Home

  Gender equality: What causes gender gaps in the labour market?

In developing countries, the probability of participating in the workforce increases by 7.8 per cent; in emerging, by 6.4 per cent; in ASNA, two regions with the widest gap in participation rates, the probability increases further, at 12.9 per cent. (...) In ASNA countries, it decreases the probability to participate by 6.2 percentage points; in developing countries by 4.8 percentage points; and in developed countries by 4.0 percentage points. (...) In developing countries, the probability to participate is substantially reduced by religion, a proxy indicator for more restrictive gender role conformity.

Score: 719400.8 - https://www.ilo.org/moscow/new...WCMS_566891/lang--en/index.htm

  Banking Concentration and Financial Crises

Lerner(-1) 2.669 0.355 URW_(-1) -0.303381 0.143294 -2.1172 0.0342 URW_(-1) -0.267395 0.121881 -2.193902 0.0282 URW_(-1) -0.258462 0.123532 -2.092276 0.0364 URW_(-1) -0.248859 0.121974 -2.040252 0.0413 Lerner -2.816 -2.296 -2.032 RRHPG_(-3) 15.05243 4.929786 3.053363 0.0023 RRHPG_(-3) 14.29347 4.875007 2.931989 0.0034 RRHPG_(-3) 15.35146 4.98456 3.079802 0.0021 RRHPG_(-3) 14.93972 4.882185 3.060047 0.0022 0.015 0.019 0.031 Boone(-1) 0.795 0.195 Boone -1.327 -0.791 0.114 0.289 _5BANK(-1) -0.027754 0.009823 -2.825503 0.0047 _5BANK(-1) -0.030247 0.009238 -3.274005 0.0011 _5BANK(-1) -0.026335 0.009577 -2.749887 0.006 _5BANK(-1) -0.026837 0.009456 -2.838001 0.0045 Area Under Curve (AUC) LERNER(-1) 2.669226 2.886136 0.924844 0.355 BOONE(-1) 0.79459 0.613244 1.295715 0.1951 LERNER -2.29624 0.981724 -2.338987 0.0193 LERNER -2.032165 0.942478 -2.156193 0.0311 Direct Call Ratio (DCR) 10 of 13 9 of 13 9 of 13 9 of 13 LERNER -2.815504 1.156062 -2.435426 0.0149 BOONE -1.327243 0.839931 -1.580181 0.1141 BOONE -0.79118 0.745733 -1.060943 0.2887 False Call Ratio % (FCR) 23.08 30.7 27.66 28.27 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 S.E. of regression 0.190344 Akaike info criterion 0.313 S.E. of regression 0.187729 Akaike info criterion 0.316544 S.E. of regression 0.189146 Akaike info criterion 0.311182 S.E. of regression 0.189216 Akaike info criterion 0.310503 Sum squared resid 12.20982 Schwarz criterion 0.369064 Sum squared resid 11.87664 Schwarz criterion 0.372608 Sum squared resid 12.05663 Schwarz criterion 0.367247 Sum squared resid 12.10135 Schwarz criterion 0.355354 Log likelihood -48.52294 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.335334 Log likelihood -49.12897 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.338878 Log likelihood -48.21217 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.333517 Log likelihood -49.09595 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.32837 Deviance 97.04589 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 98.25794 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 96.42434 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 98.19191 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Avg. log likelihood -0.14188 Avg. log likelihood -0.143652 Avg. log likelihood -0.140971 Avg. log likelihood -0.143555 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Equation: T3C1 Equation: T3C2 Equation: T3C3 Equation: T3C4 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:00 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:03 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:05 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:08 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total P(Dep=1)<=C 229 3 232 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 228 4 232 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 238 4 242 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 236 4 240 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)>C 100 10 110 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 101 9 110 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 91 9 100 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 93 9 102 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 229 10 239 0 13 13 Correct 228 9 237 0 13 13 Correct 238 9 247 0 13 13 Correct 236 9 245 0 13 13 % Correct 69.6 76.92 69.88 0 100 3.8 % Correct 69.3 69.23 69.3 0 100 3.8 % Correct 72.34 69.23 72.22 0 100 3.8 % Correct 71.73 69.23 71.64 0 100 3.8 % Incorrect 30.4 23.08 30.12 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 30.7 30.77 30.7 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 27.66 30.77 27.78 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 28.27 30.77 28.36 100 0 96.2 Total Gain* 69.6 -23.08 66.08 Total Gain* 69.3 -30.77 65.5 Total Gain* 72.34 -30.77 68.42 Total Gain* 71.73 -30.77 67.84 Percent Gain** 69.6 NA 68.69 Percent Gain** 69.3 NA 68.09 Percent Gain** 72.34 NA 71.12 Percent Gain** 71.73 NA 70.52 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total E(# of Dep=0) 317 11.94 328.94 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 316.97 11.75 328.72 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 317.12 11.88 329 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 317 11.96 328.96 