Home

Таблица 1 Число затрагиваемых стран − Сторон Конвенции, которые создали и эксплуатируют национальную систему мониторинга опустынивания, деградации земель и засухи (в мире) Region DLDD monitoring system established DLDD monitoring system functional DLDD monitoring system not functional DLDD monitoring system updated Monitorin g system not updated No DLDD- specific monitoring system Environ- mental moni- toring sys- tem partially covering DLDD No environ- mental moni- toring system covering DLDD Africa 12 7 4 5 1 18 4 6 Asia 10 9 0 8 1 18 16 0 LAC 4 3 0 3 1 13 10 3 NMED 3 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 CEE 5 4 1 3 1 4 3 1 Global (total) 34 26 5 22 4 55 35 10 ICCD/CRIC(9)/5 6 GE.10-63969 Диаграмма 1 Число затрагиваемых стран − Сторон Конвенции, которые создали и эксплуатируют национальную систему мониторинга опустынивания, деградации земель и засухи (в мире) DLDD-specific monitoring system 38% No DLDD-specific monitoring system 62% 2. (...) Таблица 5 Число затрагиваемых стран − Сторон Конвенции, создавших и эксплуатирующих национальную систему, предназначенную для мониторинга опустынивания, деградации земель и засухи (ЛАК) Subregion DLDD monitoring system established DLDD monitoring system functional DLDD monitoring system not functional DLDD monitoring system updated DLDD monitoring system not updated No DLDD- specific monitoring system Environmental monitoring sys- tem partially covering DLDD No environ- mental monitor- ing system cov- ering DLDD Andean 1 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 Caribbean 1 1 0 1 0 6 3 3 Mesoamerica 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 South Cone 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 LAC (total) 4 3 0 3 1 13 10 3 ICCD/CRIC(9)/5 GE.10-63969 11 Диаграмма 5 Число затрагиваемых стран − Сторон Конвенции, создавших и эксплуатирующих национальную систему, предназначенную для мониторинга опустынивания, деградации земель и засухи (ЛАК) DLDD-specific monitoring system 24% No DLDD- specific monitoring system 76% d. (...) Таблица 6 Число затрагиваемых стран − Сторон Конвенции, создавших и эксплуатирующих национальную систему, предназначенную для мониторинга опустынивания, деградации земель и засухи (СС) Region DLDD monitoring system established DLDD monitoring system functional DLDD monitoring system not functional DLDD monitoring system updated DLDD monitoring system not updated No DLDD- specific monitoring system Environmental monitoring sys- tem partially covering DLDD No environ- mental monitor- ing system cov- ering DLDD NMED (total) 3 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 ICCD/CRIC(9)/5 12 GE.10-63969 Диаграмма 6 Число затрагиваемых стран − Сторон Конвенции, создавших и эксплуатирующих национальную систему, предназначенную для мониторинга опустынивания, деградации земель и засухи (СС) DLDD-specific monitoring system 60% No DLDD-specific monitoring system 40% е.

Погружных насосов, утвержденных согласно ATEX для зоны 0, не существует. 8. 7 мая 2020 года датская компания «Global Functional Safety ApS» направила аналогичное письмо по электронной почте главам делегаций ряда договаривающихся сторон, представленных в Комитете по вопросам безопасности ВОПОГ. (...) Германия предлагает в порядке реализации предложения компании «Global Functional Safety ApS» проверить правильность и целесообразность общего отнесения внутреннего пространства грузовых танков к зоне 0 для взрывозащиты. (...) Определение термина «Трюм», упомянутое компанией «Global Functional Safety ApS», является, вероятно, следующим: Hold (when anti-explosion protection is required, comparable to zone 1 – see Classification of zones) means a part of the vessel which, whether covered by hatchway covers or not, is bounded fore and aft by bulkheads and which is intended to carry goods in packages or in bulk.

