Home

(e)tris Option 1 If a Party accounts for greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks from the harvested wood products pool other than by instantaneous oxidation, information on emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool removed from forests accounted for under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, during the second commitment period[, accounted for in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7]. (...) In addition to these emission and removal estimates, a Party shall include the following information: (i) Transparent and verifiable activity data for the harvested wood products categories, for estimating the harvested wood products pool [for domestic and export markets, as appropriate] [as consumed domestically and exported, as appropriate]; (i)bis Transparent and verifiable activity data for the harvested wood categories of all harvested wood products which are imported, irrespective of their origin; (ii) Information on [the] half-lives used in estimating the emissions and removals for these categories, [including] [or] information on country-specific [half-lives] FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.29 10 GE.12-71090 [data used to replace the default half-lives or otherwise account for harvested wood products in accordance with paragraphs 29 and 30 of the annex to decision 2/CMP.7], showing that [these] [the methodologies used] are at least as detailed and accurate as the default values given in paragraph 29 of the annex to decision 2/CMP.7; (iii) If the forest management reference level is based on a projection, information on whether emissions from the harvested wood products pool originating from forests prior to the start of the second commitment period have been included in or excluded from the accounting; (iv) Information on how emissions from the harvested wood products pool that have been accounted for during the first commitment period on the basis of instantaneous oxidation have been excluded from the accounting for the second commitment period; (v) Information showing that harvested wood products resulting from deforestation have been accounted on the basis of instantaneous oxidation; (vi) Information showing that carbon dioxide emissions from harvested wood products in solid waste disposal sites [, where separately accounted for, ]and from wood harvested for energy purposes have been accounted for based on instantaneous oxidation. (e)tris Option 2 If a Party accounts for greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks from the harvested wood products pool other than by instantaneous oxidation, information on emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool removed from forests accounted for under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, during the second commitment period, in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7 and any supplementary methodological guidance as agreed by the CMP. 7. (…)Article 3, paragraph 3, forest management and elected activities under Article 3, paragraph 4, (…). 8.

(g) If a Party accounts for GHG emissions by sources and removals by sinks from the harvested wood products pool other than by instantaneous oxidation, information on emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool accounted for in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7. (...) For this purpose, a Party shall, inter alia, include the following information in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraphs 16 and 27–32: FCCC/KP/CMP/2012/L.4/Rev.1 8 GE.12-71426 (i) Information on activity data for the harvested wood products categories used for estimating the harvested wood products pool removed from domestic forests, for domestic consumption and for export, as appropriate; (ii) Information on half-lives used in estimating the emissions and removals for these categories in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 29 or 30, or, alternatively, information on methodologies used to account for harvested wood products in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 30, showing that the methodologies used are at least as detailed or accurate as the first-order decay method with default half-lives provided in decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 29; (iii) If the forest management reference level is based on a projection, information on whether emissions from harvested wood products originating from forests prior to the start of the second commitment period have been included in the accounting; (iv) Information on how emissions from the harvested wood products pool that have been accounted for during the first commitment period on the basis of instantaneous oxidation have been excluded from the accounting for the second commitment period; (v) Information showing that harvested wood products resulting from deforestation have been accounted on the basis of instantaneous oxidation; (vi) Information showing that carbon dioxide emissions from harvested wood products in solid waste disposal sites, where these emissions are separately accounted for, and from wood harvested for energy purposes have been accounted on the basis of instantaneous oxidation; (vii) Information showing that the emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool accounted for do not include imported harvested wood products, irrespective of their origin. 3.

(g) If a Party accounts for GHG emissions by sources and removals by sinks from the harvested wood products pool other than by instantaneous oxidation, information on emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool accounted for in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7. (...) For this purpose, a Party shall, inter alia, include the following information in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraphs 16 and 27–32： (i) Information on activity data for the harvested wood products categories used for estimating the harvested wood products pool removed from domestic forests, for domestic consumption and for export, as appropriate； (ii) Information on half-lives used in estimating the emissions and removals for these categories in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 29 or 30, or, alternatively, information on methodologies used to account for harvested wood products in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 30, showing that the methodologies used are at least as detailed or accurate as the first-order decay method with default half-lives provided in decision 2/CMP.7, annex, paragraph 29； (iii) If the forest management reference level is based on a projection, information on whether emissions from harvested wood products originating from forests prior to the start of the second commitment period have been included in the accounting； (iv) Information on how emissions from the harvested wood products pool that have been accounted for during the first commitment period on the basis of instantaneous oxidation have been excluded from the accounting for the second commitment period； (v) Information showing that harvested wood products resulting from deforestation have been accounted on the basis of instantaneous oxidation； (vi) Information showing that carbon dioxide emissions from harvested wood products in solid waste disposal sites, where these emissions are separately accounted for, and from wood harvested for energy purposes have been accounted on the basis of instantaneous oxidation； (vii) Information showing that the emissions and removals resulting from changes in the harvested wood products pool accounted for do not include imported harvested wood products, irrespective of their origin. 4.

