Home

Результаты 1 - 10 из 507,244 для extensive selection. Время поиска 3.882 секунд.  
ELECTION OF THE MEMBERS OF THE LEGAL AND TECHNICAL COMMISSION : LIST OF CANDIDATES SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES : NOTE : ADDENDUM /? BY THE SECRETARY-GENERAL
ISBA/17/C/4/Add.1 11-36304 9 Summary of Work Experience A highly self-motivated team player and effective communicator with demonstrated professional, administrative capabilities and with extensive project management ex- perience. • Commissioner, Department of Geological Survey and Mines (May 2001 to 30 June 2010): Head of Department, and responsible for overall general ad- ministration and finance, technical and mineral policy implementation, carry- ing into effect provisions of the Mining Act and Regulations, and provision of technical advice in mineral sector and geosciences to all levels of public ad- ministration. (...) Among responsibilities were: overall direction of the project on behalf of the government, including plan- ning, timely and technical execution of activities and outputs, selection of ex- perts, workplans, selection of mineral exploration targets, budgetary manage- ment of counterpart funding and preparation activity reports.
язык:Ру́сский
счет: 1576355.8 - daccess-ods.un.org/acce...en&DS=ISBA/17/C/4/ADD.1&Lang=R
Источник данных: ods
REPORT OF THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY ON THE PROGRESS MADE IN CARRYING OUT THE POZNAN STRATEGIC PROGRAMME ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER : NOTE / BY THE SECRETARIAT
Such individual TNA projects help larger coun- tries that need more in-depth and extensive analysis to facilitate technology transfer. (...) Second Round Country Selection 33. The selection process for the second round countries is expected to be completed by October 2010. (...) Larger coun- tries that need more in-depth and extensive analysis have the option to request TNAs as a national initiative, to be drawn from the STAR. 10 (e) GEF as a Catalytic Supporting Institution for Technology Transfer 53.
язык:Ру́сский
счет: 1508222.7 - daccess-ods.un.org/acce...pen&DS=FCCC/SBI/2010/25&Lang=R
Источник данных: ods
RPT SR JUDGES LAWYERS / CONSULTATIONS PANAMA
The selection of justices of the Supreme Court is a two-step process. (...) The participants recommended that a specific legal mechanism should be defined in the short term for each step of the selection process, with precise, motivated selection criteria and on the basis of the profile of the civil servant sought, and that transparent selection processes with public participation should be introduced. (...) Its purpose is to establish a ranking within the judicial service so as to be able to select persons for promotion and implement a selection system based on a competitive examination, beginning with magistrates’ courts.
язык:Ру́сский
счет: 1495124.1 - daccess-ods.un.org/acce...en&DS=A/HRC/23/43/ADD.4&Lang=R
Источник данных: ods
REPLY OF THE GREEK GOVERNMENT TO THE WRITTEN STATEMENT MADE BY THE FEDERATION OF WESTERN THRACE TURKS IN EUROPE, GENEVA, 17 MARCH 2009
The provisions of the Treaty of Athens of 1913, which provided reciprocal and extensive minority rights for over 2 million Ottoman Greek Orthodox and approximately 650,000 Muslims of Greece, which did not embrace at that time the region of Thrace, have been superseded by the subsequent provisions of the Lausanne Peace Treaty of 1923 (Section II). (...) A/HRC/10/G/8 page 4 The selection process of the preachers and teachers of the Holy Koran is deliberately presented in a distorted way since the Muftis and Muslim boards of examiners select the competent candidates.
