Home

Results 71 - 80 of 358,256 for millions. Search took 8.564 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
Where a donor has contributed $2 million or more, the total amount of the contributions is shown. 5. (...) Where a donor has contributed $10 million or more, the total amount of the contribution is shown. Private donors Australia 4.9 million | Private donors USA 4.4 million | Private donors Germany 2.9 million  Norway | United States of America | Private donors Sweden 99.3 million | Norway 72.5 million | Private donors Spain 39 million | Netherlands 37.2 million | Denmark 35.6 million | United Kingdom 28.1 million | Germany 27 million | Private donors Japan 26.6 million | France 18.5 million | Switzerland 18.4 million | Private donors Republic of Korea 16.4 million | Private donors USA 15 million | Belgium 11.9 million | Ireland 11.8 million | Italy 10 million  Algeria | Armenia | Azerbaijan | Bulgaria | Canada | Costa Rica | Estonia | Finland | Iceland | Kuwait | Liechtenstein | Lithuania | Luxembourg | Monaco | Montenegro | New Zealand | Peru | Philippines | Qatar | Republic of Korea | Saudi Arabia | Singapore | Thailand | Türkiye | Uruguay | Private donors 1.
Language:English
Score: 450146.8 - https://www.unhcr.org/eg/wp-co...unding-Update-05-July-2022.pdf
Data Source: un
UNICEF estimates that more than 34 million children living through conflict and disaster lack access to child protection services, including 6.6 million children in Yemen, 5.5 million children in Syria and 4 million children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). (...) The five largest individual appeals are for Syrian refugees and host communities in Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq and Turkey (US$ 904 million); Yemen (US$ 542.3 million); The Democratic Republic of the Congo (US$ 326.1 million); Syria (US$ 319.8 million) and South Sudan (US$ 179.2 million). In East Asia and Pacific Region, UNICEF is seeking US$100.9 million for Myanmar (US$59.1 million); Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (US$19.5 million) and humanitarian support across the region (US$22.3 million). 
Language:English
Score: 450123.7 - https://www.unicef.org/eap/pre...ion-children-affected-conflict
Data Source: un
Outcome 2 Provisional programme expenditure, 2014-2016 Total: $1,568 million (13% of total) 2014: $606 million 2015: $529 million 2016:$433 million [VALUE]Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE]Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE]Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE]Million [PERCENTAGE] 2014-16 Regular resources 2014-16 Programme government 2014-16 Vertical funds 2014-16 Bilateral/Multilateral 218.41581800999995 238.20018325999999 183.93206640000008 927.21318669999994 Outcome 3 Provisional programme expenditure, 2014-2016 Total: $4,300 million (34% of total) 2014: $1,484 million 2015: $1,459 million 2016:$1,357 million [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] 2014-16 Regular resources 2014-16 Programme government 2014-16 Vertical funds 2014-16 Bilateral/Multilateral 171.37423344999999 734.07373269000016 1193.9763703199999 2200.9258583199999 Outcome 4 Provisional programme expenditure, 2014-2016 Total: $83 million (1% of total) 2014: $31 million 2015: $33 million 2016:$19 million [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] 2014-16 Regular resources 2014-16 Programme government 2014-16 Bilateral/Multilateral 26.612340239999998 2.8168740799999998 53.230876220000006 Outcome 5 Provisional programme expenditure, 2014-2016 Total: $724 million (6% of total) 2014: $252 million 2015: $256 million 