Home

  Closing Arguments Submitted in Kanyarukiga Trial | United Nations International Criminal Tribunal fo

Main menu About the ICTR The Genocide The Cases Documents News You are here Home » News News Closing Arguments Submitted in Kanyarukiga Trial Press release | Wed, 05/05/2010 The closing arguments in the case of Gaspard Kanyarukiga were presented 24 May 2010, before Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. The Prosecution offered a two-hour closing statement and a one-hour rebuttal, as did the Defense. (...) The Defense also raised numerous procedural issues, claiming that the case was prejudiced. (...) David Jacobs (Canada) spoke for the Defense, and Ms. Holo Makwaia (Tanzania) represented the Prosecution.

Score: 1530060.6 - https://unictr.irmct.org/en/ne...ts-submitted-kanyarukiga-trial

  Closing Arguments Submitted in Kanyarukiga Trial | United Nations International Criminal Tribunal fo

Main menu About the ICTR The Genocide The Cases Documents News You are here Home » News News Closing Arguments Submitted in Kanyarukiga Trial Press release | Wed, 05/05/2010 The closing arguments in the case of Gaspard Kanyarukiga were presented 24 May 2010, before Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. The Prosecution offered a two-hour closing statement and a one-hour rebuttal, as did the Defense. (...) The Defense also raised numerous procedural issues, claiming that the case was prejudiced. (...) David Jacobs (Canada) spoke for the Defense, and Ms. Holo Makwaia (Tanzania) represented the Prosecution.

Score: 1530060.6 - https://unictr.irmct.org/en/node/184

  Joint trial of Clément Kayishema and Obed Ruzindana | United Nations International Criminal Tribunal

Joint trial of Clément Kayishema and Obed Ruzindana | United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Jump to navigation United Nations | International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals About the Mechanism Cases English Français Kinyarwanda United Nations International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals Legacy website of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Since the ICTR’s closure on 31 December 2015, the Mechanism maintains this website as part of its mission to preserve and promote the legacy of the UN International Criminal Tribunals. (...) This motion calls, on the one hand, for equality of the means available to the Prosecution and to the Defense and, on the other hand, requests that the Prosecutor be restricted to the same number of assistants as that authorized for the Defense and paid for by the Registry. This was a question of applying the principle of equality of means, observed the Defense. The Defense further maintained that its motion was not a preliminary motion, but that the matter at issue could be raised at any time during the proceedings.

Score: 1498283.6 - https://unictr.irmct.org/en/node/1981

  Joint trial of Clément Kayishema and Obed Ruzindana | United Nations International Criminal Tribunal

Joint trial of Clément Kayishema and Obed Ruzindana | United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Jump to navigation United Nations | International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals About the Mechanism Cases English Français Kinyarwanda United Nations International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals Legacy website of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Since the ICTR’s closure on 31 December 2015, the Mechanism maintains this website as part of its mission to preserve and promote the legacy of the UN International Criminal Tribunals. (...) This motion calls, on the one hand, for equality of the means available to the Prosecution and to the Defense and, on the other hand, requests that the Prosecutor be restricted to the same number of assistants as that authorized for the Defense and paid for by the Registry. This was a question of applying the principle of equality of means, observed the Defense. The Defense further maintained that its motion was not a preliminary motion, but that the matter at issue could be raised at any time during the proceedings.

Score: 1498283.6 - https://unictr.irmct.org/en/ne...t-kayishema-and-obed-ruzindana

  RESPONSE OF THE CROA

Article 65, paragraph 1, of the LCP stipulates that the accused (regardless of the criminal offense in question) may have a defense counsel before and during the entire criminal proceedings and the proceedings on extraordinary legal remedies in accordance with the LCP, as well as in procedure for the execution of the sentence, warning measures or safety measures in accordance with special regulations. (...) The accused who declares that (s)he does not want to take a defense counsel, shall be familiarized by the authority conducting the criminal proceedings in a simple and understandable way with the meaning of his/her right to a defense counsel and the consequences of waiving this right. (...) If the court finds that the actions of the accused or the defense counsel delay the criminal proceedings, an ex officio defense counsel will be appointed, too, for further course of the proceedings until the judgment becomes final.