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=1) 12 1.06 13.06 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 12.03 1.25 13.28 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 11.88 1.12 13 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 12 1.04 13.04 12.51 0.49 13 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 317 1.06 318.06 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 316.97 1.25 318.23 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 317.12 1.12 318.24 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 317 1.04 318.04 316.49 0.49 316.99 % Correct 96.35 8.13 93 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.34 9.63 93.05 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.39 8.6 93.05 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.35 7.99 92.99 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Incorrect 3.65 91.87 7 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.66 90.37 6.95 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.61 91.4 6.95 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.65 92.01 7.01 3.8 96.2 7.31 Total Gain* 0.15 4.33 0.31 Total Gain* 0.15 5.83 0.36 Total Gain* 0.19 4.8 0.37 Total Gain* 0.15 4.19 0.31 Percent Gain** 4.05 4.5 4.28 Percent Gain** 3.83 6.06 4.95 Percent Gain** 5 4.99 4.99 Percent Gain** 4.04 4.36 4.2 *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation newtab3 nt3c1 nt3c2 t2c3 t2c3 Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV 0.0380116959 Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Sample: 1999 2016 Base Concentration Preferred No Capital 0.0380116959 Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:05 Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:11 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:49 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:53 Capital(-1) -0.668 -0.284 -0.266 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 0.000 0.023 0.026 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Real House Price Growth (-3) 10.990 14.441 14.454 12.300 Convergence achieved after 9 iterations Convergence achieved after 9 iterations Convergence achieved after 7 iterations Convergence achieved after 8 iterations 0.013 0.003 0.002 0.006 Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Bank Concentration 0.035 (5 bank) 0.479 Variable Coefficient Std. (...) Bank Concentration(-1) -0.063 -0.030 -0.047 0 (5 bank) 0.191 0.001 0.000 URW_(-1) -0.667718 0.075199 -8.87939 0 URW_(-1) -0.284358 0.125173 -2.271712 0.0231 URW_(-1) -0.266372 0.119928 -2.221097 0.0263 Area Under Curve (AUC) 0.702 0.747 0.714 0.681 RRHPG_(-3) 10.99034 4.417768 2.487758 0.0129 RRHPG_(-3) 14.44131 4.785363 3.017809 0.0025 RRHPG_(-3) 14.45436 4.760918 3.036045 0.0024 RRHPG_(-3) 12.29988 4.513267 2.725273 0.0064 Direct Call Ratio (DCR) 9 of 13 9of 13 9 of 13 7 of 13 _5BANK 0.034631 0.048918 0.707945 0.479 False Call Ratio % (FCR) 39.82 31.61 31.31 29.79 _5BANK(-1) -0.063204 0.048275 -1.309236 0.1905 _5BANK(-1) -0.029544 0.00902 -3.275292 0.0011 _5BANK(-1) -0.046886 0.00527 -8.896317 0 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 S.E. of regression 0.192644 Akaike info criterion 0.333824 S.E. of regression 0.189964 Akaike info criterion 0.317133 S.E. of regression 0.189496 Akaike info criterion 0.312737 S.E. of regression 0.193902 Akaike info criterion 0.327353 Sum squared resid 12.61797 Schwarz criterion 0.356249 Sum squared resid 12.19713 Schwarz criterion 0.361985 Sum squared resid 12.17304 Schwarz criterion 0.346376 Sum squared resid 12.78331 Schwarz criterion 0.349779 Log likelihood -55.08383 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.342757 Log likelihood -50.22973 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.335001 Log likelihood -50.47801 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.326138 Log likelihood -53.97745 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.336287 Deviance 110.1677 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 100.4595 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 100.956 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 107.9549 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Avg. log likelihood -0.161064 Avg. log likelihood -0.146871 Avg. log likelihood -0.147597 Avg. log likelihood -0.157829 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Equation: NT3C1 Equation: NT3C2 Equation: T2C3 Equation: T2C4 Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:07 Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:13 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:51 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:54 Success cutoff: C = 0.038012 Success cutoff: C = 0.038012 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total P(Dep=1)<=C 226 4 230 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 198 4 202 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)<=C 225 4 229 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 103 9 112 329 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 231 6 237 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)>C 131 9 140 