The interviews took place between
3 and 15 December 2010 before a three-member expert panel.
12. Two of the three expert panel members who interviewed the Applicant had
received relevant interview training: one in 2004 and the other as part of an expert panel
training in March 2009. (...) Training requirements for expert panel members
30. There is no requirement in any of the regulations, rules or policies of the
Organization for all expert panel members to undergo training in competency-based
interviewing.
31. (...) The definition of
assessment and expert panel are set out above in paras. 22 and 23.
32.
Language:English
Score: 506847.3
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2012-024.pdf
Data Source: oaj
It is trite law that it is not for a party to decide who an expert is, but for the Tribunal.
Consideration
6. (...) The expert report fails to offer more than a chronological account of the
implementation of the policy. (...) Voigt that confer upon him the status of “expert”.
Neither does his “expert report” contain a sworn affidavit that its contents are true and
accurate, nor any statement that he fully understands and complies with his duty to the
court.
11.
Language:English
Score: 505979.44
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2012-101.pdf
Data Source: oaj
She has come across situations where an Expert Panel does not
interview all eligible candidates or where mistakes are made by Expert
Panels in considering candidates. (...) o. An expert panel may be generic or targeted to find candidates in a
specific mission. (...) An Expert Panel must consider all candidates.
28.
Language:English
Score: 501356.9
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2014-014.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The parties may call witnesses and experts to testify. The opposing party may
cross-examine witnesses and experts. The Dispute Tribunal may examine witnesses
and experts called by either party and may call any other witnesses or experts it deems
necessary. (...) Landgraf be permitted to effectively challenge the expert evidence given on
behalf of the Secretary-General by presenting expert evidence of her own.8
31.
Language:English
Score: 496465.8
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...at/judgments/2014-UNAT-471.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Charles and 34 other
candidates successfully completed the test and were invited for interview by a
three-member expert panel in December 2010. The expert panel recommended
23 candidates for placement on the roster, which recommendation was endorsed by the
Field Central Review Body on 2 February 2011. (...) In the instant case, two of the three expert panel
members had received relevant interview training prior to the interviews.
9. (...) Charles’ other allegations in
respect of the expert panel, holding that the selection process had been properly conducted
in accordance with ST/AI/2010/3.
Language:English
Score: 496159.33
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...at/judgments/2013-unat-286.pdf
Data Source: oaj
In his response to this request, the Secretary-General stated in his Note
(A/62/748) of 14 March 2008:
With the exception of experts on mission holding consultant
contracts, the Secretariat is not aware of any established or
specified recourse mechanism or procedure applicable to experts
on mission. (...) “Experts on mission” remain accountable to the Organization for
the proper discharge of their functions. (...) ST/SGB/2002/9 (Regulations Governing the Status, Basic Rights and
Duties of Officials other than Secretariat Officials, and Experts on Mission)
indeed sets out the basic rights and duties of “experts on mission” but does not go
so far as to define them.
Language:English
Score: 491998.14
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2012-113.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Whilst it was planned at previous promotion sessions to give
special attention to candidates performing in expert posts, this did not
happen in his case as he was disadvantaged by his expert status. (...) Contrary to the Applicant’s assertion, former experts were not
disadvantaged by the methodology. Experts in UNHCR have the same
rotation possibilities as other staff members.
Language:English
Score: 483539.45
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...t/judgments/undt-2010-188e.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The parties may call witnesses and experts to testify. The
opposing party may cross-examine witnesses and experts. The
Dispute Tribunal may examine witnesses and experts called by
either party and may call other witnesses or experts it deems
necessary. (...) The Dispute Tribunal shall decide whether the personal
appearance of a witness or expert is required at oral proceedings and
determine the appropriate means for satisfying the requirement for
personal appearance.
Language:English
Score: 475119.9
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/gva-2022-002.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The APPB was silent on how his period of service on an expert post
for 12 years was taken into consideration. Moreover, the promotions
methodology was discriminatory towards staff occupying expert posts and
systematically disadvantaged them;
c. (...) Furthermore, the Tribunal, in its Judgment
Mebtouche UNDT/2009/039, had found that only persons currently assigned
to expert posts should be considered as such. The Applicant, however, was
not assigned to an expert post at the time of the 2009 promotions session;
b.
Language:English
Score: 474761.67
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...t/judgments/undt-2012-166e.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Milka were subject-matter experts;
Case No. UNDT/GVA/2015/139
Judgment No. (...) In Tiwathia UNDT/2015/021 the Tribunal “deemed that an expert sitting in
a panel set up to recruit the senior head of a medical unit, did not necessarily need
to be a doctor; an expert on management could be considered as a subject matter
expert for this post, as it required managerial skills”. (...) The Respondent noted that the subject matter experts in the panel were
Ms. Ho and Ms. Milka.
Language:English
Score: 472366.16
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2016-213.pdf
Data Source: oaj