Home

Results 1 - 10 of 613,270 for implement. Search took 0.496 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
Appendix A ATM/CNS Meeting Luanda Appendix A to WP/7 Status of Implementation of ATS/DS circuits State Requirements Status of implementation Remarks Angola Luanda: ACC-FIC Accra : VSAT under consideration Inmarsat phone used Brasilia : Not implemented Brazzaville : PSTN used To implement LTF Dakar : Not implemented Gaborone : Implemented Johannesburg : Implemented Kinshasa : Implemented Lusaka : Implemented Windhoek : Implemented Botswana Gaborone: ACC-FIC Francistown : Implemented Harare : Implemented Johannesburg : Implemented Luanda : Implemented Lusaka : Implemented Francistown TWR Windhoek : Implemented Bulawayo : Not implemented Proposal for deletion Gaborone : Implemented Congo Brazzaville APP-FIC Accra : Implemented Bangui : Implemented Douala : Implemented Kano : Implemented Khartoum : Not implemented VSAT AFISNET proposed by ASECNA Kinshasa : Implemented Libreville : Implemented Luanda : PSTN used via inmarsat phone To implement LTF ATM/CNS Meeting Luanda Appendix A to WP/7 2 State Requirements Status of implementation Remarks N’djamena : Implemented Sao Tome : Not implemented VSAT to be installed. Côte d’Ivoire Abidjan APP Accra : Implemented Bamako : Implemented Bobo Dioulasso : Not Implemented To implement VSAT Dakar : Implemented Niamey : Implemented Ouagadougou : Implemented Robertsfield : Implemented Democratic Republic of Congo Bukavu Kigali : Not Implemented Gbadolite Bangui : Not Implemented Goma Bujumbura : Not Implemented Kigali : Not Implemented Lubumbashi Ndola : Implemented Kinshasa Brazzaville : Implemented Bujumbura : Not implemented VSAT SADC implemented in Bujumbura and Kinshasa Dar-es-Salaam : Implemented Entebbe : Not implemented Khartoum : Not implemented Kigali : Not implemented VSAT SADC under consideration by Rwanda Luanda : Implemented Lusaka : Implemented Gabon Libreville ACC Accra : Implemented Bata : Not implemented VSAT planned at Bata Brazzaville : Implemented Douala : Implemented Kano : Implemented Lagos : Implemented P:\ATM-CNS-Luanda\Appendices\App-A-WP-7.doc ATM/CNS Meeting Luanda Appendix A to WP/7 3 State Requirements Status of implementation Remarks Malabo : Implemented Sao Tome : Not implemented To implement VSAT Ghana Accra APP-FIC Abidjan : Implemented Bobo Dioulasso PSTN in use. VSAT planned at Bobo Dioulasso Brazaville : Implemented Cotonou : Implemented Kano : Implemented Lagos : Implemented Libreville : Implemented Lome : Implemented Luanda Inmarsat phone in use.
