CSD indicators of sustainable development – 3rd edition
CSD Indicators of Sustainable Development – 3rd edition
The United Nations Division for Sustainable Development is pleased to announce that the third, revised set of indicators of sustainable development prepared for the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) has been released.
Background
• The CSD Indicators of Sustainable Development serve as reference for countries to develop or revise national indicators of sustainable development.
• The previous two editions of the CSD indicators were published in 1996 and 2001.
• They have been intensively tested and applied by many countries around the world.
New features
• New set of 50 core indicators has been created. • Core indicators are part of larger set of 96 indicators of sustainable development. • The larger indicator set allows for a more comprehensive and differentiated
assessment of sustainable development by countries. • Due to creation of a core set, CSD indicators remain manageable. • Core indicators fulfill three criteria:
o They cover issues that are relevant for sustainable development in most countries.
o They provide critical information not available from other core indicators. o They can be calculated by most countries with data that is readily
available or could be made available within reasonable time and costs. • CSD indicators continue to be placed in a framework of themes and sub-themes.
1
CSD Indicators of Sustainable Development – 3rd edition
• The framework contains 14 themes, which are slightly modified from the previous edition:
• Poverty • Natural hazards • Economic development • Governance • Atmosphere • Global economic partnership • Health • Land • Consumption and production
patterns • Education • Oceans, seas and coasts • Demographics • Freshwater • Biodiversity
• Indicators are no longer explicitly categorized into four pillars of sustainable development.
• Coherence with Millennium Development Goal (MDG) indicators and major sectoral indicator initiatives has been increased.
Language:English
Score: 485289.8
-
https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev...linfo/indicators/factsheet.pdf
Data Source: un
Provide gender and age disaggregated data. (3000 characters max per entry)
Outcome Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator progress to Date
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Indicator 1.1
Indicator 1.2
Indicator 1.3
How many Outputs does Outcome 1 have?
Please list up to 5 of most relevant outputs for outcome 1 and for each output, and using the project results framework, provide an update on the progress made against 3 most relevant output indicators
Output 1.1:
Output Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator progress to Date
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Indicator 1.1.1
Indicator 1.1.2
Indicator 1.1.3
Output 1.2:
Output Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator progress to Date
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Indicator 1.2.1
Indicator 1.2.2
Indicator 1.2.3
Output 1.3:
Output Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator progress to Date
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Indicator 1.3.1
Indicator 1.3.2
Indicator 1.3.3
Output 1.4:
Output Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator progress to Date
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Indicator 1.4.1
Indicator 1.4.2
Indicator 1.4.3
Output 1.5:
Output Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator progress to Date
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Indicator 1.5.1
Indicator 1.5.2
Indicator 1.5.3
Outcome 2:
Rate the current status of the outcome progress:
Progress summary: (350 word limit)
Indicate any additional analysis on how Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment and/or Youth Inclusion and Responsiveness has been ensured under this Outcome: (350 word limit)
Using the Project Results Framework as per the approved project document or any amendments- provide an update on the achievement of key outcome indicators for Outcome 2 in the table below
· If the outcome has more than 3 indicators, select the 3 most relevant ones with most relevant progress to highlight.
· Where it has not been possible to collect data on indicators, state this and provide any explanation. (...) Please list up to 5 of most relevant outputs for outcome 2 and for each output, and using the project results framework, provide an update on the progress made against 3 most relevant output indicators
Output 2.1:
Output Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator progress to Date
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Indicator 2.1.1
Indicator 2.1.2
Indicator 2.1.3
Output 2.2:
Output Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator progress to Date
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Indicator 2.2.1
Indicator 2.2.2
Indicator 2.2.3
Output 2.3:
Output Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator progress to Date
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Indicator 2.3.1
Indicator 2.3.2
Indicator 2.3.3
Output 2.4:
Output Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator progress to Date
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Indicator 2.4.1
Indicator 2.4.2
Indicator 2.4.3
Output 2.5:
Output Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator progress to Date
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Indicator 2.5.1
Indicator 2.5.2
Indicator 2.5.3
Please repeat the outcome level and output level reporting for each outcome and its respective outputs
PART III: CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES
Is the project planning any significant events in the next 6 months (eg. national dialogues, youth congresses, film screenings, etc.)