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)>C 104 9 113 0 0 0 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 98 7 105 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 226 9 235 0 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 198 9 207 329 0 329 Correct 225 9 234 329 0 329 % Correct 68.69 69.23 68.71 0 13 13 Correct 231 7 238 0 13 13 % Correct 60.18 69.23 60.53 100 0 96.2 % Correct 68.39 69.23 68.42 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 31.31 30.77 31.29 100 100 3.8 % Correct 70.21 53.85 69.59 0 100 3.8 % Incorrect 39.82 30.77 39.47 0 100 3.8 % Incorrect 31.61 30.77 31.58 0 100 3.8 Total Gain* 68.69 -30.77 64.91 0 96.2 % Incorrect 29.79 46.15 30.41 100 0 96.2 Total Gain* -39.82 69.23 -35.67 Total Gain* -31.61 69.23 -27.78 Percent Gain** 68.69 NA 67.48 Total Gain* 70.21 -46.15 65.79 Percent Gain** NA 69.23 -938.46 Percent Gain** NA 69.23 -730.77 Percent Gain** 70.21 NA 68.39 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total 316.65 12.02 328.66 316.49 E(# of Dep=0) 314.49 11.99 326.48 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 316.6 11.98 328.58 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=1) 12.35 0.98 13.34 12.51 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 314.48 11.86 326.34 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=1) 14.51 1.01 15.52 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 12.4 1.02 13.42 12.51 0.49 13 Total 329 13 342 329 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 14.52 1.14 15.66 12.51 0.49 13 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 316.65 0.98 317.63 316.49 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 314.49 1.01 315.5 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 316.6 1.02 317.62 316.49 0.49 316.99 % Correct 96.25 7.56 92.87 96.2 0.49 316.99 Correct 314.48 1.14 315.62 316.49 0.49 316.99 % Correct 95.59 7.74 92.25 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.23 7.84 92.87 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Incorrect 3.75 92.44 7.13 3.8 3.8 92.69 % Correct 95.59 8.75 92.29 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Incorrect 4.41 92.26 7.75 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.77 92.16 7.13 3.8 96.2 7.31 Total Gain* 0.05 3.76 0.19 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 4.41 91.25 7.71 3.8 96.2 7.31 Total Gain* -0.61 3.94 -0.44 Total Gain* 0.03 4.04 0.18 Percent Gain** 1.22 3.91 2.57 Total Gain* -0.61 4.95 -0.4 Percent Gain** -16.03 4.1 -5.96 Percent Gain** 0.85 4.2 2.52 Percent Gain** -16.12 5.15 -5.48 *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation new2 Dependent Variable: _5BANK Dependent Variable: LERNER Dependent Variable: BOONE Method: Panel Least Squares Method: Panel Least Squares Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 06/09/19 Time: 11:49 Date: 05/05/19 Time: 17:30 Date: 05/05/19 Time: 17:28 Sample (adjusted): 1995 2016 Sample (adjusted): 1995 2016 Sample (adjusted): 1995 2016 Periods included: 22 Periods included: 22 Periods included: 20 Cross-sections included: 19 Cross-sections included: 19 Cross-sections included: 19 Total panel (balanced) observations: 418 Total panel (balanced) observations: 418 Total panel (balanced) observations: 380 Variable Coefficient Std. (...) Lerner(-1) 2.669 0.355 URW_(-1) -0.303381 0.143294 -2.1172 0.0342 URW_(-1) -0.267395 0.121881 -2.193902 0.0282 URW_(-1) -0.258462 0.123532 -2.092276 0.0364 URW_(-1) -0.248859 0.121974 -2.040252 0.0413 Lerner -2.816 -2.296 -2.032 RRHPG_(-3) 15.05243 4.929786 3.053363 0.0023 RRHPG_(-3) 14.29347 4.875007 2.931989 0.0034 RRHPG_(-3) 15.35146 4.98456 3.079802 0.0021 RRHPG_(-3) 14.93972 4.882185 3.060047 0.0022 0.015 0.019 0.031 Boone(-1) 0.795 0.195 Boone -1.327 -0.791 0.114 0.289 _5BANK(-1) -0.027754 0.009823 -2.825503 0.0047 _5BANK(-1) -0.030247 0.009238 -3.274005 0.0011 _5BANK(-1) -0.026335 0.009577 -2.749887 0.006 _5BANK(-1) -0.026837 0.009456 -2.838001 newtab4 Area Under Curve (AUC) LERNER(-1) 2.669226 2.886136 0.924844 0.355 BOONE(-1) 0.79459 0.613244 1.295715 0.1951 LERNER -2.29624 0.981724 -2.338987 0.0193 LERNER -2.032165 0.942478 -2.156193 0.0311 Direct Call Ratio (DCR) 10 of 13 9 of 13 9 of 13 9 of 13 LERNER -2.815504 1.156062 -2.435426 0.0149 BOONE -1.327243 0.839931 -1.580181 0.1141 BOONE -0.79118 0.745733 -1.060943 0.2887 False Call Ratio % (FCR) 23.08 30.7 27.66 28.27 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 Mean dependent var 0.038012 S.D. dependent var 0.191505 S.E. of regression 0.190344 Akaike info criterion 0.313 S.E. of regression 0.187729 Akaike info criterion 0.316544 S.E. of regression 0.189146 Akaike info criterion 0.311182 S.E. of regression 0.189216 Akaike info criterion 0.310503 Sum squared resid 12.20982 Schwarz criterion 0.369064 Sum squared resid 11.87664 Schwarz criterion 0.372608 Sum squared resid 12.05663 Schwarz criterion 0.367247 Sum squared resid 12.10135 Schwarz criterion 0.355354 Log likelihood -48.52294 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.335334 Log likelihood -49.12897 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.338878 Log likelihood -48.21217 