Language:English
Score: 362071.02 - https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...G/2003/ATM-CNS/wp07appa_en.pdf
Data Source: un
Luanda Appendix G to report on Agenda Item 1 Status of Implementation of AFTN circuits State Requirements Status of Implementation Remarks Angola Luanda: Brazzaville : Not implemented Johannesburg : Implemented Botswana Gaborone: Johannesburg : Implemented Congo Brazzaville Bangui : Implemented Dakar Douala : Implemented Kinshasa : Implemented Johannesburg Libreville : Implemented Luanda : Not implemented Malabo : Not implemented Via Douala Nairobi : Not implemented N’djamena : Implemented Niamey : Implemented Sao Tome and Principe : Not implemented Côte d’Ivoire Abidjan Dakar : Implemented Democratic Republic of Congo Kinshasa Brazzaville : Implemented Johannesburg : Implemented Gabon Libreville Brazzaville : Implemented Ghana Accra Cotonou : Implemented Lome : Implemented Niamey : Implemented Namibia Windhoek Johannesburg : Implemented P:\ATM-CNS-Luanda\Final-Appendices\Ats-Cns-Luanda-App-G.doc ATM/CNS Mtg. Luanda Appendix G to report on Agenda Item 1 2 State Requirements Status of Implementation Remarks Nigeria Kano Niamey : Implemented Lagos : Implemented Sao Tome and Principe Sao Tome Brazzaville : Not implemented Senegal Dakar Abidjan : Implemented Bamako : Implemented Banjul : Implemented Bissau : Not implemented Conakry : Implemented Freetown : Implemented Niamey : Implemented Nouakchott : Implemented Roberts : Implemented SAL : Implemented (SAM) Buenos Aires : Implemented South Africa Johannesburg Antananarivo : Implemented Beira : Implemented Brazzaville : Implemented Bujumbura : Implemented Dar-es-Salaam : Implemented Gaborone : Implemented Harare : Implemented Kigali : Not Implemented Kinshasa : Implemented Lilongwe : Implemented Luanda : Implemented Lusaka : Implemented Maputo : Implemented Maseru : Implemented Manzini : Implemented Mauritius : Implemented Nairobi : Implemented Windhoek : Implemented P:\ATM-CNS-Luanda\Final-Appendices\Ats-Cns-Luanda-App-G.doc ATM/CNS Mtg. Luanda Appendix G to report on Agenda Item 1 P:\ATM-CNS-Luanda\Final-Appendices\Ats-Cns-Luanda-App-G.doc 3 State Requirements Status of Implementation Remarks (ASIA/PAC) Brisbane : Implemented (SAM) Buenos Aires : Not implemented VSAT CAFSAT installed at Johannesburg Zambia Lusaka Johannesburg : Implemented Zimbabwe Harare Johannesburg : Implemented ------ Status of Implementation of AFTN circuits State Status of Implementation Remarks Angola Botswana Congo Côte d’Ivoire Gabon Ghana Namibia Nigeria Senegal Zambia Zimbabwe
Language:English
Score: 360846.4 - https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc.../2003/ATM-CNS/report_app_g.pdf
Data Source: un
Data Indicator SeriesID SeriesDescription GeoAreaCode GeoAreaName TimePeriod Value Time_Detail Source FootNote Nature Units Reporting Type Observation Status ISOalpha3 Type SeriesCode 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 4 Afghanistan 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O AFG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 8 Albania 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ALB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 12 Algeria 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O DZA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 16 American Samoa 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O ASM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 20 Andorra 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O AND Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 24 Angola 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O AGO Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 28 Antigua and Barbuda 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ATG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 31 Azerbaijan 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O AZE Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 32 Argentina 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ARG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 36 Australia 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A AUS Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 40 Austria 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A AUT Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 44 Bahamas 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BHS Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 48 Bahrain 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BHR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 50 Bangladesh 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BGD Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 51 Armenia 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O ARM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 52 Barbados 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BRB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 56 Belgium 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BEL Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 60 Bermuda 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O BMU Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 64 Bhutan 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BTN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 68 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BOL Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 70 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BIH Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 72 Botswana 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BWA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 76 Brazil 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting. C NUMBER G V BRA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 84 Belize 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BLZ Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 86 Chagos Archipelago 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O IOT Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 90 Solomon Islands 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A SLB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 92 British Virgin Islands 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O VGB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 96 Brunei Darussalam 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BRN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 100 Bulgaria 