Appendix A
ATM/CNS Meeting Luanda Appendix A to WP/7
Status of Implementation of ATS/DS circuits
State Requirements Status of
implementation Remarks
Angola Luanda: ACC-FIC
Accra : VSAT under consideration
Inmarsat phone used
Brasilia : Not implemented Brazzaville : PSTN used To implement LTF Dakar : Not implemented Gaborone : Implemented Johannesburg : Implemented Kinshasa : Implemented Lusaka : Implemented Windhoek : Implemented
Botswana Gaborone: ACC-FIC
Francistown : Implemented Harare : Implemented Johannesburg : Implemented Luanda : Implemented Lusaka : Implemented
Francistown TWR
Windhoek : Implemented
Bulawayo : Not implemented Proposal for deletion Gaborone : Implemented
Congo Brazzaville APP-FIC
Accra : Implemented
Bangui : Implemented Douala : Implemented Kano : Implemented Khartoum : Not implemented VSAT AFISNET
proposed by ASECNA Kinshasa : Implemented Libreville : Implemented Luanda : PSTN used via inmarsat
phone
To implement LTF
ATM/CNS Meeting Luanda Appendix A to WP/7
2
State Requirements Status of implementation
Remarks
N’djamena : Implemented Sao Tome : Not implemented VSAT to be installed. Côte d’Ivoire Abidjan APP
Accra : Implemented
Bamako : Implemented Bobo Dioulasso : Not Implemented To implement VSAT Dakar : Implemented Niamey : Implemented Ouagadougou : Implemented Robertsfield : Implemented
Democratic Republic of Congo
Bukavu Kigali : Not Implemented
Gbadolite Bangui : Not Implemented
Goma Bujumbura : Not Implemented Kigali : Not Implemented
Lubumbashi Ndola : Implemented
Kinshasa Brazzaville : Implemented Bujumbura : Not implemented VSAT SADC
implemented in Bujumbura and Kinshasa
Dar-es-Salaam : Implemented Entebbe : Not implemented Khartoum : Not implemented Kigali : Not implemented VSAT SADC under
consideration by Rwanda Luanda : Implemented Lusaka : Implemented
Gabon Libreville ACC
Accra : Implemented Bata : Not implemented VSAT planned at Bata Brazzaville : Implemented Douala : Implemented Kano : Implemented Lagos : Implemented
P:\ATM-CNS-Luanda\Appendices\App-A-WP-7.doc
ATM/CNS Meeting Luanda Appendix A to WP/7
3
State Requirements Status of implementation
Remarks
Malabo : Implemented Sao Tome : Not implemented To implement VSAT Ghana Accra APP-FIC
Abidjan : Implemented Bobo Dioulasso PSTN in use. VSAT planned at Bobo
Dioulasso Brazaville : Implemented Cotonou : Implemented Kano : Implemented Lagos : Implemented Libreville : Implemented Lome : Implemented Luanda Inmarsat phone in use.
