Home

  AFI PLANNING AND IMP

{a 5 by 5 risk profile matrix for risks that will be identified in the implementation of the project} risk profile is always relative and dependent on the implementators lik el ih oo d Almost certain 90% Insignificant Moderate High Extreme Extreme Likely 65% Insignificant Low Moderate High Extreme Possible 40% Insignificant Insignificant Low Moderate High Unlikely 20% Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Low Rare 10% Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Minor 10% Significant 30% Serious 50% Critical 70% Catastrophic 100% IMPACT The table below identifies risks, mitigation, and residual risk rating after controls are put in place. (...) Communicate delivery schedule and any changes thereof with all team members and stakeholders. Minor Unlikely Insignificant 2. Unavailability of team members Arrange project meetings in advance Minor likely Insignificant 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 4.

Score: 1277464.8 - https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc.../WP04B.8%20Appendix%20C.En.pdf

  WHO | SAGE meeting of 8-10 November 2011

This interest was assessed as personal, non-specific and financially insignificant*. • Received in 2009 consultancy fees for participation in Novartis Pneumococcal Vaccine Advisory Group. (...) This interest was assessed as personal, specific and financially insignificant*. • Until 2009, received small honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline for vaccinology training of pediatricians. (...) This interest was assessed as personal, non-specific and financially insignificant*. • Received in 2009 an honorarium from GlaxoSmithKline for speaking in the Rotavirus Expert Forum.

Score: 1270521.9 - https://www.who.int/immunizati...laration_interests_nov2011/en/

  Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization

These interests were perceived as non-personal, non-specific and financially insignificant. Served on the pneumococcal vaccine advisory board of Pfizer. This interest was perceived as non-personal, non-specific and financially insignificant. Served on the Fluzone High dose advisory board of Sanofi. This interest was perceived as non-personal, non-specific and financially insignificant. Served on the smallpox and monkeypox roundtable of Bavarian Nordic.

Score: 1233260.7 - https://www.who.int/groups/str...mallpox-and-monkeypox-vaccines

  PROJECT ORGANIZATION OF IIM COM. P5 "ASSESSMENTOF AFI AERONAUTICAL NETWORKS CYBER SECURITY"

L IK E L IH O O D Almost Certain 90% Insignificant Moderate High Extreme Extreme Likely 65% Insignificant Low Moderate High Extreme Possible 40% Insignificant Insignificant Low Moderate High Unlikely 20% Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Low Rare 10% Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Minor 10% Significant 30% Serious 50% Critical 70% Catastrophic 100% IMPACT Table below identifies risks, mitigation and also residual risk rating after controls are put in place # Risk Definition Mitigation Plans Potential Impact Likelihood Rating 1. (...) Communicate delivery schedule and any changes thereof with all team members and stakeholders. Minor Unlikely Insignificant 2. Unavailability of team members Arrange project meetings in advance Minor Likely Insignificant Infrastructure & Information Management Sub-group V1.0 Page 10 of 16 4 PROJECT FRAMEWORK 4.1 Communication means 4.1.1 The communication medium that will be used between the project team members during the project progress meetings (and working meetings) is listed below: a.

Score: 1217075.6 - https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...Project%203%20Organization.pdf

  PROJECT ORGANIZATION OF IIM COM. P5 "ASSESSMENTOF AFI AERONAUTICAL NETWORKS CYBER SECURITY"

L IK E L IH O O D Almost Certain 90% Insignificant Moderate High Extreme Extreme Likely 65% Insignificant Low Moderate High Extreme Possible 40% Insignificant Insignificant Low Moderate High Unlikely 20% Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Low Rare 10% Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Insignificant Minor 10% Significant 30% Serious 50% Critical 70% Catastrophic 100% IMPACT Table below identifies risks, mitigation and also residual risk rating after controls are put in place # Risk Definition Mitigation Plans Potential Impact Likelihood Rating 1. (...) Communicate delivery schedule and any changes thereof with all team members and stakeholders. Minor Unlikely Insignificant 2. Unavailability of team members Arrange project meetings in advance Minor Likely Insignificant Infrastructure & Information Management Sub-group V1.0 Page 10 of 16 4 PROJECT FRAMEWORK 4.1 Communication means 4.1.1 The communication medium that will be used between the project team members during the project progress meetings (and working meetings) is listed below: a.