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BGR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 104 Myanmar 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A MMR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 108 Burundi 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O BDI Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 112 Belarus 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O BLR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 116 Cambodia 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O KHM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 120 Cameroon 2018 1 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CMR Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 124 Canada 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CAN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 132 Cabo Verde 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CPV Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 136 Cayman Islands 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O CYM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 140 Central African Republic 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O CAF Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 144 Sri Lanka 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A LKA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 148 Chad 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O TCD Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 152 Chile 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CHL Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 156 China 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting. (...) C NUMBER G V COM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 175 Mayotte 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Not FAO Member State;The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported N NUMBER G O MYT Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 178 Congo 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O COG Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 180 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O COD Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 184 Cook Islands 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O COK Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 188 Costa Rica 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O CRI Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 191 Croatia 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A HRV Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 192 Cuba 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CUB Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 196 Cyprus 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CYP Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 203 Czechia 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A CZE Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 204 Benin 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A BEN Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 208 Denmark 2018 5 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Indicator developped upon responses provided by the EU | Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A DNK Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 212 Dominica 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O DMA Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 214 Dominican Republic 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A DOM Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 218 Ecuador 2018 4 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A ECU Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 222 El Salvador 2018 3 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting Level of implementation: 1 lowest - 5 highest C NUMBER G A SLV Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 226 Equatorial Guinea 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting A figure was not provided, or the method by which the figure was calculated is unknown NA NUMBER G O GNQ Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 231 Ethiopia 2018 N 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting The figure is not available because the indicator—as defined for the global monitoring—does not apply to the circumstances of the specific country, and therefore is not reported C NUMBER G O ETH Country ER_REG_UNFCIM 14.6.1 3034 Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest) 232 Eritrea 2018 NaN 2018 Questionnaire on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Country self-reporting NV = The figure has not been validated by the national statistical system for global reporting.
Language:English
Score: 359522.4 - https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/...ing_to_combat_IUU_fishing.xlsx
Data Source: un
The second column describes the Elements and the last column presents the implementation status. The implementation status of “Implemented” may means “Implemented and no additional work is planned”, or “Implemented and ongoing” or “Implemented and may enhance in the future.” (...) PIA 2: Globally Interoperable Systems and Data B0 Module Elements Status FICE 1: ATS units with AIDC Implemented 2: Implementation of AMHS/IPS Implemented DATM 1: Implementation of AIXM Implemented 2: Implementation of eAIP Initiated, on- going 3: Implementation of Digital NOTAM Implemented 4: Implementation of WGS-84 Planning 5: Implementation of eTOD Initiated, on- going 6: Implementation of QMS for AIM Implemented AMET 1: WAFS Implemented 2: IAVW Implemented 3. Tropical cyclone watch Implemented 4. Aerodrome warnings Implemented 5. Wind sheer warnings and alerts Implemented 6.
Language:English
Score: 359121.8 - https://www.icao.int/NACC/Docu...2014/NACCDCA5/NACCDCA5WP13.pdf
Data Source: un