Language:English
Score: 362071.02
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...G/2003/ATM-CNS/wp07appa_en.pdf
Data Source: un
Luanda Appendix G to report on Agenda Item 1
Status of Implementation of AFTN circuits
State Requirements Status of Implementation Remarks Angola Luanda: Brazzaville : Not implemented Johannesburg : Implemented
Botswana Gaborone: Johannesburg : Implemented
Congo Brazzaville
Bangui : Implemented
Dakar Douala : Implemented Kinshasa : Implemented Johannesburg Libreville : Implemented Luanda : Not implemented Malabo : Not implemented Via Douala Nairobi : Not implemented N’djamena : Implemented Niamey : Implemented Sao Tome and
Principe : Not implemented
Côte d’Ivoire Abidjan
Dakar : Implemented
Democratic Republic of Congo
Kinshasa Brazzaville : Implemented Johannesburg : Implemented
Gabon Libreville
Brazzaville : Implemented
Ghana Accra
Cotonou : Implemented Lome : Implemented Niamey : Implemented
Namibia Windhoek
Johannesburg : Implemented
P:\ATM-CNS-Luanda\Final-Appendices\Ats-Cns-Luanda-App-G.doc
ATM/CNS Mtg. Luanda Appendix G to report on Agenda Item 1
2
State Requirements Status of Implementation Remarks Nigeria Kano
Niamey : Implemented Lagos : Implemented
Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome Brazzaville : Not implemented
Senegal Dakar Abidjan : Implemented Bamako : Implemented Banjul : Implemented Bissau : Not implemented Conakry : Implemented Freetown : Implemented Niamey : Implemented Nouakchott : Implemented Roberts : Implemented SAL : Implemented (SAM) Buenos
Aires : Implemented
South Africa Johannesburg Antananarivo : Implemented Beira : Implemented Brazzaville : Implemented Bujumbura : Implemented Dar-es-Salaam : Implemented Gaborone : Implemented Harare : Implemented Kigali : Not Implemented Kinshasa : Implemented Lilongwe : Implemented Luanda : Implemented Lusaka : Implemented Maputo : Implemented Maseru : Implemented Manzini : Implemented Mauritius : Implemented Nairobi : Implemented Windhoek : Implemented
P:\ATM-CNS-Luanda\Final-Appendices\Ats-Cns-Luanda-App-G.doc
ATM/CNS Mtg. Luanda Appendix G to report on Agenda Item 1
P:\ATM-CNS-Luanda\Final-Appendices\Ats-Cns-Luanda-App-G.doc
3
State Requirements Status of Implementation Remarks (ASIA/PAC)
Brisbane : Implemented
(SAM) Buenos Aires
: Not implemented VSAT CAFSAT installed at Johannesburg
Zambia Lusaka Johannesburg : Implemented
Zimbabwe Harare Johannesburg : Implemented
------
Status of Implementation of AFTN circuits
State
Status of Implementation
Remarks
Angola
Botswana
Congo
Côte d’Ivoire
Gabon
Ghana
Namibia
Nigeria
Senegal
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Language:English
Score: 360846.4
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc.../2003/ATM-CNS/report_app_g.pdf
Data Source: un
Data
Indicator
SeriesID
SeriesDescription
GeoAreaCode
GeoAreaName
TimePeriod
Value
Time_Detail
Source
FootNote
Nature
Units
Reporting Type
Observation Status
ISOalpha3
Type
SeriesCode
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
4
Afghanistan
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
AFG
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
8
Albania
2018
3
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
ALB
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
12
Algeria
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
DZA
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
16
American Samoa
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
N
NUMBER
G
O
ASM
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
20
Andorra
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
C
NUMBER
G
O
AND
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
24
Angola
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
AGO
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
28
Antigua and Barbuda
2018
3
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
ATG
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
31
Azerbaijan
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
C
NUMBER
G
O
AZE
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
32
Argentina
2018
3
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
ARG
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
36
Australia
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
AUS
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
40
Austria
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
AUT
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
44
Bahamas
2018
4
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
BHS
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
48
Bahrain
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
BHR
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
50
Bangladesh
2018
3
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
BGD
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
51
Armenia
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
ARM
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
52
Barbados
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
BRB
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
56
Belgium
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
BEL
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
60
Bermuda
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
N
NUMBER
G
O
BMU
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
64
Bhutan
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
C
NUMBER
G
O
BTN
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
68
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
BOL
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
70
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
C
NUMBER
G
O
BIH
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
72
Botswana
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
C
NUMBER
G
O
BWA
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
76
Brazil
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting.