GE.13-60311 (R) 150313 210313 Комитет по рассмотрению осуществления Конвенции Одиннадцатая сессия Бонн, 15−19 апреля

Self-assessment of aligned national action programmes (Central and Eastern Europe) ................... 25 ICCD/CRIC(13)/4 GE.15-00465 15 Tables and figures relating to CONS-O-8 Table 1 Number of affected country Parties that established and supported a national moni- toring system for desertification, land degradation and drought (DLDD) (Global) Region DLDD monitoring system established DLDD monitoring system not established DLDD monitoring system updated and functional DLDD monitoring system not updated/ functional Monitoring system partially covering DLDD No monitoring system partially covering DLDD Africa 13 39 9 2 32 15 Asia 11 35 9 2 32 12 Latin America and the Caribbean 11 20 7 3 19 9 Northern Mediterranean 5 7 5 0 7 0 Central and Eastern Europe 5 10 4 1 9 5 Other affected country Party 1 0 1 0 - - Global (total) 46 111 35 8 99 41 Table 2 Monitoring systems for desertification, land degradation and drought – national contribution to the target (Global) Region In place in 2012–2013 Planned for 2014–2015 Planned for 2016–2017 Planned for 2018–2019 No plan Africa 13 18 12 5 5 Asia 11 4 10 10 10 Latin America and the Caribbean 11 4 9 1 6 Northern Mediterranean 5 1 0 0 5 Central and Eastern Europe 5 0 1 0 9 Other affected country Party 1 - - - - Global (total) 46 27 32 16 35 ICCD/CRIC(13)/4 16 GE.15-00465 Figure 1 Monitoring systems for desertification, land degradation and drought – national contribution to the target (Global) Table 3 Number of affected country Parties that established and supported a national moni- toring system for desertification, land degradation and drought (Africa) Subregion DLDD monitoring system established DLDD monitoring system updated and functional Monitoring system partially covering DLDD Planned for Not planned yet 2014–2015 2016–2017 2018–2019 Central Africa 0 n.a. 5 4 3 1 2 Eastern Africa 2 2 3 3 0 1 2 Northern Africa 2 0 2 2 1 1 0 Southern Africa 2 1 9 5 4 2 1 Western Africa 7 6 13 4 4 0 0 Africa (total) 13 9 32 18 12 5 5 ICCD/CRIC(13)/4 GE.15-00465 17 Table 4 Number of affected country Parties that established and supported a national moni- toring system for desertification, land degradation and drought (Asia) Subregion DLDD monitoring system established DLDD monitoring system updated and functional Monitoring system partially covering DLDD Planned for Not planned yet 2014–2015 2016–2017 2018–2019 Central Asia 0 n.a. 0 0 1 4 0 East Asia 2 2 3 1 0 0 0 Pacific 3 2 9 2 3 1 3 South Asia 3 2 6 0 2 1 0 South-East Asia 2 2 7 0 3 0 5 West Asia 1 1 7 1 1 4 2 Asia (total) 11 9 32 4 10 10 10 Table 5 Number of affected country Parties that established and supported a national moni- toring system for desertification, land degradation and drought (Latin America and the Caribbean) Subregion DLDD monitoring system established DLDD monitoring system updated and functional Monitoring system partially covering DLDD Planned for Not planned yet 2014–2015 2016–2017 2018–2019 Andean 1 1 3 1 2 0 0 Caribbean 5 2 7 1 3 1 4 Mesoamerica 3 2 5 1 2 0 2 South Cone 2 2 4 1 2 0 0 Latin America and the Caribbean (total) 11 7 19 4 9 1 6 Table 6 Number of affected country Parties that established and supported a national moni- toring system for desertification, land degradation and drought (Northern Mediterranean) Region DLDD monitoring system established DLDD monitoring system updated and functional Monitoring system partially covering DLDD Planned for Not planned yet 2014–2015 2016–2017 2018–2019 Northern Mediterranean (total) 5 5 7 1 0 0 5 ICCD/CRIC(13)/4 18 GE.15-00465 Table 7 Number of affected country Parties that established and supported a national moni- toring system for desertification, land degradation and drought (Central and Eastern Europe) Region DLDD monitoring system established DLDD monitoring system updated and functional Monitoring system partially covering DLDD Planned for Not planned yet 2014–2015 2016–2017 2018–2019 Central and Eastern Europe (total) 5 4 6 0 1 0 9 Table 8 Number of affected country Parties that established and supported a national moni- toring system for desertification, land degradation and drought (Other affected country Parties) DLDD monitoring system established DLDD monitoring system updated and functional Monitoring system partially covering DLDD Planned for Not planned yet 2014–2015 2016–2017 2018–2019 Other affected country Party (total) 1 1 - - - - - Table 9 Number of monitoring systems established in affected country Parties and/or UNCCD subregions/regions with the technical and/or financial