B10 / 11 / 8
Page 1 / 13
BOARD PAPER - PARTNERSHIP ENGAGEMENT WITH PRIVATE SECTOR
SUMMARY
This paper discusses options, and presents recommendation for private sector engagement with the Partnership. (...) B9-10-8_2: “Engagement with the private sector – principles for engagement”, and subsequent discussions and decisions by the Board at its ninth Board meeting.
1. (...) Clear Value add Engagement demonstrates value for public health in the area of MNCH. Engagement is additive, and creates value which is over and above what could be achieved by
PMNCH without engagement of the private sector.
3.
Language:English
Score: 431111.3
-
https://www.who.int/pmnch/abou...gement_with_private_sector.pdf
Data Source: un
THE CHALLENGE OF CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT IN LAC
Successfully achieving the SDGs will require simultaneously tackling challenges of effective governance. (...) Selected UNDP innovation initiatives related to citizen engagement in LAC
Argentina
The Lab is working on citizen engagement in the context of tackling disinformation and promoting environmental policies. (...) Throughout their journey in addressing this challenge, they understand that the country might not be able to achieve waste management objectives without the engagement of citizens at large.
Honduras
UNDP Honduras has worked to engage youth in the context of the Human Development Report.
Language:English
Score: 430773.9
-
https://www.undp.org/sites/g/f...p-rblac-EN-AccLabs-Brief-2.pdf
Data Source: un
The townhall served as an opportunity for civil society representatives to engage with Secretary-General António Guterres and his senior leadership. (...) Engagement with CSOs is particularly important in the areas of protecting and promoting human rights, as well as engagement with youth and women to ensure that the views of civil society are fully reflected in the UN’s counter-terrorism policies and programmes.
To ensure systematic, coherent, and structured engagement with civil society, UNOCT developed and adopted a Civil Society Engagement Strategy to support UNOCT and Global Counter-Terrorism Coordination Compact working groups to better engage with a wide variety of civil society actors at the global, regional and national levels.
Language:English
Score: 430682.6
-
https://www.un.org/counterterrorism/node/17453
Data Source: un
The townhall served as an opportunity for civil society representatives to engage with Secretary-General António Guterres and his senior leadership. (...) Engagement with CSOs is particularly important in the areas of protecting and promoting human rights, as well as engagement with youth and women to ensure that the views of civil society are fully reflected in the UN’s counter-terrorism policies and programmes.
To ensure systematic, coherent, and structured engagement with civil society, UNOCT developed and adopted a Civil Society Engagement Strategy to support UNOCT and Global Counter-Terrorism Coordination Compact working groups to better engage with a wide variety of civil society actors at the global, regional and national levels.
Language:English
Score: 430682.6
-
https://www.un.org/counterterrorism/civil-society-engagement
Data Source: un
., 1994)
1) Passive Engagement, i.e., people told what to do.
2) Informative Engagement, i.e., people simply answer questions.
3) Consultative Engagement, i.e., people consulted by external agents but decision-making power remains with agents.
4) Bought Engagement, i.e., people participate in return for incentives (e.g., cash, food).
5) Functional Engagement, i.e., people have a say but only after major decisions have already been made by external agents.
6) Interactive Engagement, i.e., people engage in joint analysis and take control over local decisions.
7) Pro-Active Self-mobilization, i.e., people take control and start action independent of external agents.
Thus, the seven levels of engagement range from:
Passive Engagement i.e., Coercion, Collusion (Goal-seeking), at one extreme, to Pro-Active Engagement i.e., Inspirational/Purposeful (Ideal-seeking) at the other.
The importance of qualifying the type of engagement is obvious. Given the different shades of engagement, it cannot be expected that all forms of engagement will produce the same outcomes.
Language:English
Score: 430682.6
-
https://www.fao.org/fsnforum/index.php/fr/comment/4165
Data Source: un
., 1994)
1) Passive Engagement, i.e., people told what to do.
2) Informative Engagement, i.e., people simply answer questions.
3) Consultative Engagement, i.e., people consulted by external agents but decision-making power remains with agents.
4) Bought Engagement, i.e., people participate in return for incentives (e.g., cash, food).
5) Functional Engagement, i.e., people have a say but only after major decisions have already been made by external agents.
6) Interactive Engagement, i.e., people engage in joint analysis and take control over local decisions.
7) Pro-Active Self-mobilization, i.e., people take control and start action independent of external agents.
Thus, the seven levels of engagement range from:
Passive Engagement i.e., Coercion, Collusion (Goal-seeking), at one extreme, to Pro-Active Engagement i.e., Inspirational/Purposeful (Ideal-seeking) at the other.