C
NUMBER
G
V
BRA
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
84
Belize
2018
4
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
BLZ
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
86
Chagos Archipelago
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
N
NUMBER
G
O
IOT
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
90
Solomon Islands
2018
4
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
SLB
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
92
British Virgin Islands
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
N
NUMBER
G
O
VGB
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
96
Brunei Darussalam
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
BRN
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
100
Bulgaria
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
BGR
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
104
Myanmar
2018
3
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
MMR
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
108
Burundi
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
C
NUMBER
G
O
BDI
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
112
Belarus
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
BLR
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
116
Cambodia
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
KHM
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
120
Cameroon
2018
1
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
CMR
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
124
Canada
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
CAN
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
132
Cabo Verde
2018
4
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
CPV
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
136
Cayman Islands
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
N
NUMBER
G
O
CYM
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
140
Central African Republic
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
CAF
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
144
Sri Lanka
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
LKA
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
148
Chad
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
TCD
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
152
Chile
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
CHL
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
156
China
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting.
(...) C
NUMBER
G
V
COM
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
175
Mayotte
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
N
NUMBER
G
O
MYT
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
178
Congo
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
COG
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
180
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
COD
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
184
Cook Islands
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
COK
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
188
Costa Rica
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
CRI
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
191
Croatia
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
HRV
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
192
Cuba
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
CUB
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
196
Cyprus
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
CYP
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
203
Czechia
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
CZE
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
204
Benin
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
BEN
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
208
Denmark
2018
5
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
DNK
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
212
Dominica
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
C
NUMBER
G
O
DMA
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
214
Dominican Republic
2018
3
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
DOM
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
218
Ecuador
2018
4
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
ECU
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
222
El Salvador
2018
3
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest
C
NUMBER
G
A
SLV
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
226
Equatorial Guinea
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown
NA
NUMBER
G
O
GNQ
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
231
Ethiopia
2018
N
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported
C
NUMBER
G
O
ETH
Country
ER_REG_UNFCIM
14.6.1
3034
Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)
232
Eritrea
2018
NaN
2018
Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting
NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting.
Language:English
Score: 359522.4
-
https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/...ing_to_combat_IUU_fishing.xlsx
Data Source: un
The second column describes the Elements and the last column presents the implementation status. The implementation status of “Implemented” may means “Implemented and no additional work is planned”, or “Implemented and ongoing” or “Implemented and may enhance in the future.”
(...) PIA 2: Globally Interoperable Systems and Data B0 Module Elements Status FICE 1: ATS units with AIDC Implemented
2: Implementation of AMHS/IPS Implemented DATM 1: Implementation of AIXM Implemented
2: Implementation of eAIP Initiated, on- going
3: Implementation of Digital NOTAM Implemented 4: Implementation of WGS-84 Planning 5: Implementation of eTOD Initiated, on-
going 6: Implementation of QMS for AIM Implemented
AMET 1: WAFS Implemented 2: IAVW Implemented 3. Tropical cyclone watch Implemented 4. Aerodrome warnings Implemented 5. Wind sheer warnings and alerts Implemented 6.
Language:English
Score: 359121.8
-
https://www.icao.int/NACC/Docu...2014/NACCDCA5/NACCDCA5WP13.pdf
Data Source: un
Page 1 of 2
Appendix
LIST OF DEFICIENCIES IN THE AIR NAVIGATION FIELDS
ARNS
State Name Requirements Facilities or
Services
Description of Deficiency Date first
reported
Comments on
Deficiency
Description of Corrective action Executing
Body
Target date for
implementation
Priority
Angola
Navaids AFI/7, Rec.
10/4
Huambo VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA A
Navaids AFI/7, Rec.
10/4
Kuito VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA A
Navaids AFI/7, Rec.
10/4
Luena VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA U
Navaids AFI/7, Rec.
10/4
Saurimo VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA U
Cameroon Navaids AFI/7, Rec.
