Home

Results 101 - 110 of 47,078 for increment. Search took 3.818 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
Incremental Funded in arbitrary increments Multi-year Funded over multiple years.
Language:English
Score: 981931.5 - https://unece.org/fileadmin/DA...UNECE_FundingTypeCode_D09B.xsd
Data Source: un
If you mean net annual increment or another measure of forest productivity in terms of wood growth, I agree this would be desirable – and this measure is often used, for instance in the pan-European indicator set.  The problem here is that many countries with a high proportion of natural forests (including Canada) do not measure increment, and could not supply the information.  From a (wood-focussed) sustainability point of view, the important thing is that drain (harvests and natural losses) is not higher than increment.  (...) However, the net outcome of this interaction is changes in forest biomass: if drain is higher than increment, growing stock decreases; if not, growing stock is stable or increases. 
Language:English
Score: 980077.4 - https://www.fao.org/fsnforum/index.php/fr/comment/7992
Data Source: un
If you mean net annual increment or another measure of forest productivity in terms of wood growth, I agree this would be desirable – and this measure is often used, for instance in the pan-European indicator set.  The problem here is that many countries with a high proportion of natural forests (including Canada) do not measure increment, and could not supply the information.  From a (wood-focussed) sustainability point of view, the important thing is that drain (harvests and natural losses) is not higher than increment.  (...) However, the net outcome of this interaction is changes in forest biomass: if drain is higher than increment, growing stock decreases; if not, growing stock is stable or increases. 
Language:English
Score: 980077.4 - https://www.fao.org/fsnforum/fr/comment/7992
Data Source: un
Website: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/fp.htm TRENDS and PROJECTIONS – Representation of women in the UN Secretariat with appointments of one year or more OHCHR  30 June 2001 – 30 June 2011   Representation of women (Percentage – Trends 10 year period 30 June 2001 - 30 June 2011) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 Total % 60.0 68.3 50.0 59.0 21.7 53.3 46.7 33.9 66.7 27.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 Total change % 8.3 9.0 31.6 -12.8 -39.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Average annual increment (Percentage) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG June 2001 – June 2011 0.8 0.9 3.2 -1.3 -3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Year at which gender parity will be reached at current average annual increment P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG At June 2001 – June 2011 average annual increment Reached Reached Reached Never Never Stagnant Stagnant Reached Year at which gender parity will be reached at 2% annual increase P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG Reached Reached Reached 2019 2022 2036 2036 Reached *Source: Prepared on the basis of data provided by the Office of Human Resources Management.  
Language:English
Score: 979562.6 - https://www.un.org/womenwatch/...tariat/OHCHR%20Projections.pdf
Data Source: un
Data availability for T&T is limited and the estimation is likely to rely on a significant amount of benchmark data. 232323232323 Key Modeling PrinciplesKey Modeling Principles Calculating Joint and Common Costs - EPMU Fixed common and joint costs between increments are recovered by use of an EPMU (Equi- proportionate Mark-up), whereby fixed common costs are recovered pro rata to incremental costs. The model will calculate common costs for subsets of increments, (such as the network) on a cost category by cost category basis as set out below: For each LRAIC cost category the sum of component incremental costs (where each component is removed in turn) is compared to the incremental cost for the subset of components as a whole (where all components are removed at once). The difference between these two sets of costs is the fixed common and joint costs across these increments for this cost category. These common costs to the subset of components are then allocated to the components using an EPMU approach. 24 The Model Development ProcessThe Model Development Process 25 Overview of Modeling ProcessOverview of Modeling Process Data Requirements CCA Revaluation Study  LRAIC Model Outputs  LRAIC Model Inputs 26262626262626262626 Data RequirementsData Requirements Economic costing Incremental costing Reporting i.
