In developing countries, the probability of participating in the workforce increases by 7.8 per cent; in emerging, by 6.4 per cent; in ASNA, two regions with the widest gap in participation rates, the probability increases further, at 12.9 per cent.
(...) In ASNA countries, it decreases the probability to participate by 6.2 percentage points; in developing countries by 4.8 percentage points; and in developed countries by 4.0 percentage points. (...) In developing countries, the probability to participate is substantially reduced by religion, a proxy indicator for more restrictive gender role conformity.
Language:English
Score: 719400.8
-
https://www.ilo.org/moscow/new...WCMS_566891/lang--en/index.htm
Data Source: un
Lerner(-1)
2.669
0.355
URW_(-1)
-0.303381
0.143294
-2.1172
0.0342
URW_(-1)
-0.267395
0.121881
-2.193902
0.0282
URW_(-1)
-0.258462
0.123532
-2.092276
0.0364
URW_(-1)
-0.248859
0.121974
-2.040252
0.0413
Lerner
-2.816
-2.296
-2.032
RRHPG_(-3)
15.05243
4.929786
3.053363
0.0023
RRHPG_(-3)
14.29347
4.875007
2.931989
0.0034
RRHPG_(-3)
15.35146
4.98456
3.079802
0.0021
RRHPG_(-3)
14.93972
4.882185
3.060047
0.0022
0.015
0.019
0.031
Boone(-1)
0.795
0.195
Boone
-1.327
-0.791
0.114
0.289
_5BANK(-1)
-0.027754
0.009823
-2.825503
0.0047
_5BANK(-1)
-0.030247
0.009238
-3.274005
0.0011
_5BANK(-1)
-0.026335
0.009577
-2.749887
0.006
_5BANK(-1)
-0.026837
0.009456
-2.838001
0.0045
Area Under Curve (AUC)
LERNER(-1)
2.669226
2.886136
0.924844
0.355
BOONE(-1)
0.79459
0.613244
1.295715
0.1951
LERNER
-2.29624
0.981724
-2.338987
0.0193
LERNER
-2.032165
0.942478
-2.156193
0.0311
Direct Call Ratio (DCR)
10 of 13
9 of 13
9 of 13
9 of 13
LERNER
-2.815504
1.156062
-2.435426
0.0149
BOONE
-1.327243
0.839931
-1.580181
0.1141
BOONE
-0.79118
0.745733
-1.060943
0.2887
False Call Ratio % (FCR)
23.08
30.7
27.66
28.27
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
S.E. of regression
0.190344
Akaike info criterion
0.313
S.E. of regression
0.187729
Akaike info criterion
0.316544
S.E. of regression
0.189146
Akaike info criterion
0.311182
S.E. of regression
0.189216
Akaike info criterion
0.310503
Sum squared resid
12.20982
Schwarz criterion
0.369064
Sum squared resid
11.87664
Schwarz criterion
0.372608
Sum squared resid
12.05663
Schwarz criterion
0.367247
Sum squared resid
12.10135
Schwarz criterion
0.355354
Log likelihood
-48.52294
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.335334
Log likelihood
-49.12897
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.338878
Log likelihood
-48.21217
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.333517
Log likelihood
-49.09595
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.32837
Deviance
97.04589
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Deviance
98.25794
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Deviance
96.42434
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Deviance
98.19191
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Avg. log likelihood
-0.14188
Avg. log likelihood
-0.143652
Avg. log likelihood
-0.140971
Avg. log likelihood
-0.143555
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=1
13
Obs with Dep=1
13
Obs with Dep=1
13
Obs with Dep=1
13
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Equation: T3C1
Equation: T3C2
Equation: T3C3
Equation: T3C4
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:00
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:03
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:05
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:08
Success cutoff: C = 0.038
Success cutoff: C = 0.038
Success cutoff: C = 0.038
Success cutoff: C = 0.038
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
P(Dep=1)<=C
229
3
232
0
0
0
P(Dep=1)<=C
228
4
232
0
0
