Home

Results 1 - 10 of 644,999 for degree applications. Search took 1.321 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
It is not a degree. The Applicant has confirmed that she has no other degrees 37. Staff members have an obligation to ensure that degrees listed in their job application are recognized degrees. (...) The Applicant cannot rely on a degree that was not awarded. 40.
Language:English
Score: 1155864.9 - https://www.un.org/en/internal...dt/judgments/undt-2019-018.pdf
Data Source: un
Data Indicator SeriesID SeriesDescription GeoAreaCode GeoAreaName TimePeriod Value Time_Detail Source FootNote Nature Units Reporting Type Observation Status ISOalpha3 Type SeriesCode 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 1 World 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 2 Africa 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 4 Afghanistan 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O AFG Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 5 South America 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 8 Albania 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A ALB Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 9 Oceania 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 11 Western Africa 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 12 Algeria 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O DZA Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 13 Central America 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 14 Eastern Africa 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 15 Northern Africa 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 16 American Samoa 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State; The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O ASM Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 17 Middle Africa 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 18 Southern Africa 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 19 Americas 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 20 Andorra 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O AND Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 21 Northern America 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 24 Angola 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O AGO Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 28 Antigua and Barbuda 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A ATG Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 29 Caribbean 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 30 Eastern Asia 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 31 Azerbaijan 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A AZE Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 32 Argentina 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting. C NUMBER G V ARG Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 34 Southern Asia 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 35 South-Eastern Asia 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 36 Australia 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O AUS Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 39 Southern Europe 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 40 Austria 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU C NUMBER G A AUT Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 44 Bahamas 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A BHS Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 48 Bahrain 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BHR Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 50 Bangladesh 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A BGD Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 51 Armenia 2018 2 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A ARM Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 52 Barbados 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BRB Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 53 Australia and New Zealand 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 54 Melanesia 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 56 Belgium 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU C NUMBER G A BEL Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 57 Micronesia 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 60 Bermuda 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State; The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O BMU Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 61 Polynesia 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 62 Central and Southern Asia 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 64 Bhutan 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A BTN Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 68 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BOL Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 70 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BIH Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 72 Botswana 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A BWA Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 76 Brazil 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting. C NUMBER G V BRA Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 84 Belize 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A BLZ Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 86 Chagos Archipelago 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State; The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O IOT Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 90 Solomon Islands 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A SLB Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 92 British Virgin Islands 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State; The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O VGB Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 96 Brunei Darussalam 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BRN Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 100 Bulgaria 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU C NUMBER G A BGR Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 104 Myanmar 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A MMR Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 108 Burundi 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A BDI Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 112 Belarus 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BLR Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 116 Cambodia 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O KHM Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 120 Cameroon 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A CMR Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 124 Canada 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A CAN Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 127 Southern Asia (excluding India) 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 132 Cabo Verde 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A CPV Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 135 Caucasus and Central Asia 2018 2 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 136 Cayman Islands 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State; The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O CYM Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 140 Central African Republic 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O CAF Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 142 Asia 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 143 Central Asia 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 144 Sri Lanka 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A LKA Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 145 Western Asia 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 148 Chad 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A TCD Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 150 Europe 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 151 Eastern Europe 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 152 Chile 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest C NUMBER G A CHL Country ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 154 Northern Europe 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 155 Western Europe 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest E NUMBER G A NULL Region ER_REG_SSFRAR 14.b.1 3033 Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 156 China 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting.
Language:English
Score: 1141839.7 - https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/...for_small-scale_fisheries.xlsx
Data Source: un
On 5 May 2015, the Applicant responded that all the “completed degrees are listed.” … The RVU turned to the other educational institution listed in the Applicant’s … PHP, that is, Group IPG/ISTI with a query from the RVU to clarify whether the Brevet d’études Supérieures Spécialisées awarded in 1992 could be aligned with a Bachelor’s degree. (...) On 10 April 2018, the OIOS Resident Auditor provided MINUSMA with a list of staff members with negative reference checks, which included the Applicant. … On 8 June 2018, the RVU informed the Applicant that the educational titles listed in her PHP are not at University degree level and are not accepted as fulfilling the minimum requirement for, or in lieu of, a first-level post-secondary degree (Bachelor’s degree) for the purposes of recruitment to the Professional level. (...) Applicants with a first level university degree combined with additional qualifying years of experience (earned after receipt of degree) are also considered to have met the educational requirements equivalent to a Master’s.