10/4
Maroua VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Cameroon A
Guinea Navaids, AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Kankan VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Labe VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Nzerekore VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A
Kenya Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Mandera VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Kenya U
Lesotho Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Maseru VOR/DME 2002 Not implemented To implement Lesotho U
Liberia Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Robertsfield ILS 04 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Liberia U
Libya Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Sarir VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Libya U
Madagascar Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Antsiranana VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Maintirano VOR 2002 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Morondava VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Sainte Marie VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar A
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Toliara VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U
Sao Tome &
Principe
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Sao Tome ILS 11 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sao Tome &
Principe
A
Page 2 of 2
State Name Requirements Facilities or
Services
Description of Deficiency Date first
reported
Comments on
Deficiency
Description of Corrective action Executing
Body
Target date for
implementation
Priority
Sierra Leone Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Freetown/
Lungi
ILS 30 1999 Unserviceable To repair Sierra
Leone
U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Freetown/
Lungi
VOR/DME 1999 Unserviceable To repair Sierra
Leone
U
Somalia Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Hargeisa VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Somalia U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Mogadishu VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Somalia U
Sudan Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Geneina VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Juba ILS 13 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan A
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Karina VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan U
Tanzania Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Dodoma VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania 31/12/2005 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Mbeya VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania June 2006 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Mwanza DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania June 2005 U
Zambia Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Mongu VOR 1998 Not implemented Under installation Zambia 30/12/2005 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4
Solwezi VOR 1998 Not implemented Sourcing for funds Zambia Dec.w 2006 U
-------
Language:English
Score: 359094.14
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...1/CNS_SG4/docs/wp14_app_en.pdf
Data Source: un
(Presented by the Secretariat)
SUMMARY
This paper examines the status of implementation of ARNS facilities in the AFI Region and identifies deficiencies and corrective measures for their elimination.
(...) ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE MEETING
3.1 The meeting is invited to:
a) take note of the above information;
b) update the meeting on the attached deficiencies; and
c) Angola and Madagascar who have along outstanding list should be urged
to implement the facilities.
-----------------------------
CNS/SG3 – WP/10
1
LIST OF DEFICIENCIES IN THE AIR NAVIGATION FIELDS
NAVAIDS
State Name Requirements Facilities or Services
Description of Deficiency Date first reported
Comments on Deficiency
Description of Corrective action Executing Body
Target date for implementation
Priority
Angola
Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Huambo VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA A
Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Kuito VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA A
Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Luena VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA U
Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Saurimo VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA U
Cameroon Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Maroua VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Cameroon A
Congo D.R.C.
Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Kindu VOR 1998 Unserviceable New equipment to be installed DR Congo 2005 U
Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Kisangani VOR/DME 1998 Unserviceable New equipment being installed DR Congo 2005 A
Guinea Navaids, AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Kankan VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Labe VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Nzerekore VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A
Kenya Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Mandera VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Kenya U
Lesotho Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Maseru VOR/DME 2002 Not implemented To implement Lesotho U
Liberia Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Robertsfield ILS 04 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Liberia U
Libya Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Sarir VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Libya U
Madagascar Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Antsiranana VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Maintirano VOR 2002 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Morondava VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Sainte Marie VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar A