Score: 1486738.5 - https://www.ohchr.org/sites/de...ntion/Call/Country/Croatia.pdf

  Peru

Peru United States ITU Activities on Countering Spam Français  |  Español   Print Version   Home : Office of the Secretary-General : CSD Peru Back to home   Back to Anti-Spam Laws and Authorities   Peru - National Institute of Defense of the Consumer and Intellectual Property - INDECOPI Peru has approved on May 2004 a specific law "LEY N° 28493" dealing with spam e-mails. (...) In the text of the LEY N° 28493 it is written that " sending unsolicited messages for commercial purposes without the authorization of the recipient will be illegal, and any violation criminally sanctioned". The fraudulent aspects of unsolicited messages are currently covered by specific provisions of the Criminal Code dealing with Delitos informáticos (cyber crimes), which include manipulation of personal banking data, utilization of false identity for sending e-mails, and others. In 2002, to better face the new challenges posed by cyber crimes a Multisectorial Commission was created to implement the UNGA Resolution 55/63 on "Combating the Criminal Misuse of Information Technologies". Competent Authority Ministry of Transport and Communications- Viceministerio de Comunicaciones   Enforcement Authority: National Institute of Defense of the Consumer and Intellectual Property Contact points Peruvian Multisectorial Commission to Implement the UNGA Resolution 55/63 on "Combating the Criminal Misuse of Information Technologies Fax +511-433-1807  Enforcement : National Institute of Defense of the Consumer and Intellectual Property Postal address  Calle de la Prosa 138 San Borja Telephone number (511) 224-7800 (511) 224-7777  Fax. (511) - 224-0348 Relevant legislation in place LEY N. 28493 (spanish only) The Criminal Code sanctions misleading and fraudulent behaviors linked to spam and its content. - for manipulation of personal banking data, misuse of credit cards ant Automatic Teller Machines: Criminal Code Article 186 - for E-mail false identity: Criminal Code Article 161  - data manipulation and/or falsification: Criminal Code Article 427   - unauthorized access to telematic and computer systems and services.

Score: 1481911.9 - https://www.itu.int/osg/spu/sp...islation/legislation_peru.html

  First Application - Qualification Requirement | International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugos

First Application - Qualification Requirement | International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Skip to main content United Nations | International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals IRMCT About the Mechanism Cases English Français bosanski, hrvatski ili srpski Shqip Македонски Legacy website of the ICTY | TPIY | MKSJ United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Toggle navigation About the ICTY Cases Documents Press Outreach Features × Legacy website of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Since the ICTY’s closure on 31 December 2017, the Mechanism maintains this website as part of its mission to preserve and promote the legacy of the UN International Criminal Tribunals.   (...) First Application - Qualification Requirement Pursuant to Rules 44 and 45 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (hereinafter “the Rules”) and to Articles 14 and 15 of the Directive on the Assignment of Defense Counsel (hereinafter “the Directive”) the counsel: 1. must be admitted to the practice of law in a State, or be a university professor of law; 2. must have written and oral proficiency in one of the two working languages of the Tribunal;* 3. must be a member in good standing of the Association of Defense Counsel practicing before the Tribunal (ADC-ICTY); 4. must not have been found guilty or otherwise disciplined in relevant disciplinary; proceedings against him/her in a national or international forum, including proceedings pursuant to the Code of Professional Conduct for Defense Counsel Appearing Before the International Tribunal; ** 5. must not have been found guilty in relevant criminal proceedings; 6. must not have engaged in conduct whether in pursuit of his/her profession or otherwise which is dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a counsel, prejudicial to the administration of justice, or likely to diminish public confidence in the International Tribunal or the administration of justice, or otherwise bring the International Tribunal into disrepute; 7. must not have provided false or misleading information in relation to his/her qualifications and fitness to practice or have failed to provide relevant information; 8. must possess established competence in criminal law and/or international criminal law/international humanitarian law/ international human rights law; 9. must possess at least seven years of relevant experience, whether as a judge, prosecutor, attorney or in some other capacity, in criminal proceedings; 10. must have indicated his or her availability and willingness to be assigned by the Tribunal to any person detained under the authority of the Tribunal lacking the means to remunerate counsel, under the terms set out in the Directive; 11. any other information which you deem relevant; *If the Registrar deems it in the interest of justice, he may waive this requirements, as provided in Rule 44 (B) of the Rules and Article 14(C) of the Directive.

Score: 1473307.2 - https://www.icty.org/en/sid/304

  First Application - Qualification Requirement | International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugos

