Case No.: UNDT/NBI/2019/104
Order No.: 100 (NBI/2019)
Page 3 of 10
briefing on Safe and Defensive driving.4 Since April 2017, the Applicant has not
held a driving permit and he has not performed driving functions.5
8. (...) The Applicant acknowledges that since 2017 he has been aware of the
decision not to reinstate his driving permit and has performed only non-driving
functions. (...) Nor does he have a right to reinstatement of
his driving permit. The Applicant violated the zero-tolerance policy against
driving under the influence of alcohol and refused to take a breathalyzer.
Language:English
Score: 728592.97
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2019-100.pdf
Data Source: oaj
UNOCI policy clearly states that driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol is
punishable by immediate withdrawal of driving privileges at the roadside. (...) The relevant parts of the
SOPs are reproduced below:
“(ix) Impaired Driving.
Impaired driving is driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or driving without proper control
of the vehicle. Impaired driving is considered a serious offence in the mission and driving under the
influence of alcohol and or drugs is not tolerated.
Language:English
Score: 723403.27
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2010-052.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Stephen Lieberman, directed the removal of the Applicant’s hard drive from the
FSU office. The Applicant contends that the hard drive was removed after working
hours when no one was in the office. (...) UNDT/2011/018
Page 10 of 29
Respondent was aware that the FSU may have sensitive material stored on the hard
drive.
The sequestration of the Applicant’s hard drive
22. (...) Lieberman, on 10 April 2006, to sequester his hard
drive.
23. This is the first reference to the icon in relation to the sequestration of the hard
drive.
Language:English
Score: 715816.1
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2011-018.pdf
Data Source: oaj
ST/AI/2010/6 (Road and driving safety) prohibits staff
from driving under the influence. (...) Before, they were in a private school.
34. He has been driving since he was 18 years old and did not often drink and
drive. (...) He knows the mission’s policy on drink driving. Every mission has the same
policy, no drunk driving.
Language:English
Score: 710135.06
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2019-030.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Turkey be demoted by one grade and his UNIFIL driving permit be withdrawn
for one year. The UNDT further ordered that Mr. (...) Administrative Instruction ST/AI/2010/6 (Road and driving safety)
contains express provisions against driving under the influence of alcohol. (...) Turkey did not claim that he was not unacquainted with those
UNIFIL issuances against drunk driving and he conceded that he had seen posters at UNIFIL
publicizing its zero-tolerance driving policies.
Language:English
Score: 699249.66
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...at/judgments/2019-UNAT-955.pdf
Data Source: oaj
In November 2007, Lutta was involved in a traffic accident while driving an official
United Nations vehicle in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. (...) By a memorandum dated 29 November 2007, the Chief Transportation Officer
informed Lutta of the suspension of his UNOCI Driving Permit and Privileges. By
memorandum in January 2008, Lutta was informed that his UNOCI Driving Permit and
Privileges were permanently withdrawn.
6. (...) The JDC concluded
that there was not adequate evidence that Lutta had been driving under the influence of
alcohol. Having so concluded, it could not find that Lutta had breached his duty to exercise
reasonable care while driving a United Nations vehicle.
Language:English
Score: 688644.34
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...at/judgments/2011-unat-117.pdf
Data Source: oaj
It was alleged that the Applicant was driving under
the influence of alcohol at the time, which caused the said accident.
(ii) The Applicant was subsequently charged with:
(a) violating the applicable UNOCI (United Nations Operation in Cote
d'Ivoire) driving rules, which strictly prohibit driving under the
influence of alcohol or drugs;
(b) failing to exercise reasonable car e when utilizing the property and
assets of the Organization; and
(c) acting in a manner unbecoming of his status as an international
civil servant in violation of Staff Regulations 1.2(t) and (q) and
Staff Rule 101.2(b).
(iii) The JDC Panel considering the Applicant’s case adopted its report on
19 June 2009 and made the following unanimous conclusions/
recommendation:
(a) that there was no adequate evidence that the Applicant was driving
under the influence of alcohol on the day of the accident;
(b) that the Applicant had not breached his duty to exercise reasonable
care while driving the UN vehicle;
Case No.

Language:English
Score: 668227
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2009-060.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 2 June 2014, the Management Evaluation Unit (MEU) advised the
Applicant that on 8 May 2014 it had been notified that the decision to suspend his
driving privileges would be revoked, his driving privileges were fully reinstated
and that he was now in possession of a valid DP. (...) Torres had suspended the driving licence because that was for the DMS
and is not in the power of the HoO.
29. (...) The
Administration cannot suspend his driving privileges for prolonged or
frequent absences from work this reason.
Language:English
Score: 667075.3
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2015-112.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The cases
cited by the Respondent were entirely distinguishable as they involved inter
alia driving United Nations vehicles, which the Applicant was not driving
while drunk, which has not been proven in this case and driving with a
Case No. (...) The examination form, known as the Impaired Driving
Observation Report, was attached to the investigation report. (...) The
Applicant points out there is no rule regarding the offence cited in the sanction letter
namely, driving after having consumed alcohol. The Applicant does however,
acknowledge that the MINUSMA Code of Conduct prohibits driving while
intoxicated.
Language:English
Score: 667057.9
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2020-165.pdf
Data Source: oaj
It is common cause that when the allegations of sexual misconduct first
surfaced, a shared Google drive was set up on the instance of the Applicant.
(...) Kemokai
to grant him access before his interview leaves no doubt that the purpose of setting up
the drive was to ensure that witnesses align their interview statements.
57. (...) Kemokai
for access to the Google drive in order for them to view the files and information therein
galvanises the above finding.
58.
Language:English
Score: 645368.75
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2021-078.pdf
Data Source: oaj