2016:$216 million [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] 2014-16 Regular resources 2014-16 Programme government 2014-16 Vertical funds 2014-16 Bilateral/Multilateral 116.97592483 59.738698159999998 79.015386610000007 467.88385419999997 Outcome 6 Provisional programme expenditure, 2014-2016 Total: $1,011 million (8% of total) 2014: $281 million 2015: $331 million 2016: $399 million [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] 2014-16 Regular resources 2014-16 Programme government 2014-16 Bilateral/Multilateral 64.04682163999999 18.542371789999997 927.45670439999981 Outcome 7 Provisional programme expenditure, 2014-2016 Total: $569 million (5% of total) 2014: $215 million 2015: $228 million 2016:$127 million [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] 2014-16 Regular resources 2014-16 Programme government 2014-16 Vertical funds 2014-16 Bilateral/Multilateral 151.20446884 252.79841791999996 12.914076250000001 152.51432421999999 Number of supported countries and 2014-2016 expenditure ($ US dollars millions) by Strategic Plan output Number of supported countries (Dec 2016) Output 1.1 Output 1.2 Output 1.3 Output 1.4 Output 1.5 Output 2.1 Output 2.2 Output 2.3 Output 2.4 Output 2.5 Output 2.6 Output 3.1 Output 3.2 Output 3.3 Output 3.4 Output 3.5 Output 4.1 Output 4.2 Output 4.3 Output 4.4 Output 5.1 Output 5.2 Output 5.3 Output 5.4 Output 5.5 Output 5.6 Output 6.1 Output 6.2 Output 6.3 Output 6.4 Output 7.1 Output 7.2 Output 7.3 Output 7.4 Output 7.5 Output 7.6 Output 7.7 Output 7.8 SP Outcome 1 SP Outcome 2 SP Outcome 3 SP Outcome 4 SP Outcome 5 SP Outcome 6 SP Outcome 7 126 62 113 116 81 90 60 63 72 76 21 30 80 63 52 33 13 20 11 26 43 60 15 45 27 24 27 27 8 22 14 30 32 25 21 20 27 21 Expenditure 2014-2016: Regular Resources Output 1.1 Output 1.2 Output 1.3 Output 1.4 Output 1.5 Output 2.1 Output 2.2 Output 2.3 Output 2.4 Output 2.5 Output 2.6 Output 3.1 Output 3.2 Output 3.3 Output 3.4 Output 3.5 Output 4.1 Output 4.2 Output 4.3 Output 4.4 Output 5.1 Output 5.2 Output 5.3 Output 5.4 Output 5.5 Output 5.6 Output 6.1 Output 6.2 Output 6.3 Output 6.4 Output 7.1 Output 7.2 Output 7.3 Output 7.4 Output 7.5 Output 7.6 Output 7.7 Output 7.8 SP Outcome 1 SP Outcome 2 SP Outcome 3 SP Outcome 4 SP Outcome 5 SP Outcome 6 SP Outcome 7 187.29868984000001 18.228668679999998 45.670637280000001 47.730034600000003 22.67868570000001 90.22598107999994 25.410372869999989 29.123813509999991 37.554936220000002 24.746787879999971 11.353926449999999 26.74468203 77.101817760000003 20.30433627 32.745694200000003 14.47770319 4.4011950199999976 2.6771527700000002 4.654822529999997 14.879169920000001 15.10806693 35.049411760000012 7.46555 08399999988 29.644297279999989 15.332666529999999 14.375931489999999 32.414833689999988 14.610851200000001 1.7530233200000001 15.26811343 5.3235226999999972 13.491002999999999 40.901036690000012 17.111116510000009 7.1965197199999968 14.76162021 42.303126409999997 10.116523600000001 Expenditure 2014-2016: Local Government Output 1.1 Output 1.2 Output 1.3 Output 1.4 Output 1.5 Output 2.1 Output 2.2 Output 2.3 Output 2.4 Output 2.5 Output 2.6 Output 3.1 Output 3.2 Output 3.3 Output 3.4 Output 3.5 Output 4.1 Output 4.2 Output 4.3 Output 4.4 Output 5.1 Output 5.2 Output 5.3 Output 5.4 Output 5.5 Output 5.6 Output 6.1 Output 6.2 Output 6.3 Output 6.4 Output 7.1 Output 7.2 Output 7.3 Output 7.4 Output 7.5 Output 7.6 Output 7.7 Output 7.8 SP Outcome 1 SP Outcome 2 SP Outcome 3 SP Outcome 4 SP Outcome 5 SP Outcome 6 SP Outcome 7 477.76890185000002 436.14465231000008 134.20468600999999 86.591426650000002 80.827831060000008 66.738139250000003 