Home

Results 1 - 10 of 143,900 for outline. Search took 4.809 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
We are of the opinion that this year's proposed budget outline recalls the need to revise the practice of the recosting. This should be done with a view towards keeping the budget outline from continuing to grow despite adverse economic situation. (...) Chairman, , The budget outline serves as a guideline to draft the future programme budget.
Language:English
Score: 667638.6 - https://www.un.org/en/ga/fifth...2015_Republic%20of%20Korea.pdf
Data Source: un
Microsoft PowerPoint - C5_Rev04.ppt Proposed programme budget for the biennium 2014-2015 Briefing to the Fifth Committee by the Controller on 8 May 2013 2 Budget Outline level for the biennium 2014-2015 ▪ For 2014-2015, the Secretary-General proposed a Budget Outline of $5,492.5 million, which included the updated Annex II ▪ In 2010-2011 and 2012- 2013, the General Assembly invited the Secretary- General to prepare a budget at the total proposed Budget Outline level, which included Annex II ▪ However, for 2014-2015, the General Assembly invited the SG to prepare a budget at a level approximately $100 million below the total proposed budget outline level of $5,492.5 million Budget Outline level since the introduction of Annex II (in millions of United States dollars) Initial Budget Outline Updated Annex II Total proposed Budget Outline Budget Outline per GA res. (a) (b) (c = a+b) (d) 2010-2011a 4,617.9 253.1 4,871.0 4,871.0 2012-2013 5,456.1 (59.4) 5,396.7 5,396.7 2014-2015 5,341.0 151.5b 5,492.5 5,392.7 b The updated Annex II was provided to the Fifth Committee as Addendum 2 to the Supplementary Information on the proposed programme budget outline, dated 18 December 2012. a The General Assembly requested in resolution 63/266 for future budget documents to include an annex on the Impact of items before the General Assembly and foreseeable items yet to be considered 3 Implementing the reduction in line with resolution 67/248 ▪ The Assembly requested the Secretary-General in resolution 67/248 to ensure the fair, equitable and non-selective treatment of all budget sections (paragraph 11) ▪ Some sections or elements thereof have a specific status, in particular when it concerns: – A specific regulation or statute which provides for level of autonomy – A number of policy-making organs in section 1: the OPGA, ACABQ, CPC, BoA and CoC – Activities for which financing is provided mostly by the Agencies, Funds and Programmes – Special expenses – Newly established entities – All areas of work pertaining to programme support, conference management, public information and capital projects for which reductions had already been proposed 4 Process leading to the proposed programme budget ▪ The initial submission of Programme Managers was received early January ▪ Memorandum was issued mid-January with the request to Programme Managers to: – Determine how reductions could best be achieved, maintaining a ratio between post and non-post resources – Conduct a comprehensive review of staffing requirements to best allocate reductions in post resources – Explain the expected impact of the reductions, if any 5 Overview of resources: changes to the financial resources table Component PercentageAmount 2012-2013 estimateRecosting Total before recosting Resource growth2010-2011 appropri- ation 2008-2009 expenditure BEFORE Recosting 2014-2015 estimate Total before recosting 2012-2013 resources at revised rates PercentageTotal Reflected in the budget outline report In line with resolution 67/248 New mandates and inter- component changes Technical adjustment (delayed impact and non-recurrent) Resource changeNEW ▪ In the previous biennium, the base was set at the 2010-2011 appropriation ▪ For 2014-2015, the General Assembly invited the Secretary-General to prepare his proposed programme budget at revised 2012-2013 rates ▪ The base is therefore set at the 2012-2013 resources at revised rates, incorporating the revised appropriation and deferred recosting, also in line with para. 47 of the First Performance Report (A/67/592) ▪ The new presentation provides an evolution of resource change from 2012- 2013 to 2014-2015 (see above) as well as a further break-down by subprogramme 6 Technical adjustment, new mandates, intercomponent changes ▪ Technical adjustment: delayed impact for posts established in and removal of one-time costs approved for 2012-2013 ▪ New mandates: resource changes as included in the total proposed Budget Outline level ▪ Intercomponent changes: cost-neutral redeployments within one budget section (between executive direction and management, programme of work and programme support) Recosting Total before recostingPercentageTotal Reflected in the budget outline report In line with resolution 67/248 New mandates, intercomponent changes Technical Adjustment (Delayed impact and non-recurrent) Resource change 2012-2013 resources at revised rates 7 Resource changes