Home

(e)tris Option 1 If a Party accounts for greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks from the harvested wood products pool other than by instantaneous oxidation, information on emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool removed from forests accounted for under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, during the second commitment period[, accounted for in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7]. (...) In addition to these emission and removal estimates, a Party shall include the following information: (i) Transparent and verifiable activity data for the harvested wood products categories, for estimating the harvested wood products pool [for domestic and export markets, as appropriate] [as consumed domestically and exported, as appropriate]; (i)bis Transparent and verifiable activity data for the harvested wood categories of all harvested wood products which are imported, irrespective of their origin; FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.29 GE.12-71089 10 (ii) Information on [the] half-lives used in estimating the emissions and removals for these categories, [including] [or] information on country-specific [half-lives] [data used to replace the default half-lives or otherwise account for harvested wood products in accordance with paragraphs 29 and 30 of the annex to decision 2/CMP.7], showing that [these] [the methodologies used] are at least as detailed and accurate as the default values given in paragraph 29 of the annex to decision 2/CMP.7; (iii) If the forest management reference level is based on a projection, information on whether emissions from the harvested wood products pool originating from forests prior to the start of the second commitment period have been included in or excluded from the accounting; (iv) Information on how emissions from the harvested wood products pool that have been accounted for during the first commitment period on the basis of instantaneous oxidation have been excluded from the accounting for the second commitment period; (v) Information showing that harvested wood products resulting from deforestation have been accounted on the basis of instantaneous oxidation; (vi) Information showing that carbon dioxide emissions from harvested wood products in solid waste disposal sites [, where separately accounted for, ]and from wood harvested for energy purposes have been accounted for based on instantaneous oxidation. (e)tris Option 2 If a Party accounts for greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks from the harvested wood products pool other than by instantaneous oxidation, information on emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool removed from forests accounted for under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, during the second commitment period, in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7 and any supplementary methodological guidance as agreed by the CMP. (…)Article 3, paragraph 3, forest management and elected activities under Article 3, paragraph 4, (…).

(g) If a Party accounts for GHG emissions by sources and removals by sinks from the harvested wood products pool other than by instantaneous oxidation, information on emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool accounted for in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7. (...) For this purpose, a Party shall, inter alia, include the following information in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraphs 16 and 27–32: (i) Information on activity data for the harvested wood products categories used for estimating the harvested wood products pool removed from domestic forests, for domestic consumption and for export, as appropriate; (ii) Information on half-lives used in estimating the emissions and removals for these categories in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 29 or 30, or, alternatively, information on methodologies used to account for harvested wood products in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 30, showing that the methodologies used are at least as detailed or accurate as the first-order decay method with default half-lives provided in decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 29; (iii) If the forest management reference level is based on a projection, information on whether emissions from harvested wood products originating from forests prior to the start of the second commitment period have been included in the accounting; (iv) Information on how emissions from the harvested wood products pool that have been accounted for during the first commitment period on the basis of instantaneous oxidation have been excluded from the accounting for the second commitment period; (v) Information showing that harvested wood products resulting from deforestation have been accounted on the basis of instantaneous oxidation; (vi) Information showing that carbon dioxide emissions from harvested wood products in solid waste disposal sites, where these emissions are separately accounted for, and from wood harvested for energy purposes have been accounted on the basis of instantaneous oxidation; (vii) Information showing that the emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool accounted for do not include imported harvested wood products, irrespective of their origin.

(g) If a Party accounts for GHG emissions by sources and removals by sinks from the harvested wood products pool other than by instantaneous oxidation, information on emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool accounted for in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7. (...) For this purpose, a Party shall, inter alia, include the following information in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraphs 16 and 27–32: FCCC/KP/CMP/2012/L.4/Rev.1 9 GE.12-71425 (i) Information on activity data for the harvested wood products categories used for estimating the harvested wood products pool removed from domestic forests, for domestic consumption and for export, as appropriate; (ii) Information on half-lives used in estimating the emissions and removals for these categories in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 29 or 30, or, alternatively, information on methodologies used to account for harvested wood products in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 30, showing that the methodologies used are at least as detailed or accurate as the first-order decay method with default half-lives provided in decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 29; (iii) If the forest management reference level is based on a projection, information on whether emissions from harvested wood products originating from forests prior to the start of the second commitment period have been included in the accounting; (iv) Information on how emissions from the harvested wood products pool that have been accounted for during the first commitment period on the basis of instantaneous oxidation have been excluded from the accounting for the second commitment period; (v) Information showing that harvested wood products resulting from deforestation have been accounted on the basis of instantaneous oxidation; (vi) Information showing that carbon dioxide emissions from harvested wood products in solid waste disposal sites, where these emissions are separately accounted for, and from wood harvested for energy purposes have been accounted on the basis of instantaneous oxidation; (vii) Information showing that the emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool accounted for do not include imported harvested wood products, irrespective of their origin. 3.