33.137009239999998 47.981837209999988 62.534695399999997 26.325800019999999 1.48270214 24.406329509999971 553.90593296000054 89.616637490000002 49.858436169999997 16.28639656 0.64409795000000003 0.64087611 0.93852964000000005 0.59337037999999998 7.5964160499999958 5.8671331399999938 3.453455329999997 5.9076897900000001 1.7667120199999999 35.14729183 3.3368921999999981 4.6477648199999937 6.0065266099999972 4.5511881600000006 2.0817218 26.978659029999999 12.87370868 52.716434030000002 55.132743670000004 37.715659289999998 30.268229209999969 35.031262210000001 Expenditure 2014-2016: Vertical Fund Output 1.1 Output 1.2 Output 1.3 Output 1.4 Output 1.5 Output 2.1 Output 2.2 Output 2.3 Output 2.4 Output 2.5 Output 2.6 Output 3.1 Output 3.2 Output 3.3 Output 3.4 Output 3.5 Output 4.1 Output 4.2 Output 4.3 Output 4.4 Output 5.1 Output 5.2 Output 5.3 Output 5.4 Output 5.5 Output 5.6 Output 6.1 Output 6.2 Output 6.3 Output 6.4 Output 7.1 Output 7.2 Output 7.3 Output 7.4 Output 7.5 Output 7.6 Output 7.7 Output 7.8 SP Outcome 1 SP Outcome 2 SP Outcome 3 SP Outcome 4 SP Outcome 5 SP Outcome 6 SP Outcome 7 67.722187669999983 2.7470286800000001 421.29589148000019 252.25258935000011 113.91779911 0.28405859999999999 5.8831274000000011 0 3.3755240099999999 174.3893563900001 0 0.86682073000000004 68.333358389999958 1120.2360559199999 0 4.5401352799999932 0 0 0 0 15.104581489999999 21.43513163999998 10.701448409999999 30.330490569999998 1.4437344999999999 0 0 0.44831695999999999 0 0 5.0133073600000007 0.11415599999999999 1.5089229500000001 2.5356118400000001 1.3764664799999999 2.0423380400000002 0.32327358 0 Expenditure 2014-2016: Bilateral/Multilateral Output 1.1 Output 1.2 Output 1.3 Output 1.4 Output 1.5 Output 2.1 Output 2.2 Output 2.3 Output 2.4 Output 2.5 Output 2.6 Output 3.1 Output 3.2 Output 3.3 Output 3.4 Output 3.5 Output 4.1 Output 4.2 Output 4.3 Output 4.4 Output 5.1 Output 5.2 Output 5.3 Output 5.4 Output 5.5 Output 5.6 Output 6.1 Output 6.2 Output 6.3 Output 6.4 Output 7.1 Output 7.2 Output 7.3 Output 7.4 Output 7.5 Output 7.6 Output 7.7 Output 7.8 SP Outcome 1 SP Outcome 2 SP Outcome 3 SP Outcome 4 SP Outcome 5 SP Outcome 6 SP Outcome 7 458.64261189999979 38.853485439999993 138.49180892000001 180.14019433000001 52.13320693 604.45682433999957 74.965009640000005 57.611997509999988 107.84909215 46.737928199999999 35.592334860000001 77.713505300000023 233.48433535999999 112.20318767000001 233.21325665000001 1544.31157334 8.3634397600000003 27.155694530000002 7.2529257399999967 10.45881619 107.0257610 7 70.515020919999998 15.198534520000001 55.79512625000001 100.30885024 119.0405612 604.17246098999988 154.58293456999999 13.296465230000001 155.40484361 21.349939759999991 11.71158236 31.167858320000001 26.617879430000009 12.275517000000001 18.658839530000002 16.37960293999998 14.35310488 Outcome 1 Provisional programme expenditure, 2014-2016 Total: $3,264 million (26% of total) 2014: $1,120 million 2015: $1,089 million 2016:$1,054 million [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE]Million [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] Million [PERCENTAGE] 2014-16 Regular resources 2014-16 Programme government 2014-16 Vertical funds 2014-16 Bilateral/Multilateral 321.60671609999997 1215.53749788 857.93549629000017 868.26130751999995 2
Language:English
Score: 449983.25 - https://www.undp.org/sites/g/f...ssion/dp2017-15_Annex%203.docx
Data Source: un
