Home

  THE SECRETARY-GENERAL’S MECHANISM FOR INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGED USE OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPON

Anti-personnel Mine Ban Convention Implementation Machinery Meetings of the States parties are held annually in Geneva or in a mine-affected State at the end of November or beginning of December. (...) July 2017 Four limited-membership committees consisting of 4 to 5 States parties each support the implementation of the Convention, namely: (i) Committee on Article 5 Implementation (destruction of anti-personnel mines in mined areas); (ii) Committee on Cooperative Compliance; (iii) Committee on Victim Assistance; and (iv) Committee on Enhancing Cooperation and Assistance. (...) The Role of the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs In close cooperation with the Convention’s Implementation Support Unit, the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) provides support and facilitates the implementation of the Anti- personnel Mine Ban Convention at the international level.

Score: 1098359.6 - https://www.un.org/disarmament...07/APLC-Fact-Sheet-Jul2017.pdf

  Assessing the application of anti-corruption measures – a new tool in the fight against corruption |

The purpose of the methodology is to assess whether the authorities are implementing anti-corruption measures and whether the implementation has led to a certain change, but also to encourage the authorities to be proactive in planning and implementing anti-corruption measures. (...) The Assessment Index explores the effect of anti-corruption measures and encourages the authorities to be proactive in planning and implementing anti-corruption measures. (...) Both systems are most successful in creating the conditions for the implementation of anti-corruption regulations, while they have the least effect in creating an ethical culture.    

Score: 1096400.5 - https://www.undp.org/montenegr...-tool-fight-against-corruption

  AGREEMENT ON THE IMP

AGREEMENT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE VI OF THE GATT 1994 1 ILLUSTRATIVE MOCK EXAMPLES ILLUSTRATIVE1 MOCK EXAMPLES OF NOTIFICATIONS UNDER ARTICLE 18.5 Case 1: Your country has no anti-dumping laws and/or regulations. 2 A simple letter stating this fact is sufficient. EXAMPLE: "With reference to Article 18.5 of the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994, the Government of [name of Member] notifies the Committee on Anti-Dumping Practices that it has no laws and/or regulations relevant to the Agreement." (...) AGREEMENT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE VI OF THE GATT 1994 2 Case 4: Yes, there are currently anti-dumping laws and/or regulations in existence.

Score: 1096388 - https://www.wto.org/english/tr..._e/adp_e/adp_mock_examples.pdf

  CONCEPT OF JOINT CON

The project aims to implement the donor agreement signed in March 2017 between UNDP and the Government of Uzbekistan on providing anti-corruption programme support to the Republic of Uzbekistan. (...) At the same time, citizens' self-governance bodies, non-profit NGOs and citizens can participate in the development and implementation of state and other anti- corruption programmes; in raising the legal awareness and legal culture of the population, forming an intolerant attitude towards corruption in society; in public control over the implementation of legislation; in making proposals to improve legislation; in cooperation with state bodies and other organizations in the area of combating corruption. (...) The goal of the Joint Contest is to increase the effectiveness of the anti- corruption system, create the most favorable business climate, promote a positive image of the country in the international arena, and involve civil society institutions in the process of developing and implementing anti-corruption measures.

Score: 1092182.2 - https://www.undp.org/sites/g/f...pt_application%20PCEAT_eng.pdf

  WTO ANALYTICAL INDEX

Members' communications in this regard can be found in document series G/ADP/N/1/*. 16 Members have not, as yet, made any notification of anti-dumping legislation and/or regulations. Annex A of the Committee's annual reports sets out the status of notifications concerning legislation under Article 18.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, and sets out the reference symbol of the document(s) containing each Member's current notification in this regard.2 Notifications on anti-dumping legislation are circulated as unrestricted documents. 1.3 Article 18.6: Annual reviews of the implementation of the Anti-Dumping Agreement 3. Paragraph 7.4 of the Doha Ministerial Decision of 14 November 2001 on Implementation-Related Issues and Concerns states that the Ministerial Conference: "[t]akes note that Article 18.6 of the Agreement on the Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 requires the Committee on Anti-Dumping Practices to review annually the implementation and operation of the Agreement taking into account the objectives thereof. (...) filename=q:/G/ADP/9.pdf 1 Article 18 of the agreement on implementation of Article vi of the general agreement on tariffs and trade 1994 1.1 Text of Article 18 1.2 Article 18.5: Anti-dumping legislation notifications 1.3 Article 18.6: Annual reviews of the implementation of the Anti-Dumping Agreement