0
P(Dep=1)<=C
238
4
242
0
0
0
P(Dep=1)<=C
236
4
240
0
0
0
P(Dep=1)>C
100
10
110
329
13
342
P(Dep=1)>C
101
9
110
329
13
342
P(Dep=1)>C
91
9
100
329
13
342
P(Dep=1)>C
93
9
102
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Correct
229
10
239
0
13
13
Correct
228
9
237
0
13
13
Correct
238
9
247
0
13
13
Correct
236
9
245
0
13
13
% Correct
69.6
76.92
69.88
0
100
3.8
% Correct
69.3
69.23
69.3
0
100
3.8
% Correct
72.34
69.23
72.22
0
100
3.8
% Correct
71.73
69.23
71.64
0
100
3.8
% Incorrect
30.4
23.08
30.12
100
0
96.2
% Incorrect
30.7
30.77
30.7
100
0
96.2
% Incorrect
27.66
30.77
27.78
100
0
96.2
% Incorrect
28.27
30.77
28.36
100
0
96.2
Total Gain*
69.6
-23.08
66.08
Total Gain*
69.3
-30.77
65.5
Total Gain*
72.34
-30.77
68.42
Total Gain*
71.73
-30.77
67.84
Percent Gain**
69.6
NA
68.69
Percent Gain**
69.3
NA
68.09
Percent Gain**
72.34
NA
71.12
Percent Gain**
71.73
NA
70.52
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
E(# of Dep=0)
317
11.94
328.94
316.49
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=0)
316.97
11.75
328.72
316.49
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=0)
317.12
11.88
329
316.49
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=0)
317
11.96
328.96
316.49
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=1)
12
1.06
13.06
12.51
0.49
13
E(# of Dep=1)
12.03
1.25
13.28
12.51
0.49
13
E(# of Dep=1)
11.88
1.12
13
12.51
0.49
13
E(# of Dep=1)
12
1.04
13.04
12.51
0.49
13
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Correct
317
1.06
318.06
316.49
0.49
316.99
Correct
316.97
1.25
318.23
316.49
0.49
316.99
Correct
317.12
1.12
318.24
316.49
0.49
316.99
Correct
317
1.04
318.04
316.49
0.49
316.99
% Correct
96.35
8.13
93
96.2
3.8
92.69
% Correct
96.34
9.63
93.05
96.2
3.8
92.69
% Correct
96.39
8.6
93.05
96.2
3.8
92.69
% Correct
96.35
7.99
92.99
96.2
3.8
92.69
% Incorrect
3.65
91.87
7
3.8
96.2
7.31
% Incorrect
3.66
90.37
6.95
3.8
96.2
7.31
% Incorrect
3.61
91.4
6.95
3.8
96.2
7.31
% Incorrect
3.65
92.01
7.01
3.8
96.2
7.31
Total Gain*
0.15
4.33
0.31
Total Gain*
0.15
5.83
0.36
Total Gain*
0.19
4.8
0.37
Total Gain*
0.15
4.19
0.31
Percent Gain**
4.05
4.5
4.28
Percent Gain**
3.83
6.06
4.95
Percent Gain**
5
4.99
4.99
Percent Gain**
4.04
4.36
4.2
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
newtab3
nt3c1
nt3c2
t2c3
t2c3
Dependent Variable: CRISLV
Dependent Variable: CRISLV
Dependent Variable: CRISLV
Dependent Variable: CRISLV
0.0380116959
Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps)
Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps)
Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps)
Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps)
Sample: 1999 2016
Base
Concentration
Preferred
No Capital
0.0380116959
Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:05
Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:11
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:49
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:53
Capital(-1)
-0.668
-0.284
-0.266
Sample: 1999 2016
Sample: 1999 2016
Sample: 1999 2016
Sample: 1999 2016
0.000
0.023
0.026
Included observations: 342
Included observations: 342
Included observations: 342
Included observations: 342
Real House Price Growth (-3)
10.990
14.441
14.454
12.300
Convergence achieved after 9 iterations
Convergence achieved after 9 iterations
Convergence achieved after 7 iterations
Convergence achieved after 8 iterations
0.013
0.003
0.002
0.006
Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian
Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian
Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian
Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian
Bank Concentration
0.035
(5 bank)
0.479
Variable
Coefficient
Std. (...) Bank Concentration(-1)