Page 1 of 2 Appendix LIST OF DEFICIENCIES IN THE AIR NAVIGATION FIELDS ARNS State Name Requirements Facilities or Services Description of Deficiency Date first reported Comments on Deficiency Description of Corrective action Executing Body Target date for implementation Priority Angola Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Huambo VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA A Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Kuito VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA A Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Luena VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA U Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Saurimo VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA U Cameroon Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Maroua VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Cameroon A Guinea Navaids, AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Kankan VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Labe VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Nzerekore VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A Kenya Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Mandera VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Kenya U Lesotho Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Maseru VOR/DME 2002 Not implemented To implement Lesotho U Liberia Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Robertsfield ILS 04 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Liberia U Libya Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Sarir VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Libya U Madagascar Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Antsiranana VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Maintirano VOR 2002 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Morondava VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Sainte Marie VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar A Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Toliara VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U Sao Tome & Principe Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Sao Tome ILS 11 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sao Tome & Principe A Page 2 of 2 State Name Requirements Facilities or Services Description of Deficiency Date first reported Comments on Deficiency Description of Corrective action Executing Body Target date for implementation Priority Sierra Leone Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Freetown/ Lungi ILS 30 1999 Unserviceable To repair Sierra Leone U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Freetown/ Lungi VOR/DME 1999 Unserviceable To repair Sierra Leone U Somalia Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Hargeisa VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Somalia U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Mogadishu VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Somalia U Sudan Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Geneina VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Juba ILS 13 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan A Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Karina VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan U Tanzania Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Dodoma VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania 31/12/2005 U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Mbeya VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania June 2006 U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Mwanza DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania June 2005 U Zambia Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Mongu VOR 1998 Not implemented Under installation Zambia 30/12/2005 U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Solwezi VOR 1998 Not implemented Sourcing for funds Zambia Dec.w 2006 U -------
Language:English
Score: 359094.14 - https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...1/CNS_SG4/docs/wp14_app_en.pdf
Data Source: un
(Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY This paper examines the status of implementation of ARNS facilities in the AFI Region and identifies deficiencies and corrective measures for their elimination. (...) ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE MEETING 3.1 The meeting is invited to: a) take note of the above information; b) update the meeting on the attached deficiencies; and c) Angola and Madagascar who have along outstanding list should be urged to implement the facilities. ----------------------------- CNS/SG3 – WP/10 1 LIST OF DEFICIENCIES IN THE AIR NAVIGATION FIELDS NAVAIDS State Name Requirements Facilities or Services Description of Deficiency Date first reported Comments on Deficiency Description of Corrective action Executing Body Target date for implementation Priority Angola Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Huambo VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA A Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Kuito VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA A Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Luena VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA U Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Saurimo VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility ENANA U Cameroon Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Maroua VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Cameroon A Congo D.R.C. Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Kindu VOR 1998 Unserviceable New equipment to be installed DR Congo 2005 U Navaids AFI/7, Rec. 10/4 Kisangani VOR/DME 1998 Unserviceable New equipment being installed DR Congo 2005 A Guinea Navaids, AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Kankan VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Labe VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Nzerekore VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Guinea A Kenya Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Mandera VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Kenya U Lesotho Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Maseru VOR/DME 2002 Not implemented To implement Lesotho U Liberia Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Robertsfield ILS 04 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Liberia U Libya Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Sarir VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Libya U Madagascar Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Antsiranana VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Maintirano VOR 2002 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Morondava VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Sainte Marie VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar A CNS/SG3 – WP/10 2 State Name Requirements Facilities or Services Description of Deficiency Date first reported Comments on Deficiency Description of Corrective action Executing