Wales, AU, 2008
Merchant 2
4
193
98
9.65
4.9
2000
2000
7
7
3 7 11 14 25 3 7 11 14 25
Pitted fruit
0.33 0.35 0.18 0.17 0.12 0.30 0.37 0.27 0.24 0.16
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.015
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Havelock, N. NZ, NZ, 2008
Lapin 2 195 16.3 1200 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.38 1.4
< 0.01 < 0.01
0.013 0.052
4 97 8.08 1200 7 7 Pitted fruit
1.4 < 0.01 0.053
Frankfurt/Oder, DE, EU, 2008
Schatten- morelle
2 192 20.0 960 7 3 7 14 21
Pitted fruit
1.8 1.5 1.2 0.96
0.031 0.029 0.029 0.031
0.040 0.048 0.043 0.044
Agárd, HU, EU, 2008
Kavics 2 194 20.0 970 7 7
Pitted fruit
0.90 0.011 0.017
Söllingen, DE, EU, 2009
Schatten- morelle
2 190 16.7 1140 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.77 0.011 < 0.01
Sulfoxaflor
1784
Application Residues (mg/kg) Location Year
Variety No g ai/ha
g ai/100L
L/ha RTI DAT Portion Sulfoxaflor X11719474 X11721061
Epila, ES, EU, 2008
Blanca 2 201 10.1 1990 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.54 0.010 0.026
Panagitsa, GR, EU, 2008
Mpakirtz-eika 2 202 16.7 1210 7 3 7 14 21
Pitted fruit
0.95 0.98 0.80 0.73
0.011 0.014 0.019 0.021
0.012 0.016 0.021 0.022
Sahorre, FR, EU, 2008
Burlat 2 199 20.1 990 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.80 < 0.01 0.044
Orefield, PA, US, 2009
Montmorency 2 205 8.63 2380 7 6 Pitted fruit
1.2 0.016 0.026
Fennville, MI, US, 2009
Sour 2 202 21.0 960 7 7 Pitted fruit
1.2 0.013 0.048
Hart, MI, US, 2009
Sour 2 202 16.3 1240 7 7 Pitted fruit
1.0 0.016 0.042
Fennville, MI, US, 2009
Sweet 2 202 21.0 960 7 3 7 14 21
Pitted fruit
0.62 0.76 0.56 0.35
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
0.010 0.018 0.013 0.012
Hart, MI, US, 2009
Sweet 2 202 16.3 1240 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.59 < 0.01 0.019
Marysville, CA, US, 2010
Brooks 2 204 16.2 1260 7 6 Pitted fruit
0.55 < 0.01 0.010
Nectarines
Table 9 Residue trials for sulfoxaflor in nectarines
Application Residues (mg/kg) Location Year
Variety No g ai/ha
g ai/100L
L/ha RTI DAT Portion Sulfoxaflor X11719474 X11721061
Shepparton, Australia, 2009
Grand Sweet
2 192 16 1200 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.12 < 0.01 < 0.01
Ardmona, Australia, 2008
A38-039 Yellow
2
4
192
96
10.7
5.33
1800
1800
8
7
3 7 14 22 3 7 14 22
Pitted fruit
0.27 0.18 0.13 0.16 0.17 0.14 0.12 0.15
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.010 < 0.01 0.011 0.010 0.013
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.011 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.061 0.010
Orange, Australia, 2008
Fairlane 2 195 9.75 2000 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.14 < 0.01 0.010
4 87 4.85 2000 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.16 < 0.01 0.010
Karragullen, Australia, 2008
Red Gold 2 197 19.7 1000 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.10 < 0.01 < 0.01
4 98 9.8 1000 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.23 0.010 0.015
Havelock, New Zealand, 2008
Red Gold 2 195 13 1500 7
7 Pitted fruit
0.11 < 0.01
0.014
4 98 6.53 1500 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.19 < 0.01 0.021
Sulfoxaflor
1785
Peaches
Table 10 Results of residue trials conducted with two (or four) applications of sulfoxaflor 240 g ai/L SC in/on peach
Application Residues (mg/kg) Location Year
Variety No g ai/ha
g ai/100L
L/ha RTI DAT Portion Sulfoxaflor X11719474 X11721061
Shepparton, Victoria, Australia, 2008
Taylor Queen
2
4
194
97
10.8
5.4
1800
1800
7
7
3 7 14 28 3 7 14 28
Pitted fruit
0.34 0.22 0.20 0.24 0.22 0.16 0.23 0.14
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.011 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.013 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.011 < 0.01
Orange, New South Wales, Australia, 2008
O’Henry 2 194 9.7 2000 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.27 < 0.01 0.021
