Home

A declaration setting forth all pertinent detailed information concerning the production or manufacture of the merchandise is considered sufficient only if requested by the district collector of Customs.

WORK PROGRAMME ON THE REVISION OF THE GUIDELINES FOR THE REVIEW OF BIENNIAL REPORTS, NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, INCLUDING NATIONAL INVENTORY REVIEWS.

WORK PROGRAMME ON THE REVISION OF THE GUIDELINES FOR THE REVIEW OF BIENNIAL REPORTS AND NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, INCLUDING NATIONAL INVENTORY REVIEWS, FOR DEVELOPED COUNTRY PARTIES :DRAFT CONCLUSIONS : ADDENDUM / PROPOSED BY THE CHAIR

The Observatory also provides legislators with the conclusions and recommendations emanating from the country’s participation in the universal periodic review. IV. Manifestations of racial discrimination A. (...) According to the allegations received, that type of accusation would have the function of justifying violent police action against those resisting arrest, or the seizure of their merchandise. 37. Sellers of Senegalese origin and other street vendors detained in the context of such operations have alleged that the merchandise confiscated during their detention by the police is never inventoried in its entirety and mostly never returned or sometimes returned in part. (...) In spite of this, the procedures for the seizure of merchandise and for detention continue, with a suggestion of arbitrariness, both in the laying of charges and in the selection of the persons at whom police action is directed.

The audit committee reviews, at least annually, the entity’s risk management process and risk profile. (...) The audit committee reviews the reports from the external auditors. (...) The audit committee reviews the performance of internal audit/oversight function including the review of risk assessment processes, plan and budgets (including making an assessment of the appropriateness of oversight resources)， and periodic external quality assessment.

In 2008, the Government of India organized a review of the National Rural Health Mission in Rajasthan. (...) In 2008, the Government of India organized a review of the National Rural Health Mission in that state. (...) Neither the basic instruments (e.g. indicators for EmOC), nor the basic machinery (e.g. maternal death reviews) are firmly established. In short, India’s current monitoring, accountability and redress mechanisms in relation to the public and private health sector are not fit for purpose. 65.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE), Environmental Performance Reviews: Mongolia (draft), November 2017 (ECE/CEP/185), p. 271. (...) Unless otherwise noted, references to statistics in the present report are taken from that report. 7 Mongolia, Ministry of Environment and Green Development, Mongolia Second Assessment Report on Climate Change 2014; ECE, Environmental Performance Reviews: Mongolia , pp. 166–167. 8 ECE, Environmental Performance Reviews: Mongolia , p. 271. (...) See also “National Committee on Environmental Pollution Reduction meets”, Montsame News Agency, 2 August 2017. 25 ECE, Environmental Performance Reviews: Mongolia , pp. 78 and 197. 26 Ibid., p. 206.

The secretariat, where appropriate, may consider other UNFCCC review processes when coordinating BR and NC reviews, in particular with a view to addressing the need to improve the cost-effectiveness of the review process and national circumstances. (...) The secretariat, where appropriate, shall consider other UNFCCC review processes when coordinating BR and NC reviews, in particular with a view to addressing the need to improve the cost-effectiveness of the review process and national circumstances. (...) Review experts shall, as necessary, perform desk review tasks in their home countries and participate in in-country visits and centralized reviews.

Australia’s approach to Article 36 Reviews was described in detail in the paper “The Australian Article 36 Review Process” (CCW/GGE.2/2018/WP.6). 11. (...) Australia encourages other nations to undertake weapons reviews, even if they are not a party to Additional Protocol I. (...) As consistently mentioned throughout GGE discussions, Australia is a strong supporter of Article 36 Reviews. 23. States should conduct weapons reviews in accordance with their inter

Mendez, the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment visited Georgia, but was not allowed to visit the occupied regions of Georgia. 26 April-June 2015. 27 See weekly press reviews on the human rights violations and current events in Abkhazia, prepared by the Justice Department of Georgia’s Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia, April-June 2015. 28 Gali districted is located in the occupied Abkhazia region. (...) Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI). 38 Report of the Year 2014 of the Public Defender of Georgia on the Situation of Rights of the Population Affected by the Conflicts, 5 June 2015, page 21. 39 Russia’s Responsibility for Human Rights in Occupied Regions of Georgia” Submission from the Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association (GYLA), National Institute for Human Rights (NIHR) and Human Rights Priority for consideration at the 113th Session of the Human Rights Committee (16 March-2 April 2015) Russian Federation, p. 3. 40 April-June 2015. 41 See weekly press reviews on the human rights violations and current events in Abkhazia, prepared by the Justice Department of Georgia’s Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia, April-June 2015. (...) Paragraph 23.1 (i). 45 Report of the Year 2014 of the Public Defender of Georgia on the Situation of Rights of the Population Affected by the Conflicts, 5 June 2015, pages 16-20. 46 Consolidated Report on the Conflict in Georgia, Council of Europe (November 2014-March 2015), 22 April 2015, SG/Inf (2015) 18, paragraph 44. 47 April-June 2015. 48 See weekly press reviews on the human rights violations and current events in Abkhazia, prepared by the Justice Department of Georgia’s Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia, April-June 2015.