Between 2014 and 2018, the accumulated value of the reform and efficiency gains totaled some $58 million, including the redeployment of over 66 positions in the Professional category to strengthen technical work. (...) Overview of biennial efficiency savings 2020-21 Re-profiling and redeployments from the Management and Reform portfolio: US$1.9 million Re-profiling of staff development provision: US$ 1.4 million Removal of unassigned resources previously used for technical meetings: US$ 0.4 million Reductions in travel support costs: US$ 0.4 million Reductions in RBTC provisions within the Policy portfolio: US$ 0.3 million Re-profiling and grading of positions within the Policy portfolio: US$0.2 million Savings total: US$4.6 million (in constant 2018-19 US$) Source: Programme and Budget for 2020–21 - Programme of work and results framework , page 89; Programme and Budget for the biennium 2020-21 2018-19 Redeployment of resources from management, administrative and support services to front-line analytical and technical ones that directly deliver value to member States, including the creation of the equivalent of 26.5 new positions in the Professional category: US$15 million Savings total: US$15 million (in constant 2016-17 US$) Source: Programme and Budget for the biennium 2018-19 , pages  iii and 6. 2016-17 Conversion of managerial positions to technical positions: US$6 million Reductions in the number of administrative positions: US$3.1 million Reprofiled/redeployed positions/streamlining of General Service positions: US$3.7 million Conversion of general service positions to technical positions: US$3.7 million Redeployed non-staff expenditure: US$7.8 million Savings from new travel policy for Governing Body members: US$0.5 million Savings total: US$24.8 million (in constant 2014-15 US$) Source: Programme and Budget for the Biennium 2016-17 , pages 4-5. 2014-15 Reduction in the duration of the March programme and budget session of the Governing Body: US$0.5 million Rationalization of publications and their dissemination, including Century Project: US$0.5 million Consolidation of structures and reprofiling of positions resulting from HQ Reform: US$1.2 million Reductions/streamlining of administrative and management positions: US$1.2 million Savings total: US$3.4 million (in constant 2012-13 US$) Source: Programme and Budget for the Biennium 2014-15 , pages xv-xvi and paragraphs 14-15. 2012-13 Reduced budget for the International Labour Conference: US$0.78 million Reduced budget for the Governing Body: US$0.29 million Reduced budget for service to meetings (through paper smart strategy and efficient working method): US$1.8 million Reduced budget for support services (non-staff costs, administrative efficiencies and improved working methods): US$1.9 million Reductions Office-wide as a result of the new measures on travel: US$0.8 million Savings total: US$5.6 million (in constant 2010-11 US$) Source: Programme and Budget for the Biennium 2012-13 , pages 10-11. 2010-11 Reduced budget for management and support: US$2.8 million Reduced number of administrative personnel in technical programmes: US$1.2 million Reduced staff travel costs: US$1.1 million Reductions in the number and length of documents and other savings related to the Governing Body and the International Labour Conference: US$2.8 million Savings total: US$7.9 million Source: Programme and Budget for the Biennium 2010-11 , pages 5-6. 2008-09 Reduced budget for management services: US$2.2 million Reduced budget for support services: US$1.3 million Reduced budget for services to meetings: US$0.8 million Reduced budget for support personnel in technical programmes: approximately US$1 million. Savings total: US$5.3 million Source: Programme and Budget for the Biennium 2008-09 , page 4. 2006-07 Elimination of smaller units and subunits in technical programmes.