CNS/SG3 – WP/10
2
State Name Requirements Facilities or Services
Description of Deficiency Date first reported
Comments on Deficiency
Description of Corrective action Executing Body
Target date for implementation
Priority
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Toliara VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U
Sao Tome & Principe
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Sao Tome ILS 11 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sao Tome & Principe
A
Sierra Leone Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Freetown/ Lungi
ILS 30 1999 Unserviceable To repair Sierra Leone U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Freetown/ Lungi
VOR/DME 1999 Unserviceable To repair Sierra Leone U
Somalia Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Hargeisa VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Somalia U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Mogadishu VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Somalia U
Sudan Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Geneina VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Juba ILS 13 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan A
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Karina VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan U
Tanzania Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Dodoma VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania 31/12/2005 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Mbeya VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania June 2006 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Mwanza DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania June 2005 U
Zambia Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Mongu VOR 1998 Not implemented Under installation Zambia 30/12/2005 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Solwezi VOR 1998 Not implemented Sourcing for funds Zambia Dec.w 2006 U
Language:English
Score: 358316.2
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc.../SG/2010/CNS_SG3/Docs/wp10.pdf
Data Source: un
Microsoft Word - CNS_SG6 WP06-ARNS en.docx
CNS/SG/6 - WP/06
Appendix
ARNS deficiencies
State Name Requirements Facilities or Services
Description of Deficiency
Date first reported
Comments on Deficiency
Description of Corrective action
Executing Body Target date for implementation
Priority
Angola
Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Huambo VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility ENANA 30 September 2014 A
Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Kuito VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility ENANA 30 September 2014 A
Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Luena VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility ENANA 30 September 2014 U
Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Saurimo VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility ENANA 30 September 2014 U
Cameroon Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4
Maroua VOR 1998 Not implemented
Implementation in progress
Cameroon 30 September 2014 A
Guinea
Navaids, AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Kankan VOR 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Guinea 30 September 2014 A
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Labe VOR 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Guinea 30 September 2014 A
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Nzerekore VOR 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Guinea 30 September 2014 A
Kenya Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Mandera VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Kenya 30 September 2014 U
Lesotho Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Maseru VOR/DME 2002 Not implemented
To implement Lesotho 30 September 2014 U
Madagascar
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Antsiranana VOR 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Madagascar 30 September 2014 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Maintirano VOR 2002 Not implemented
Implement facility Madagascar 30 September 2014 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Morondava VOR 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Madagascar 30 September 2014 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Sainte Marie VOR 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Madagascar 30 September 2014 A
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Toliara VOR 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Madagascar 30 September 2014 U
Sao Tome & Navaids AFI/7 Rec. Sao Tome ILS 11 1998 Not Implement facility Sao Tome & 30 September 2014 A
CNS/SG/6 - WP/06
State Name Requirements Facilities or Services
Description of Deficiency
Date first reported
Comments on Deficiency
Description of Corrective action
Executing Body Target date for implementation
Priority
Principe 10/4 implemented Principe Sierra Leone Navaids AFI/7 Rec.
10/4 Freetown/ Lungi
ILS 30 1999 Unserviceable To repair Sierra Leone 30 September 2014 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Freetown/ Lungi
VOR/DME 1999 Unserviceable To repair Sierra Leone 30 September 2014 U
Somalia
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Hargeisa VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Somalia 30 September 2014 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Mogadishu VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Somalia 30 September 2014 U
Tanzania
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Dodoma VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Tanzania 30 September 2014 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Mbeya VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Tanzania 30 September 2014 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Mwanza DME 1998 Not implemented
Implement facility Tanzania 30 September 2014 U
Zambia
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Mongu VOR 1998 Not implemented
