Home

  Microsoft PowerPoint - 19GuerTin260903.ppt

Awakening of the international community 2. Illegal logging vs illegal activities in the forestry sector 3. (...) Consequences on the wood products industry 5. Fight against illegal logging & illegal activities 6. Conclusion 1. (...) Illegal logging vs illegal activities in the forestry sector Item for the UNECE Timber Committee to consider regarding the definition of illegal logging and illegal activities in the forestry sector Is there a need to clarify and/or spell out the definition of illegal logging and/or illegal activities in the forestry sector?

Score: 786535.06 - https://unece.org/fileadmin/DA...1/presentations/19-guertin.pdf

  mp_carl-eric_finale

The pernicious effects of illegal logging and illegal activities should also prompt us to pay attention to the problem. (...) The European Pulp and Paper industry’s position against illegal logging and the trade of illegally harvested wood. (...) Brack and Hayman (2001) mention that illegalities may also occur “during transport, including illegal processing and export, misdeclaration to customs, and avoidance of taxes and other monies. ”4 In Table 1, Contreras-Hermosilla presents examples of illegal activities in the forestry sector, grouped into six categories: illegal occupation of forestlands; illegal logging; arson; illegal timber trade and transport, and timber smuggling; transfer pricing and other illegal accounting practices ; and illegal forest processing.

Score: 783236.87 - https://unece.org/fileadmin/DA...resentations/guertin-paper.pdf

  Situation in the Mideast - Note verbale from Syria - Question of Palestine

Signature illegible, Chamber of Commerce, Nablus l4. Signature illegible 15. (...) Signature illegible, Jenin Municipality 40. Signature illegible, Youth Activities Centre, Name of camp illegible 41. Signature illegible, Youth Activities Centre, Name of camp illegible 42.

Score: 771980.86 - https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-180903/

  Basic knowledge | SFM Toolbox | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Law enforcement, therefore, is one of the main tools for reducing illegal practices in the forest sector. What is forest illegality? (...) The scale and cost of forest illegality The clandestine nature of illegal forest activities makes their scale and value difficult to estimate. (...) Illegal logging and illegal timber trade are often associated with other illegalities, such as money laundering, drug trafficking, the corruption of government officials and tax evasion.

Score: 770541.2 - https://www.fao.org/sustainabl...nforcement/basic-knowledge/en/

  Data Indicator Serie

Data Indicator SeriesID SeriesDescription GeoAreaCode GeoAreaName TimePeriod Value Time_Detail Source FootNote Nature Units Reporting Type Observation Status ISOalpha3 Type SeriesCode 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 4 Afghanistan 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O AFG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 8 Albania 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ALB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 12 Algeria 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O DZA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 16 American Samoa 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O ASM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 20 Andorra 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O AND Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 24 Angola 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O AGO Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 28 Antigua and Barbuda 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ATG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 31 Azerbaijan 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O AZE Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 32 Argentina 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ARG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 36 Australia 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A AUS Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 40 Austria 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A AUT Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 44 Bahamas 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BHS Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 48 Bahrain 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BHR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 50 Bangladesh 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BGD Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 51 Armenia 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O ARM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 52 Barbados 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BRB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 56 Belgium 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BEL Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 60 Bermuda 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O BMU Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 64 Bhutan 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BTN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 68 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BOL Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 70 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BIH Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 72 Botswana 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BWA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 76 Brazil 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting. C NUMBER G V BRA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 84 Belize 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BLZ Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 86 Chagos Archipelago 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O IOT Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 90 Solomon Islands 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A SLB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 92 British Virgin Islands 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O VGB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 96 Brunei Darussalam 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BRN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 100 Bulgaria 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BGR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 104 Myanmar 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A MMR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 108 Burundi 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BDI Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 112 Belarus 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BLR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 116 Cambodia 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O KHM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 120 Cameroon 2018 1 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CMR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 124 Canada 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CAN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 132 Cabo Verde 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CPV Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 136 Cayman Islands 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O CYM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 140 Central African Republic 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O CAF Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 144 Sri Lanka 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A LKA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 148 Chad 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O TCD Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 152 Chile 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CHL Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 156 China 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting. (...) C NUMBER G V COM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 175 Mayotte 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O MYT Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 178 Congo 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O COG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 180 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O COD Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 184 Cook Islands 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O COK Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 188 Costa Rica 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O CRI Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 191 Croatia 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A HRV Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 192 Cuba 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CUB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 196 Cyprus 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CYP Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 203 Czechia 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CZE Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 204 Benin 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BEN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 208 Denmark 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A DNK Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 212 Dominica 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O DMA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 214 Dominican Republic 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A DOM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 218 Ecuador 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ECU Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 222 El Salvador 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A SLV Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 226 Equatorial Guinea 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O GNQ Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 231 Ethiopia 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O ETH Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 232 Eritrea 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting.