First Application - Qualification Requirement | International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Skip to main content United Nations | International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals IRMCT About the Mechanism Cases English Français bosanski, hrvatski ili srpski Shqip Македонски Legacy website of the ICTY | TPIY | MKSJ United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Toggle navigation About the ICTY Cases Documents Press Outreach Features × Legacy website of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Since the ICTY’s closure on 31 December 2017, the Mechanism maintains this website as part of its mission to preserve and promote the legacy of the UN International Criminal Tribunals.   (...) First Application - Qualification Requirement Pursuant to Rules 44 and 45 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (hereinafter “the Rules”) and to Articles 14 and 15 of the Directive on the Assignment of Defense Counsel (hereinafter “the Directive”) the counsel: 1. must be admitted to the practice of law in a State, or be a university professor of law; 2. must have written and oral proficiency in one of the two working languages of the Tribunal;* 3. must be a member in good standing of the Association of Defense Counsel practicing before the Tribunal (ADC-ICTY); 4. must not have been found guilty or otherwise disciplined in relevant disciplinary; proceedings against him/her in a national or international forum, including proceedings pursuant to the Code of Professional Conduct for Defense Counsel Appearing Before the International Tribunal; ** 5. must not have been found guilty in relevant criminal proceedings; 6. must not have engaged in conduct whether in pursuit of his/her profession or otherwise which is dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a counsel, prejudicial to the administration of justice, or likely to diminish public confidence in the International Tribunal or the administration of justice, or otherwise bring the International Tribunal into disrepute; 7. must not have provided false or misleading information in relation to his/her qualifications and fitness to practice or have failed to provide relevant information; 8. must possess established competence in criminal law and/or international criminal law/international humanitarian law/ international human rights law; 9. must possess at least seven years of relevant experience, whether as a judge, prosecutor, attorney or in some other capacity, in criminal proceedings; 10. must have indicated his or her availability and willingness to be assigned by the Tribunal to any person detained under the authority of the Tribunal lacking the means to remunerate counsel, under the terms set out in the Directive; 11. any other information which you deem relevant; *If the Registrar deems it in the interest of justice, he may waive this requirements, as provided in Rule 44 (B) of the Rules and Article 14(C) of the Directive.

Score: 1473307.2 - https://www.icty.org/en/conten...tion-qualification-requirement

  First Application - Qualification Requirement | International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugos

First Application - Qualification Requirement | International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Skip to main content United Nations | International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals IRMCT About the Mechanism Cases English Français bosanski, hrvatski ili srpski Shqip Македонски Legacy website of the ICTY | TPIY | MKSJ United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Toggle navigation About the ICTY Cases Documents Press Outreach Features × Legacy website of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Since the ICTY’s closure on 31 December 2017, the Mechanism maintains this website as part of its mission to preserve and promote the legacy of the UN International Criminal Tribunals.   (...) First Application - Qualification Requirement Pursuant to Rules 44 and 45 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (hereinafter “the Rules”) and to Articles 14 and 15 of the Directive on the Assignment of Defense Counsel (hereinafter “the Directive”) the counsel: 1. must be admitted to the practice of law in a State, or be a university professor of law; 2. must have written and oral proficiency in one of the two working languages of the Tribunal;* 3. must be a member in good standing of the Association of Defense Counsel practicing before the Tribunal (ADC-ICTY); 4. must not have been found guilty or otherwise disciplined in relevant disciplinary; proceedings against him/her in a national or international forum, including proceedings pursuant to the Code of Professional Conduct for Defense Counsel Appearing Before the International Tribunal; ** 5. must not have been found guilty in relevant criminal proceedings; 6. must not have engaged in conduct whether in pursuit of his/her profession or otherwise which is dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a counsel, prejudicial to the administration of justice, or likely to diminish public confidence in the International Tribunal or the administration of justice, or otherwise bring the International Tribunal into disrepute; 7. must not have provided false or misleading information in relation to his/her qualifications and fitness to practice or have failed to provide relevant information; 8. must possess established competence in criminal law and/or international criminal law/international humanitarian law/ international human rights law; 9. must possess at least seven years of relevant experience, whether as a judge, prosecutor, attorney or in some other capacity, in criminal proceedings; 10. must have indicated his or her availability and willingness to be assigned by the Tribunal to any person detained under the authority of the Tribunal lacking the means to remunerate counsel, under the terms set out in the Directive; 11. any other information which you deem relevant; *If the Registrar deems it in the interest of justice, he may waive this requirements, as provided in Rule 44 (B) of the Rules and Article 14(C) of the Directive.

Score: 1473307.2 - https://www.icty.org/en/node/8460

  Albania’s Response

Meanwhile, in article 52, of law no. 7905 dated 21.3.1995 "Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Albania", as amended, provides the necessary guarantees for the free and independent practice of the profession of lawyer by providing for cases when examinations and searches in the office of a defense lawyer are allowed in the lawyer's office, and procedures for performing them. (...) Meanwhile, Article 11 provides for the rights of a lawyer, which guarantees the exercise of the profession of lawyer at any court or administrative body. [6: Article 8] Also, article 50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has provided that the defense lawyer enjoys the rights the law recognizes to the defendant, except those preserved to the latter in person. (...) Article 52, on the other hand, provides for the prohibition of Interceptions of conversations or communications between defense lawyers and their assistants, or between defense lawyers and the persons they defend, and prohibits any form of inspection of the mail between the defendant and his defense lawyer is prohibited, except when they constitute material evidence of the criminal offence object of investigations. .

Score: 1464875.9 - https://www.ohchr.org/sites/de...esponse-questionnaire-ijl.docx