Language:English
Score: 483205.27
-
https://www.un.org/peacebuildi...rogress_report_oct2022_en.docx
Data Source: un
The 3rd generation indicators: the final set
6.1. In addition to the consultation, an indicator review was undertaken to identify
indicators to support future monitoring. (...) The 68 indicators include all the previous 15 ‘headline’ indicators, though not all of
them are within the 20 ‘UK Framework Indicators’. (...) In the new set, the ‘UK Framework Indicators’ were not explicitly described as
‘headline’ indicators, and within the new strategy document little distinction was made between the ‘Framework’ indicators and other supporting indicators.
Language:English
Score: 483203.66
-
https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev...icators/egmIndicators/crp8.pdf
Data Source: un
•The CARICOM GEI includes indicators most relevant to the CARICOM Context.
OVERVIEW OF THE CARICOM GEI INDICATORS AND SDG ALIGNMENT
* Italicised indicators are those considered for inclusion in the CARICOM GEI list in 2018 - 2019
OVERVIEW OF THE CARICOM GEI INDICATORS AND SDG ALIGNMENT Indicators Data Source SDG Alignment
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
Indicator 3a - Labour force participation rate
for persons aged 15-24, by sex
Main: Labour Force Surveys
Other: Living Standard
Surveys
Not in SDG Indicator Framework
Indicator 3b - Labour force participation rate
for persons aged 15+, by sex
Not in SDG Indicator Framework
Indicator 4 - Proportion of employed who are
own-account workers, by sex
Not in SDG Indicator Framework
Indicator 8a - Percentage distribution of
employed population in agricultural sector, by
sex and age
Not in SDG Indicator Framework
Indicator 8b - Percentage distribution of
employed population in industrial sector, by sex
and age
Not in SDG Indicator Framework
OVERVIEW OF THE CARICOM GEI INDICATORS AND SDG ALIGNMENT Indicators Data Source SDG Alignment
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY (Cont’d)
Indicator 8c - Percentage distribution of
employed population in service sector, by sex
and age
Main: Labour Force Surveys
Other: Living Standard
Surveys
SDG indicator 8.9.2 “Number of jobs in tourism
industries as a proportion of total jobs and
growth rate of jobs by sex”, can be partially
measured by this indicator.
(...) Proposed by
PAHO
Indicator 34 – Maternal Mortality Ratio This is SDG 3.1.1
Indicator 35b - Antenatal care coverage, at
least four visits
Not in SDG Indicator Framework
OVERVIEW OF THE CARICOM GEI INDICATORS AND SDG ALIGNMENT Indicators Data Source SDG Alignment
HEALTH
Indicator 36a - Out of Pocket Health
Expenditures by Sex Main: Multiple Indicator
Cluster Survey (MICS) OR
Demographic Health Survey
OR Knowledge, Attitude,
Behaviour and Practices
Survey
Not in SDG Indicator Framework. Proposed by
PAHO
Indicator 39 - Women’s share of population
aged 15-49 living with HIV/AIDS
Not in SDG Indicator Framework
Indicator 40 - Access to anti-retroviral drug, by
sex and age
Not in SDG Indicator Framework
Indicator 52 - Adolescent birth rate This is SDG 3.7.2
Time Use for Unpaid Health Care in Households
by Sex*
Not in SDG Indicator Framework.
