Home

ISBA/17/C/4/Add.1 11-36301 (C)8 Summary of Work Experience A highly self-motivated team player and effective communicator with demonstrated professional, administrative capabilities and with extensive project management experience. • Commissioner, Department of Geological Survey and Mines (May 2001 to 30 June 2010): Head of Department, and responsible for overall general administration and finance, technical and mineral policy implementation, carrying into effect provisions of the Mining Act and Regulations, and provision of technical advice in mineral sector and geosciences to all levels of public administration. (...) As head of Project Coordination Unit, responsible for contractual relationships with financiers, planning and overall supervision of activities, financial management, procurement and investment promotion. Gained extensive international experience in the mineral sector and represented government at several international investment conferences including the African Mining Investment Conference/Indaba, Cape Town, Mines and Money, London and the PDAC, Toronto (...) Among responsibilities were: overall direction of the project on behalf of the government, including planning, timely and technical execution of activities and outputs, selection of experts, workplans, selection of mineral exploration targets, ISBA/17/C/4/Add.1 911-36301 (C) budgetary management of counterpart funding and preparation activity reports.

Such individual TNA projects help larger countries that need more in-depth and extensive analysis to facilitate technology transfer. (...) Second Round Country Selection 33. The selection process for the second round countries is expected to be completed by October 2010. (...) Larger countries that need more in-depth and extensive analysis have the option to request TNAs as a national initiative, to be drawn from the STAR.

The selection of justices of the Supreme Court is a two-step process. (...) The participants recommended that a specific legal mechanism should be defined in the short term for each step of the selection process, with precise, motivated selection criteria and on the basis of the profile of the civil servant sought, and that transparent selection processes with public participation should be introduced. (...) Its purpose is to establish a ranking within the judicial service so as to be able to select persons for promotion and implement a selection system based on a competitive examination, beginning with magistrates’ courts.

The procedure envisaged by the Law with regard to the selection of candidates is extremely cumbersome. In the opinion of the Special Rapporteur, the selection procedure could be made more straightforward by organizing regular competitive selection processes and appointing successful candidates on the basis of their rating in that process. Competitive examinations conducted, at least partly, in a written and anonymous manner represent an important tool in the selection process.13 Mandatory training, including an internship in court, could be provided only to candidates who had been successful in the selection process. 4.

The provisions of the Treaty of Athens of 1913, which provided reciprocal and extensive minority rights for over 2 million Ottoman Greek Orthodox and approximately 650,000 Muslims of Greece, which did not embrace at that time the region of Thrace, have been superseded by the subsequent provisions of the Lausanne Peace Treaty of 1923 (Section II). (...) It is strongly believed that because of the benefits of the Law 3536/2007, the preachers and teachers of the Holy Koran will be in a better position to contribute more efficiently to the spiritual needs of their communities. The selection process of the preachers and teachers of the Holy Koran is deliberately presented in a distorted way since the Muftis and Muslim boards of examiners select the competent candidates.

Methodological issues (e.g. choice of methods/activity data/emission factors, assumptions, parameters and conventions underlying the emission estimates and the rationale for their selection, information on carbon dioxide (CO2) capture, any specific methodological issues (e.g. description of national methods and models)) 3.2.4.3. (...) Methodological issues (e.g. choice of methods/activity data/emission factors, assumptions, parameters and conventions underlying the emission estimates and the rationale for their selection, any specific methodological issues (e.g. (...) Methodological issues (e.g. choice of methods/activity data/emission factors, assumptions, parameters and conventions underlying the emission estimates and the rationale for their selection, any specific methodological issues (e.g.

Methodological issues (e.g. choice of methods/activity data/emission factors, assumptions, parameters and conventions underlying the emission estimates and the rationale for their selection, any specific methodological issues (e.g. description of national methods and models)) 3.3.1.3. (...) Methodological issues (e.g. choice of methods/activity data/emission factors, assumptions, parameters and conventions underlying the emission estimates and the rationale for their selection, any specific methodological issues (e.g. (...) Methodological issues (e.g. choice of methods/activity data/emission factors, assumptions, parameters and conventions underlying the emission estimates and the rationale for their selection, information on CO2 capture, any specific methodological issues (e.g. description of national methods and

Methodological issues (e.g. choice of methods/activity data/emission factors, assumptions, parameters and conventions underlying the emission estimates and the rationale for their selection, any specific methodological issues (e.g. description of national methods and models)) 3.3.1.3. (...) Methodological issues (e.g. choice of methods/activity data/emission factors, assumptions, parameters and conventions underlying the emission estimates and the rationale for their selection, any specific methodological issues (e.g. (...) Methodological issues (e.g. choice of methods/activity data/emission factors, assumptions, parameters and conventions underlying the emission estimates and the rationale for their selection, information on CO2 capture, any specific methodological issues (e.g. description of national methods and models)) 4.2.3.

Annex I Parties should also make every effort to develop and/or select emission factors (EFs), and collect and select activity data (AD), in accordance with the IPCC good practice. (...) The NIR shall include: (a) Descriptions, references and sources of information for the specific methodologies, including higher-tier methods and models, assumptions, EFs and AD, as well as the rationale for their selection. For tier 3 models, additional information for improving transparency;12 (b) An indication of the level of complexity (IPCC tier) applied and a description of any national methodology used by the Annex I Party, as well as information on anticipated future improvements; (c) For key categories, an explanation if the recommended methods from the appropriate decision tree in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines are not used; (d) A description of the national key categories, as indicated in paragraph 39 above, including: 12 Parties should, as applicable, report information on: basis and type of model, application and adaptation of the model, main equations/processes, key assumptions, domain of application, how the model parameters were estimated, description of key inputs and outputs, details of calibration and model evaluation, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, QA/QC procedures adopted and references to peer-reviewed literature. (...) Methodological issues (e.g. choice of methods/activity data/emission factors, assumptions, parameters and conventions underlying the emission estimates and the rationale for their selection, information on carbon dioxide (CO2) capture, any specific methodological issues (e.g. description of national methods and models)) 3.2.4.3.

The Working Group was briefed about the State Department Worldwide Personal Protective Services contract, which is the programme established to “pre-plan, organize, set up, deploy and operate Contractor protective service details for the protection of U.S. and/or certain foreign government high-level officials”.30 It includes provisions for selection of personnel, as well as procedures for the vetting of staff and compulsory training. 32. (...) Following these allegations, the Commission on Wartime Contracting conducted a hearing on 14 September 2009 on State Department selection, management, and oversight of security and other contractors in support of the United States Embassy in Kabul. 32 The Senate Subcommittee on Contracting Oversight also initiated an investigation and reported a pattern of ineffectual Department of State oversight of the ArmorGroup North America contract. (...) Officials from the Commission informed the Working Group that the current model of extensive contracting out (at a ratio of approximately one contractor for every Government employee), has not yet proved it is more cost-effective than a model with fewer contractors. 43.