2019 OIAI Audit Report on the Private Fundraising and Partnerships Division (PFP) | UNICEF Internal Audit and Investigations
Skip to main content
Internal Audit and Investigations
Toggle navigation
Global Links
Visit UNICEF Global
High contrast
Internal Audit and Investigations
Main navigation
About us
Internal audit
Investigations
Search area has closed.
(...) Search Close
Search UNICEF
Fulltext search
Max
Document
2019 OIAI Audit Report on the Private Fundraising and Partnerships Division (PFP)
About
The audit, in April 2019, reviewed UNICEF's Private Fundraising and Partnerships (PFP) Division.
Download document
Download file
(PDF, 347,27 KB)
Related topics
Data and Reports
Audit and investigations
Global
2019 reports
Headquarters, regional office and thematic reports
More to explore
Footer
OIAI Home
About us
OIAI Charter
Internal Audit
Internal Audit reports
Investigations
Annual Reports
Related sites and standards
Uniform Principles and Guidelines for Investigations
Evaluation
About UNICEF
What UNICEF does
Where UNICEF works
UNICEF publications
Press centre
UNICEF Data
Transparency and accountability
Work for UNICEF
Footer Secondary
Legal
Terms of Use
Footer tertiary
Report fraud, abuse, wrongdoing
Language:English
Score: 859404.3
-
https://www.unicef.org/auditan...-and-partnerships-division-pfp
Data Source: un
Правовые ресурсы
According the Act XIX of 1998 on the criminal procedure (CPA), an aggrieved party, substitute private prosecutor, private party, other interested party as well as the representatives thereof are participants of the criminal proceedings.
(...) In connection with terrorism, the aggrieved party may act as substitute private prosecutor or private party, depending on the circumstances of the concrete case.
Aggrieved party may act as a substitute private prosecutor if a) the prosecutor or the investigating authority rejected the report or terminated the investigation; b) the prosecutor partly set aside the indictment; c) the prosecutor dropped the charge; d) as a result of the investigation, the prosecutor did not establish the commission of any criminal offence that should be prosecuted based on public prosecution, consequently neither he/she filed an indictment, nor did he/she take over the representation of the indictment as a result of an investigation ordered in a procedure initiated by private prosecution; e) the prosecutor dropped the charge at trial because in his judgment, the criminal offence should not be prosecuted based on public prosecution.
Language:English
Score: 838422.9
-
https://www.un.org/victimsofterrorism/ru/node/694
Data Source: un
Legal Resources available to Victims
According the Act XIX of 1998 on the criminal procedure (CPA), an aggrieved party, substitute private prosecutor, private party, other interested party as well as the representatives thereof are participants of the criminal proceedings.
(...) In connection with terrorism, the aggrieved party may act as substitute private prosecutor or private party, depending on the circumstances of the concrete case.
Aggrieved party may act as a substitute private prosecutor if a) the prosecutor or the investigating authority rejected the report or terminated the investigation; b) the prosecutor partly set aside the indictment; c) the prosecutor dropped the charge; d) as a result of the investigation, the prosecutor did not establish the commission of any criminal offence that should be prosecuted based on public prosecution, consequently neither he/she filed an indictment, nor did he/she take over the representation of the indictment as a result of an investigation ordered in a procedure initiated by private prosecution; e) the prosecutor dropped the charge at trial because in his judgment, the criminal offence should not be prosecuted based on public prosecution.
Language:English
Score: 838422.9
-
https://www.un.org/victimsofterrorism/en/node/694
Data Source: un
الموارد القانونية المتاحة للضحايا
According the Act XIX of 1998 on the criminal procedure (CPA), an aggrieved party, substitute private prosecutor, private party, other interested party as well as the representatives thereof are participants of the criminal proceedings.
(...) In connection with terrorism, the aggrieved party may act as substitute private prosecutor or private party, depending on the circumstances of the concrete case.
Aggrieved party may act as a substitute private prosecutor if a) the prosecutor or the investigating authority rejected the report or terminated the investigation; b) the prosecutor partly set aside the indictment; c) the prosecutor dropped the charge; d) as a result of the investigation, the prosecutor did not establish the commission of any criminal offence that should be prosecuted based on public prosecution, consequently neither he/she filed an indictment, nor did he/she take over the representation of the indictment as a result of an investigation ordered in a procedure initiated by private prosecution; e) the prosecutor dropped the charge at trial because in his judgment, the criminal offence should not be prosecuted based on public prosecution.