in line with resolution 67/248 and reflected in Budget Outline report ▪ Resource changes in line with resolution 67/248 – These changes follow from the invitation by the General Assembly to prepare a budget approximately $100 million below the total proposed Budget Outline level – The fascicles contain an analysis of the impact on the volume of outputs and performance targets ▪ Resource changes reflected in the Budget Outline report – These changes are efforts of the Secretary-General to increase efficiency, while ensuring the effective implementation of mandated activities (para. 12 of A/67/529) Recosting Total before recostingPercentageTotal Reflected in the budget outline report In line with resolution 67/248 New mandates, intercomponent changes Technical Adjustment (Delayed impact and non-recurrent) Resource change 2012-2013 resources at revised rates 8 Resource changes in line with resolution 67/248 and reflected in Budget Outline report: format of presentation Reference to affected performance target with comparison vis- à-vis estimate for 2012-2013, if applicable Reference to affected output with comparison vis-à- vis number of outputs in 2012- 2013, if applicable What is the financial impact of the reduction? (...) Reductions in line with resolution 67/248 Reductions in performance targets Reductions in the volume of outputsDescription Net reductions in inputs Recosting Total before recostingPercentageTotal Reflected in the budget outline report In line with resolution 67/248 New mandates, intercomponent changes Technical Adjustment (Delayed impact and non-recurrent) Resource change 2012-2013 resources at revised rates Reductions in performance targets Reductions in the volume of outputsDescription Net reductions in inputs No impactNo impactWhich reductions have been achieved?
Language:English
Score: 663417.97 - https://www.un.org/en/ga/fifth...30_Briefing_ASG_Controller.pdf
Data Source: un
I have the honour to introduce the Report of the Secretary-General on the Proposed Programme Budget Outline for the Biennium 2018-2019 (A/71/428). Once considered and approved by the General Assembly, the Outline will serve as the basis for the Secretary-General’s proposed programme budget for 2018-2019. 2. (...) When compared against the final expenditures of just under $5.7 billion for 2014-2015, the Outline reflects a decrease of $259 million. 3. The Outline strictly follows the process set out in resolutions 41/213 and 63/266, and continues to reflect the [eight] priorities proposed for the work of the Organization in line with resolution 71/6. 4. (...) In its resolution 63/266, the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to include Annex II in future Outline reports. 5. In line with this request, the Outline provides the fullest picture of all necessary resources estimated for the following biennium.
Language:English
Score: 658298.5 - https://www.un.org/en/ga/fifth...etOutline_ASG%20Controller.pdf
Data Source: un
Information provided in this form will be used to inform the review and evaluation of CSO submissions as outlined in the Call for Expression of Interest under section 3. (...) CSO expertise and experience in the sector area 2.1 CSO mandate, sector area and geographic coverage Outline the organisation’s mandate, field of work and geographic coverage 2.2 Available expertise and specialists Outline the distinctive technical capacity of the organisation in the sector area 2.3 Key results achieved over the past 5 years Outline of key results achieved in sector area in recent years, including any recognition received at local / global level for the work in the sector area Section 3. Local experience, presence and community relations 3.1 Ongoing programmes in sector area Outline of type / scope of ongoing programmes in the sector area 3.2 Knowledge of the local context Outline of presence and community relations in the proposed programme location(s) 3.3 Existing networks Outline of ongoing collaborations with national institutions and local communities in the sector area Section 4.
Language:English
Score: 657808.8 - https://www.unicef.org/vietnam/media/9691/file
Data Source: un
Microsoft Word - E - Budget outline - Statement of the Chairman to Fifth Committee 19 November 2014.docx 1 Check against delivery Statement of the Chairman Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions 19 November 2014 Proposed programme budget outline for the biennium 2016-2017 (ACABQ report A/69/556) Mr Chairman, I am pleased to introduce the Advisory Committee’s report (A/69/556) on the proposed programme budget outline for the biennium 2016-2017 (A/69/416). According to the Secretary-General, the total preliminary estimate of the budget outline for the biennium 2016-2017 amounts to $5,698.5 million. (...) The Committee makes specific reference to UNMEER, which in its view, should be treated in the budget outline similarly to the initiatives currently reflected in Annex II of the Secretary-General’s report.
