Home

This is the first procedural act by which an applicant invests the Tribunal of dealing with the appeal.

“are cations chall ing an invest closure of th of Khaled onsibilities of 40; 2015-841; of the Uni for Pa une 2015, t for Palestine ued the fol dgment No.

This is the first procedural act by which an applicant invests the Tribunal of dealing with the appeal.

This is the first procedural act by which an applicant invests the Tribunal of dealing with the appeal.

This is the first procedural act by which an applicant invests the Tribunal of dealing with the appeal.

This is the first procedural act by which an applicant invests the Tribunal of dealing with the appeal.

This is the first procedural act by which an applicant invests Case No. UNDT/NY/2018/025 Order No. 155 (NY/2018) Page 3 of 4 the tribunal of dealing with the appeal.

ST/SGB/2006/6 provides in part: Financial disclosure statement 2.1 The following staff members have an obligation to file an annual financial disclosure statement: (a) All staff members at the D-1 or L-6 level and above; (b) All staff members who are procurement officers, or whose principal occupational duties are the procurement of goods and services for the United Nations; (c) All staff members whose principal occupational duties relate to the investment of the assets of the United Nations, the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund or of any accounts for which the United Nations has fiduciary or custodial responsibility; (d) Other staff members whose direct access to confidential procurement or investment information warrants the filing of a financial disclosure statement; (e) All staff members serving in the Ethics Office. 2.2 The relevant head of department or office shall determine, in accordance with guidelines issued by the Ethics Office, the staff members who shall file financial disclosure statements under sections 2.1(b), (c) and (d) above. 20.

Witold presents scenarios of different staff members to demonstrate the discriminatory effect in comparison with other UNJSPF beneficiaries, stating that his investment in the Fund significantly outlasts his life expectancy while the other beneficiaries’ investment is exhausted at an age roughly equivalent to their life expectancy. Since the sole reason for this distinction is his re-entry into service which did not have any negative effect on the other participants’ contributions and their return on investment, the differentiation lacks any rational basis. 18.

This is the first procedural act by which an applicant invests the Tribunal of dealing with the appeal.