support of developed country Parties DLDD-specific monitoring systems supported in 2012 DLDD-specific monitoring systems supported in 2013 Monitoring systems partially covering DLDD supported in 2012 Monitoring systems partially covering DLDD supported in 2013 Developed country Parties (total) 28 27 70 79 ICCD/CRIC(13)/4 GE.15-00465 19 Figure 2 Number of monitoring systems established in affected country Parties and/or UNCCD subregions/regions with the technical and/or financial support of developed country Parties ICCD/CRIC(13)/4 20 GE.15-00465 Table 10 Geographic distribution of assistance provided by developed country Parties (DCPs) to monitoring systems (MS) of affected country Parties Entity Entities supported (number of monitoring systems) Number of DCPs supporting monitoring system establishment/ maintenance in affected countries Country Subregion Region/Global Africa 65 MS in 33 countries 8 3 8 Central Africa 6 1 1 Eastern Africa 8 1 3 Northern Africa 10 1 3 Southern Africa 4 0 3 Western Africa 37 5 4 Asia 10 MS in 9 countries 7 1 5 Central Asia 6 6 3 East Asia 2 0 1 Pacific 0 0 0 South Asia 1 0 1 South-East Asia 0 1 1 West Asia 1 0 1 Latin America and the Caribbean 12 MS in 8 countries 0 0 2 Andean 3 1 Caribbean 3 1 Mesoamerica 1 1 South Cone 5 2 Northern Mediterranean 0 n.a. 2 1 Central and Eastern Europe 4 MS in 4 countries n.a. 2 4 Global 8 2 Total 8 global support to MS by 2 DCPs 8 regional MS in all 4 regions supported by 4 DCPs 15 subregional MS in 6 subregions supported by 5 DCPs 91 MS in 54 affected countries supported by 8 DCPs Total of 122 MS supported by 10 DCPs ICCD/CRIC(13)/4 GE.15-00465 21 Tables and figures relating to CONS-O-10 Table 11 Self-assessment of aligned national action programmes (Global) Region Knowledge-based identification and analysis of biophysical and socioeconomic drivers of DLDD Knowledge-based identification and analysis of the interaction between DLDD and climate change and biodiversity Assessment of the barriers to SLM Recommendation s for removing the barriers to SLM included Data for the indicators available Trends in abundance and distribution of selected species Trend in carbon stocks above and below ground Africa 9 9 9 9 8 7 Asia 5 4 6 6 4 5 Latin America and the Caribbean 3 3 3 3 3 1 Northern Mediterranean 4 5 5 5 5 5 Central and Eastern Europe 2 1 2 1 2 2 Global (total) 23 22 25 24 22 20 Figure 3 Self-assessment of aligned national action programmes (Global) ICCD/CRIC(13)/4 22 GE.15-00465 Table 12 Revision of the national action programme and inclusion of a knowledge-based identification of drivers of desertification, land degradation and drought and their interaction (Global) Region Self-assessed Planned for 2014–2015 Planned for 2016–2017 Planned for 2018–2019 No plan Africa 9 - - - - Asia 5 1 1 0 1 Latin America and the Caribbean 3 0 0 0 0 Northern Mediterranean 5 - - - - Central and Eastern Europe 2 1 0 0 0 Global (total) 24 2 1 0 1 Table 13 Revision of the national action programme and inclusion of a knowledge-based identification of interaction of desertification, land degradation and drought with climate change and biodiversity (Global) Region Self-assessed Planned for 2014–2015 Planned for 2016–2017 Planned for 2018–2019 No plan Africa 9 - - - - Asia 4 1 1 0 1 Latin America and the Caribbean 3 0 1 0 0 Northern Mediterranean 5 - - - - Central and Eastern Europe 1 2 0 0 0 Global (total) 22 3 2 0 1 ICCD/CRIC(13)/4 GE.15-00465 23 Table 14 Self-assessment of aligned national action programmes (Africa) Subregion Knowledge-based identification and analysis of biophys- ical and socioeco- nomic drivers of DLDD Knowledge-based identification and analysis of the interaction between DLDD and climate change and biodi- versity Assessment of the barriers to SLMa Recommenda- tions for removing the barriers to SLMa includ- ed Data for the indicators available Trends in abun- dance and distri- bution of selected species Trend in carbon stocks above and below ground Central Afri- ca n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Position of the NHRCK on the Report of the Special Rapporteur ................ 3–7 3 A. Functional Autonomy (para. 57) ........................................................... 3−4 3 B. (...) On the concern that the NHRCK lacks functional autonomy (Paragraph 57) 3. Functional autonomy of the NHRCK is ensured by the National Human Rights Commission Act. (...) Nevertheless, by empowering investigative officers through professional training programs and actively recruiting investigators, functional capacity of the NHRCK has recovered the level before the staff reduction took place.