Language:English
Score: 653395.6 - https://www.un.org/en/ga/fifth...et%20Outline_Chair%20ACABQ.pdf
Data Source: un
Manager, NCA & Vice Chairman, ITU-T SG 12 RG-AFR) NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY Division Outline  Background and Objective of ITU-T E.805  Scope and Structure of Recommendation  Key Thematic Areas (for discussion)  Conclusion & Way Forward 2 PRESENTATION OUTLINE NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY Division Outline  E.805, “Strategies to Establish Quality Regulatory Frameworks” was developed in response to Resolution 95 of WTSA-16 on “ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector initiatives to raise awareness on best practices and policies related to service quality” [b-WTSA-Res95]. 3 BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE (ITU-T E.805) NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY Division Outline  E.805 (formerly E.RQUAL) seeks to provide guidance to regulators aiming to establish national or regional regulatory frameworks to monitor and measure quality of service (QoS) and quality of experience (QoE).  E.RQUAL, given its regulatory implications went through ITU’s Traditional Approval Process (TAP) before it was approved at the last ITU-T SG 12 meeting held, 26 Nov - 5 Dec 2019.  The Editor was Tiago Sousa Prado of Anatel Brazil. The work received support from Ghana, Rwanda, Cameroun, Benin, Niger, AT&T, Opticom GmBH, to mention a few. 4 BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE (ITU-T E.805) NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY Division Outline E.805 Recommendation was structured to address the following:  Provide references for regulators on service quality regulatory frameworks suitable to assess, compare and give transparency on: - subscription voice, video and/or IP-based communication quality achieved by operators; - quality as perceived by end-users; and - user satisfaction for different operators  Establish guidance on high-level quality regulatory approaches and enforcement strategies for informed consumer choices;  Provide strategies to empower end-users with useful information based on results of the service quality measurements. 5 SCOPE OF WORK: ITU-T E.805 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY Division Outline 6 THEMATIC AREAS (FOR DISCUSSION) NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY Division Outline  Assessing impact of Service quality regulation on Competition  Adopting a more responsive strategy to regulation.  Selection of Key Regulatory Indicators (KRIs) that better inform consumers.  Understanding the relationship between Customer’s Satisfaction or Perceived Quality and QoS assessment  Implementation of a QoS measurement regime that reflect the contributions of relevant stakeholders 7 Approaches to Service Quality Regulation NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY Division Outline  Request for action plans to cure poor QoS  Inform consumers on service quality results  Monetary compensations  Breaking of loyalty contracts  Suspension of sales 8 Enforcement Strategies NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY Division Outline 1.
Language:English
Score: 650527.93 - https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/W.../qos/202003/Documents/E805.pdf
Data Source: un
Revised Toolkit Outline | UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab Skip to main content UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab Menu Inclusive Policy Markers Learning E-teams Member search Think pieces Publications Podcasts Expert advice Invite a friend Work by region Quick links About the Lab About the MOST Programme Stay connected           UNESCO.org Log in User login Username or e-mail * Password * Create new account Request new password You are here: Home » E-teams » Inclusive and Participatory Youth Policy in Southeast Asia » Discussions » Revised Toolkit Outline Inclusive and Participatory Youth Policy in Southeast Asia Public E-team SHARE THIS: Send Request To Join Overview Documents Discussions Members Join Register Ask an expert Explore the inclusive policy markers Join an e-team Invite a friend Revised Toolkit Outline Please comment on the revised toolkit outline. This outline was developed based on the piloting of the toolkit in Laos and Viet Nam, an extensive literature review and the feedback received from our networks on the draft toolkit. SHARE THIS: Comments Sue Vize 05 Sep 2018 10:05 Please find the draft outline here Attachments:  UNESCO Youth policy toolkit - outline.docx < Back to discussion list Author: Sue Vize Regional Adviser for Social and Human Sciences in Asia and the Pacific UNESCO UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab We enable knowledge co-creation and translation into inclusive policies Stay connected           Quick links About the Lab About the MOST Programme WWW.UNESCO.ORG Disclaimer of use Privacy Policy Terms of use Contact us Protection of human rights : Procedure 104 Join Register Ask an expert Explore the inclusive policy markers Join an e-team Invite a friend
Language:English
Score: 648916.8 - https://en.unesco.org/inclusivepolicylab/node/1259
Data Source: un