Language:English
Score: 482894.63
-
https://www.cepal.org/sites/de...-_isiuwa_iyahen_-_un_women.pdf
Data Source: un
(1500 character limit)
PART IV: INDICATOR BASED PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
Using the Project Results Framework as per the approved project document or any amendments - provide an update on the achievement of key indicators at both the outcome and output level in the table below (if your project has more indicators than provided in the table, select the most relevant ones with most relevant progress to highlight). Where it has not been possible to collect data on indicators, state this and provide any explanation. Provide gender and age disaggregated data. (300 characters max per entry)
Performance Indicators
Indicator Baseline
End of project Indicator Target
Indicator Milestone
Current indicator progress
Reasons for Variance/ Delay
(if any)
Outcome 1
Indicator 1.1
Indicator 1.2
Indicator 1.3
Output 1.1
Indicator 1.1.1
Indicator 1.1.2
Output 1.2
Indicator 1.2.1
Indicator 1.2.2
Output 1.3
Indicator 1.3.1
Indicator 1.3.2
Output 1.4
Indicator 1.4.1
Indicator 1.4.2
Outcome 2
Indicator 2.1
Indicator 2.2
Indicator 2.3
Output 2.1
Indicator 2.1.1
Indicator 2.1.2
Output 2.2
Indicator 2.2.1
Indicator 2.2.2
Output 2.3
Indicator 2.3.1
Indicator 2.3.2
Output 2.4
Indicator 2.4.1
Indicator 2.4.2
Outcome 3
Indicator 3.1
Indicator 3.2
Indicator 3.3
Output 3.1
Indicator 3.1.1
Indicator 3.1.2
Output 3.2
Indicator 3.2.1
Indicator 3.2.2
Output 3.3
Indicator 3.3.1
Indicator 3.3.2
Output 3.4
Indicator 3.4.1
Indicator 3.4.2
Outcome 4
Indicator 4.1
Indicator 4.2
Indicator 4.3
Output 4.1
Indicator 4.1.1
Indicator 4.1.2
Output 4.2
Indicator 4.2.1
Indicator 4.2.2
Output 4.3
Indicator 4.3.1
Indicator 4.3.2
Output 4.4
Indicator 4.4.1
Language:English
Score: 482790.23
-
https://www.un.org/peacebuildi...t_template_-_2020_english.docx
Data Source: un
Assessment of data sources and statistics available to compile indicators
10.Selection of indicators for refined set
12. (...) Institutionalization of Indicator Unit and dedicated
team
18. Indicator set use and strengthening advocacy
17. (...) Preliminary draft list of potential indicators
8. Development of Methodological Sheets for all indicators
19.
Language:English
Score: 482711.3
-
https://www.cepal.org/sites/de...hange-disasters-indicators.pdf
Data Source: un
On this basis, the meeting agreed on 54 core indicators, 33 additional indicators and 12 indicators to be developed. (...) Nine indicators were replaced with new, more appropriate indicators and four were deleted. (...) The forest area indicator is also contained in the MDG indicator list.
Language:English
Score: 482626.37
-
https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev...ators/egmIndicators/report.pdf
Data Source: un
Typology of questions and indicators
11. Using a typology of questions and indicators helps in choosing indicators so that they are most relevant for the user.
(...) These are Performance indicators. Generally these indicators use the same variables as descriptive indicators but are connected with target values. (...) a new and fourth category of indicators has been developed: policy-effectiveness indicators (Figure 5).
Language:English
Score: 482581.05
-
https://unece.org/DAM/env/docu...p/ac.10/cep.ac.10.2002.3.e.pdf
Data Source: un
Afterwards, section IV explains how general sustainable development indicator sets such as the CSD indicators can be used to develop issue-specific indicator sets, such as climate change indicators. (...) These
core indicators are part of a larger set of 96 indicators of sustainable development. (...) For filling the gaps, existing indicator sets could be instructive as well, as climate change indicators may be related to existing indicators.
Language:English
Score: 482575.2
-
https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev...008/Background_paper_final.pdf
Data Source: un
Microsoft Word - FRY LAW ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS (English)
LAW ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS FOR THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA1
I. (...) This Law governs the acquisition and protection of rights in geographical indications.
A geographical indication protects an appellation of origin or an indication of source applied to goods manufactured by natural or legal persons within a specified geographical area.
(...) The authorized user of a geographical indication shall acquire the right to use that indication on entry of recognition of his capacity in the Register of Authorized Users of Geographical Indications.
Language:English
Score: 482308.25
-
https://www.wto.org/english/th..._e/cgr_e/WTACCCGR3A2_LEG_2.pdf
Data Source: un