Country name: Nomination transmitted by: First and Last Name: Function: Government of: Signature and official seal: Telephone number: Fax number: E-Mail address: Date: Attached is the contact information, transmitted pursuant to Article 5 of the Basel Convention, of the newly designated ? (...) UNEP/CHW.9/33 4 COMPETENT AUTHORITY* Functional title: Department: Organization: Address: City: Country: Telephone number: Fax number: E-Mail address: Contact person: Other information: * In the case of multiple competent authorities, please include list in an attachment. FOCAL POINT Functional title: Department: Organization: Address: City: Country: Telephone number: Fax number: E-Mail address: Contact person: Other information: The Secretariat will acknowledge receipt of the information transmitted, and will make it publicly available on the website of the Basel Convention (http://www.basel.int). ___________________

With respect of waste personal computers, electronic equipment and mobile telephones, concerns about the practical difficulties in differentiating between “new”, “used but still functional” and “waste” items had been expressed by the WCO Harmonized System Review Sub-Committee. (...) Also, as far as electronic equipment was concerned, there was difficulty in composing a single definition for “waste” or “used” or “no longer functional”. One possibility would be to provide text in the Harmonised System General Explanatory Notes indicating that provisions include articles and parts that are no longer functional but this would not be straightforward as they would need to be presented as wastes when in reality they would not be regarded as such by many.

Online tools made available over the past five years include: metabolic mapping software, for both whole metabolic networks and specific pathways;155 platforms for comparative and functional genomics;156 as well as the management and quality analysis of gene sequences.157 Substantial investment has been made in developing new platforms designed to handle the volume of data produced by contemporary sequencing studies.158 28. (...) Some of this software makes it easier to visualise complex biological information, including: genome sequence data: sequence assembly data; plasmid maps; gene expression; comparative and functional genomic data; transcription; secondary structure of RNA;159 and biochemical networks. 160 29. (...) Advanced modelling software has been used to take partially-characterised biological systems (such as those from yeast functional genomics or drug screening) and through the use of artificial intelligence develop theories as to what the missing components of the system might be (both in terms of intermediaries and processes).

. +43 (1) 5265181, Fax: 526 51 81-160; E-mail: schottenfeld@falkensteiner.com V.15-06291 23 GC.16/INF/1 Приложение II [LETTERHEAD] The Permanent Mission of [COUNTRY] to UNIDO has the honour to confirm that FIRST NAME LAST NAME has been authorized to collect the pre-printed conference access cards for the following participants of the sixteenth session of the General Conference: FIRST NAME LAST NAME, FUNCTIONAL TITLE FIRST NAME LAST NAME, FUNCTIONAL TITLE FIRST NAME LAST NAME, FUNCTIONAL TITLE FIRST NAME LAST NAME, FUNCTIONAL TITLE FIRST NAME LAST NAME, FUNCTIONAL TITLE [Date] [Official seal]