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.333517 Log likelihood -49.09595 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.32837 Deviance 97.04589 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 98.25794 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 96.42434 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Deviance 98.19191 Restr. deviance 110.5159 Avg. log likelihood -0.14188 Avg. log likelihood -0.143652 Avg. log likelihood -0.140971 Avg. log likelihood -0.143555 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=0 329 Total obs 342 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Obs with Dep=1 13 Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification Equation: T3C1 Equation: T3C2 Equation: T3C3 Equation: T3C4 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:00 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:03 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:05 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:08 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Success cutoff: C = 0.038 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total P(Dep=1)<=C 229 3 232 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 228 4 232 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 238 4 242 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)<=C 236 4 240 0 0 0 P(Dep=1)>C 100 10 110 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 101 9 110 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 91 9 100 329 13 342 P(Dep=1)>C 93 9 102 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 229 10 239 0 13 13 Correct 228 9 237 0 13 13 Correct 238 9 247 0 13 13 Correct 236 9 245 0 13 13 % Correct 69.6 76.92 69.88 0 100 3.8 % Correct 69.3 69.23 69.3 0 100 3.8 % Correct 72.34 69.23 72.22 0 100 3.8 % Correct 71.73 69.23 71.64 0 100 3.8 % Incorrect 30.4 23.08 30.12 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 30.7 30.77 30.7 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 27.66 30.77 27.78 100 0 96.2 % Incorrect 28.27 30.77 28.36 100 0 96.2 Total Gain* 69.6 -23.08 66.08 Total Gain* 69.3 -30.77 65.5 Total Gain* 72.34 -30.77 68.42 Total Gain* 71.73 -30.77 67.84 Percent Gain** 69.6 NA 68.69 Percent Gain** 69.3 NA 68.09 Percent Gain** 72.34 NA 71.12 Percent Gain** 71.73 NA 70.52 Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Estimated Equation Constant Probability Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total Dep=0 Dep=1 Total E(# of Dep=0) 317 11.94 328.94 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 316.97 11.75 328.72 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 317.12 11.88 329 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=0) 317 11.96 328.96 316.49 12.51 329 E(# of Dep=1) 12 1.06 13.06 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 12.03 1.25 13.28 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 11.88 1.12 13 12.51 0.49 13 E(# of Dep=1) 12 1.04 13.04 12.51 0.49 13 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Total 329 13 342 329 13 342 Correct 317 1.06 318.06 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 316.97 1.25 318.23 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 317.12 1.12 318.24 316.49 0.49 316.99 Correct 317 1.04 318.04 316.49 0.49 316.99 % Correct 96.35 8.13 93 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.34 9.63 93.05 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.39 8.6 93.05 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Correct 96.35 7.99 92.99 96.2 3.8 92.69 % Incorrect 3.65 91.87 7 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.66 90.37 6.95 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.61 91.4 6.95 3.8 96.2 7.31 % Incorrect 3.65 92.01 7.01 3.8 96.2 7.31 Total Gain* 0.15 4.33 0.31 Total Gain* 0.15 5.83 0.36 Total Gain* 0.19 4.8 0.37 Total Gain* 0.15 4.19 0.31 Percent Gain** 4.05 4.5 4.28 Percent Gain** 3.83 6.06 4.95 Percent Gain** 5 4.99 4.99 Percent Gain** 4.04 4.36 4.2 *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification *Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation **Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation newtab3 nt3c1 nt3c2 t2c3 t2c3 Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV Dependent Variable: CRISLV 0.0380116959 Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Sample: 1999 2016 Base Concentration Preferred No Capital 0.0380116959 Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:05 Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:11 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:49 Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:53 Capital(-1) -0.668 -0.284 -0.266 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 Sample: 1999 2016 0.000 0.023 0.026 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Included observations: 342 Real House Price Growth (-3) 10.990 14.441 14.454 12.300 Convergence achieved after 9 iterations Convergence achieved after 9 iterations Convergence achieved after 7 iterations Convergence achieved after 8 iterations 0.013 0.003 0.002 0.006 Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Bank

