Home

Cropland Management (if elected) CMBY CMt CMt CMt CMt CMt CMT CMnet AQCMT B.3. Grazing Land Management (if elected) GLMBY GLMt GLMt GLMt GLMt GLMt GLMT GLMnet AQGLMT B.4. (...) Cropland Management (if elected) -2,000 -10,000 -10,000 -10,000 -6,000 -36,000 -8,000 -28,000 B.3.

Cross-cutting issues to be considered when exploring the options and issues identified by Parties in the paragraphs below; consistency; continuity from the current rules; factoring out, including age structure and indirect climate change effects; inter-annual variability; natural disturbances; symmetry in the accounting of emissions and removals; sustainable forest management; and co-benefits, including biodiversity. 3. The range of options and issues identified by Parties for consideration: (a) Activity-based approach based on Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Kyoto Protocol: (i) Few changes: (1) Legally required;1 (2) Definitions, modalities, rules and guidelines that apply in the first commitment period that could carry over to the second commitment period; (ii) More changes: (1) Legally required; and (2) Article 3, paragraph 4, forest management: - Moving to net-net and including emissions and removals from forest management in the base year; - Moving to net-net and estimating base year emissions and removals using a base period; - Moving to net-net and applying forward-looking baselines; - Remaining gross-net and applying discount factors; - Other; (iii) Many changes: (1) Legally required; and (2) Article 3, paragraph 4 forest management (options as above); and (3) Other activities under Article 3, paragraph 4: - Estimating base year emissions and removals using a base period; - Applying forward-looking baselines; (4) Merging Article 3, paragraph 3, and Article 3, paragraph 4; 1 When only legally required changes are considered, the current treatment of the activities will be retained. (...) The following elements could apply to the options listed in paragraph 3 above: (a) Additional and all activities to be mandatory; (b) Land-use flexibility; (c) Temporary removal from the accounting of areas subjected to natural disturbances; (d) Treatment of harvested wood products as part of the consideration of forest management and Article 3, paragraph 3, activities; (e) Potential activities: (i) Wetland management, restoration and degradation; (ii) Devegetation; (iii) Forest degradation; (iv) Others; (f) Discounting factors; (g) Limiting the magnitude of land use, land-use change and forestry for Annex I compliance; (h) National circumstances. 5.

To enhance the technical capacity of the personnel in each of the countries by improving methodological choices in the selection of the appropriate methods, activity data, and emission factors, thus leading to the development of improved and sustainable inventory management systems in Eastern and Southern Africa. 7–9 March 2011, Port Louis, Mauritius CSU, GIZ, GEO, UNFCCC, USAID, USEPA First In-country Meeting (Zambia) for Capacity- Building Project for Sustainable National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Management Systems in Eastern and Southern Africa To strengthen each country’s institutional arrangements, functions, and ability to manage their GHG inventories. (...) To enhance the technical capacity of the personnel in each of the countries by improving methodological choices in the selection of the appropriate methods, activity data, and emission factors, thus leading to the development of improved and sustainable inventory management systems in Eastern and Southern Africa. 26–29 July 2011, Pretoria, South Africa CSU, GIZ, GEO, UNFCCC, USAID, USEPA Phase 1 Closing Workshop of the Regional Capacity- building for Sustainable National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Management Systems in Southeast Asia To strengthen each country’s institutional arrangements, functions, and ability to manage their GHG inventories. (...) Thünen Institute, USEPA, First In-country Meeting (Malawi) for Capacity- building Project for Sustainable National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Management Systems in Eastern and Southern Africa To strengthen each country’s institutional arrangements, functions, and ability to manage their GHG inventories.

Distr. GENERAL ICCD/COP(6)/CST/INF.1 20 de junio de 2003 ESPAÑOL Original: INGLÉS ESPAÑOL, FRANCÉS E INGLÉS ÚNICAMENTE CONFERENCIA DE LAS PARTES Comité de Ciencia y

Border management is, nevertheless, only one response to addressing irregular migration. (...) The EU’s legislative framework on the management of the external borders emphasises the obligation on Member States to respect fundamental rights. (...) A/HRC/23/G/2 14 GE.13-13927 UNSR’s report from the mission to Greece – recommendations to the EU As underlined by the Rapporteur, the Commission is assisting Greece in the implementation of the Action Plan "Asylum and Migration management", which includes a section on border management.

The Bio-medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998, regulate the collection, management, storage, treatment and disposal of biomedical waste, such as human and animal anatomical wastes, items contaminated with blood or body fluids, medicines and chemical wastes. (...) Special trainings on such issues as hazardous waste management, safe removal and handling of asbestos and disaster management can also be organized at the request of the industry. 45. (...) The Special Rapporteur also welcomes the progress made with regard to the sound management of hazardous substances and the safe disposal of toxic wastes.

Distr. GENERAL FCCC/CP/2004/10/Add.2 19 de abril de 2005 ESPAÑOL Original: INGLÉS CONFERENCIA DE LAS PARTES INFORME DE LA CONFERENCIA DE LAS PARTES SOBRE SU DÉCIMO PERÍODO DE

GEF-5 Cross-Cutting Capacity Development ............................................................. 37 6. Results-Based Management................................................................................................. 39 Part III. (...) As the entity entrusted with the management of the Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) and the Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF), the GEF finances climate change adaptation in vulnerable developing countries. (...) Under the GEF’s Results-Based Management (RBM) System, for climate change mitigation, 212 projects, including 167 Full-sized Projects (FSPs) and 45 Medium-sized Projects (MSPs), were rated on their performance towards meeting the project’s overall global environment/development objective and implementation progress.

• Commercial contract negotiations and drafting. • Develop and manage network of professional advisers for the Embassy. • Manage relationships with key commercial interests and contacts. (...) Among responsibilities were: overall direction of the project on behalf of the government, including planning, timely and technical execution of activities and outputs, selection of experts, workplans, selection of mineral exploration targets, budgetary management of counterpart funding and preparation activity reports.