Language:English
Score: 449921.63 - https://www.ilo.org/global/abo.../efficiency/lang--en/index.htm
Data Source: un
Between 2014 and 2018, the accumulated value of the reform and efficiency gains totaled some $58 million, including the redeployment of over 66 positions in the Professional category to strengthen technical work. (...) Overview of biennial efficiency savings 2020-21 Re-profiling and redeployments from the Management and Reform portfolio: US$1.9 million Re-profiling of staff development provision: US$ 1.4 million Removal of unassigned resources previously used for technical meetings: US$ 0.4 million Reductions in travel support costs: US$ 0.4 million Reductions in RBTC provisions within the Policy portfolio: US$ 0.3 million Re-profiling and grading of positions within the Policy portfolio: US$0.2 million Savings total: US$4.6 million (in constant 2018-19 US$) Source: Programme and Budget for 2020–21 - Programme of work and results framework , page 89; Programme and Budget for the biennium 2020-21 2018-19 Redeployment of resources from management, administrative and support services to front-line analytical and technical ones that directly deliver value to member States, including the creation of the equivalent of 26.5 new positions in the Professional category: US$15 million Savings total: US$15 million (in constant 2016-17 US$) Source: Programme and Budget for the biennium 2018-19 , pages  iii and 6. 2016-17 Conversion of managerial positions to technical positions: US$6 million Reductions in the number of administrative positions: US$3.1 million Reprofiled/redeployed positions/streamlining of General Service positions: US$3.7 million Conversion of general service positions to technical positions: US$3.7 million Redeployed non-staff expenditure: US$7.8 million Savings from new travel policy for Governing Body members: US$0.5 million Savings total: US$24.8 million (in constant 2014-15 US$) Source: Programme and Budget for the Biennium 2016-17 , pages 4-5. 2014-15 Reduction in the duration of the March programme and budget session of the Governing Body: US$0.5 million Rationalization of publications and their dissemination, including Century Project: US$0.5 million Consolidation of structures and reprofiling of positions resulting from HQ Reform: US$1.2 million Reductions/streamlining of administrative and management positions: US$1.2 million Savings total: US$3.4 million (in constant 2012-13 US$) Source: Programme and Budget for the Biennium 2014-15 , pages xv-xvi and paragraphs 14-15. 2012-13 Reduced budget for the International Labour Conference: US$0.78 million Reduced budget for the Governing Body: US$0.29 million Reduced budget for service to meetings (through paper smart strategy and efficient working method): US$1.8 million Reduced budget for support services (non-staff costs, administrative efficiencies and improved working methods): US$1.9 million Reductions Office-wide as a result of the new measures on travel: US$0.8 million Savings total: US$5.6 million (in constant 2010-11 US$) Source: Programme and Budget for the Biennium 2012-13 , pages 10-11. 2010-11 Reduced budget for management and support: US$2.8 million Reduced number of administrative personnel in technical programmes: US$1.2 million Reduced staff travel costs: US$1.1 million Reductions in the number and length of documents and other savings related to the Governing Body and the International Labour Conference: US$2.8 million Savings total: US$7.9 million Source: Programme and Budget for the Biennium 2010-11 , pages 5-6. 2008-09 Reduced budget for management services: US$2.2 million Reduced budget for support services: US$1.3 million Reduced budget for services to meetings: US$0.8 million Reduced budget for support personnel in technical programmes: approximately US$1 million. Savings total: US$5.3 million Source: Programme and Budget for the Biennium 2008-09 , page 4. 2006-07 Elimination of smaller units and subunits in technical programmes.
Language:English
Score: 449921.63 - www.ilo.org/global/abou.../efficiency/lang--en/index.htm
Data Source: un
Total income increased by 3 per cent, from $423 million in 2010 to $436 million in 2011. Total expenditures increased by 8 per cent, from $344 million to $373 million. (...) Total expenditures, including support costs, increased to $53 million, from $52 million in 2010. The resource balance available at the end of 2011 was $34 million, compared to $31 million in 2010 (and $38 million in 2009). (...) In 2011, UNDP spent $31 million ($33 million in 2010), including $15 million ($11 million in 2010) in other resources.