язык:Ру́сский
счет: 1464946.5 - daccess-ods.un.org/acce...et?open&DS=A/HRC/10/G/8&Lang=R
Источник данных: ods
REPORT OF THE OPEN-ENDED INTERGOVERNMENTAL WORKING GROUP ON THE REVIEW OF THE WORK AND FUNCTIONING OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
GE.11-13045 (R) 170611 200611 Совет по правам человека Межправительственная Рабочая группа открытого состава по
язык:Ру́сский
счет: 1375275.4 - daccess-ods.un.org/acce...?open&DS=A/HRC/WG.8/2/1&Lang=R
Источник данных: ods
REPORT OF THE SUB-COMMISSION ON THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS : ELECTION OF MEMBERS : NOTE
He was also non-resident Ambassador to several countries including Canada, Brazil, Ecuador, Malta, Bahamas, Jamaica, Finland, Poland, Czechoslovakia and Switzerland. 7. He has extensive experience within the United Nations system, having served as Permanent Representative to the United Nations Office and the International Organizations in Geneva for four years and as Ambassador-Deputy Permanent Representative in New York from 1980 to 1983. (...) Ambassador Vikis has served as Ambassador of the Republic of Cyprus to Mexico, Venezuela, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, Panama, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Cuba and the Dominican Republic. 2. He has very extensive experience with the United Nations system, for many years serving as Permanent Representative, Deputy Permanent Representative and as Director of the office of the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. (...) Jorge Carpizo E/CN.4/2002/100/Add.1 page 23 Since July 1987: Member of the Mexican National System of Researchers; Second Level June-December 1987: Seconded to New York University; research on the Law of the Sea June-December 1988: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Director of the magazine University of Mexico November 1988-July 1990: Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of Mexico to UNESCO, Paris August 1990-March 1991: National Human Rights Commission; Adviser to the President of the Commission for Special Affairs 1991-1993: United Nations Decade for International Law; member of the Mexican committee Since 1992: Institute for legislative Research, Mexican House of Representatives; member of the Academic Council Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Research Centre for North America; member of the Reporting Commission Institute for Legal Research, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; member of the Subcommittee for Scholarships Institute for Legal Research, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; member of the Council September 1993-February 1994: Organization of American States; member of the panel of three legal experts for the Nicaragua case 1993: Mexican Attorney-General’s Office; Adviser 1994: Secretariat of the Interior; Adviser to the Secretary Since 1996: International law Association; member of the Mexican Branch Since January 1997: Full-time Senior Researcher E/CN.4/2002/100/Add.1 page 24 1997: National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT); member of the Selection Committee of the Social Sciences Programme to Support Research Projects and of the Scholarships Committee January 1998-July 1999: Jamail Center for Legal Research, University of Texas, Austin; Visiting Researcher 1998-2001: United Nations Subcommission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights; Alternate Member Coordinator for the Public International law section of the Mexican Law Dictionary, published by the Institute for Legal Research; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 2000: Member of the International Affairs Section of the Board on the Reform of the State Publications The candidate submitted an extensive list of 59 articles, 2 legal opinions and 10 books, in Spanish and English of which he is the author, as well as the titles of 44 lectures that he has delivered.
язык:Ру́сский
счет: 1361605.1 - daccess-ods.un.org/acce...S=E/CN.4/2002/100/ADD.1&Lang=R
Источник данных: ods
PROCESS CURRENTLY UTILIZED BY THE INTERNATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE OF NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS TO ACCREDIT NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PARIS PRINCIPLES : REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL
The Sub-Committee (“SCA”) notes the following:  While the NHRC considers and proposes new members, the existing legislative process refers to the selection of new members by the Emir. The existing legislation should establish a clear, transparent and pluralistic nomination process. The SCA refers to General Observation 2.1 “Ensuring pluralism” and General Observation 2.2 “Selection and appointment of the governing body”.  There is no legislative provision guaranteeing the immunity of NHRC members for actions undertaken in their official capacity. (...) The SCA refers to General Observation 2.2 “Selection and appointment of the governing body” and emphasizes the importance that the selection and appointment process involves; a transparent process; broad consultation through the selection and appointment process; advertising vacancies broadly; maximizing the number of potential candidates from a wide range of societal groups; and selecting members to serve in their own individual capacity rather than on behalf of the organization they represent
язык:Ру́сский
счет: 1360355.6 - daccess-ods.un.org/acce...get?open&DS=A/HRC/13/45&Lang=R
Источник данных: ods
METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES UNDER THE CONVENTION :REVISION OF THE UNFCCC REPORTING GUIDELINES ON ANNUAL INVENTORIES FOR PARTIES INCLUDED IN ANNEX I TO THE CONVENTION : DRAFT CONCLUSIONS / PROPOSED BY THE CHAIR
FCCC/SBSTA/2013/L.29/Add.1 GE.13-70854 7 also make every effort to develop and/or select emission factors (EFs), and collect and select activity data (AD), in accordance with IPCC good practice. (...) As part of its inventory preparation, each Annex I Party should: (a) Apply category-specific QC procedures for key categories and for those individual categories in which significant methodological and/or data revisions have occurred, in accordance with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines; FCCC/SBSTA/2013/L.29/Add.1 10 GE.13-70854 (b) Provide for a basic review of the inventory by personnel that have not been involved in the inventory development process, preferably an independent third party, before the submission of the inventory, in accordance with the planned QA procedures referred to in paragraph 19 above; (c) Provide for a more extensive review of the inventory for key categories, as well as for categories where significant changes to methods or data have been made, in accordance with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines; (d) On the basis of the reviews described in paragraph 26(b) and (c) above and periodic internal evaluations of the inventory preparation process, re-evaluate the inventory planning process, in order to meet the established quality objectives referred to in paragraph 24 above. (...) The NIR shall include: (a) Descriptions, references and sources of information for the specific methodologies, including higher-tier methods and models, assumptions, EFs and AD, as well as the rationale for their selection. For tier 3 models, additional information for improving transparency;12 (b) An indication of the level of complexity (IPCC tier) applied and a description of any national methodology used by the Annex I Party, as well as information on anticipated future improvements; (c) For key categories, an explanation if the recommended methods from the appropriate decision tree in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines are not used; (d) A description of the national key categories, as indicated in paragraph 39 above, including: (i) A summary table with the key categories identified for the latest reporting year (by level and trend); (ii) Information on the level of category disaggregation used and the rationale for its use; (iii) Additional information relating to the methodology used for identifying key categories; (e) Information on how and where feedstocks and non-energy use of fuels have been reported in the inventory; (f) Assessment of completeness, including information and explanations in relation to categories not estimated or included elsewhere, and information related to the geographical scope; (g) Information on uncertainties, as requested in paragraph 42 above; (h) Information on any recalculations relating to previously submitted inventory data, as requested in paragraphs 43 to 45 above, including changes in methodologies, sources of information and assumptions, in particular in relation to recalculations made in response to the review process; (i) Information on changes in response to the review process; (j) Information on the national inventory arrangements and changes to the national inventory arrangements, including a description of the institutional arrangements for inventory preparation, as well as information on verification as requested in paragraphs 40 and 41 above and on QA/QC as requested in paragraph 46 above. 51.