Under installation Zambia 30 September 2014 U
Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4
Solwezi VOR 1998 Not implemented
Sourcing for funds Zambia 30 September 2014 U
Priority:
U: Urgent A: Average
Language:English
Score: 358060.91
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...CNS_SG6%20WP06-ARNS%20en.2.pdf
Data Source: un
Public Participation
Site map
Home
About UNECE
Programmes
Information
Meetings
Contact Us
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
About the Convention
Introduction
Content
Text
Status of ratification
Amendments
Amendment procedure
2005 Almaty amendment on GMO
Archives
Convention bodies
Meeting of the Parties
Fourth meeting – Chisinau 2011
Extra-ordinary meeting – Geneva 2010
Third meeting – Riga 2008
Second meeting – Almaty 2005
Extra-ordinary meeting – Kyiv 2003
First meeting – Lucca 2002
Preparatory process
Bureau of the Meeting of the Parties
Working Group of the Parties to the Convention
Compliance Committee
Background
Members
Meetings
Documents
Submissions by Parties
Referrals by the secretariat
Communications from the public
Implementation of decisions on compliance
Guidance document
Expert Group on Public Participation
Expert Group on Communication Strategy
Task Force on Access to Justice
Task Force on Electronic Information Tools
Task Force on Public Participation in Decision-making
Task Force on Public Participation in International Forums
Working Group on PRTRs
Former bodies
Protocol on PRTRs
Introduction
Content
Text
Status of ratification
Meeting of the Parties to the Protocol
Working Group of the Parties
Bureau
Compliance Committee
Former Bodies
Capacity-building
Guidance on implementation
International PRTR Coordinating Group
PRTR.net global portal
Side events and workshops
Workplan activities
Strategic plan
Work programme 2009-2011
Capacity-building
Communication strategy
Cross-cutting processes
Financial arrangements
GMO
International outreach
Public participation in Strategic Decision-making
National Profiles programme
Thematic and regional workshops
Implementation and compliance
Introduction
Implementation by Parties
Reporting requirements
2011 reporting cycle
2008 reporting cycle
2005 reporting cycle
Compliance Committee
Background
Members
Meetings
Documents
Submissions by Parties
Referrals by the secretariat
Communications from the public
Implementation of decisions on compliance
Guidance document
Calendar of meetings
Publications and guidance
Guidance on the Convention
Guidance on the Protocol
Other guidance documents
National publications
Other publications
Aarhus Centres
Introduction
Contacts
Aarhus Clearinghouse
News centre
Media
News in brief
Press releases
Related events
Site index
Contacts
Convention Secretariat
National Focal Points
Non-governmental and other organizations
UNECE » Programmes » Environment policy » Aarhus Convention » Implementation report drafts submitted 2007/2008
AARHUS CONVENTION
Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
Status of implementation Guidance on reporting requirements ENG
FRE
RUS Implementation reports 2011
Implementation reports 2008
Implementation reports 2005
Reports from international, regional and NGOs 2008
Implementation report drafts submitted 2007/2008
Reports from international, regional and NGOs 2005
2011 National Implementation Reports
Please follow links in the table below to access the national implementation reports as submitted by the Parties.
Date received
w/track changes
National language
Implementation report by Albania
09-02-11
ENG
ENG
SQI
Implementation report by Armenia
06-12-10
ENG
RUS
RUS
HYE
Implementation report by Austria
10-12-10
ENG
ENG
DEU
Implementation report by Azerbaijan
22-02-11
ENG
RUS
Implementation report by Belarus
14-04-11
RUS
RUS
Implementation report by Belgium (synthesis)
08-12-10
ENG
ENG
Implementation report by Belgium - Federal Authority
08-12-10
ENG
FRE
NLD
Implementation report by Belgium - Brussels Capital Region
08-12-10
ENG
FRE
FRE
NLD
Implementation report by Belgium - Flemish Region
08-12-10
NLD
Implementation report by Belgium - Walloon Region
08-12-10
FRE
Implementation report by Bosnia & Herzegovina
28-12-10
ENG
ENG
BOS
Implementation report by Bulgaria
29-12-10
ENG
ENG
BUL
Implementation report by Croatia
27-01-11
ENG
HRV
Implementation report by Cyprus
14-03-11
ENG
ENG
Implementation report by Czech Republic
10-12-10
ENG
RUS
CES
Implementation report by Denmark
17-10-10
ENG
ENG
DAN
Implementation report by Estonia
17-12-10
ENG
ENG
EST
Implementation report by European Union
26-04-11
ENG
Implementation report by Finland
07-01-11
ENG
ENG
FIN
Implementation report by France
07-02-11
ENG
FRE
FRE
Implementation report by Georgia
03-12-10
ENG
ENG
KAT
Implementation report by Germany
03-12-10
ENG
ENG
FRE
RUS
DEU
Implementation report by Greece
24-01-11
ENG
ENG
Implementation report by Hungary
07-03-11
ENG
ENG
HUN
Implementation report by Italy
23-12-10
ENG
ENG
Implementation report by Kazakhstan
13-12-10
ENG
RUS
Implementation report by Kyrgyzstan
21-12-10
ENG
RUS
RUS
Implementation report by Latvia
11-01-11
ENG
ENG
LAV
Implementation report by Lithuania
23-12-10
ENG
LTU
Implementation report by Luxembourg
Implementation report by Malta
Implementation report by Moldova
19-01-11
ENG
ENG
Implementation report by the Netherlands
04-03-11
ENG
ENG
Implementation report by Norway
22-12-10
ENG
ENG
NNO
Implementation report by Poland
Implementation report by Portugal
Implementation report by Romania
24-12-10
ENG
ROM
Implementation report by Serbia
30-12-10
ENG
SRP
Implementation report by Slovakia
15-03-11
ENG
SLK
Implementation report by Slovenia
08-12-10
ENG
ENG
SLV
Implementation report by Spain
27-01-11
ENG
ENG
SPA
Implementation report by Sweden
20-12-10
ENG
ENG
SWE
Implementation report by Tajikistan
Implementation report by The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Implementation report by Turkmenistan
15-11-10
ENG
RUS
Implementation report by Ukraine
07-12-10
ENG
RUS
Implementation report by United Kingdom
16-12-10
ENG
ENG
The above table was updated on 11 May 2011.