Score: 719128.6 - https://www.un.org/development...2019LINK-Monday-Session4-A.pdf

  SITUATION GENERALE en JUIN 1991

LIBYE, MAROC et TUNISIE Aucun développement significatif n'est probable. SOUDAN Des criquets épars sont probablement présents dans quelques zones des provinces du Nord Darfour, Nord Kordofan et Nil Blanc, et ils se reproduiront dans les zones recevant des pluies. (...) YÉMEN Il est probable que des adultes isolés persistent dans le Wadi Hadramaut et se reproduisent si des pluies arrivent. (...) AFGHANISTAN et IRAN Aucun développement significatif n'est probable. 4 juillet 1991 6

Score: 718980.37 - https://www.fao.org/ag/locusts/common/ecg/1399/fr/DL154f.pdf

  relation: http://en.

relation: http://en.unesco.org/mediabank/21346/ title: This Phoenician city was probably abandoned during the First Punic War (c. 250 creator: Fruneau, Yvon subject: Culture subject: World Heritage description: This Phoenician city was probably abandoned during the First Punic War (c. 250 B.C.) and as a result was not rebuilt by the Romans. (...) The houses were built to a standard plan in accordance with a sophisticated notion of town planning. date: 2008 type: Image type: NonPeerReviewed format: image language: none rights: cc_by_sa_3_igo identifier: http://en.unesco.org/mediabank/21346/1/30208663.jpg identifier: This Phoenician city was probably abandoned during the First Punic War (c. 250.

