Home

According to INRA data, since the current Administration came to power, some 3,889,291 hectares have been titled, as against the 5,516,210 hectares titled during the period from 1996 to 2006. 31. (...) The Permanent Forum also states that it “strongly supports the efforts of the current Government of Bolivia ... to discontinue this enslaving practice and return indigenous lands to their lawful owners, the Guaraní themselves”. (...) As part of its development policies, one of the thrusts of the current Administration has been the revaluation and utilization of the coca leaf, including its processing.

Recent developments in the context of the membership of Bulgaria in European organizations .............................................................................. 8–10 5 B. The current judicial reform strategy ............................................................... 11–16 6 III. (...) In particular, the prosecution service, considered as part of the judiciary in Bulgaria, should be more prominently included in the current judicial reform strategy and in future judicial reform efforts. (...) In the view of the Special Rapporteur, budgetary allocations to fund the courts in the current fiscal year, or in the next financial year, may be reduced solely with the consent of the judiciary, or of an independent body representing it, at all times, including in times of crisis.

On 12 January 2016, the two judges duly appointed by the current Sejm were admitted to the bench. From that moment onwards, the Tribunal had 12 sitting judges instead of the 15 required by the Constitution. 29. (...) On that day, the President of the Republic appointed judge Julia Przyłębska, recently selected by the ruling majority during the current Sejm, as the “acting President” of the Constitutional Tribunal. Judge Przyłębska admitted the three judges appointed by the eighth (current) Sejm to take up their functions in the Tribunal and convened a meeting of the General Assembly for the same day.

Nevertheless, it strives to identify areas of complementarity around the concept of development partnership, and to help ground UN discussions on the right to development in the current development assistance discourse and available evidence concerning ODA. (...) However, this ‘global compact’ does set the tone of the current international discourse around aid and development and, for the purpose of this study, is used as part of an assessment of the way in which the right to development is being realised. (...) If that UN target were achieved, aid would be about $165 billion, three times the current level, and above what is required to meet the MDGs.

Parties generally shared the view that the current approach under the Kyoto Protocol to GHGs, sectors and source categories should continue to be applied. 28. (...) They also noted that the reporting of any newly included gases should be comparable and consistent with the current reporting framework under the Kyoto Protocol. 30. (...) Parties noted that the current provisions of the Kyoto Protocol exclude emissions from international aviation and maritime transport from national totals.

GE.17-15205(A)  اللجنة التنفيذية لربانمج املفوض السامي والستون الثامنة الدورة 2017تشرين

.: General 31 August 2020 Resolution 2541 (2020) Adopted by the Security Council on 31 August 2020 The Security Council, Recalling all its previous resolutions, statements of its President and press statements on the situation in Mali, Reaffirming its strong commitment to the sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity of Mali, emphasizing that the Malian authorities have primary responsibility for the provision of stability and security throughout the territory of Mali, and underscoring the importance of achieving national ownership of peace- and security- related initiatives, Recalling the provisions of the Agreement on Peace and Reconciliation in Mali (“the Agreement”) calling upon the Security Council to give its full support to the Agreement, to closely monitor its implementation and, if necessary, to take measures against anyone hindering the implementation of the commitments contained therein or the realization of its objectives, Expressing its deep concern regarding the recent developments in Mali, strongly condemning the mutiny which happened in Kati, on 18 August 2020, underlining the urgent need to restore rule of law and to move towards the return to constitutional order, reiterating its strong support to the Economic Community of West African States’ (ECOWAS) initiatives and mediation efforts in Mali, and expressing its readiness to discuss this matter, in the course of the year, in light of the potential implications of these recent developments on the implementation of the Agreement, Recognizing that some progress was made during the past eight months in the implementation of the Agreement, and that a combination of some level of political will and international pressure, including through the prospect of sanctions, constituted important factors in securing this progress, expressing a significant sense of impatience with parties over the persistent delays in the full implementation of key provisions of the Agreement, further noting that continued delays in implementation contribute to a political and security vacuum jeopardizing the stability and development of Mali as well as the viability of the Agreement, stressing the need for increased ownership and prioritization in the implementation of the Agreement, and further stressing the importance of the full, effective and meaningful participation of S/2020/859 20-11300 3/4 women in the mechanisms established by the Agreement to support and moni tor its implementation, Strongly condemning all abuses and violations of human rights and violations of international humanitarian law in Mali, calling upon all parties to bring an end to such violations and abuses and to comply with their obligations under applicable international law, Recalling the provisions of resolution 2531 (2020) urging the Malian parties to take immediate and concrete action, in a spirit of genuine cooperation, to fulfil the priority measures listed in its paragraph 3 before the end of MINUSMA’s current mandate, encouraging the Panel of Experts established pursuant to resolution 2374 (2017) (“the Panel of Experts”) to identify parties responsible for potential lack of implementation of these priority measures through its regular reporting and interim updates, and expressing its intent, should these priority measures not be implemented by the end of MINUSMA’s current mandate, to respond with measures pursuant to resolution 2374 (2017) on individuals and entities who are thus obstructing or threatening the implementation of the Agreement, Stressing that all parties to the Agreement share the primary responsibility to make steadfast progress in its implementation, Taking note of the decisions of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 2374 (2017) concerning Mali (“the Committee”) of 20 December 2018 and 10 July 2019 that several individuals be placed on the list of individuals and entities subject to measures pursuant to resolution 2374 (2017) (“the 2374 Sanctions List”) and further taking note of the intention of the Committee to consider the removal of these individuals from the 2374 Sanctions List if the priority measures listed in paragraph 3 of resolution 2531 (2020) are fully implemented and the individuals designated cease all illicit activities, including those listed in the statement of case, while stressing that the Security Council has not yet seen sufficient progress to merit such consideration, Reiterating that individuals or entities placed on the 2374 Sanctions List shall not benefit from any financial, operational or logist ical support from United Nations entities deployed in Mali, until their removal from the 2374 Sanctions List and without prejudice to the exemptions set by paragraphs 2, 5, 6 and 7 of resolution 2374 (2017), welcoming the measures already taken by United Nations entities deployed in Mali to ensure these individuals or entities do not benefit from such support, and reiterating its request made in resolution 2531 (2020) for the Secretary- General to include in his next quarterly report on MINUSMA an update on these measures, Taking note of the final report (S/2020/785) of the Panel of Experts, Noting the importance of continued cooperation and information exchange between the Panel of Experts and all other United Nations entities operating in Mali, within their mandates and capabilities, Determining that the situation in Mali continues to constitute a threat to international peace and security in the region, Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, 1. (...) Decides to extend until 30 September 2021 the mandate of the Panel of Experts, as set out in paragraphs 11 to 15 of resolution 2374 (2017), as well as the request to MINUSMA, as set out in paragraph 16 of resolution 2374 (2017), expresses its intention to review the mandate and take appropriate action regarding its further extension no later than 31 August 2021, and requests the Secretary-General to take the necessary administrative measures as expeditiously as possible to re -establish the Panel of Experts, in consultation with the Committee, drawing, as appropriate, on the expertise of the current members of the Panel of Experts; 4. Requests the Panel of Experts to provide to the Council, after discussion with the Committee, a midterm report no later than 28 February 2021, a final report no later than 15 August 2021, and periodic updates in between, as appropriate; 5.