Score: 1217075.6 - https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...ject%20Organization%20V1.0.pdf

  PowerPoint Presentation

PowerPoint Presentation SEA Pilot Project to Support Spatial Planning in Gurjaani Practical Aspects of Effective SEA Implementation Doug Hickman Nova Scotia, Canada Example of Scoping Matrix Planning Item Proposed Action Stressor Biodiversity Soil Climate Air Water Landscape Protected Areas Cultural Heritage Health Socio- Economic Trans- boundary Effects Flora Fauna Probable significant negative effect – to be addressed in SEA Report Probable insignificant negative effect – will be briefly addressed in SEA Report No significant effect or positive effect – will not be addressed in SEA Report Legend Example of Scoping Matrix Planning Item Proposed Action Stressor Biodiversity Soil Climate Air Water Landscape Protected Areas Cultural Heritage Health Socio- Economic Trans- boundary Effects Flora Fauna Transport Residential Industrial Etc Probable significant negative effect – to be addressed in SEA Report Probable insignificant negative effect – will be briefly addressed in SEA Report No significant effect or positive effect – will not be addressed in SEA Report Legend Example of Scoping Matrix Planning Item Proposed Action Stressor Biodiversity Soil Climate Air Water Landscape Protected Areas Cultural Heritage Health Socio- Economic Trans- boundary Effects Flora Fauna Transport New road – capacity: 500 cars/hour Residential New apartments for 2000 people Single family houses for 1000 people Industrial Light industrial buildings – 10 ha Warehousing – 4 ha Etc Probable significant negative effect – to be addressed in SEA Report Probable insignificant negative effect – will be briefly addressed in SEA Report No significant effect or positive effect – will not be addressed in SEA Report Legend Example of Scoping Matrix Planning Item Proposed Action Stressor Biodiversity Soil Climate Air Water Landscape Protected Areas Cultural Heritage Health Socio- Economic Trans- boundary Effects Flora Fauna Transport New road – capacity: 500 cars/hour Land use change Noise Residential New apartments for 2000 people Single family houses for 1000 people Land use change Demand for environ- mental services Industrial Light industrial buildings – 10 ha Warehousing – 4 ha Spills of hazardous substances Etc Probable significant negative effect – to be addressed in SEA Report Probable insignificant negative effect – will be briefly addressed in SEA Report No significant effect or positive effect – will not be addressed in SEA Report Legend Example of Scoping Matrix Planning Item Proposed Action Stressor Biodiversity Soil Climate Air Water Landscape Protected Areas Cultural Heritage Health Socio- Economic Trans- boundary Effects Flora Fauna Transport New road – capacity: 500 cars/hour Land use change Noise Loss of habitat Loss of habitat Loss of high- quality agricultural soil Ambiance of sites impacted by vehicle noise Removal of houses Residential New apartments for 2000 people Single family houses for 1000 people Land use change Demand for environ- mental services Loss of habitat Loss of habitat Soil pollution from Increased solid waste Increase in GHG’s from organic waste Odour from organic waste Increase in water demand exceeds rate of recharge Industrial Light industrial buildings – 10 ha Warehousing – 4 ha Spills of hazardous substances Air pollution from spilled items Water pollution from spilled items Toxic impact of spilled items Water pollution from spilled materials Etc Probable significant negative effect – to be addressed in SEA Report Probable insignificant negative effect – will be briefly addressed in SEA Report No significant effect or positive effect – will not be addressed in SEA Report Legend Example of Scoping Matrix Planning Item Proposed Action Stressor Biodiversity Soil Climate Air Water Landscape Protected Areas Cultural Heritage Health Socio- Economic Trans- boundary Effects Flora Fauna Transport New road – capacity: 500 cars/hour Land use change Noise Loss of habitat Loss of habitat Loss of high- quality agricultural soil Ambiance of sites impacted by vehicle noise Removal of houses Residential New apartments for 2000 people Single family houses for 1000 people Land use change Demand for environ- mental services Loss of habitat Loss of habitat Soil pollution from Increased solid waste Increase in GHG’s from organic waste Odour from organic waste Increase in water demand exceeds rate of recharge Industrial Light industrial buildings – 10 ha Warehousing – 4 ha Spills of hazardous substances Air pollution from spilled items Water pollution from spilled items Toxic impact of spilled items Water pollution from spilled materals Etc Probable significant negative effect – to be addressed in SEA Report Probable insignificant negative effect – will be briefly addressed in SEA Report No significant effect or positive effect – will not be addressed in SEA Report Legend SEA Pilot Project to Support Spatial Planning in Gurjaani Example of Scoping Matrix Example of Scoping Matrix Example of Scoping Matrix Example of Scoping Matrix Example of Scoping Matrix Example of Scoping Matrix