Language:English
Score: 449787.94 - https://www.undp.org/sites/g/f...-session/English/dp2012-17.doc
Data Source: un
UNICEF will also need US$909 million for the Syria refugee crisis, another US$334 million for the crisis inside Syria, US$484 million for the response in Yemen, and over US$356 million for programmes in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. (...) As part of its Humanitarian Action for Children which sets out the agency’s 2022 appeal, UNICEF plans to reach: 7.2 million children with treatment for severe acute malnutrition. 62.1 million children with measles vaccinations. 53.4 million people with access to safe water for drinking and domestic needs. 27.9 million children and caregivers with access to mental health and psychosocial support. 21.3 million children and women with access to gender-based violence risk mitigation, prevention or response interventions. 51.9 million people with safe and accessible channels to report sexual exploitation and abuse by aid workers. 77.1 million children with formal or non-formal education, including early learning.  23.6 million households with cash assistance. (...) More than 812.2 million people reached through behavioral messages on disease prevention and access to health services. 3.2 million people with access to safe channels to report sexual exploitation and abuse. 8.6 million women, girls and boys accessing GBV risk mitigation, prevention or response interventions. 14.9 million households reached with humanitarian cash transfers.
Language:English
Score: 449737.2 - https://www.unicef.org/turkiye...eal-children-affected-conflict
Data Source: un
On the basis of that study, the accrued liability estimates for UNCDF are $11 million; UNIFEM, $20 million; and UNDP, $430 million, totalling $461 million. (...) Total income increased by 7 per cent from $394 million in 2009 to $423 million. Total expenditures increased by 8 per cent from $318 million to $344 million. (...) In 2010, UNDP spent $33 million (2009: $39 million), including $11 million (2009: $10 million) in other resources.
Language:English
Score: 449670.9 - https://www.undp.org/sites/g/f...-session/english/dp2011-33.doc
Data Source: un
END   UNHCR 2020 Global Trends Report – key data: 82.4 million people forcibly displaced globally (79.5 million in 2019) – a 4 per cent increase 26.4 million refugees (26.0 million in 2019) including: 20.7 million refugees under UNHCR’s mandate (20.4 million in 2019) 5.7 million Palestine refugees under UNRWA’s mandate (5.6 million in 2019) 48.0 million internally displaced people (45.7 million in 2019) 4.1 million asylum-seekers (4.1 million in 2019) 3.9 million Venezuelans displaced abroad (3.6 million in 2019) 2020 is the ninth year of uninterrupted rise in forced displacement worldwide. Today, one per cent of humanity is displaced and there are twice as many forcibly displaced people than in 2011 when the total was just under 40 million. More than two thirds of all people who fled abroad came from just five countries: Syria (6.7 million), Venezuela (4.0 million), Afghanistan (2.6 million), South Sudan (2.2 million) and Myanmar (1.1 million). (...) For the seventh year in a row, Turkey hosted the largest refugee population worldwide (3.7 million refugees), followed by Colombia (1.7 million, including Venezuelans displaced abroad), Pakistan (1.4 million), Uganda (1.4 million) and Germany (1.2 million).
Language:English
Score: 449579.8 - https://www.unhcr.org/tr/en/29...d-of-soaring-displacement.html
Data Source: un
UNHCR 2020 Global Trends Report – key data: 82.4 million people forcibly displaced globally (79.5 million in 2019) – a 4 per cent increase 26.4 million refugees (26.0 million in 2019) including: 20.7 million refugees under UNHCR’s mandate (20.4 million in 2019) 5.7 million Palestine refugees under UNRWA’s mandate (5.6 million in 2019) 48.0 million internally displaced people (45.7 million in 2019) 4.1 million asylum-seekers (4.1 million in 2019) 3.9 million Venezuelans displaced abroad (3.6 million in 2019) 2020 is the ninth year of uninterrupted rise in forced displacement worldwide. Today, one per cent of humanity is displaced and there are twice as many forcibly displaced people than in 2011 when the total was just under 40 million. More than two thirds of all people who fled abroad came from just five countries: Syria (6.7 million), Venezuela (4.0 million), Afghanistan (2.6 million), South Sudan (2.2 million) and Myanmar (1.1 million). (...) For the seventh year in a row, Turkey hosted the largest refugee population worldwide (3.7 million refugees), followed by Colombia (1.7 million, including Venezuelans displaced abroad), Pakistan (1.4 million), Uganda (1.4 million) and Germany (1.2 million).
Language:English
Score: 449579.8 - https://www.unhcr.org/th/en/ca...egory/who-we-are-en/figures-en
Data Source: un