Score: 718873.9 - https://en.unesco.org/mediaban.../DC/mediabank-eprint-21346.txt

  COFO 19 - Semana Forestal Mundial

COFO 19 - Semana Forestal Mundial Please note that this page is no longer being updated and it is available for historical reference only العربية 中文 English Français русский Español Página principal de la FAO Forestal COFO 2009 Documentos Discursos Documentos de eventos especiales Calendario provisional Reseña de prensa Earth Negotiations Bulletin reports Estados Mienbros COFO 19 - Semana Forestal Mundial envíe por correo electrónico Reseña de prensa    La FAO pide mejor gestión forestal mundial ante cambios medioambientales (16/03/09) Ecodiario http://ecodiario.eleconomista.es/internacional/noticias/1101926/03/09/La-FAO-pide-mejor-gestion-forestal-mundial-ante-cambios-medioambientales.html   La FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación (16/03/09) Soitu http://www.soitu.es/soitu/2009/03/16/info/1237207917_724709.html   La FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación (16/03/09) Terra http://actualidad.terra.es/ciencia/articulo/fao-latinoamerica-cree-probable-consiga-3127773.htm   África prevé mantener su actual ritmo de deforestación (16/03/09) Afrol News http://www.afrol.com/es/articulos/32690   La mejora de los bosques pasa por tener instituciones más competentes y más inversiones en I+D (16/03/09) diariodigitalagrario http://www.diariodigitalagrario.net/versiones/rc2/articulo2.asp?id=45555   La FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación (16/03/09) Periodista Digital http://www.periodistadigital.com/ciencia/object.php? (...) CodArt=62790   El 42% de la destrucción de selva en el Planeta entre el 200 y el 2006 se produjo en Brasil (17/03/09) El País http://www.elpais.com/articulo/sociedad/42/destruccion/selva/Planeta/200/2006/produjo/Brasil/elpepuintlat/20090316elpepusoc_10/Tes   La FAO presenta su último informe sobre la Situación de los Bosques del Mundo 2009 (17/03/09) Portal Medio Ambiente http://www.portaldelmedioambiente.com/noticias/4911/la_fao_presenta_su_ultimo_informe_sobre_la_situacion_de_los_bosques_del_mundo_2009/   La FAO presenta las claves para una mejor gestión de los bosques del mundo (17/03/09) Consumer http://www.consumer.es/web/es/medio_ambiente/2009/03/17/184090.php   La FAO advierte sobre el avance de la deforestación en América Latina (17/03/09) Madrid Digital http://www.madriddigital.info/5/13606/la-fao-advierte-sobre-avance-deforestacion-america-latina.html   El 42% de la destrucción de selva en el Planeta entre el 200 y el 2006 se produjo en Brasil El Pais - 16/03/09 23:52   Afectará crisis económica sector forestal mexicano: FAO Milenio - 16/03/09 18:53 Semana del lunes 16 al domingo 22 de marzo de 2009 MSN Latino - 16/03/09 14:33   FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación ADN.es - 16/03/09 14:00   FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación ADN.es - 16/03/09 14:00   La FAO pide mejor gestión forestal mundial ante cambios medioambientales Univision.com - 16/03/09 13:16   El Zaragoza participará en la campaña de la FAO El Periodico de Aragon - 17/03/09 03:37  E l mundo pierde 70 millones de hectáreas de bosques en 15 años: FAO Xinhuanet (ES) - 17/03/09 00:06   FAO: La FAO presenta su último informe sobre la Situación de los Bosques del Mundo 2009 Agrodigital, la web del campo - 17/03/09 00:04   CRISIS ES OPORTUNIDAD PARA EL SECTOR FORESTAL, SEGUN FAO ANSA.it - 16/03/09 23:58   El 42% de la destrucción de selva en el Planeta entre el 200 y el 2006 se produjo en Brasil   El 75% de la destrucción de la selva en América del Sur se ha dado en Brasil, según la FAO Noticiero Digital - 16/03/09 23:18   Informe de ONU: Crisis económica plantea difíciles consecuencias para bosques Xinhuanet (ES) - 16/03/09 23:16   Afectará crisis económica sector forestal mexicano: FAO Milenio - 16/03/09 18:53   'La menor demanda de madera y productos madereros como resultado Yahoo Mexico - 16/03/09 18:31   Registra Latinoamérica un tercio de la deforestación mundial: FAO EL Sendero del Peje - 16/03/09 18:22   La Fundación Global Nature celebrará el Día Forestal Mundial con diversos actos Gente Digital - 16/03/09 16:46   FAO cree «poco probable» que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación Los Tiempos - 16/03/09 16:46   Impactará crisis económica mundial a bosques y silvicultura EL Sendero del Peje - 16/03/09 16:35   FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación La Prensa - 16/03/09 16:32   FAO demanda mejor gestión forestal ante cambio medioambiental El Nuevo Diario - 16/03/09 15:20   La mejora de los bosques pasa por tener instituciones más competentes y más inversiones en I+D Diario Digital Agrario - 16/03/09 15:00   FAO pide mejor gestión forestal mundial ante cambios medioambientales El Comercio - 16/03/09 13:48     última actualización:  viernes 20 de marzo de 2009 Contacte con nosotros  |  Política de privacidad  |  Alerta de estafa © FAO, 2022