Score: 1091983.1 - https://www.wto.org/english/re...7_e/anti_dumping_art18_oth.pdf

  WTO | Anti-dumping - Gateway

WTO | Anti-dumping - Gateway WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION Home   |  About WTO   |  News & events   |  Trade topics   |  WTO membership   |  Documents & resources   |  External relations Contact us   |  Site map   |  A-Z   |  Search español   français home trade topics anti-dumping Anti-dumping If a company exports a product at a price lower than the price it normally charges on its own home market, it is said to be “dumping” the product. (...) Its focus is on how governments can or cannot react to dumping — it disciplines anti-dumping actions, and it is often called the “Anti-dumping Agreement”. (...) Technical information about anti-dumping   back to top The mandate Brief summary of the Anti-dumping Agreement   Explanation of the Anti-dumping Agreement Members’ obligations to notify the WTO on anti-dumping measures Browse or download the text of the “Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994” from the legal texts gateway Find decisions of WTO bodies concerning the Anti-dumping Agreement in the Analytical Index — Guide to WTO Law and Practice The Doha negotiating mandate Section on Anti-dumping in the 2001 Doha Ministerial Declaration The Doha Implementation Decision, 2001 Ministers’ decisions on developing countries’ difficulties implementing the current WTO Anti-dumping Agreement.   

Score: 1088319.5 - https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm

  Joint contest for grants in the field of preventing and combating corruption | United Nations Develo

Joint contest for grants in the field of preventing and combating corruption | United Nations Development Programme Skip to main content Uzbekistan Who we are What we do Our impact Get involved English Русский O`zbek Global Nav toggle Search Who we are What we do Our impact Get involved English Locations Back Select Language Русский O`zbek Home Uzbekistan Joint contest for grants in the field of preventing and combating corruption Joint contest for grants in the field of preventing and combating corruption June 16, 2022 Image: UNDP Uzbekistan The Joint Contest  "Involving Civil Society Institutions in the Development and Implementation of Innovations in Preventing and Combating Corruption" (referred to as the Joint Contest) is conducted by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) project “Preventing Corruption through Effective, Accountable and Transparent Institutions of Governance in Uzbekistan (PCEAT), project “Strengthening civic space, voice of women and youth to enhance the role of the Agency for Counteracting Corruption in Uzbekistan" jointly with the Ministry of Justice, the General Prosecutor's Office, the Anti-Corruption Agency of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the National Commission on Countering Corruption. The goal is to increase the effectiveness of the anti-corruption system, create favorable business climate, promote a positive image of the country in the international arena and engage civil society institutions in the process of developing and implementing anti-corruption measures. The main objectives of the Joint Contest: - to implement projects jointly with civil society institutions to prevent and counteractcorruption in social partnership and public control, as well as to carry out anti-corruption expertise of the legislation; - to use new capacities, i.e. to involve the civil sector in the search for traditional and non-traditional solutions, as well as to increase the participation of civil society institutions in the process of preventing and counteracting corruption; - to engage civil society institutions in the development and implementation of various measures to counteract and prevent corruption in relation to vulnerable groups, including persons with disabilities, low-income families, women and youth; - to create conditions for targeted activities to further involve civil society institutions in the process of developing and implementing anti-corruption measures, including through the use of advanced technologies; - to incorporate inclusive methods and apply modern technologies in the areas where women are most exposed to corruption, as well as prevent corruption through ensuring transparency of the activities of state institutions; - to foster honesty and integrity, as well as zero-tolerance towards corruption in children through application of innovative ideas and new mechanisms for anti-corruption education and training.

Score: 1077579.2 - https://www.undp.org/uzbekista...nting-and-combating-corruption