مـن املترادفـات: الوسـائل اإللكترونيـة لتحديـد اهلويـة ، .)electronic identification means ،identity credential( وسائل إثبات اهلوية "مورِّد خدمة أوراق االعتماد/اإلثباتـات" أو) Credential provider("مورِّد أوراق االعتماد" - ٢٠ )Credential service provider ( مقدِّم خدمات وسائل إثبـات اهلويـة) يعـين (أ) كيانـاً يصـدر وسـائل) إثبات اهلوية لألشخاص؛ (ب) جهة فاعلة موثوقة ُتصدر أوراق االعتماد و/أو تديرها. (...) املصدر: .)identity service provider( ؛ مورِّد خدمة اهلوية)credential service provider( (اإلثباتات) ــات" - ٣٣ ــام إدارة اهلوي ــة ) Identity system("نظ ــين بيئــة إلكتروني ــامالت[يع إدارة اهلويــات ]ملع (يشار إليها أيضاً بأهنا إطار لتوفري الثقـة)، ميكـن [القواعد التشغيلية] قواعد النظامجمموعة من تنظمها مصـادر ذات حجيـة املتبادلة فيما بني األفـراد واملنظمـات واخلـدمات واألجهـزة ألنَّ فيها ضمان الثقة التعـاريف (املرفـق). (...) يعين الكيـان، أو املنظمـة، الـذي يضـع، ) Trust framework provider(ر إطار الثقة" "موفِّ -٥٢ ــة بــذلك اخلاصــة بنظــام ــة املقترن ــة التعاقدي إلدارة معــيَّنأو يعتمــد قواعــد النظــام والصــيغة البنيوي اهلويات.

A/CN.9/WG.IV/WP.165 األمــم المتحـدة Distr.: Limited الجمعية العامة 30 September 2020 Arabic Original: English 141020 141020 V.20-05626

Hundreds of small-scale municipalities that carried out the role of water service provider were unable to obtain funding or implement the required investment to improve their services. (...) For instance, the Empresa Portuguesa das Águas Livres, a State-owned service provider, operates at the bulk level in the greater Lisbon area and both at the bulk and retail levels in the city of Lisbon.15 2. (...) Besides registering non-compliant cases, the provider has to register the causes, the remedial actions and the results of verification analyses to evaluate the efficacy of remedial actions. 54.

Consistent with the principle of transparency in the provision of open services, each individual provider will strive to publish and disseminate all signal and system information necessary to allow manufacturers to design and develop GNSS receivers on a non-discriminatory basis. 5. (...) These discussions should focus on potential cooperation in the development of the necessary ground infrastructure to monitor signal and service performance for open services, recognizing that the actual implementation of this infrastructure is subject to the budgetary limitations of each system provider, and the completion of provider-to- provider agreements as necessary and appropriate.

Having pointed out that "it is established that a dispute within the meaning of Article 60 of the Statute must relate to the operative clause of the judgment in question and cannot concern the reasons for the judgment except in so far as these are inseparable from the operative clause", the Court states that it must now "ascertain whether a dispute appears to exist between the Parties in the present case, within the meaning of Article 60 of the Statute" It recalls the positions adopted by the Parties (paragraphs 25 to 30 of the Order) and concludes S/2011/446 6 11-42618 that, in the light of those positions, "a difference of opinion or views appears to exist between them as to the meaning or scope of the 1962 Judgment" The Court declares that this difference appears to relate, (i) "in the first place, to the meaning and scope of the phrase 'vicinity on Cambodian territory' used in the second paragraph of the operative clause of the Judgment"; (ii) "next, to the nature of the obligation imposed on Thailand, in the second paragraph of the operative clause of the Judgment, to `withdraw any military or police forces, or other guards or keepers', and, in particular, to the question of whether this obligation is of a continuing or an instantaneous character"; and (iii) "finally, to the question of whether the Judgment did or did not recognize with binding force the line shown on the Annex I map as representing the frontier between the two Parties" The Court recalls that "the Permanent Court of International Justice previously had occasion to state that a difference of opinion as to whether a particular point has or has not been decided with binding force also constitutes a case which comes within the terms of Article 60 of the Statute" Having concluded that "a dispute thus appears to exist between the Parties as to the meaning or scope of the 1962 Judgment, and [that it] therefore appears that the Court may, pursuant to Article 60 of the Statute, entertain the request for interpretation of the said Judgment submitted by Cambodia", the Court considers, "in consequence, [that it] cannot accede to the request by Thailand that the case be removed from the General List" and that "there is a sufficient basis for [it] to be able to indicate the provisional measures requested by Cambodia, if the necessary conditions are fulfilled". (...) Judge Cancado Trindade recalls that, in so far as legal interpretation is concerned, in the present case, Cambodia and Thailand uphold the distinct theses of the existence of a continuing, or else an instantaneous obligation, respectively. In a request for provisional measures of protection like the one before the Court, pertaining to a situation which appears to abide by the prerequisites of urgency and gravity, and imminence of irreparable harm, the Court cannot simply decline to answer the points raised before it. In the cas d'espéce, concerning the domain of inter-State relations (between Cambodia and Thailand), when the fundamental principle of the prohibition of use or threat of force is at stake, as it is here, the corresponding obligation is, in his understanding, a continuing or permanent one (rather than an immediate or "instantaneous" one), for the States concerned 14 .Judge Cancado Trindade then addresses another aspect of the case, moving from his considerations on time and law to those pertaining to space and law.