Body Target date for implementation Priority Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Toliara VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Madagascar U Sao Tome & Principe Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Sao Tome ILS 11 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sao Tome & Principe A Sierra Leone Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Freetown/ Lungi ILS 30 1999 Unserviceable To repair Sierra Leone U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Freetown/ Lungi VOR/DME 1999 Unserviceable To repair Sierra Leone U Somalia Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Hargeisa VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Somalia U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Mogadishu VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Somalia U Sudan Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Geneina VOR 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Juba ILS 13 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan A Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Karina VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Sudan U Tanzania Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Dodoma VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania 31/12/2005 U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Mbeya VOR/DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania June 2006 U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Mwanza DME 1998 Not implemented Implement facility Tanzania June 2005 U Zambia Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Mongu VOR 1998 Not implemented Under installation Zambia 30/12/2005 U Navaids AFI/7 Rec. 10/4 Solwezi VOR 1998 Not implemented Sourcing for funds Zambia Dec.w 2006 U
Language:English
Score: 358316.2 - https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc.../SG/2010/CNS_SG3/Docs/wp10.pdf
Data Source: un
Microsoft Word - CNS_SG6 WP06-ARNS en.docx CNS/SG/6 - WP/06 Appendix ARNS deficiencies State  Name   Requirements   Facilities  or   Services   Description  of   Deficiency   Date  first   reported   Comments  on   Deficiency   Description  of   Corrective  action   Executing  Body   Target  date  for   implementation   Priority     Angola   Navaids  AFI/7,  Rec.   10/4   Huambo   VOR/DME   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   ENANA   30  September  2014   A   Navaids  AFI/7,  Rec.   10/4   Kuito   VOR/DME   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   ENANA   30  September  2014   A   Navaids  AFI/7,  Rec.   10/4   Luena   VOR/DME   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   ENANA   30  September  2014   U   Navaids  AFI/7,  Rec.   10/4   Saurimo   VOR/DME   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   ENANA   30  September  2014   U   Cameroon   Navaids  AFI/7,  Rec.   10/4   Maroua   VOR   1998   Not   implemented   Implementation  in   progress   Cameroon   30  September  2014   A   Guinea   Navaids,  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Kankan   VOR   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Guinea   30  September  2014   A   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Labe   VOR   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Guinea   30  September  2014   A   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Nzerekore   VOR   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Guinea   30  September  2014   A   Kenya   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Mandera   VOR/DME   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Kenya   30  September  2014   U   Lesotho   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Maseru   VOR/DME   2002   Not   implemented   To  implement   Lesotho   30  September  2014   U   Madagascar   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Antsiranana   VOR   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Madagascar   30  September  2014   U   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Maintirano   VOR   2002   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Madagascar   30  September  2014   U   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Morondava   VOR   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Madagascar   30  September  2014   U   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Sainte  Marie   VOR   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Madagascar   30  September  2014   A   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4     Toliara   VOR   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Madagascar   30  September  2014   U   Sao  Tome  &   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   Sao  Tome   ILS  11   1998   Not   Implement  facility   Sao  Tome  &   30  September  2014   A   CNS/SG/6 - WP/06 State  Name   Requirements   Facilities  or   Services   Description  of   Deficiency   Date  first   reported   Comments  on   Deficiency   Description  of   Corrective  action   Executing  Body   Target  date  for   implementation   Priority   Principe   10/4   implemented   Principe   Sierra  Leone   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Freetown/   Lungi   ILS  30   1999   Unserviceable   To  repair   Sierra  Leone   30  September  2014   U   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Freetown/   Lungi   VOR/DME   1999   Unserviceable   To  repair   Sierra  Leone   30  September  2014   U   Somalia   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Hargeisa   VOR/DME   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Somalia   30  September  2014   U   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4     Mogadishu   VOR/DME   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Somalia   30  September  2014   U   Tanzania   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Dodoma   VOR/DME   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Tanzania   30  September  2014   U   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Mbeya   VOR/DME   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Tanzania   30  September  2014   U   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Mwanza   DME   1998   Not   implemented   Implement  facility   Tanzania   30  September  2014   U   Zambia   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4   Mongu   VOR   1998   Not   implemented   Under  installation   Zambia   30  September  2014   U   Navaids  AFI/7  Rec.   10/4     Solwezi   VOR   1998   Not   implemented   Sourcing  for  funds   Zambia   30  September  2014   U   Priority: U: Urgent A: Average