Revised Toolkit Outline | UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab Skip to main content UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab Menu Inclusive Policy Markers Learning E-teams Member search Think pieces Publications Podcasts Expert advice Invite a friend Work by region Quick links About the Lab About the MOST Programme Stay connected           UNESCO.org Log in User login Username or e-mail * Password * Create new account Request new password You are here: Home » E-teams » Inclusive and Participatory Youth Policy in Southeast Asia » Discussions » Revised Toolkit Outline Inclusive and Participatory Youth Policy in Southeast Asia Public E-team SHARE THIS: Send Request To Join Overview Documents Discussions Members Join Register Ask an expert Explore the inclusive policy markers Join an e-team Invite a friend Revised Toolkit Outline Please comment on the revised toolkit outline. This outline was developed based on the piloting of the toolkit in Laos and Viet Nam, an extensive literature review and the feedback received from our networks on the draft toolkit. SHARE THIS: Comments Sue Vize 05 Sep 2018 10:05 Please find the draft outline here Attachments:  UNESCO Youth policy toolkit - outline.docx < Back to discussion list Author: Sue Vize Regional Adviser for Social and Human Sciences in Asia and the Pacific UNESCO UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab We enable knowledge co-creation and translation into inclusive policies Stay connected           Quick links About the Lab About the MOST Programme WWW.UNESCO.ORG Disclaimer of use Privacy Policy Terms of use Contact us Protection of human rights : Procedure 104 Join Register Ask an expert Explore the inclusive policy markers Join an e-team Invite a friend
Language:English
Score: 648916.8 - en.unesco.org/inclusive...ssions/revised-toolkit-outline
Data Source: un
Revised Toolkit Outline | UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab Skip to main content UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab Menu Inclusive Policy Markers Learning E-teams Member search Think pieces Publications Podcasts Expert advice Invite a friend Work by region Quick links About the Lab About the MOST Programme Stay connected           UNESCO.org Log in User login Username or e-mail * Password * Create new account Request new password You are here: Home » E-teams » Inclusive and Participatory Youth Policy in Southeast Asia » Discussions » Revised Toolkit Outline Inclusive and Participatory Youth Policy in Southeast Asia Public E-team SHARE THIS: Send Request To Join Overview Documents Discussions Members Join Register Ask an expert Explore the inclusive policy markers Join an e-team Invite a friend Revised Toolkit Outline Please comment on the revised toolkit outline. This outline was developed based on the piloting of the toolkit in Laos and Viet Nam, an extensive literature review and the feedback received from our networks on the draft toolkit. SHARE THIS: Comments Sue Vize 05 Sep 2018 10:05 Please find the draft outline here Attachments:  UNESCO Youth policy toolkit - outline.docx < Back to discussion list Author: Sue Vize Regional Adviser for Social and Human Sciences in Asia and the Pacific UNESCO UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab We enable knowledge co-creation and translation into inclusive policies Stay connected           Quick links About the Lab About the MOST Programme WWW.UNESCO.ORG Disclaimer of use Privacy Policy Terms of use Contact us Protection of human rights : Procedure 104 Join Register Ask an expert Explore the inclusive policy markers Join an e-team Invite a friend
Language:English
Score: 648916.8 - https://en.unesco.org/inclusiv...ssions/revised-toolkit-outline
Data Source: un
Written feedback until 30 April, outline present at next FG-AI4H meeting 19 - 21 May, WHA ?? (...) Co-chairs: Naomi Lee, Shubs Upadhyay, Eva Weicken Writing comittee: above mentioned & Kassandra Karpathatkis, Alastair Denniston, Jane Carolan, Tommy Wilkinson, Xiao Liu Outline (Del7.4) based on contributions of ALL members Introduction WG-CE A Timeline - Where are we to date? Outline B Introduction draft outline Table of contents Introduction & Background Scoping phase Design phase Development phase Building data Testing and validation Clinical studies, safety and efficacy Economic evaluation Implementation of algorithm Ongoing monitoring Recommendations C Presentation outline draft Introduction & Background Objective: guidance for best practice evaluation, emphasis on principles of evaluation (relevance across all countries, ensure AI is safe, effective, cost-effective) Following AI life cycle and draw on existing evaluation frameworks Audience Information about the contributors/FG-AI4H Global scope, interest in evaluation that supports SDG-3 Considerations on evaluation in LMIC settings Collaboration within FG-AI4H (WGs, TGs) D Presentation outline draft Scoping Phase & Design phase Helping procurers, competent authorities, decision makers consider a structured approach.
Language:English
Score: 648583.74 - https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/f...ents/all/FGAI4H-L-040-A01.pptx
Data Source: un