Language:English
Score: 976720 - https://www.itu.int/ITU-D/fina...CReddock-Downes_costing-en.pdf
Data Source: un
Microsoft Word - DESA_Projections June 2001-2011.doc Prepared by the Focal Point for Women, Coordination Division, UN Women, February 2012 Website: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/fp.htm TRENDS and PROJECTIONS – Representation of women in the UN Secretariat with appointments of one year or more DESA    30 June 2001 – 30 June 2011   Representation of women (Percentage – Trends 10 year period 30 June 2001 - 30 June 2011) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 Total % 47.1 54.0 48.1 37.0 50.0 53.2 49.1 34.1 39.3 20.5 30.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total change % 6.9 -11.1 3.2 -14.9 -18.8 -30.0 -50.0 0.0 Average annual increment (Percentage) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG June 2001 – June 2011 0.7 -1.1 0.3 -1.5 -1.9 -0.3 -5.0 0.0 Year at which gender parity will be reached at current average annual increment P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG At June 2001 – June 2011 average annual increment Reached Never Reached Never Never Never Never Stagnant Year at which gender parity will be reached at 2% annual increase P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG Reached 2018 Reached 2019 2026 2036 2036 2036 *Source: Prepared on the basis of data provided by the Office of Human Resources Management Required average annual increase to achieve 50% gender balance in all categories by 2015 (percentage) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG Reached 3.3 Reached 4.0 7.4 12.5 12.5 12.5
Language:English
Score: 975558.3 - https://www.un.org/womenwatch/...etariat/DESA%20Projections.pdf
Data Source: un
Microsoft Word - DFS_Projections June 2008-2011.doc Prepared by the Focal Point for Women, Coordination Division, UN Women, February 2012; Website: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/fp.htm TRENDS and PROJECTIONS – Representation of women in the UN Secretariat with appointments of one year or more DFS  30 June 2008 – 30 June 2011   Representation of women (Percentage – Trends 10 year period 30 June 2008 - 30 June 2011) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG 2008 2011 2008 2011 2008 2011 2008 2011 2008 2011 2008 2011 2008 2011 2008 2011 Total % 33.3 73.3 34.2 34.0 43.6 40.5 31.8 32.1 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 Total change % 40.0 -0.2 -3.1 0.3 42.9 0.0 -100.0 0.0 Average annual increment (Percentage) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG June 2008 – June 2011 13.3 -0.1 -1.0 0.1 14.3 0.0 -33.3 0.0 Year at which gender parity will be reached at current average annual increment P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG At June 2008 – June 2011 average annual increment Reached Never Never 2176 2012 Never Never Reached Year at which gender parity will be reached at 2% annual increase P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG Reached 2019 2016 2020 2015 2036 2036 Reached *Source: Prepared on the basis of data provided by the Office of Human Resources Management.  
Language:English
Score: 975558.3 - https://www.un.org/womenwatch/...retariat/DFS%20Projections.pdf
Data Source: un
Microsoft Word - DPA_Projections June_2001-2011.doc Prepared by the Focal Point for Women, Coordination Division, UN Women,Website: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/fp.htm TRENDS and PROJECTIONS – Representation of women in the UN Secretariat with appointments of one year or more DPA  30 June 2001 – 30 June 2011   Representation of women (Percentage – Trends 10 year period 30 June 2001 - 30 June 2011) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 Total % 50.0 34.6 44.4 46.7 33.3 50.0 38.5 26.8 46.2 38.5 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total change % -15.4 2.2 16.7 -11.6 -7.7 -22.2 0.0 0.0 Average annual increment (Percentage) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG June 2001 – June 2011 -1.5 0.2 1.7 -1.2 -0.8 -2.2 0.0 0.0 Year at which gender parity will be reached at current average annual increment P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG At June 2001 – June 2011 average annual increment Never 2026 Reached Never Never Never Stagnant Stagnant Year at which gender parity will be reached at 2% annual increase P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG 2019 2013 Reached 2023 2017 2036 2036 2036 *Source: Prepared on the basis of data provided by the Office of Human Resources Management.  
Language:English
Score: 975558.3 - https://www.un.org/womenwatch/...retariat/DPA%20Projections.pdf
Data Source: un
Website: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/fp.htm TRENDS and PROJECTIONS – Representation of women in the UN Secretariat with appointments of one year or more ECA  30 June 2001 – 30 June 2011   Representation of women (Percentage – Trends 10 year period 30 June 2001 - 30 June 2011) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 Total % 22.7 45.8 39.7 30.3 34.0 41.5 17.2 9.1 23.1 37.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total change % 23.1 -9.4 7.6 -8.2 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Average annual increment (Percentage) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG June 2001 – June 2011 2.3 -0.9 0.8 -0.8 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Year at which gender parity will be reached at current average annual increment P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG At June 2001 – June 2011 average annual increment 2013 Never 2022 Never 2020 Stagnant Stagnant Stagnant Year at which gender parity will be reached at 2% annual increase P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG 2013 2021 2015 2031 2017 2036 2036 2036 *Source: Prepared on the basis of data provided by the Office of Human Resources Management.  
Language:English
Score: 975558.3 - https://www.un.org/womenwatch/...retariat/ECA%20Projections.pdf
Data Source: un
Microsoft Word - OCHA_ Projections_for_June_2001-2011.doc Prepared by the Focal Point for Women, Coordination Division, UN Women Website: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/fp.htm TRENDS and PROJECTIONS – Representation of women in the UN Secretariat with appointments of one year or more OCHA  30 June 2001 – 30 June 2011   Representation of women (Percentage – Trends 10 year period 30 June 2001 - 30 June 2011) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 Total % 100.0 66.7 45.0 45.0 35.7 73.1 25.0 31.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total change % -33.3 0.0 37.4 6.0 50.0 -25.0 0.0 0.0 Average annual increment (Percentage) P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG June 2001 – June 2011 -3.3 0.0 3.7 0.6 5.0 -2.5 0.0 0.0 Year at which gender parity will be reached at current average annual increment P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG At June 2001 – June 2011 average annual increment Reached Stagnant Reached 2042 Reached Never Stagnant Stagnant Year at which gender parity will be reached at 2% annual increase P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG Reached 2014 Reached 2020 Reached 2036 2036 2036 *Source: Prepared on the basis of data provided by the Office of Human Resources Management.  
Language:English
Score: 975558.3 - https://www.un.org/womenwatch/...etariat/OCHA%20Projections.pdf
Data Source: un