Language:English
Score: 358060.91 - https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...CNS_SG6%20WP06-ARNS%20en.2.pdf
Data Source: un
Public Participation Site map  Home About UNECE Programmes Information Meetings Contact Us United Nations Economic Commission for Europe About the Convention Introduction Content Text Status of ratification Amendments Amendment procedure 2005 Almaty amendment on GMO Archives Convention bodies Meeting of the Parties Fourth meeting – Chisinau 2011 Extra-ordinary meeting – Geneva 2010 Third meeting – Riga 2008 Second meeting – Almaty 2005 Extra-ordinary meeting – Kyiv 2003 First meeting – Lucca 2002 Preparatory process Bureau of the Meeting of the Parties Working Group of the Parties to the Convention Compliance Committee Background Members Meetings Documents Submissions by Parties Referrals by the secretariat Communications from the public Implementation of decisions on compliance Guidance document Expert Group on Public Participation Expert Group on Communication Strategy Task Force on Access to Justice Task Force on Electronic Information Tools Task Force on Public Participation in Decision-making Task Force on Public Participation in International Forums Working Group on PRTRs Former bodies Protocol on PRTRs Introduction Content Text Status of ratification Meeting of the Parties to the Protocol Working Group of the Parties Bureau Compliance Committee Former Bodies Capacity-building Guidance on implementation International PRTR Coordinating Group PRTR.net global portal Side events and workshops Workplan activities Strategic plan Work programme 2009-2011 Capacity-building Communication strategy Cross-cutting processes Financial arrangements GMO International outreach Public participation in Strategic Decision-making National Profiles programme Thematic and regional workshops Implementation and compliance Introduction Implementation by Parties Reporting requirements 2011 reporting cycle 2008 reporting cycle 2005 reporting cycle Compliance Committee Background Members Meetings Documents Submissions by Parties Referrals by the secretariat Communications from the public Implementation of decisions on compliance Guidance document Calendar of meetings Publications and guidance Guidance on the Convention Guidance on the Protocol Other guidance documents National publications Other publications Aarhus Centres Introduction Contacts Aarhus Clearinghouse News centre Media News in brief Press releases Related events Site index Contacts Convention Secretariat National Focal Points Non-governmental and other organizations UNECE » Programmes » Environment policy » Aarhus Convention » Implementation report drafts submitted 2007/2008 AARHUS CONVENTION Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters Status of implementation Guidance on reporting requirements ENG FRE RUS Implementation reports 2011 Implementation reports 2008 Implementation reports 2005 Reports from international, regional and NGOs 2008 Implementation report drafts submitted 2007/2008 Reports from international, regional and NGOs 2005 2011 National Implementation Reports Please follow links in the table below to access the national implementation reports as submitted by the Parties.     Date received       w/track changes National language Implementation report by Albania 09-02-11 ENG     ENG     SQI Implementation report by Armenia 06-12-10 ENG   RUS     RUS HYE Implementation report by Austria 10-12-10 ENG     ENG     DEU Implementation report by Azerbaijan 22-02-11 ENG   RUS         Implementation report by Belarus 14-04-11     RUS     RUS   Implementation report by Belgium (synthesis) 08-12-10 ENG     ENG       Implementation report by Belgium - Federal Authority 08-12-10 ENG FRE         NLD Implementation report by Belgium - Brussels Capital Region 08-12-10 ENG FRE     FRE   NLD Implementation report by Belgium - Flemish Region 08-12-10             NLD Implementation report by Belgium - Walloon Region 08-12-10             FRE Implementation report by Bosnia & Herzegovina 28-12-10 ENG     ENG     BOS Implementation report by Bulgaria 29-12-10 ENG     ENG     BUL Implementation report by Croatia 27-01-11 ENG           HRV Implementation report by Cyprus 14-03-11 ENG     ENG       Implementation report by Czech Republic 10-12-10 ENG   RUS       CES Implementation report by Denmark 17-10-10 ENG     ENG     DAN Implementation report by Estonia 17-12-10 ENG     ENG     EST Implementation report by European Union 26-04-11 ENG             Implementation report by Finland 07-01-11 ENG     ENG     FIN Implementation report by France 07-02-11 ENG FRE     FRE     Implementation report by Georgia 03-12-10 ENG     ENG     KAT Implementation report by Germany 03-12-10 ENG     ENG FRE RUS DEU Implementation report by Greece 24-01-11 ENG     ENG       Implementation report by Hungary 07-03-11 ENG     ENG     HUN Implementation report by Italy 23-12-10 ENG     ENG       Implementation report by Kazakhstan 13-12-10 ENG   RUS         Implementation report by Kyrgyzstan 21-12-10 ENG   RUS     RUS   Implementation report by Latvia 11-01-11 ENG     ENG     LAV Implementation report by Lithuania 23-12-10 ENG           LTU Implementation report by Luxembourg                 Implementation report by Malta                 Implementation report by Moldova 19-01-11 ENG     ENG       Implementation report by the Netherlands 04-03-11 ENG     ENG       Implementation report by Norway 22-12-10 ENG     ENG     NNO Implementation report by Poland                 Implementation report by Portugal                 Implementation report by Romania 24-12-10 ENG           ROM Implementation report by Serbia 30-12-10 ENG           SRP Implementation report by Slovakia 15-03-11 ENG           SLK Implementation report by Slovenia 08-12-10 ENG     ENG     SLV Implementation report by Spain 27-01-11 ENG     ENG     SPA Implementation report by Sweden 20-12-10 ENG     ENG     SWE Implementation report by Tajikistan                 Implementation report by The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia                 Implementation report by Turkmenistan 15-11-10 ENG   RUS         Implementation report by Ukraine 07-12-10 ENG   RUS         Implementation report by United Kingdom 16-12-10 ENG     ENG       The above table was updated on 11 May 2011.