Score: 769970.9 - https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/...ing_to_combat_IUU_fishing.xlsx

  PowerPoint Presentation

• International Committee on Global Navigation Satellite System (ICG) was established under the umbrella of United Nations’ Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (UN-COPUOS), –Promote the use of GNSS and its integration into infrastructures, particularly in developing countries –Encourage compatibility and interoperability among global and regional systems • In the multiple occasions of ICG, the importance of ITU’s regulatory works is also introduced. from www.gpsworld.com Spectrum Protection Activities in ICG • ICG provides forums for RNSS community, 1) to increase the knowledge for the protection of RNSS spectrum and 2) to encourage the continued access to benefits of RNSS IDM (Interference Detection and Mitigation) workshops ICG Expert Meeting in Dec. 2015 – Provided educational seminar to multiple RNSS stake holders • Example topics discussed at ICG: Impact from Electromagnetic Emissions Interference Detection and Geo-Location Capabilities Importance of National Spectrum Management Jammers US RU China EU manufacture illegal illegal illegal Nation-by- nation sell illegal illegal illegal illegal export illegal illegal illegal Nation-by- nation purchase Undefined (consumer import illegal) illegal illegal illegal own legal Undefined Undefined legal use illegal illegal illegal illegal National Legal Status Examples(1 of 2) - Jammers - National Legal Status Examples (2 of 2) - Short Range Devices - • Different regulatory authorization for RNSS repeaters among countries – to protect RNSS signals, national regulations should ensure that RNSS repeaters are deployed only where RNSS signals cannot reach (e.g., underground or deep indoor locations) and that each device is uniquely authorized and registered so that it cannot be used elsewhere • Unique Short Range Device regulations such as US Federal Regulations Title 47, Part 15 Summary (1 of 2) • Interference reporting and detection are important start points for GNSS spectrum protection • In addition to ITU spectrum management, national law enforcement will play significantly important roles for GNSS spectrum protection but can be different among countries • In addition to national telecommunication regulations, other regulations such as sales, import/export etc. are required to prevent access to jammer devices and to limit the potential for other sources to interference with RNSS systems Summary (2 of 2) • Many organizations, including UN-COPUOS ICG, are currently working to support the protection of RNSS systems, for the purpose of increasing the knowledge about RNSS spectrum protection • ITU is also expected to provide significant contributions to appropriate spectrum management for ensuring the continued access of RNSS benefits, in cooperation with national spectrum agencies and other international organizations

Score: 769429.25 - https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/s...ms%20(ICG)%20-%20Hitachi-2.pdf

  Dear Judy, please find attached a brief on recent activities at the international level in respect o

I. Symposium on Illegal International Traffic in Hazardous Chemicals The Prague Symposium on illegal international traffic in hazardous chemicals was organized as a starting point for the work that needs to be done by both developed and developing countries and countries with economies in transition. (...) Abiola Olanipekun serving as moderator for the session on existing measures to address illegal traffic. The symposium concluded with the analysis of the magnitude and effects of the problem and existing measures to address illegal international traffic in hazardous chemicals. (...) UNEP GC-24 /GMEF DECISION ON PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS As a follow-up to the Prague symposium and in recognition of the gravity and tragedy associated with illegal traffic, the Government of Nigeria had submitted a draft decision on prevention of illegal international traffic in hazardous chemicals to the 24th session of the UNEP GC/GMEF, which held from 5 to 9 February 2007.

Score: 766194.1 - https://www.who.int/ifcs/champions/info_ifcschamp.doc

  CoverF3-10w.PDF

Programme Area F of Chapter 19, Agenda 21 addresses the prevention of illegal international traffic in toxic and dangerous products. (...) Starting point of the discussion on illegal international traffic in toxic and dangerous products is the recognition and endorsement of the internationally existing definition of illegal international traffic as given in Agenda 21 Chapter 19. (...) Recognising the international dimension and the manifold facets of the problem of illegal traffic in toxic and dangerous products, efforts to prevent illegal import and export are strongly supported.

Score: 762931.54 - https://www.who.int/ifcs/docum...ts/forums/forum3/en/10w_en.pdf

  Putting a Stop to Global Environmental Crime Has Become An Imperative | United Nations

September 2014, No. 2 Vol.LI, Illegal Wildlife Trade T he illegal trade in wildlife and timber has escalated rapidly and globally, and now encompasses a wide range of flora and fauna across all continents, including terrestrial and aquatic animals, forests and other plants and their products. (...) Sustainable development, livelihoods, good governance and the rule of law are all being threatened, as significant sums of money are flowing to militias and terrorist groups. The illegal trade in wildlife is recognized as the fourth most lucrative global crime, closely behind illegal drugs, trafficking in humans and arms. (...) Duncan Copeland Collaboration and Capacity-Building to End Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing With fish stocks and marine ecosystems under ever-increasing pressure from human activity, clamping down on illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing has never been more important.

Score: 762783.9 - https://www.un.org/en/chronicl...al-crime-has-become-imperative

  The fight to save our oceans | FAO Stories | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Addressing illegal fishing contributes to the growth and empowerment of the people who rely on oceans for food and income. (...) Learn more: FAO helps tighten the net around illegal fishing Declaring an International Day for the Fight against IUU Fishing Podcast- TZH 46 - How do you tackle illegal fishing? One year after the launch of #CleanSeas, the tide is turning Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing FAO and the Vatican condemn illegal fishing and forced labour on the high seas, urge collective action The violation of human rights in the fishing sector Video News Release: Fight illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing in Thailand   14.

Score: 761734.5 - https://www.fao.org/fao-stories/article/en/c/1136937/