We agree that there should be some obligations by an IdM service provider where there has been a breach of security. (...) Article 12 of the MLES provides for non - discrimination of a certification service provider that verifies the public key of a PKI transaction. This quite limited function allows parties to choose a third -party certification provider to verify the authenticity of a signature between two parties who have chosen the third-party certifying provider.

Hundreds of small-scale municipalities that carried out the role of water service provider were unable to obtain funding or implement the required investment to improve their services. (...) For instance, the Empresa Portuguesa das Águas Livres, a State-owned service provider, operates at the bulk level in the greater Lisbon area and both at the bulk and retail levels in the city of Lisbon.15 2. (...) Besides registering non-compliant cases, the provider has to register the causes, the remedial actions and the results of verification analyses to evaluate the efficacy of remedial actions. 54.

The 20% limit on the transmission of programmes by any one content provider remains unchanged. Cross-ownership arrangements between the television and publishing sectors provide an opportunity for the development of companies and, indeed, the entire sector. (...) Article 5 (Principles guaranteeing pluralism and competition in the broadcasting system) This article sets forth the principles of: pluralism; distinct eligibility requirements for network operators, content providers and providers of interactive services; equal treatment and non-discrimination between content providers; separate accounts in the event of any one operator being authorised to act as provider of both content and services or corporate separation in the event of any one operator being authorised to act as content provider and network operator. (...) Article 15 (Cumulative limits concerning television and radio programmes and revenues in the integrated communications system; provisions concerning advertising) The first paragraph envisages that, once the national plan for the allocation of digital technology radio and television frequencies is fully implemented, no single provider of content may hold , including through affiliates or subsidiaries, licences allowing them to broadcast more than 20% of all radio programmes that can be broadcast on terrestrial frequencies at the national level over the networks envisaged by the plan.

An unregulated informal service provider operates the services and the community reported serious complaints to the Special Rapporteur about access to water, the quality of the services, their price and systematic and indiscriminate disconnections. (...) One woman said that she had accumulated a large debt due to water bills and her service was cut off and her appeals to the service provider rejected, despite the fact that she is suffering from cancer. Residents called for accountability for service provision to be urgently addressed and for the municipal water provider (Sistema Municipal de Agua Potable y Alcantarillado) to take over the provision of services from a private body that had been created and that they considered to be overcharging and failing them.

Consistent with the principle of transparency in the provision of open services, each individual provider will strive to publish and disseminate all signal and system information necessary to allow manufacturers to design and develop GNSS receivers on a non-discriminatory basis. 5. (...) These discussions should focus on potential cooperation in the development of the necessary ground infrastructure to monitor signal and service performance for open services, recognizing that the actual implementation of this infrastructure is subject to the budgetary limitations of each system provider, and the completion of provider-to-provider agreements as necessary and appropriate.

The Network Act provides that when information which intrudes upon a person’s privacy, defames an individual, or otherwise violates another person’s rights is disseminated via the Internet, the “victim of such a violation may request the provider of information and communications services who handled the information to delete the information or publish a rebuttable statement”.8 Upon receiving such a request, the provider of information communication services, or intermediaries, must delete or block access to the information for up to 30 days, then notify the applicant and the publisher of information immediately of the measures taken, and post a public message to inform the users that it has taken the necessary measures.9 39. (...) Additionally, article 44-3 stipulates that the service provider may, if it finds that information circulated through its network and managed by it intrudes upon someone’s privacy, defames someone, or violates someone’s rights, “take temporary measures at its discretion”. Further, article 44-2(6) provides that “if [a provider of information 8 Network Act, art. 44-2(1). 9 Ibid.

The gap between requirement and availability of human resources at various level of health care is wide and where they are available, the concerned affected women-provider interactions are beset with many problems. (...) A/HRC/14/NI/11 4 GE.10-14064 groups including women, who had suffered denial of health care and had not received mandated health care from a public or private health provider were presented. In these public hearings, the Commission brought victims, NGOs and concerned authorities on the same platform, which helped in the resolution of individual problems, identification of systemic problems and forging of partnerships.