Language:English
Score: 357886.18 - https://unece.org/fileadmin/DA...eports_implementation_2011.htm
Data Source: un
Establishment and implementation of National ASBU Plan by dd/mm/yy by AFI States 4. Establishment and review of National PBN Plan by dd/mm/yy and expected implementation by dd/mm/yy. 5. Implement seamless ANS along air Traffic Flows ( ARs ) by dd/mm/yy (AFI single sky) 6. (...) Integration of ANS supporting infrastructure/ systems by dd/mm/yy  Integration of communication infrastructures  AFTN/AMHS implemented by: dd/mm/yy  AIDC implemented by: dd/mm/yy  VoIP implemented by: dd/mm/yy  VHF implemented by: dd/mm/yy  CPDLC implemented by: dd/mm/yy  VDL implemented by: dd/mm/yy  NOCs implemented by dd/mm/yy  BCCs implemented by dd/mm/yy   Integrated GNSS infrastructures and regulations  Basic RNAV/RNP flight procedures implemented by: dd/mm/yy  SBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy  GBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy  Integration of surveillance systems  SSR implemented by: dd/mm/yy  ADS-C implemented by: dd/mm/yy  ADS-B implemented by: dd/mm/yy  MLAT implemented by: dd/mm/yy  Integrated AIM  AIS/AIM transition by: dd/mm/yy  % of States implementing QMS for AIM by: dd/mm/yy  % of States implementing e-TOD for Areas 1,2,3 and 4 by: dd/mm/yy  % of States implementing WGS-84 by: dd/mm/yy  % of States implementing AIXM by: dd/mm/yy  Integration of communication infrastructures  AFTN/AMHS implemented by: dd/mm/yy  AIDC implemented by: dd/mm/yy  VoIP implemented by: dd/mm/yy  VHF implemented by: dd/mm/yy  CPDLC implemented by: dd/mm/yy  VDL implemented by: dd/mm/yy  X% of AMBEX digital units implemented by dd/mm/yy  Integrated GNSS infrastructures and regulations  Basic GNSS procedures implemented by: dd/mm/yy  SBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy  GBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy  Integration of surveillance systems  SSR implemented by: dd/mm/yy  ADS-C implemented by: dd/mm/yy  ADS-B implemented by: dd/mm/yy  MLAT implemented by: dd/mm/yy  Integrated AIM  AIS/AIM transitiond by: dd/mm/yy  SWIM implemented by: dd/mm/yy  Implement phases 5, 6 and 7 of AFI digital OPMET Transition Plan by dd/mm/yy  Integration of digital OPMET to SWIM environment by dd/mm/yy  Integration of communication infrastructures  AFTN/AMHS implemented by: dd/mm/yy  AIDC implemented by: dd/mm/yy  VoIP implemented by: dd/mm/yy  VHF implemented by: dd/mm/yy  CPDLC implemented by: dd/mm/yy  VDL implemented by: dd/mm/yy  Full implementation of AMBEX digital units by dd/mm/yy  Integrated GNSS infrastructures and regulations  Basic GNSS procedures implemented by: dd/mm/yy  SBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy  GBAS implemented by: dd/mm/yy  Integration of surveillance systems  SSR implemented by: dd/mm/yy  ADS-C implemented by: dd/mm/yy  ADS-B implemented by: dd/mm/yy  MLAT implemented by: dd/mm/yy  Integrated AIM  AIS/AIM transitiond by: dd/mm/yy  SWIM implemented by: dd/mm/yy:  Implement phase 8 of AFI digital OPMET Transition Plan by dd/mm/yy  Full digital OPMET exchange in the future SWIM environment by dd/mm/yy  % of States with e-AIP implementation by: dd/mm/yy  % of States Implementing Digital NOTAM by: dd/mm/yy  SWIM implemented by: dd/mm/yy  Implement phases 1, 2, 3 and 4 of AFI digital OPMET by dd/mm/yy 7.