4 98 4.9 2000 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.13 < 0.01 0.014
Karragullen, W- Australia, 2008
Rich Lady 2 190 19 1000 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.15 < 0.01 0.010
4 97 9.7 1000 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.15 < 0.01 0.018
Havelock, North New Zealand, 2008
Golden Queen
2 192 10.7 1800 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.14 < 0.01 < 0.01
4 97 5.4 1800 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.10 < 0.01 < 0.01
Ballandean, Queensland, Australia, 2009
Diamond Princess
2 194 19.4 1000 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.012 < 0.01 < 0.01
Shadforth, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
O’Henry 2 198 19.8 1000 7 3 7 14
Pitted fruit
0.18 0.10 0.11
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
0.022 0.010 0.014
Toolamba, Victoria, Australia, 2010
September Snow
2 199 16.6 1200 7 8 Pitted fruit
0.12 < 0.01 0.010
Yering, Victoria, Australia, 2009
Royal Gem 2 192 16 1200 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.11 < 0.01 0.016
Szekesfehervar, Hungary, EU, 2008
Padana 2 198 20 990 7 3 8 14 21
Pitted fruit
0.64 0.36 0.22 0.14
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
0.040 0.029 0.024 0.019
Pfinztal-Sollingen, Germaney, EU, 2008
South Have 2 197 22.2 890 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.20 < 0.01 0.010
Corbere, France, EU, 2008
Corindon 2 203 20.0 1020 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.54 0.010 0.022
Quatretonda, Spain, EU, 2008
Federica 2 202 9.99 2020 7 3 7 14 21
Pitted fruit
0.49 0.27 0.25 0.12
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
0.017 0.017 0.018 0.013
Barbiano, Italy, EU, 2008
Sweet Red 2 198 13.4 1480 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.21 < 0.01 < 0.01
Lakka, Greece, EU, 2009
Andross 2 210 13.4 1570 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.83 < 0.01 0.012
Orefield, PA, USA, 2008
Glen Glow 2 202 7.18 2820 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.90 < 0.01 < 0.01
Montezuma,GA, USA, 2008
Flame Prince
2 202 21.4 940 7 4 7 10 14
Pitted fruit
0.058 0.032 0.032 0.028
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Sulfoxaflor
1786
Application Residues (mg/kg) Location Year
Variety No g ai/ha
g ai/100L
L/ha RTI DAT Portion Sulfoxaflor X11719474 X11721061
Barney, GA, USA, 2008
Suwane 2 202 21.0 960 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.054 < 0.01 < 0.01
Blissfield, MI, USA, 2008
TNR 31 2 202 10.1 1990 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.17 < 0.01 0.017
Vernon, TX, USA, 2008
Loring 2 203 17.1 1180 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.14 < 0.01 < 0.01
Sanger, CA, USA, 2008
Tra-Zee 2 203 14.3 1420 7 6 Pitted fruit
0.12 < 0.01 < 0.01
Apricots
Table 11 Results of residue trials conducted with two (or four) applications of sulfoxaflor 240 g ai/L SC in/on apricots
Application Residues (mg/kg) Location Year
Variety No g ai/ha
g ai/100L
L/ha RTI DAT Portion Sulfoxaflor X11719474 X11721061
Shepparton, Victoria, Australia 2008
Trevatt
2
4
193
97
14.8
7.5
1300
1300
7
7
0 3 7 10 0 3 7 10
Pitted fruit
0.70 0.46 0.42 0.40 0.29 0.22 0.18 0.28
< 0.01 < 0.01 0.011 0.010 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
0.026 0.036 0.039 0.043 0.011 0.011 0.017 0.024
Hastings, Hawkes Bay, New Zealand 2008
Sundrop 2
190 9.5 2000 7
7
Pitted fruit
0.15 < 0.01
< 0.01
4 95 4.8 2000 7 7 Pitted fruit
0.17 < 0.01 < 0.01
Plums
Table 12 Results of residue trials conducted with two applications of sulfoxaflor 240 g ai/L SC in/on plum
Application Residues (mg/kg) Location Year
Variety No g ai/ha g ai/100L
L/ha RTI DAT Portion Sulfoxaflor X11719474 X11721061
Nashdale, Australia, 2009
Autumn Giant
2 192 19.2 1000 7 3 7 14 28
Fruit, pitted
0.040 0.020 < 0.01 < 0.01
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Blissfield, MI, USA, 2009
NS
2
2
208 [240 SC]
202 [500 WDG]
6.93
15.7
3000
1280
7
7
1 3 7 14 1 3 7 14
Fruit, pitted