Language:English
Score: 357886.18
-
https://unece.org/fileadmin/DA...eports_implementation_2011.htm
Data Source: un
Establishment and implementation of National ASBU Plan by
dd/mm/yy by AFI States 4. Establishment and review of National PBN Plan by dd/mm/yy and
expected implementation by dd/mm/yy. 5. Implement seamless ANS along air Traffic Flows ( ARs ) by
dd/mm/yy (AFI single sky) 6. (...) Integration of ANS supporting
infrastructure/
systems by
dd/mm/yy
Integration of communication infrastructures AFTN/AMHS implemented by: dd/mm/yy AIDC implemented by: dd/mm/yy VoIP implemented by: dd/mm/yy VHF implemented by: dd/mm/yy CPDLC implemented by: dd/mm/yy VDL implemented by: dd/mm/yy NOCs implemented by dd/mm/yy BCCs implemented by dd/mm/yy
Integrated GNSS infrastructures and regulations
Basic RNAV/RNP flight procedures implemented by: dd/mm/yy
SBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy GBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy
Integration of surveillance systems SSR implemented by: dd/mm/yy ADS-C implemented by: dd/mm/yy ADS-B implemented by: dd/mm/yy MLAT implemented by: dd/mm/yy
Integrated AIM AIS/AIM transition by: dd/mm/yy % of States implementing QMS for AIM by:
dd/mm/yy
% of States implementing e-TOD for Areas 1,2,3 and 4 by: dd/mm/yy
% of States implementing WGS-84 by: dd/mm/yy % of States implementing AIXM by: dd/mm/yy
Integration of communication infrastructures AFTN/AMHS implemented by: dd/mm/yy AIDC implemented by: dd/mm/yy VoIP implemented by: dd/mm/yy VHF implemented by: dd/mm/yy CPDLC implemented by: dd/mm/yy VDL implemented by: dd/mm/yy X% of AMBEX digital units implemented by
dd/mm/yy
Integrated GNSS infrastructures and regulations
Basic GNSS procedures implemented by: dd/mm/yy
SBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy GBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy
Integration of surveillance systems SSR implemented by: dd/mm/yy ADS-C implemented by: dd/mm/yy ADS-B implemented by: dd/mm/yy MLAT implemented by: dd/mm/yy
Integrated AIM AIS/AIM transitiond by: dd/mm/yy SWIM implemented by: dd/mm/yy Implement phases 5, 6 and 7 of AFI digital
OPMET Transition Plan by dd/mm/yy
Integration of digital OPMET to SWIM environment by dd/mm/yy
Integration of communication infrastructures AFTN/AMHS implemented by: dd/mm/yy AIDC implemented by: dd/mm/yy VoIP implemented by: dd/mm/yy VHF implemented by: dd/mm/yy CPDLC implemented by: dd/mm/yy VDL implemented by: dd/mm/yy Full implementation of AMBEX digital units by
dd/mm/yy
Integrated GNSS infrastructures and regulations
Basic GNSS procedures implemented by: dd/mm/yy
SBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy GBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy
Integration of surveillance systems SSR implemented by: dd/mm/yy ADS-C implemented by: dd/mm/yy ADS-B implemented by: dd/mm/yy MLAT implemented by: dd/mm/yy
Integrated AIM AIS/AIM transitiond by: dd/mm/yy SWIM implemented by: dd/mm/yy: Implement phase 8 of AFI digital OPMET
Transition Plan by dd/mm/yy
Full digital OPMET exchange in the future SWIM environment by dd/mm/yy
% of States with e-AIP implementation by: dd/mm/yy
% of States Implementing Digital NOTAM by: dd/mm/yy
SWIM implemented by: dd/mm/yy Implement phases 1, 2, 3 and 4 of AFI digital
OPMET by dd/mm/yy
7.