The emergence of new GNSS and regional augmentations has focused attention on the need for the coordination of programme plans among current and future operators in order to enhance the utility of GNSS services. 2. The representatives of GNSS core system providers, GNSS augmentation providers and the international organizations primarily associated with the use of GNSS and representatives of international projects in developing countries, Aware of the overlap of GNSS mission objectives and of the interdisciplinary applications of GNSS services, Recognizing the advantages of ongoing communication and cooperation among operators and users of GNSS and their augmentations, Recognizing the need to protect the investment of the current user base of GNSS services through the continuation of existing services, Aware that the complexity and cost of user equipment should be reduced whenever possible, Convinced that GNSS providers should pursue greater compatibility and interoperability among all current and future systems in terms of spectrum, signal structures, time and geodetic reference standards to the maximum extent possible, Desiring to promote the international growth and potential benefits of GNSS, Noting that General Assembly resolution 59/2 (paragraph 11) invites GNSS and augmentation providers to consider establishing an international committee on GNSS in order to maximize the benefits of the use and applications of GNSS to support sustainable development, Have agreed to establish on the basis of these non-binding terms of reference, the International Committee on GNSS for the purpose of promoting the use and application of GNSS on a global basis. 9 A/AC.105/879 B. (...) The working group formed to address compatibility and interoperability, to be co-led by the United States of America and the Russian Federation, will pursue the following actions: Action A1: Establish a providers forum to enhance compatibility and inter- operability among current and future global and regional space-based systems.

A balanced mandate would E/CN.4/2005/G/30 Page 4 allow the Rapporteur to present a full and fair picture of the situation, and give his findings a weight which the current one-sided approach cannot achieve. (...) Israel has responded to these distortions at length in response to the Rapporteur's previous reports, and can only express its disappointment that, notwithstanding its refutations, many of these elements continue to reappear in the Addendum. In this current response, Israel prefers not to focus yet again on the misrepresentations and distortions, but rather to address two conceptual aspects of the Addendum which, in Israel's view, reflect an approach which is damaging to the new spirit of progress and reconciliation in the region: disregard for the agreed Road Map and peace agreement framework, and the discouragement of confidence building measures, including the disengagement initiative. (...) In the careful thinking of the Road Map, these talks can only take place after a number of preliminary steps have occurred – including concerted Palestinian action to dismantle the terrorist infrastructure and to prevent the current indoctrination and incitement. For the Rapporteur, however, Palestinian actions are irrelevant – as is the phased process agreed by the parties and the international community.

LAND TRANSITION MATRIX Article 3.3 activities Article 3.4 activities Article 3.3 activities Other (5) Total area at the end of the current inventory year (1) This table should be used to report land area and changes in land area subject to the various activities in the inventory year. (...) (6) The value in the cell of row “Total area at the end of the current inventory year” corresponds to the total land area of a country and is constant for all years. (...) GREENHOUSE GAS SOURCE AND SINK ACTIVITIES Net emissions/removals (1) Accounting Parameters(7) Accounting Quantity (8) (Gg CO2 equivalent) Number of the reported year in the commitment period: INFORMATION TABLE ON ACCOUNTING FOR ACTIVITIES UNDER ARTICLES 3.3 AND 3.4 OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL (6) Cumulative net emissions and removals for all years of the commitment period reported in the current submission. (1) All values are reported in table 5(KP) of the CRF for the relevant inventory year as reported in the current submission and are automatically entered in this table