Language:English
Score: 1128626.8 - https://www.un.org/en/internal...at/judgments/2019-UNAT-950.pdf
Data Source: un
The configurable redundant deployment enablement capability enables the IoT applications to configure deployment of redundant functional components of the IoT in order to provide different degrees of reliability required in communication, service provision and data management, based on the requirements of the IoT applications [A-7-1]. (...) The configurable data integrity check capability enables the IoT applications to configure the parameters for checking the data lifetime, the available attributes of the data and the consistency of data in order to provide different degrees of availability in data management, based on the requirements of the IoT applications [A-7-3]. The configurable device integrity check capability enables the IoT applications to configure the parameters for checking the status of all device functions in order to provide different degrees of availability of IoT devices, based on the requirements of the IoT applications [A-7-4].
Language:English
Score: 1119885.3 - https://www.itu.int/wftp3/Publ.../files/basic-html/page878.html
Data Source: un
In its article 4, the Treaty of Tlatelolco describes its “zone of application”. Paragraph 1 of said article defines “zone of application” as: “the whole of the territories for which the Treaty is in force”. (...) Paragraph 2 of article 4, expanding the “zone of application” beyond “the territories” mentioned in paragraph 1, expressly indicates the geographical coordinates of the “zone of application”. 5. (...) In this Treaty, as in Tlatelolco 20 years later, security was an urgent concern among the States that negotiated those instruments. 7 Article 4: “The region to which this Treaty refers is bounded as follows: Beginning at the South Pole, thence due north to a point 7 degrees south latitude, 90 degrees west longitude; thence by a rhumb line to a point 15 degrees north latitude, 118 degrees west longitude; thence by a rhumb line to a point 56 degrees north latitude, 144 degrees west longitude; thence by a rhumb line to a point 52 degrees north latitude, 150 degrees west longitude; thence by a rhumb line to a point 46 degrees north latitude, 180 degrees longitude; thence by a rhumb line to a point 50 degrees 36. 4 minutes north latitude, l67 degrees east longitude, thereby coinciding with the End Point of the United States-Russia Convention Line of 1867; thence along this Convention Line to its Initial Turning Point 65 degrees 30 minutes north latitude, 168 degrees 58 minutes 22. 587 seconds west longitude; thence due north along the Convention Line to its Starting Point at 72 degrees north latitude; thence by a rhumb line to a point 75 degrees north latitude; 165 degrees west longitude; thence due east to a point 75 degrees north latitude, 140 degrees west longitude; thence by a great circle to a point 86 degrees 30 minutes north latitude, 60 degrees west longitude; thence due south along the 60 degrees west meridian to a point 82 degrees 13 minutes north latitude, which coincides with Point No. 127 of the Line of the Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark, which entered into force March 13, 1974; thence along this Line of Agreement to Point No. 1 at 61 degrees north latitude, 57 degrees 13. 1 minutes west longitude; thence by a rhumb line to a point 47 degrees north latitude, 43 degrees west longitude; thence by a rhumb line to a point 36 degrees north latitude 65 degrees west longitude; thence by a rhumb line to a point at the Equator and 20 degrees west longitude; thence due south to the South Pole.”