Score: 1213471.8 - https://unece.org/sites/defaul...EA_16%20March%202022_ENG_0.pdf

  Advisory group - Malaria vaccine

This interest was perceived as non-personal, non-specific and financially insignificant*. Worked on the DSMB Novavax Maternal RSV immunization project. (...) This interest was assessed as personal, specific, and financially insignificant*. Provides advice to Valneva on chikungunya vaccine development. This interest was assessed as personal, specific, and financially insignificant*. Provides advice to Takeda on a dengue vaccine trial.

Score: 1181294.3 - https://www.who.int/initiative...ramme/programme-advisory-group

  Desert Locust briefs 2001

Despite good breeding conditions in West Africa , Sudan and along the Indo- Pakistan border where good rains fell in July, only insignificant numbers of solitarious adults have been reported from Sudan and Pakistan . (...) Situation remains calm The Desert Locust situation remains calm from West Africa to SW Asia. Only a few insignificant locust adults are present in southern Egypt , in the spring breeding areas of western Pakistan , and in north-western Somalia . (...) At this point, only limited control may be required. Elsewhere, insignificant numbers of locusts are present on the Red Sea coast of Sudan and others may be present on the coasts of Eritrea , Saudi Arabia and Yemen where small scale breeding is expected to occur.

Score: 1174750.6 - https://www.fao.org/ag/locusts...es/briefs/1590/1351/index.html

  Informality in Latin America and the Caribbean: Why does it persist and how can it be addressed?

Total 26 100.00 positive statistically significant 14 53.85 100.00 insignificant 12 46.15 46.15 sign_significance Freq. (...) Total 43 100.00 positive statistically significant 22 51.16 100.00 insignificant 19 44.19 48.84 negative statistically significant 2 4.65 4.65 sign_significance Freq. (...) Total 11 100.00 positive statistically significant 7 63.64 100.00 insignificant 3 27.27 36.36 negative statistically significant 1 9.09 9.09 sign_significance Freq.

Score: 1139460.5 - https://www.cepal.org/sites/de...s/201904-04_11._chacaltana.pdf

  WHO | SAGE Working Group on Ebola Vaccines and Vaccination (established November 2014)

This interest was assessed as personal, non-specific and financially insignificant*. Serves as a member of the DSMB of GSK on porcine-free rotavirus vaccine. This interest was assessed as personal, non-specific and financially insignificant*. Serves as a member of the DSMB of Janssen on inactivated polio vaccine. This interest was assessed as personal, non-specific and financially insignificant*. Serves as a member of the DSMB of CAPRISA on a HIV monoclonal antibody.

Score: 1127503.6 - https://www.who.int/immunizati...y/sage/sage_wg_ebola_nov14/en/