On the same day, 29 July 2017, the HRO of UNSOS addressed an e-mail to the Acting
Chief of Payroll, which reads:
Thank you for the advice from Payroll’s perspective, and we appreciate your feedback.
However, in order to be fair to the staff member, may we hear consideration from the
Pension Fund itself? (...) From HR and Payroll
perspective, I understand your message.
Since the Pension Fund colleagues are in the loop on this conversation, we await to
hear their comments concerning the staff member's request.
12. (...) Hence, the e-mail of 31 July 2017, and the subsequent
clarifications, indicated that from the perspective of the Organisation the matter was closed,
but that Ms.
Language:English
Score: 470840.14
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...t/judgments/2020-UNAT-1041.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 5 August 2019, IMF/OII informed the Applicant that the allegations against
him were not substantiated and that the matter had been closed from an investigation
perspective.4
6. On 23 July 2019 and on 24 August 2019, the Applicant wrote to the UNDP
Chief of Staff and the UNDP Acting Assistant Administrator respectively, requesting
for the draft report of the investigations.5
1 Application, section II and annex 3.
2 Application, section V.
3 Application, section VII.
4 Application, annex 3.
5 Application, section VII, para. 3 and annex 4.
Language:English
Score: 464013.67
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2019-152.pdf
Data Source: oaj
From the Organisation’s perspective, it is equally poor form to
have a staff member on payroll with no functions to perform.
Language:English
Score: 455225.2
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2015-383.pdf
Data Source: oaj
By 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, 15 October 2019, the parties are to file a joint
submission in which they indicate (a) whether the perspectives for resolving the
present case informally are realistic and (b) their agreement to suspend the
proceedings;
11.
Language:English
Score: 455225.2
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...es/undt/orders/ny-2019-136.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Considering the lack of cooperation between the parties in responding to
Order No. 107 (NY/2019) and the history of the Applicant’s cases before the Dispute
Tribunal, the Tribunal sees no perspective in granting leave to the Applicant’s request
for stay of the proceedings as the parties appear completely incapable of reaching
agreement on any matters at all.
Language:English
Score: 446763.5
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...es/undt/orders/ny-2019-169.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Madi recounts the facts from his perspective and asks for a review
of the rejection of his application for EVR and the consequences of depriving him of his
retirement benefits following 21 years working with UNRWA by forcing him to resign from
UNRWA. (...) By restating the underlying facts from his perspective, Mr. Madi
is in effect simply rearguing his case before the Appeals Tribunal.
Language:English
Score: 433181.74
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...at/judgments/2018-UNAT-853.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Therefore,
from a systematic perspective those decisions do not seem to be considered as
judgments.
Language:English
Score: 430749.9
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/gva-2010-042.pdf
Data Source: oaj
From the Organisation’s
perspective, it is equally poor form to have a staff member on
payroll with no functions to perform.
Language:English
Score: 430749.9
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2014-259.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Document26.PDF
Jorge - 11/21/2000 Gender Perspectives in Telecommunications Policy
1
Gender Perspectives in Telecommunications Policy
A Curriculum Proposal
Sonia Nunes Jorge (sjorge@att.net)
Presented at
ITU – Development Symposium for Regulators Geneva
November 21, 2000
Jorge - 11/21/2000 Gender Perspectives in Telecommunications Policy
2
Overview
There is a crucial need for a gender perspective in all areas of policy making.
(...) Jorge - 11/21/2000 Gender Perspectives in Telecommunications Policy
4
Telecommunications Policy: The Rationale for a Gender Perspective
Why a gender perspective?
(...) Jorge - 11/21/2000 Gender Perspectives in Telecommunications Policy
5
Telecommunications Policy: The Rationale for a Gender Perspective
A few examples from a gender-aware perspective:
Women headed households tend to live on smaller incomes, in most cases too small to afford basic service tariffs.