Language:English
Score: 1118035 - https://www.un.org/depts/los/g.../contributions_2018/OPANAL.pdf
Data Source: un
TOEFL MyBest score is accepted. 2. Otherwise, applicants received degrees from institutions where the official language of teaching is exclusively English can be accepted with appropriate proof materials. (...) Applicant who has not obtained the degree certificate when applying shall provide an official pre-graduation certificate showing their student status and the expected graduation date. (...) Ningbo, Hangzhou, Shanghai’s Locations in China Application Guide for IDE Master’s Degree Program INTRODUCTION ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS FOR APPLICATION APPLICATION DEADLINE SELECTION PROCESS AND DATES FOR ANNOUNCING ADMISSI FEES INSURANCE SCHOLARSHIP REGISTRATION ACCOMMODATION CONTACT
Language:English
Score: 1104824.8 - https://www.un.org/technologyb..._guide_of_ide_program_2022.pdf
Data Source: un
If all of the requirements are not met, your application will not be processed. Successful application does not guarantee placement. Applicants to the United Nations internship programme must at the time of application meet one of the following requirements: (a) Be enrolled in a graduate school programme (second university degree or equivalent, or higher); (b) Be enrolled in the final academic year of a first university degree programme (minimum Bachelor’s level or equivalent); (c) Have graduated with a university degree (as defined in (a) above) and (b)  if selected, must commence the internship within a one-year period of graduation Application process All internship vacancies will be posted in the United Nations Careers Portals. (...) Important note: You must Upload with your online application, a proof of enrolment stating that you are currently enrolled in a course of study and your expected date of graduation and if you have graduated, a certified copy of your degree.
Language:English
Score: 1100252.5 - https://www.unon.org/content/internship-programme
Data Source: un
If all of the requirements are not met, your application will not be processed. Successful application does not guarantee placement. Applicants to the United Nations internship programme must at the time of application meet one of the following requirements: (a) Be enrolled in a graduate school programme (second university degree or equivalent, or higher); (b) Be enrolled in the final academic year of a first university degree programme (minimum Bachelor’s level or equivalent); (c) Have graduated with a university degree (as defined in (a) above) and (b)  if selected, must commence the internship within a one-year period of graduation Application process All internship vacancies will be posted in the United Nations Careers Portals. (...) Important note: You must Upload with your online application, a proof of enrolment stating that you are currently enrolled in a course of study and your expected date of graduation and if you have graduated, a certified copy of your degree.
Language:English
Score: 1100252.5 - https://www.unon.org/node/748
Data Source: un
1 Application Guide for IDE Master’s Degree Program 2021,Zhejiang University INTRODUCTION The UN Technology Bank for the Least Developed Countries, the World Eco-Design Conference (WEDC) and the International School of Design at Zhejiang University, Ningbo (ISD-ZJU Ningbo), China jointly signed the agreement on cooperation and promotion of the implementation of International Design Education (IDE) program. (...) Please refer to the UN website for a full https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/ldc_list.pdf 2 list;  Applicants must be non-Chinese citizens with proper moral conduct;  Have a bachelor’s degree (Applicant who has not obtained the degree certificate when applying shall provide the pre-graduation certificate first, then provide the academic degree certificates no later than registration);  Must be under the age of 35 (Age limit is flexible for healthy applicants with certain work experience and high academic ability);  In good health with no infectious disease or any physical or mental diseases that may affect the normal study. (...) Admitted applicants are required to provide the original copies of academic degree certificates; those who fail to provide the original copies will be disqualified for the enrollment. 2.
Language:English
Score: 1098397.9 - https://www.un.org/technologyb...rogram_scholarship_updated.pdf
Data Source: un
UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE AD HOC INTERNSHIP PROGRAMME APPLICATION FORM IMPORTANT: Please carefully read the following notes before submitting the application form: 1. Eligibility requirements : Only applicants who meet the following conditions would be considered: (a) Applicants are enrolled in a degree programme in a graduate school (second university degree or higher) at the time of application and during the internship; or (b) Applicants pursuing their studies in countries where higher education is not divided into undergraduate and graduate stages have completed at least four years of full-time studies at a university or equivalent institution towards the completion of a degree. 2. (...) Highest Education (College and/or University or Equivalent): Degrees Obtained Institution (Name, Place and Country) Years and Months Attended (mm/yyyy-mm/yyyy) Name of a Degree Obtained Major subjects of Study             -                               -                               -                   Degrees Expected Institution (Name, Place and Country) Years and Months Attended (mm/yyyy-mm/yyyy) Name of a Degree Expected Major subjects of Study             -                               -                               -                   14.
Language:English
Score: 1091063.2 - https://unece.org/fileadmin/DA...nship_application_form2009.doc
Data Source: un