Home

Analysis Reporting entities 1.3 CONS-O-3 IA3.1, ID3.1 Progress in the participation of CSOs and STIs in the Convention processes per year globally and by region/subregion Country Parties (affected, developed), SRAPs/RAPs IO3.1, IG3.1 Progress in the participation of CSOs and STIs in the Convention processes per year globally and by region/subregion United Nations agencies and IGOs, GEF IA3.2, ID3.2 National contribution to the target Country Parties (affected, developed), SRAPs/RAPs IA3.3, ID3.3 Most important reasons for increasing/ decreasing trends per region Country Parties (affected, developed), SRAPs/RAPs IO3.3, IG3.3 Most important reasons for increasing trends United Nations agencies and IGOs, GEF 1.3 CONS-O-4 IA4.1, ID4.1 Education initiatives by CSOs/STIs per year globally and by region/subregion Country Parties (affected, developed), SRAPs/RAPs Types of events most predominant in each region/ subregion IO4.1, IG4.1 Education initiatives by CSOs/STIs per year globally and by region United Nations agencies and IGOs, GEF Types of events most predominant in each region IA4.2, ID4.2 National contribution to the target Country Parties (affected, developed), SRAPs/RAPs IA4.3, ID4.3 Most important reasons for increasing/decreasing trends in regions Country Parties (affected, developed), SRAPs/RAPs IO4.3, IG4.3 Most important reasons for increasing trends in regions United Nations agencies and IGOs, GEF Notes: IA denotes analysis of performance indicators relating to affected country Parties, ID denotes analysis of performance indicators relating to developed country Parties IO denotes analysis of performance indicators relating to United Nations agencies and international organizations, IG denotes analysis of performance indicators relating to the Global Environment Facility The symbol CONS-O-number refers to consolidated indicator number. (...) Analysis Reporting entities 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 CONS-O-5 IA5.1 Progress in formulation of NAPs aligned with The Strategy Affected country Parties, SRAPs/RAPs IA5.2 Most common reasons for NAP process not initiated/ aligned in some countries and their relevance Affected country Parties, SRAPs/RAPs IA5.3 Alignment of NAPs to The Strategy: what components NAPs contain and which regions have integrated them into investment frameworks Affected country Parties with NAP aligned with The Strategy, SRAPs/RAPs IA5.4 Which countries/ regions have received external assistance and type of assistance Affected country Parties, SRAPs/RAPs IA5.5 Identification of major difficulties in formulation/ alignment of NAPs Affected country Parties, SRAPs/RAPs 2.4 CONS-O-6 ID6.1 Progress and distribution of partnership agreements, in terms of: Developed country Parties (a) Number of partnership agreements concluded and under implementation or planned by type (3 types: relating to integrated investment framework established within integrated financing strategies (IFS), within other IFS or not related to integrated investment frameworks) and per year (b) Geographical distribution of bilateral partnership agreements (c) Distance to 2014 target (d) National contribution to progress towards 2014 target ICCD/COP(10)CST/4 ICCD/CRIC(10)/14 22 GE.11-63322 Outcome in The Strategy Indicator number Ref. Analysis Reporting entities IO6.1 IG6.1 Progress and distribution of partnership agreements, in terms of: United Nations agencies and IGOs, GEF (a) Number of partnership agreements concluded and under implementation by type (3 types: relating to integrated investment framework established within IFS, within other integrated financing strategies or not related to integrated investment frameworks) and per year (b) Geographical distribution of multilateral partnership agreements ID6.2 IO6.2 IG6.2 Distance to 2014 target and distribution of partnership agreements Developed country Parties, United Nations agencies and IGOs, GEF ID6.3 IO6.3 IG6.3 Contribution of UNCCD- related institutions and bodies Developed country Parties, United Nations agencies and IGOs, GEF ID6.4 IO6.4 Identification of major difficulties in establishing partnership agreements Developed country Parties, United Nations agencies and IGOs 2.5 CONS-O-7 IA7.1 Progress in the establishment of synergies among the three Rio conventions, in terms of: Affected country Parties, SRAPs/ RAPs (a) Number of affected country Parties with joint national plans/functional mechanisms in place or planned to ensure synergies among three Rio conventions and time frame by which countries should have joint initiatives in place (b) Coverage of joint initiatives and operational mechanisms (c) Distance to 2014 target IA7.2 Support from the institutions of the Rio conventions on the establishment of synergistic processes Affected country Parties, SRAPs/ RAPs ICCD/COP(10)CST/4 ICCD/CRIC(10)/14 GE.11-63322 23 Outcome in The Strategy Indicator number Ref.