The importance of qualifying the type of engagement is obvious. Given the different shades of engagement, it cannot be expected that all forms of engagement will produce the same outcomes.
Language:English
Score: 430682.6
-
https://www.fao.org/fsnforum/fr/comment/4165
Data Source: un
The Smartest Investment: A Framework for Business Engagement in Education | UN Global Compact
All
Participants
Search
Who We Are
The SDGs
Participation
Take Action
Engage Locally
Explore Our Library
About
News
Sign In
Contact Us
Explore our enhanced library
Designed to help you find the resources you need to take the next step on your sustainability journey.
Back to Listings
Resource Author
UNICEF
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
United Nations Global Compact
UN Special Envoy for Global Education
Report
(2013)
The Smartest Investment: A Framework for Business Engagement in Education
Resource Author
UNICEF
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
United Nations Global Compact
UN Special Envoy for Global Education
Guides engagement by business to create education and learning opportunities for children, youth and adults. Provides a framework to help companies identify the business case and develop engagement activities in a responsible manner.
Access Resource
The Smartest Investment: A Framework for Business Engagement in Education
(English)
The Smartest Investment: A Framework for Business Engagement in Education
(Chinese-Mandarin)
The Smartest Investment: A Framework for Business Engagement in Education
(French)
The Smartest Investment: A Framework for Business Engagement in Education
(Spanish)
The Smartest Investment: A Framework for Business Engagement in Education
(Arabic)
The Smartest Investment: A Framework for Business Engagement in Education
(Portuguese)
Resource Details
Issues
UN Goals & Issues
Ten Principles
Partnerships
Children's Rights
Education
Human Rights
Youth
SDG
Goal 4: Quality Education
Goal 10: Reduced Inequalities
Goal 17: Partnerships for the Goals
Share Resource
Mail
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Help us transform the world through business
Contribute Today
Sign Up for Our Bulletin
Have a Question?
Language:English
Score: 430490.1
-
https://www.unglobalcompact.org/library/391
Data Source: un
The Due Diligence Review of Private Sector Entities Engaging with UNECE was presented at the same time.
(...) The UNECE Framework does not provide a detailed roadmap for further action and does not contain a forward- looking vision for strengthening strategic engagement with the private sector. UNECE does not have dedicated staff devoted to engagement with the private-sector.
(...) The perception of UNECE’s engagement with the business sector was significantly different inside and outside the Organization.
Language:English
Score: 430103.9
-
https://unece.org/sites/defaul...%20with%20private%20sector.pdf
Data Source: un
., 1994)
1) Passive Engagement, i.e., people told what to do.
2) Informative Engagement, i.e., people simply answer questions.
3) Consultative Engagement, i.e., people consulted by external agents but decision-making power remains with agents.
4) Bought Engagement, i.e., people participate in return for incentives (e.g., cash, food).
5) Functional Engagement, i.e., people have a say but only after major decisions have already been made by external agents.
6) Interactive Engagement, i.e., people engage in joint analysis and take control over local decisions.
7) Pro-Active Self-mobilization, i.e., people take control and start action independent of external agents.
Thus, the seven levels of engagement range from:
Passive Engagement i.e., Coercion, Collusion (Goal-seeking), at one extreme, to Pro-Active Engagement i.e., Inspirational/Purposeful (Ideal-seeking) at the other.
The importance of qualifying the type of engagement is obvious. Given the different shades of engagement, it cannot be expected that all forms of engagement will produce the same outcomes.
Language:English
Score: 429943.95
-
https://www.fao.org/fsnforum/zh-hans/comment/4165
Data Source: un
., 1994)
1) Passive Engagement, i.e., people told what to do.
2) Informative Engagement, i.e., people simply answer questions.
3) Consultative Engagement, i.e., people consulted by external agents but decision-making power remains with agents.
4) Bought Engagement, i.e., people participate in return for incentives (e.g., cash, food).
5) Functional Engagement, i.e., people have a say but only after major decisions have already been made by external agents.
6) Interactive Engagement, i.e., people engage in joint analysis and take control over local decisions.
7) Pro-Active Self-mobilization, i.e., people take control and start action independent of external agents.
Thus, the seven levels of engagement range from:
Passive Engagement i.e., Coercion, Collusion (Goal-seeking), at one extreme, to Pro-Active Engagement i.e., Inspirational/Purposeful (Ideal-seeking) at the other.
The importance of qualifying the type of engagement is obvious. Given the different shades of engagement, it cannot be expected that all forms of engagement will produce the same outcomes.
Language:English
Score: 429943.95
-
https://www.fao.org/fsnforum/index.php/zh-hans/comment/4165
Data Source: un
