Home

En su primera sesión, celebrada el 12 de diciembre, el Grupo de Trabajo decidió aprobar la participación de las siguientes organizaciones no gubernamentales en su labor: Age International CareRights Centro Internacional de Longevidad COCAEL Community Hive Organization DroItS huMains Océan Indien Fundación Tsao Fundación Yemi Age Nigeria Gerontoplus Gramin Vikas Vigyan Samiti A/AC.278/2016/L.2 3/3 16-21893 International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care International Association of Homes and Services for the Ageing International Association of World Peace Advocates New World Hope Organization Old Generation Rejuvenation Ashram Pramacare RAS Outreach Wellness Programme for the Aged Seniors Rights Service Uganda Reach the Aged Association F.

Al desplegar la tecnología de reconocimiento facial en las reuniones y manifestaciones, la injerencia adquiere una escala enorme e indiscriminada, ya que se requiere la recopilación y el procesamiento de imágenes faciales de todas las personas captadas por una cámara equipada con un sistema de tecnología de reconocimiento facial o conectada a un sistema de este tipo. 34. (...) Además, las autoridades que continúen utilizando técnicas de grabación audiovisual y reconocimiento facial deberían implantar un marco regulador con disposiciones que protejan eficazmente los datos personales, en particular tratándose de imágenes faciales y los datos derivados de ellos. (...) A/HRC/44/24 12 GE.20-08316 grabación y reconocimiento facial debe poder ser objeto de impugnación judicial.

This experiment found that “almost all Facebook users shown adverts for mechanics were men, while ads for nursery nurses were seen almost exclusively by women.”23 Schona Jolly QC assessed the experience and stated: “Facebook’s system itself may, and does appear to, lead to discriminatory outcomes”.24 Automated facial recognition in the gig economy There is increasing concern that facial recognition software may be placing people from ethnic minority groups at a disadvantage in the gig economy. (...) Drivers from ethnic minority backgrounds have failed the facial recognition check, and been unable to work as a result. (...) Comunicación escrita del Reino Unido de Gran Bretaña e Irlanda del Norte: Comisión para la Igualdad y los Derechos Humanos* Nota de la Secretaría Report of the EHRC in response to the thematic report on the effects of artificial intelligence on the enjoyment of the right to privacy – Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Automated facial recognition (AFR) in policing

Policing, data retention, and facial recognition technology Following EHRC’s submission to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy, the ECtHR has ruled on Catt v the United Kingdom.19 The ECtHR found that the UK Government violated the right to privacy (Article 8 ECHR) of the applicant and while there was a pressing need to collect the personal data about the applicant, there was no pressing need to retain it. (...) The use of automated facial recognition in policing, and its impact on privacy rights, has become an increasing concern in recent years. In August 2020, the Court of Appeal found that there were ‘fundamental deficiencies’ in the legal framework governing the use of automated facial recognition, and that its use was in breach of the right to privacy (Article 8 ECHR), the Data Protection Act 2018 and the Public Sector Equality Duty.20 The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has previously stated21 that data protection law sets high standards in relation to the use of Live Facial Recognition (LFR) in a law enforcement context and when used in public places.

Moreover, she is extremely grateful for the opportunity to meet and engage in Shenzhen with technology companies and researchers working on automation and machine learning, as well as on emerging assistive technologies and other relevant themes pertaining to the digitalization of health and care services for older persons, using integrated big data computing, artificial intelligence and facial recognition technologies. 3. The Independent Expert expresses her sincere gratitude to the Government for its cooperation in ensuring the success of the visit.

GE.21-01029 (S) 170221 180221 Consejo de Derechos Humanos 46º período de sesiones 22 de febrero a 19 de marzo de 2021 Tema 3 de la agenda Promoción y protección de todos los