0.009456 -2.838001 0.0045 Area Under Curve (AUC) LERNER(-1) 2.669226 2.886136 0.924844 0.355 BOONE(-1) 0.79459 0.613244 1.295715 0.1951 LERNER -2.29624 0.981724 -2.338987 0.0193 LERNER -2.032165 0.942478 -2.156193 0.0311 Direct Call Ratio (DCR) 10 of 13 9 of 13 9 of 13 9 of 13 LERNER -2.815504 1.156062 -2.435426 0.0149 BOONE -1.327243 0.839931 -1.580181 0.1141 BOONE -0.79118 0.745733 -1.060943 0.2887 False Call Ratio % (FCR) 23.08 30.7 27.66 28.27 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 S.E. of regression 0.190344 Akaike info criterion 0.313 S.E. of regression 0.187729 Akaike info criterion 0.316544 S.E. of regression 0.189146 Akaike info criterion 0.311182 S.E. of regression 0.189216 Akaike info criterion 0.310503 Sum squared resid 12.20982 Schwarz criterion 0.369064 Sum squared resid 11.87664 Schwarz criterion 0.372608 Sum squared resid 12.05663 Schwarz criterion 0.367247 Sum squared resid 12.10135 Schwarz criterion 0.355354 Log likelihood -48.52294 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.335334 Log likelihood -49.12897 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.338878 Log likelihood -48.21217 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.333517 Log likelihood -49.09595 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.32837 Deviance 97.04589 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 98.25794 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 96.42434 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 98.19191 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Avg. log likelihood -0.14188 Avg. log likelihood -0.143652 Avg. log likelihood -0.140971 Avg. log likelihood -0.143555 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Equation: T3C1 Equation: T3C2 Equation: T3C3 Equation: T3C4 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:00 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:03 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:05 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:08 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total P(Dep=1)<=C 229 3 232 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 228 4 232 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 238 4 242 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 236 4 240 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)>C 100 10 110 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 101 9 110 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 91 9 100 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 93 9 102 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 229 10 239 0 13 13 Correct 228 9 237 0 13 13 Correct 238 9 247 0 13 13 Correct 236 9 245 0 13 13 % Correct 69.6 76.92 69.88 0 100 3.8 % Correct 69.3 69.23 69.3 0 100 3.8 % Correct 72.34 69.23 72.22 0 100 3.8 % Correct 71.73 69.23 71.64 0 100 3.8 % Incorrect 30.4 23.08 30.12 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 30.7 30.77 30.7 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 27.66 30.77 27.78 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 28.27 30.77 28.36 100 0 96.2 Total Gain* 69.6 -23.08 66.08 Total Gain* 69.3 -30.77 65.5 Total Gain* 72.34 -30.77 68.42 Total Gain* 71.73 -30.77 67.84 Percent Gain** 69.6 NA 68.69 Percent Gain** 69.3 NA 68.09 Percent Gain** 72.34 NA 71.12 Percent Gain** 71.73 NA 70.52 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total E(# of Dep=0) 317 11.94 328.94 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 316.97 11.75 328.72 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 317.12 11.88 329 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 317 11.96 328.96 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=1) 12 1.06 13.06 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 12.03 1.25 13.28 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 11.88 1.12 13 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 12 1.04 13.04 12.51 0.49 13 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 317 1.06 318.06 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 316.97 1.25 318.23 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 317.12 1.12 318.24 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 317 1.04 318.04 316.49 0.49 316.99 % Correct 96.35 8.13 93 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.34 9.63 93.05 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.39 8.6 93.05 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.35 7.99 92.99 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Incorrect 3.65 91.87 7 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.66 90.37 6.95 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.61 91.4 6.95 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.65 92.01 7.01 3.8 96.2 7.31 Total Gain* 0.15 4.33 0.31 Total Gain* 0.15 5.83 0.36 Total Gain* 0.19 4.8 0.37 Total Gain* 0.15 4.19 0.31 Percent Gain** 4.05 4.5 4.28 Percent Gain** 3.83 6.06 4.95 Percent Gain** 5 4.99 4.99 Percent Gain** 4.04 4.36 4.2 *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation Table 2 t2c1 t2c2 t2c3 t2c3 Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV 0.0380116959 Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Sample: 1999 2016 Base Concentration Preferred No Capital 0.0380116959 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:38 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:45 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:49 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:53 Liqiuidity(-1) -0.085 -0.044 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 0.076 0.337 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Capital(-1) -0.519 -0.232 -0.266 Convergence achieved after 9 iterations Convergence achieved after 7 iterations Convergence achieved after 7 iterations Convergence achieved after 8 iterations 0.000 0.068 0.026 Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Real House Price Growth (-3) 8.906 12.279 14.454 12.300 0.047 0.016 0.002 0.006 Variable Coefficient Std.

Score: 652816.85 - https://www.un.org/development...2019LINK-Monday-Session4-A.pdf

  UNAI Quiz: World Food Day | United Nations

A. 20 per cent B. 40 per cent C. 60 per cent Correct! According to the new Driven to Waste report from WWF and Tesco,  approximately 40 per cent of all the food grown goes uneaten, which is higher than the previously estimated figure of 33 per cent. (...) Between 811 and 911 million people Correct!  According to the 2021 report   “The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World” , it is projected that between 720 and 811 million people in the world faced hunger in 2020. (...) For how much per cent of biodiversity loss are food systems responsible? A. 20 B. 40 C. 60 Correct! According to UNEP , food systems cause 60 per cent of biodiversity loss, and generate up to a third of human greenhouse gas emissions.

Score: 652667.14 - https://www.un.org/en/academic...act/unai-quiz-world-food-day-0

  UNAI Quiz: World Children’s Day Quiz | United Nations

A. 97 countries B. 103 countries C. 196 countries Correct!  The Convention on the Rights of the Child is the most rapidly ratified human rights treaty in history. (...) Incorrect. The correct answer is C. During 2020 UNICEF was able to support more than 301 million children, including 147 million girls, with remote learning. Incorrect. The correct answer is C. During 2020 UNICEF was able to support more than 301 million children, including 147 million girls, with remote learning.

Score: 652667.14 - https://www.un.org/en/academic...-children%E2%80%99s-day-quiz-0