Language:English
Score: 838422.9
-
https://www.un.org/victimsofterrorism/ar/node/694
Data Source: un
Recursos legales disponibles para las víctimas
According the Act XIX of 1998 on the criminal procedure (CPA), an aggrieved party, substitute private prosecutor, private party, other interested party as well as the representatives thereof are participants of the criminal proceedings.
(...) In connection with terrorism, the aggrieved party may act as substitute private prosecutor or private party, depending on the circumstances of the concrete case.
Aggrieved party may act as a substitute private prosecutor if a) the prosecutor or the investigating authority rejected the report or terminated the investigation; b) the prosecutor partly set aside the indictment; c) the prosecutor dropped the charge; d) as a result of the investigation, the prosecutor did not establish the commission of any criminal offence that should be prosecuted based on public prosecution, consequently neither he/she filed an indictment, nor did he/she take over the representation of the indictment as a result of an investigation ordered in a procedure initiated by private prosecution; e) the prosecutor dropped the charge at trial because in his judgment, the criminal offence should not be prosecuted based on public prosecution.
Language:English
Score: 834189.7
-
https://www.un.org/victimsofterrorism/es/node/694
Data Source: un
Ressources juridiques disponibles pour les victimes
According the Act XIX of 1998 on the criminal procedure (CPA), an aggrieved party, substitute private prosecutor, private party, other interested party as well as the representatives thereof are participants of the criminal proceedings.
(...) In connection with terrorism, the aggrieved party may act as substitute private prosecutor or private party, depending on the circumstances of the concrete case.
Aggrieved party may act as a substitute private prosecutor if a) the prosecutor or the investigating authority rejected the report or terminated the investigation; b) the prosecutor partly set aside the indictment; c) the prosecutor dropped the charge; d) as a result of the investigation, the prosecutor did not establish the commission of any criminal offence that should be prosecuted based on public prosecution, consequently neither he/she filed an indictment, nor did he/she take over the representation of the indictment as a result of an investigation ordered in a procedure initiated by private prosecution; e) the prosecutor dropped the charge at trial because in his judgment, the criminal offence should not be prosecuted based on public prosecution.
Language:English
Score: 834189.7
-
https://www.un.org/victimsofterrorism/fr/node/694
Data Source: un
Even if Article 14 required a pass-through analysis, the Panel did not find any reason that the investigating authority had acted inconsistently, based on the evidence.6
1.3 Article 14(a): "usual investment practice … of private investors"
1.3.1 General
7. (...) Thus, we understand the term 'usual practice' to describe common or customary conduct of private investors in respect of equity investment.
(...) In our view, it would not be correct to conclude that any loan made by the government (or by private lenders in a market dominated by the government) would ipso facto not be 'commercial'.
Language:English
Score: 832081.3
-
https://www.wto.org/english/re...ai17_e/subsidies_art14_jur.pdf
Data Source: un
Julie Makani, Professor and Principal Investigator for Sickle Cell Disease programme, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Tanzania
Mr. (...) Shah reshaped the $20 billion agency’s operations in more than 70 countries around the world by elevating the role of innovation, creating high-impact public-private partnerships, and focusing US investments to deliver stronger results. (...) Shah founded Latitude Capital, a private equity firm focused on power and infrastructure projects in Africa and Asia and served as a Distinguished Fellow in Residence at Georgetown University.
Language:English
Score: 827737.3
-
https://sdgs.un.org/events/welcome-and-opening-32695
Data Source: un
Julie Makani, Professor and Principal Investigator for Sickle Cell Disease programme, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Tanzania
Mr. (...) Shah reshaped the $20 billion agency’s operations in more than 70 countries around the world by elevating the role of innovation, creating high-impact public-private partnerships, and focusing US investments to deliver stronger results. (...) Shah founded Latitude Capital, a private equity firm focused on power and infrastructure projects in Africa and Asia and served as a Distinguished Fellow in Residence at Georgetown University.
Language:English
Score: 827737.3
-
https://sdgs.un.org/ru/node/32695
Data Source: un
Julie Makani, Professor and Principal Investigator for Sickle Cell Disease programme, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Tanzania
Mr. (...) Shah reshaped the $20 billion agency’s operations in more than 70 countries around the world by elevating the role of innovation, creating high-impact public-private partnerships, and focusing US investments to deliver stronger results. (...) Shah founded Latitude Capital, a private equity firm focused on power and infrastructure projects in Africa and Asia and served as a Distinguished Fellow in Residence at Georgetown University.
Language:English
Score: 827737.3
-
https://sdgs.un.org/ar/node/32695
Data Source: un