Language:English
Score: 357545.07
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...gets%20-vers.%2013-05-2015.pdf
Data Source: un
This module includes elements which should be viewed as a subset of all available meteorological information that can be used to support enhanced operational efficiency and safety. Element Implementation Status 1 Element Description:
WAFS Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010
Status Implemented
Status Details Enter status details
2 Element Description: IAVW
Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010
Status Implemented
Status Details Enter status details
3 Element Description: TCAC forecasts
Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010
Status Implemented
Status Details Enter status details
4 Element Description: Aerodrome warnings
Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010
Status Implemented
Status Details Enter status details.
5 Element Description: Wind shear warnings and alerts
Date Planned/Implemented December 2017
Status Developing
Status Details Awaiting equipment
6 Element Description: SIGMET
Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010
Status Implemented
Status Details Enter status details
7 Element Description: Other OPMET information (METAR, SPECI and/or TAF)
Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010
Status Implemented
Status Details Enter status details
8 Element Description: QMS for MET
Date Planned/Implemented DECEMBER 2018
Status Developing
Status Details This process have started ,no date can be given at this time for completion
5th Edition GANP 2016 7 of 20 [Barbados]
Achieved Benefits Access and Equity
Capacity
Efficiency
Environment
Safety
Implementation Challenges Ground system Implementation
Avionics Implementation
Procedures Availability
Operational Approvals
Notes
5th Edition GANP 2016 8 of 20 [Barbados]
[Barbados] ASBU Air Navigation Reporting Form (ANRF) PIA 2 Block - Module B0 - DATM Date MAY, 2017 Module Description: The initial introduction of digital processing and management of information, from origination to publication, through aeronautical information service (AIS)/aeronautical information management (AIM) implementation, use of aeronautical exchange model (AIXM), migration to electronic aeronautical information publication (AIP) and better quality and availability of data. (...) Safety: QMS implementation ensures data changes are controlled and compliant with State requirements and regulations.
5th Edition GANP 2016 9 of 20 [Barbados]
Implementation Challenges Ground system Implementation
Avionics Implementation
Procedures Availability
Operational Approval: Challenges exist in coordinating with adjacent States to ensure operational viability during times of change. (...) Element Implementation Status 1 Element Description:
ADS-C over oceanic and remote areas Date Planned/Implemented Enter date if applicable
Status N/A
Status Details Enter status details
2 Element Description: CPDLC over continental areas
Date Planned/Implemented Enter date if applicable
Status N/A
Status Details Enter status details
3 Element Description: CPDLC over oceanic and remote areas
Date Planned/Implemented Enter date if applicable
Status N/A
Status Details Enter status details
Achieved Benefits Access and Equity
Capacity
Efficiency
Environment
Safety
Implementation Challenges Ground system Implementation
Avionics Implementation
Procedures Availability
Operational Approvals
Notes
Language:English
Score: 357506.54
-
https://www.icao.int/NACC/Docu...Groups/ANIWG/ASBU/ASBU-BRB.pdf
Data Source: un