GE.15-15213 (F) *1515213* Comité chargé de l’examen de la mise en œuvre de la Convention Quatorzième session Ankara (Turquie), 13 - 22 octobre 2015 Point 2 e) de l'ordre du jour

The biggest challenges for China in realization of the 2030 Agenda remain the following: how to eradicate poverty, improve people’s livelihood, defuse social problems, achieve common prosperity, improve national governance system and capability, and achieve coordinated development among different regions, at all levels and in all fields. (...) China will step up the legislative work to improve the socialist market economic system, develop socialist democratic political system, foster advanced socialist culture, innovate on social governance, safeguard citizens’ rights and enhance people’s livelihood, safeguard national security, protect the eco-environment and improve government functions. (...) The inter -agency mechanism has assigned the 169 targets of the 2030 Agenda to specific government agencies, ensuring full accountability for every review task.

Regional, subregional and international cooperation can enhance the collective ability of Parties to implement the Convention, improve synergies, avoid duplication of effort between the different conventions, and ultimately both improve the effectiveness of programming and facilitate its support. 4. (...) Implementation of Article 6 of the Convention serves to spread and improve understanding and awareness of climate change and to change behaviour, and therefore communication should address the general public and all stakeholders, such as those referred to in paragraph 9 above. 11. (...) Such cooperation can further enhance synergies between conventions and improve the effectiveness of all sustainable development efforts.

(c) In view of the mounting evidence of the serious threat posed by climate change, the Annex I mitigation target for the second commitment period should be substantially larger than the 5.2 percent reduction target for the first period. (...) These countries will find it particularly advantageous to make greater use of the CDM facility in meeting their emission reduction targets. In short, Annex I Parties could adopt more ambitious emission reduction targets, without incurring excessive costs, by greater use of the CDM. (...) We will achieve our target by monitoring our performance closely and adopting new measures if needed.

And as implementation of measures enshrined in the Decree of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan dated July 1, 2004, the “State Program on improvement of living conditions and increasing employment of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons”, as well as in the amendments to this document dated 31 October, 2007 and 21 February, 2011, were provided. (...) As it is known that in the Summit at the United Nations Headquarter in New York from 25-27 September 2015, the Heads of member States decided on new global Sustainable Development Goals which include 17 Goals and 169 targets. The most of the targets directly or indirectly are linked to the development of business which requires human oriented approach. For instance, the target 8 of the SDGs is about the “Decent work and economic growth” which shows that the real economic growth can not be considered without human rights oriented approach.

As for monitoring soil moisture, because the target areas include cold latitudes, some with permafrost, long-term data will be obtained by algorithm based on the microwave radiation data from satellites such as SMMR and SSMI. (...) Another aspect to be considered is the impact of snowfall in the target areas; there has been no previous attempt systematically to assess soil freezing and related erosion. (...) There has been considerable effort made by TSMS in recent years to improve its technological capabilities and human resources for a better and more advanced forecasting of droughts and other climatic events.

Secondly, most agricultural programmes fail to target the poor: taken as a whole, agricultural public expenditures are highly regressive. (...) In addition, the improved psychological well-being of the family may in turn improve the care, support and nurture provided to the children in the household.12 25. (...) The Ministry of Health has sought to improve the housing conditions of day labourers and to enable them to use the national health card.

As far as the environmental objectives are concerned which are laid down in the National Environmental Policy Plans, SVV II ECE/RCTE/PC/5/Add.1 page 6 specifies these targets for the transport sector as a whole. Over and above this, the SVV II aims at a selective improvement in accessibility (congestion reduction), particularly with a view to retaining and strengthening the transport and distribution function of the Netherlands. (...) NORWAY Adopting specific targets related to sustainable development and then seeking the most cost-efficient ways to reach them. (...) The government has decided that these targets should be in force the years to come. A revision is also undertaken at the moment.

The concentration of population growth in LDCs will make it harder to eradicate poverty, reduce inequality, combat hunger and malnutrition, expand and update education and health systems, improve the provision of basic services and ensure that no one is left behind, unless specific measures are taken that will target these areas through the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. (...) These are some qualitative and quantitative changes in the decades-long target on official development assistance for the least developed countries. (...) However, LDCs are still further away from the target of 2 per cent of global exports called for in the Istanbul Programme of Action and target 17.11 of the Sustainable Development Goals.