Language:English
Score: 422512.5
-
https://www.itu.int/ITU-D/treg...R/DSR/documents/Document26.pdf
Data Source: un
Generic template
GBAS/SBAS IMPLEMENTATION in APAC
AUSTRALIA’S PERSPECTIVE Jorge Woods - CASA 1
PERSPECTIVES
OVERALL
GBAS
SBAS
RELATED NAV/SUR
2| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
OVERALL (1)
Aviation is self funding in Australia
Government Policy Task
o Influence infrastructure investment and operating costs at the service of society
o Whole of Government Approach
Australia
o Departments/Agencies under State Safety Program
o Industry
3| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
OVERALL (2)
Australia ‘thinks’
o Global ATM Concept (GATMOC, Doc 9854)
o Balancing GATMOC’s
• Performance Service Asset Package (PSAP) (Cir335)
• across its 11 KPA (Doc 9883)
• using the GANP
4| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
OVERALL (3)
GBAS/SBAS =
o part of Navigation Equation, which is
o part of ATM/CNS, which is
o part of Aviation Transport System, which is
o part of Transport System
5| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
GBAS
2006-2011 = SYD GBAS trials
2012(06) = SYD GBAS – restricted operators
2014(06) = SYD GBAS – all operators
o RWY: 07, 16L, 16R, 25, 34L, 34R
2017(06) = MEL GBAS – all operators
o RWY 09, 16, 27, 34
FUTURE = Potentially BN, PH and AD
6| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
SBAS
2019(Q3): Cost benefit analysis across 10 industry sectors (including aviation)
o Benefits expected = several billions AUD
Test bed indicates performance compatible with cost benefits analysis
Important to know the user base
o SBAS = potential APV to 1000 RWY Ends
7| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
RELATED NAV/SUR (1) – Context
GNSS/ADS-B mandate IFR (2013 => 2017)
Navigation Rationalization Project (NRP) (2016)
PBN
TIFP
Surveillance
ADS-B Data Sharing
8| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
RELATED NAV/SUR (1) – Context
GNSS/ADS-B mandate IFR (2013 => 2017)
o Most IFR flights GNSS as primary
o Extend surveillance coverage substantially
o Progressive Steps: 2013; 2014 (2); 2016; 2017
o GNSS/ADS-B Mandate ≠ SBAS equipped
9GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
RELATED NAV & SUR (2) Navigation Rationalisation Project (NRP) (1)
2016 – Decommissioned ~50% ground-based navaids
Backup Navaid Network (BNN):
o Allow recovery of “flight in progress” if unable to access GNSS (e.g. localized jamming; aircraft fault)
o Support aircraft without fault detection and exclusion (all SBAS receivers have FDE)
o Provide limited ongoing network capacity in the case of a sustained failure (balance between flexibility and resilience)
10| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
RELATED NAV/SUR (3) Navaid Rationalization Project (NRP)(2)
BNN Limitations
o Cost of IFR training that is not used
• E.g. recency on NDB/VOR approaches
o Proximity of alternate airports for aircraft without FDE
o Network architecture needs review
11| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
RELATED NAV/SUR (4) – PBN (1)
12| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
RELATED NAV/SUR (5) – PBN (2)
13
Navigation Specifications used in Australia
| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
RELATED NAV/SUR (6) – TIFP
Total ≈ 300 aerodromes (certified or registered)
TIFP figures (now/planned)
o Baro-VNAV ≈ 105/337
o RNP-AR ≈ 40/44
o GLS ≈ 10/18
o SBAS Potentially
• to all ≈ 1100 Runway Ends
• depending on benefits for each individual case
14| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
RELATED NAV/SUR (7)
15| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
SUR Coverage 10000 ft
RELATED NAV/SUR (8)
16| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
ADS-B Data Sharing – Australia/Indonesia
WRAP UP (1)
WE ‘THINK’
o balance ICAO Performance Service Asset Package (PSAP)
o for 11 KPA in ICAO GATMOC
o across known user base
o with stakeholders moving in synchronism
o using the GANP
o Ref: Docs 9854, 9883, Circ. 335
17| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
WRAP UP (2)
GBAS: proved net benefits in specific cases
SBAS: viable for user-base > than aviation
RELATED NAV/SUR: GBAS/SBAS within context
o navigation rationalisation and backup
o PBN, TIFP
o surveillance needs
18| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
END
19| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
SPARE SLIDES
20| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
RELATED NAV/SUR
21| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
GNSS/ADS-B Mandate – Schedule (1)
RELATED NAV/SUR
22| GBAS/SBAS Implementation in APAC - Australia’s Perspective
GNSS/ADS-B Mandate Schedule (2)
Language:English
Score: 420831.1
-
https://www.icao.int/APAC/APAC...0Perspective%20(J%20Woods).pdf
Data Source: un