0.27 0.27 0.21 0.26 0.37 0.39 0.36 0.31
< 0.01 < 0.01 0.011 0.014 0.012 0.014 0.015 0.017
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Fresno, CA, USA, 2009
NE Flavor
2 203 [240 SC]
10.8 1880 7 7 Fruit, pitted
0.062 < 0.01 < 0.01
Sulfoxaflor
1787
Application Residues (mg/kg) Location Year
Variety No g ai/ha g ai/100L
L/ha RTI DAT Portion Sulfoxaflor X11719474 X11721061
2 202 [500
WDG] 10.8 1870 7 7 Fruit,
pitted 0.090 < 0.01 < 0.01
Porterville, CA, USA, 2009
NE Fortune
2 203 [240 SC]
12.3
12.3
1650
1660
7 7 Fruit, pitted
0.044
< 0.01 < 0.01
2 204 [500
WDG] 12.3 1660 7 7 Fruit,
pitted 0.066 < 0.01 < 0.01
Monmouth, OR, USA, 2008
Moyer
2 200 [240 SC]
13.8 1450 7 7 Fruit, pitted
0.045
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
2 201 [500
WDG] 13.8 1460 7 7 Fruit,
pitted 0.054 < 0.01 < 0.01
Dinuba, CA, USA, 2008
Black Fryers
2 202 [240 SC]
10.6 1900 7 7 Fruit, pitted
0.030 < 0.01 < 0.01
2 205 [500
WDG] 10.6 1940 7 7 Fruit,
pitted 0.017 < 0.01 < 0.01
Lindsay, CA, USA 2009
Angelina’s
2 202 [240 SC]
20.9 960
7 7 Fruit, pitted
0.11 < 0.01 < 0.01
2 201 [500
WDG] 20.8 960 7 7 Fruit,
pitted 0.11 < 0.01 < 0.01
Tree nuts
Almonds
Table 13 Residue trials for sulfoxaflor in almonds
Application Residues (mg/kg) Location Year
Variety No g ai/ha L/ha RTI DAT Portion Sulfoxaflor X11719474 X11721061
Sanger, CA USA 2008
Ne Plus
2 202 1280
7 7
nutmeat
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
Kerman, CA USA 2008
Carmels 2 205 1870 7 3 7 14 21
nutmeat
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Visalia, CA USA 2008
Non-Pareil
2 200 1870
7 7
nutmeat
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
Madera, CA USA 2008
Non-Pareil
2 200 1880
7 7
nutmeat
0.012
< 0.01
< 0.01
Madera, CA USA 2008
Butte
2 203 1870
7 7
nutmeat
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
Terra Bella, CA 2008
Monterey 2 202 2980 7 7
nutmeat
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
Sulfoxaflor
1788
Pecans
Table 14 Residue trials for sulfoxaflor in pecans
Application Residues (mg/kg) Location Year
Variety No g ai/ha L/ha RTI DAT Portion Sulfoxaflor X11719474 X11721061
Chula, GA, USA, 2009
Summer 2 202 1280 7 3 7 14 21
nutmeat < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
< 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Scooterville, GA, USA, 2009
Summer 2 202 1280 7 7 nutmeat < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Sycamore, GA, USA, 2009
Summer 2 202 1270 7 7 nutmeat < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Lonoke, AR, USA, 2009
Native/Stuart 2 202 960 7 7 nutmeat < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Madill, OK, USA, 2009
Desirable 2 204 1140 7 7 nutmeat < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Claytonville, TX, USA, 2009
Choctaw 2 204 1140 7 7 nutmeat < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Animal Feeds
Table 15 Results of residue trials conducted with two applications of sulfoxaflor 240 g ai/L SC in/on almond hulls in the USA in 2008
Application Residues (mg/kg) Location Year
Variety No g ai/ha L/ha RTI DAT Portion Sulfoxaflor X11719474 X11721061
Sanger, CA USA 2008
Ne Plus
2 202 1280
7 7
hulls
3.1
0.097 0.15
Kerman, CA USA 2008
Carmels 2 205 1870 7 3 7 14 21
hulls
2.1 1.7 2.2 1.6
0.032 0.033 0.043 0.039
0.09 0.093 0.13 0.13
Visalia, CA USA 2008
Non-Pareil
2 200 1870
7 7 hulls
1.5 0.039 0.078
Madera, CA USA 2008
Non-Pareil
2 200 1880
7 7
hulls
1.2 0.028 0.047
Madera, CA USA 2008
Butte
2 203 1870
7 7
hulls
1.5 0.028 0.090
Terra Bella, CA 2008
Monterey 2 202 2980 7 7
hulls
2.2 0.040 0.14
APPRAISAL
Sulfoxaflor was first evaluated for residues and toxicological aspects by the 2011 JMPR. (...) Sulfoxaflor
1794
Calculated processing factors are summarized in the following table based on the JMPR 2014 recommendations for MRLs and STMRs.
Language:English
Score: 1599641.8
-
https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/...R/Evaluation14/Sulfoxaflor.pdf
Data Source: un