Language:English
Score: 357545.07 - https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...gets%20-vers.%2013-05-2015.pdf
Data Source: un
This module includes elements which should be viewed as a subset of all available meteorological information that can be used to support enhanced operational efficiency and safety. Element Implementation Status 1 Element Description: WAFS Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010 Status Implemented Status Details Enter status details 2 Element Description: IAVW Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010 Status Implemented Status Details Enter status details 3 Element Description: TCAC forecasts Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010 Status Implemented Status Details Enter status details 4 Element Description: Aerodrome warnings Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010 Status Implemented Status Details Enter status details. 5 Element Description: Wind shear warnings and alerts Date Planned/Implemented December 2017 Status Developing Status Details Awaiting equipment 6 Element Description: SIGMET Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010 Status Implemented Status Details Enter status details 7 Element Description: Other OPMET information (METAR, SPECI and/or TAF) Date Planned/Implemented Before May 2010 Status Implemented Status Details Enter status details 8 Element Description: QMS for MET Date Planned/Implemented DECEMBER 2018 Status Developing Status Details This process have started ,no date can be given at this time for completion 5th Edition GANP 2016 7 of 20 [Barbados] Achieved Benefits Access and Equity Capacity Efficiency Environment Safety Implementation Challenges Ground system Implementation Avionics Implementation Procedures Availability Operational Approvals Notes 5th Edition GANP 2016 8 of 20 [Barbados] [Barbados] ASBU Air Navigation Reporting Form (ANRF) PIA 2 Block - Module B0 - DATM Date MAY, 2017 Module Description: The initial introduction of digital processing and management of information, from origination to publication, through aeronautical information service (AIS)/aeronautical information management (AIM) implementation, use of aeronautical exchange model (AIXM), migration to electronic aeronautical information publication (AIP) and better quality and availability of data. (...) Safety: QMS implementation ensures data changes are controlled and compliant with State requirements and regulations. 5th Edition GANP 2016 9 of 20 [Barbados] Implementation Challenges Ground system Implementation Avionics Implementation Procedures Availability Operational Approval: Challenges exist in coordinating with adjacent States to ensure operational viability during times of change. (...) Element Implementation Status 1 Element Description: ADS-C over oceanic and remote areas Date Planned/Implemented Enter date if applicable Status N/A Status Details Enter status details 2 Element Description: CPDLC over continental areas Date Planned/Implemented Enter date if applicable Status N/A Status Details Enter status details 3 Element Description: CPDLC over oceanic and remote areas Date Planned/Implemented Enter date if applicable Status N/A Status Details Enter status details Achieved Benefits Access and Equity Capacity Efficiency Environment Safety Implementation Challenges Ground system Implementation Avionics Implementation Procedures Availability Operational Approvals Notes
Language:English
Score: 357506.54 - https://www.icao.int/NACC/Docu...Groups/ANIWG/ASBU/ASBU-BRB.pdf
Data Source: un