Score: 717249.17 - https://www.fao.org/forestry/cofo2009/54782/es/

  Lançamento TIC Domicílios 2020

Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-Probability Sampling. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1 (2): 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008. (...) A. 2018. Combining Probability and Nonprobability Samples to Form Efficient Hybrid Estimates: An Evaluation of the Common Support Assumption. (...) Combining Data from Probability and Non-Probability Samples Using Pseudo-Weights.

Score: 717249.17 - https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/S...atorsDuringCOVID-19_Brazil.pdf

  Microsoft Word - DGPWG.2011.WP.010.2.en.doc

Articles that contain only extremely insensitive detonating substances and which demonstrate a negligible probability of accidental initiation or propagation (under normal conditions of transport). Note.— An extremely insensitive detonating substance is a substance which although capable of sustaining a detonation has demonstrated through tests that it is so insensitive that there is very little probability of accidental initiation. 0486 . . . AUXILIARY EXPLOSIVE COMPONENT, isolated An "isolated auxiliary explosive component" is a small device that explosively performs an operation related to the article’s functioning, other than its main explosive loads’ performance. (...) A substance which, although capable of sustaining a detonation, has demonstrated through tests that it is so insensitive that there is very little probability of accidental initiation. — EXPLOSIVE, EXTREMELY INSENSITIVE SUBSTANCE (EIS) A substance which has demonstrated through tests that it is so insensitive that there is very little probability of accidental initiation. — . . . — END —

Score: 716856.3 - https://www.icao.int/safety/Da...011/DGPWG.2011.WP.010.2.en.pdf

  SITUATION GENERALE EN MARS 1991

TUNISIE Une reproduction à petite échelle est probablement en cours dans les zones de végétation verte entre Kebili et Gafsa. (...) KENYA, OUGANDA et TANZANIE Aucun développement significatif n'est probable. ÉGYPTE Quelques adultes épars peuvent être présents dans le Désert du Sud-Est. (...) AFGHANISTAN Aucun développement significatif n'est probable. 3 avril 1991 7

Score: 716308.9 - https://www.fao.org/ag/locusts/common/ecg/1402/fr/DL151f.pdf

  Adult Mortality in the Era of HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa

Figure 3.c.2 plots the adult female probability of dying against the adult male probability of dying (ages 15-49) for the 35 countries in Africa with estimated HIV prevalence of 1.0 percent or greater. (...) Figures 3.c.3 and 3.c.4 plot the male and female median age-specific probability of dying by prevalence group. These figures reveal a very strong association between the age-pattern of the probability of dying and adult HIV prevalence. For both sexes, as the HIV prevalence increases the probability of dying between ages 20 and 60 increases while the probability of dying at other ages remains little changed.

Score: 715068.07 - https://www.un.org/development...pd-egm-200309-clark_paper3.pdf

  Presentation to Nucl

--Risk is not simply a function of the probability of a given event, but is a function of probability times consequences, or 'r= p X c'. This means that even if the probability of a global nuclear exchange is relatively low, the consequences are so grave that only a probability of zero or very close thereto can be acceptable. (...) Statistically speaking we probably already shouldn't be here, and a study of those near misses leads one to conclude that the only reason we ARE here is by what General Lee Butler terms 'Divine Providence'.

Score: 714521.3 - https://www.un.org/en/conf/npt...tatements/pdf/individual_4.pdf