  WTO ANALYTICAL INDEX

WTO ANALYTICAL INDEX Anti-Dumping Agreement – Article 17 (Practice) 1 ARTICLE 17 OF THE AGREEMENT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE VI OF THE GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE 1994 ..................................................... 1 1.1 Text of Article 17 ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Ministerial Declaration on Dispute Settlement Pursuant to the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (Anti-Dumping Agreement) or the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement) ............................ 2 1.3 Ministerial Decision on Review of Article 17.6 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement ................... 2 1 ARTICLE 17 OF THE AGREEMENT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE VI OF THE GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE 1994 1.1 Text of Article 17 Article 17 Consultation and Dispute Settlement 17.1 Except as otherwise provided herein, the Dispute Settlement Understanding is applicable to consultations and the settlement of disputes under this Agreement. 17.2 Each Member shall afford sympathetic consideration to, and shall afford adequate opportunity for consultation regarding, representations made by another Member with respect to any matter affecting the operation of this Agreement. 17.3 If any Member considers that any benefit accruing to it, directly or indirectly, under this Agreement is being nullified or impaired, or that the achievement of any objective is being impeded, by another Member or Members, it may, with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory resolution of the matter, request in writing consultations with the Member or Members in question. (...) At the Ministerial Conference in Marrakesh on 15 April 1994, the Ministers adopted the Declaration on Dispute Settlement Pursuant to the Anti-Dumping Agreement or the SCM Agreement, which states: "Ministers recognize, with respect to dispute settlement pursuant to the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994 or Part V of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, the need for the consistent resolution of disputes arising from anti-dumping and countervailing duty measures." 1.3 Ministerial Decision on Review of Article 17.6 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement 2. At the Ministerial Conference in Marrakesh on 15 April 1994, the Ministers adopted the Decision on Review of Article 17.6 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, which states: "Ministers decide as follows: The standard of review in paragraph 6 of Article 17 of the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994 shall be reviewed after a period of three years with a view to considering the question of whether it is capable of general application." _____ Current as of: December 2021 1 Article 17 of the agreement on implementation of article vi of the general agreement on tariffs and trade 1994 1.1 Text of Article 17 1.2 Ministerial Declaration on Dispute Settlement Pursuant to the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (Anti-Dumping Agreement) or the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Ag... 1.3 Ministerial Decision on Review of Article 17.6 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement

Score: 1077541.8 - https://www.wto.org/english/re...7_e/anti_dumping_art17_oth.pdf

  1 REGULATION on cond

The Joint Contest is being held to further involve civil society institutions in the process of developing and implementing anti-corruption measures through joint projects with NGOs and other civil society institutions The Joint Contest is aimed at further involving civil society institutions in the development and implementation of anti-corruption measures through joint projects with NGOs and other civil society institutions to combat corruption as part of a social partnership. The goal is to increase the effectiveness of the anti-corruption system, create the most favorable business climate, promote a positive image of the country in the international arena, and involve civil society institutions in the process of developing and implementing anti-corruption measures. 1.2 Funding: The total budget of the Joint Contest is 70,000 USD. (...) Separate attention will also be paid to projects aimed at development and implementation of anti-corruption measures using innovative solutions and advanced technologies that contribute to development of social partnerships between civil society institutions, governmental bodies and private sector, including those implemented jointly.

Score: 1077263.8 - https://www.undp.org/sites/g/f...ompetition_PCEAT%20-%20Eng.pdf

  Montenegro showcases new Korea-inspired methodology to assess implementation of anti-corruption meas

Montenegro showcases new Korea-inspired methodology to assess implementation of anti-corruption measures | United Nations Development Programme Skip to main content Seoul Policy Centre for Knowledge Exchange through SDG Partnerships Who we are What we do Our impact Get involved English 한국어 Global Nav toggle Search Who we are What we do Our impact Get involved English Locations Back Select Language 한국어 Home Seoul Policy Centre for Knowledge Exchange through SDG Partnerships Montenegro showcases new Korea-inspired methodology to assess implementation of anti-corruption measures Montenegro showcases new Korea-inspired methodology to assess implementation of anti-corruption measures April 15, 2022   On 6 April 2022, UNDP Seoul Policy Centre (USPC) took part in a hybrid conference co-hosted by Montenegro’s Agency for Prevention of Corruption, UNDP Montenegro, and the Office for European Integration aiming to overview the country’s successful implementation of assessment methodologies for corruption mitigation inspired by the Korean Anti-corruption Initiative Assessment (AIA) model.   (...) Ahjung Lee, Governance Portfolio Manager of USPC, reviewed the basic concept of AIA and provided feedback on Montenegro’s AIA-inspired methodology, noting its noteworthy features and offering some suggestions based on Korea’s lessons learned from AIA implementation. She noted that in order to ensure sustainability of these anti-corruption efforts, continuous methodological refinements, as well as advocacy efforts for building the political will are crucial. (...) Mr. Jungoh Son, Anti-Corruption Policy Advisor of UNDP and secondee from ACRC, congratulated Montenegro’s successful adoption and implementation of the AIA tool and emphasized the role of the authority heads to ensure their anti-corruption activities were inclusive and sustainable. * UNDP Seoul Policy Centre (USPC) shares Korea’s tested-and-proven policy tools with other countries through SDG Partnerships and UNDP’s Global Policy Network (GPN).

Score: 1076321.9 - https://www.undp.org/policy-ce...ation-anti-corruption-measures