язык:Ру́сский
счет: 1334616.2 - https://daccess-ods.un.org/acc...C/SBSTA/2013/L.29/ADD.1&Lang=R
Источник данных: ods
TRANSFER PRICING PRACTICAL MANUAL FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES : NOTE / BY THE SECRETARIAT
It is envisioned that in a later version of this docu- ment there will be more hyperlinks to relevant public documents available on the internet, and more extensive di- rect citation. The Manual remains a practical document, however, not an academic treatise. (...) Initial risk/documentation review • Criteria for Selection – (see compliance strategies and policies above) • Industry Approach i. Selecting Cases to proceed to Audit • Criteria for Selection ii. Undertaking an Audit • Timing, process etc iii.
язык:Ру́сский
счет: 1289379.7 - daccess-ods.un.org/acce...t?open&DS=E/C.18/2009/5&Lang=R
Источник данных: ods
GE.13-70310 (R) 1
FCCC/SBSTA/2013/L.15 8 GE.13-70310 also make every effort to develop and/or select emission factors (EFs), and collect and select activity data (AD), in accordance with the IPCC good practice. (...) As part of its inventory preparation, each Annex I Party should: (a) Apply category-specific QC procedures for key categories and for those individual categories in which significant methodological and/or data revisions have occurred, in accordance with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines; FCCC/SBSTA/2013/L.15 GE.13-70310 11 (b) Provide for a basic review of the inventory by personnel that have not been involved in the inventory development process, preferably an independent third party, before the submission of the inventory, in accordance with the planned QA procedures referred to in paragraph 19 above; (c) Provide for a more extensive review of the inventory for key categories, as well as for categories where significant changes to methods or data have been made, in accordance with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines; (d) On the basis of the reviews described in paragraph 26(b) and (c) above and periodic internal evaluations of the inventory preparation process, re-evaluate the inventory planning process, in order to meet the established quality objectives referred to in paragraph 24 above. (...) The NIR shall include: (a) Descriptions, references and sources of information for the specific methodologies, including higher-tier methods and models, assumptions, EFs and AD, as well as the rationale for their selection. For tier 3 models, additional information for improving transparency;11 (b) An indication of the level of complexity (IPCC tier) applied and a description of any national methodology used by the Annex I Party, as well as information on anticipated future improvements; (c) For key categories, an explanation if the recommended methods from the appropriate decision tree in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines are not used; (d) A description of the national key categories, as indicated in paragraph 39 above, including: (i) A summary table with the key categories identified for the latest reporting year (by level and trend); (ii) Information on the level of category disaggregation used and the rationale for its use; (iii) Additional information relating to the methodology used for identifying key categories; (e) Information on how and where feedstocks and non-energy use of fuels have been reported in the inventory; (f) Assessment of completeness, including information and explanations in relation to categories not estimated or included elsewhere, and information related to the geographical scope; (g) Information on uncertainties, as requested in paragraph 42 above; (h) Information on any recalculations relating to previously submitted inventory data, as requested in paragraphs 43 to 45 above, including changes in methodologies, sources of information and assumptions, in particular in relation to recalculations made in response to the review process; (i) Information on changes in response to the review process; (j) Information on the national inventory arrangements and changes to the national inventory arrangements, including a description of the institutional arrangements 11 Parties should, as applicable, report information on: basis and type of model, application and adaptation of the model, main equations/processes, key assumptions, domain of application, how the model parameters were estimated, description of key inputs and outputs, details of calibration and model evaluation, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, QA/QC procedures adopted and references to peer-reviewed literature.
язык:Ру́сский
счет: 1288137.8 - daccess-ods.un.org/acce...DS=FCCC/SBSTA/2013/L.15&Lang=R
Источник данных: ods