Home

The relevant indicators of achievement, together with baseline and target data, against which performance will be measured, are presented in section III of this document. 10. (...) The objective of the UNECE subprogramme of transport is to facilitate the international movement of persons and goods by inland transport modes and improve safety, environmental protection, energy efficiency and security in the transport sector to levels that contribute effectively to sustainable development. 12. (...) Biennial Assessment Review of performance measures for 2012–2013 and establishment of targets for 2014–2015 Cluster Expected Accomplishments Indicators of Achievement Actual Performance Measures 15 Transport Statistics Improved availability and scope of transport statistical data (a) Number of reliable statistical products available on the Internet Performance measures: Target 2010–2011: Complete statistical database online Complete statistical database online Target 2012–2013: Maintenance of online statistical database Complete statistical database online Target 2014–2015: Maintenance of online statistical database (b) Use of data as measured by website downloads Performance measures: Target 2010–2011: 82 000 downloads 84 000 downloads Target 2012–2013: 85 000 downloads ……… downloads1 Target 2014–2015: 88 000 downloads IV.

GE.17-14668 (F)  Comité chargé de l’examen de la mise en œuvre de la Convention Seizième session Ordos (Chine), 7-13 septembre 2017 Point 2 e) de

The secretariat, where appropriate, may consider other UNFCCC review processes when coordinating BR and NC reviews, in particular with a view to addressing the need to improve the cost-effectiveness of the review process and national circumstances. (...) The secretariat, where appropriate, shall consider other UNFCCC review processes when coordinating BR and NC reviews, in particular with a view to addressing the need to improve the cost-effectiveness of the review process and national circumstances. (...) Lead reviewers shall also collectively prepare an annual report to the SBSTA as part of the annual report referred to in paragraph 40 above, containing suggestions on how to improve the quality, efficiency and consistency of the reviews in the light of paragraph 5 above of these guidelines.

List of possible work areas and their associated activities, actors, targets/timeframes, indicators of progress and implementation aspects……………………………………………… 38 List of acronyms and abbreviations used in Table B…………… 108 Resolutions adopted by the International Conference on Chemicals Management at its first session ...........................................................................109 SAICM/RM/Afr.1/INF/1 5 I/1. (...) The sound management of chemicals is essential if we are to achieve sustainable development, including the eradication of poverty and disease, the improvement of human health and the environment and the elevation and maintenance of the standard of living in countries at all levels of development; 2. (...) To provide and support enabling frameworks for businesses to develop and improve products that advance the objectives of the Strategic Approach; m.

Forests and their sustainable management are core aspects of SDG15 on life on earth and its targets. Forests can contribute to achieving all of the SDGs and their associated targets. (...) (c) Global goals and targets build on country priorities and realities. (...) e) Given the relation between indicators and targets, the proposed set of forest related indicators should be adjusted to include indicators related to the global forest goals and targets of the IAF Strategic Plan.

Views expressed by Parties on possible improvements to emissions trading and the project-based mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol, as means that may be available to Annex I Parties to reach their emission reduction targets, compiled by the Chair of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol .................................................................... 15 III. (...) One Party further proposed that the UNFCCC could develop specific reduction or limitation targets, while ICAO and IMO could provide the technical expertise on how such targets could be achieved. 34. (...) FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/3 page 15 Annexe II [ENGLISH ONLY] Views expressed by Parties on possible improvements to emissions trading and the project-based mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol, as means that may be available to Annex I Parties to reach their emission reduction targets, compiled by the Chair of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol This annex is the compilation of views of Parties and does not prejudge any actions by the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol.

Introduce sectoral crediting of emission reductions below a previously established no-lose target 4. A non-Annex I Party may propose a no-lose target for emissions from a sector. Such targets shall be approved by {the CMP} {a body constituted by the CMP and operating under its guidance}. The Party may receive upfront financing, technology and credits for verified emission reductions below the target. There shall be no consequences for a Party that does not meet its approved target.

Structured summary: Tracking progress made in implementing and achieving the NDC under Article 4 of the Paris Agreementa Unit, as applicable Reference point(s), level(s), baseline(s), base year(s) or starting point(s), as appropriate (paras. 67 and 77(a)(i) of the MPGs) Implementation period of the NDC covering information for previous reporting years, as applicable, and the most recent year, including the end year or end of period (paras. 68 and 77(a)(ii–iii) of the MPGs) Target levelb Target year or period Progress made towards the NDC, as determined by comparing the most recent information for each selected indicator, including for the end year or end of period, with the reference point(s), level(s), baseline(s), base year(s) or starting point(s) (paras. 69–70 of the MPGs) Year 1 Year 2 … … … End year Indicator(s) selected to track progress of the NDC or portion of NDC under Article 4 of the Paris Agreement (paras. 65 and 77(a) of the MPGs): {Indicator} {Parties can add rows for each additional indicator and supporting information for each indicator, e.g. baseline values, baseline for the portion of NDC, target values, mitigation effects of policies and measures, etc.} (...) a This table could be used for each NDC target in case Party’s NDC has multiple targets. b Parties may provide information on conditional targets in a documentation box with references to the relevant page in their biennial transparency report.

Identifying which proteins a target protein interacts with can help in understanding its function. (...) In drug screening, protein arrays can be used to determine which compounds react with target proteins and which react with non-target proteins i.e. those which could potentially cause side effects. (...) In the long term such technologies may improve sufficiently to be used by a BW aggressor to deliver a foreign gene into human cells. 17.

All Parties provided information on mitigation targets or mitigation co-benefits resulting from adaptation actions and/or economic diversification plans in their NDCs (see figure 1), which range from economy-wide absolute emission reduction targets to strategies, plans and actions for low-emission development, to be implemented within a specified time frame or implementation period: (a) Some Parties included absolute emission reduction targets expressed as an emission reduction from the level in a specified base year, ranging from 7.2 to 88.0 per cent. (...) In addition, a few of these Parties expressed their target as a carbon budget in addition to the absolute target, establishing an overall limit on GHGs to be emitted over a specified period of time (e.g. between 2021 and 2030); (b) Many Parties included relative targets for reducing emissions below the ‘business as usual’ level by a specified target year, either for the whole economy or for specific sectors, ranging from 5 to 103.5 per cent and thus achieving carbon neutrality; or emission intensity targets for reducing specific GHG emissions per GDP unit relative to a base-year (e.g. 1990) level; (c) Some Parties included strategies, plans and actions for low-emission development reflecting their particular national circumstances; (d) Some Parties provided information on mitigation co-benefits resulting from their adaptation actions and/or economic diversification plans, mostly in combination with other targets. 34 Including emissions from countries that are not Parties to the Paris Agreement, a harmoniz