-0.063
-0.030
-0.047
0
(5 bank)
0.191
0.001
0.000
URW_(-1)
-0.667718
0.075199
-8.87939
0
URW_(-1)
-0.284358
0.125173
-2.271712
0.0231
URW_(-1)
-0.266372
0.119928
-2.221097
0.0263
Area Under Curve (AUC)
0.702
0.747
0.714
0.681
RRHPG_(-3)
10.99034
4.417768
2.487758
0.0129
RRHPG_(-3)
14.44131
4.785363
3.017809
0.0025
RRHPG_(-3)
14.45436
4.760918
3.036045
0.0024
RRHPG_(-3)
12.29988
4.513267
2.725273
0.0064
Direct Call Ratio (DCR)
9 of 13
9of 13
9 of 13
7 of 13
_5BANK
0.034631
0.048918
0.707945
0.479
False Call Ratio % (FCR)
39.82
31.61
31.31
29.79
_5BANK(-1)
-0.063204
0.048275
-1.309236
0.1905
_5BANK(-1)
-0.029544
0.00902
-3.275292
0.0011
_5BANK(-1)
-0.046886
0.00527
-8.896317
0
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
S.E. of regression
0.192644
Akaike info criterion
0.333824
S.E. of regression
0.189964
Akaike info criterion
0.317133
S.E. of regression
0.189496
Akaike info criterion
0.312737
S.E. of regression
0.193902
Akaike info criterion
0.327353
Sum squared resid
12.61797
Schwarz criterion
0.356249
Sum squared resid
12.19713
Schwarz criterion
0.361985
Sum squared resid
12.17304
Schwarz criterion
0.346376
Sum squared resid
12.78331
Schwarz criterion
0.349779
Log likelihood
-55.08383
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.342757
Log likelihood
-50.22973
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.335001
Log likelihood
-50.47801
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.326138
Log likelihood
-53.97745
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.336287
Deviance
110.1677
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Deviance
100.4595
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Deviance
100.956
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Deviance
107.9549
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Avg. log likelihood
-0.161064
Avg. log likelihood
-0.146871
Avg. log likelihood
-0.147597
Avg. log likelihood
-0.157829
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=1
13
Obs with Dep=1
13
Obs with Dep=1
13
Obs with Dep=1
13
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Equation: NT3C1
Equation: NT3C2
Equation: T2C3
Equation: T2C4
Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:07
Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:13
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:51
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:54
Success cutoff: C = 0.038012
Success cutoff: C = 0.038012
Success cutoff: C = 0.038
Success cutoff: C = 0.038
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
P(Dep=1)<=C
226
4
230
0
P(Dep=1)<=C
198
4
202
329
13
342
P(Dep=1)<=C
225
4
229
329
13
342
P(Dep=1)>C
103
9
112
329
0
0
P(Dep=1)<=C
231
6
237
0
0
0
P(Dep=1)>C
131
9
140
0
0
0
P(Dep=1)>C
104
9
113
0
0
0
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
P(Dep=1)>C
98
7
105
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Correct
226
9
235
0
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Correct
198
9
207
329
0
329
Correct
225
9
234
329
0
329
% Correct
68.69
69.23
68.71
0
13
13
Correct
231
7
238
0
13
13
% Correct
60.18
69.23
60.53
100
0
96.2
% Correct
68.39
69.23
68.42
100
0
96.2
% Incorrect
31.31
30.77
31.29
100
100
3.8
% Correct
70.21
53.85
69.59
0
100
3.8
% Incorrect
39.82
30.77
39.47
0
100
3.8
% Incorrect
31.61
30.77
31.58
0
100
3.8
Total Gain*
68.69
-30.77
64.91
0
96.2
% Incorrect
29.79
46.15
30.41
100
0
96.2
Total Gain*
-39.82
69.23
-35.67
Total Gain*
-31.61
69.23
-27.78
Percent Gain**
68.69
NA
67.48
Total Gain*
70.21
-46.15
65.79
Percent Gain**
NA
69.23
-938.46
Percent Gain**
NA
69.23
-730.77
Percent Gain**
70.21
NA
68.39
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
316.65
12.02
328.66
316.49
E(# of Dep=0)
314.49
11.99
326.48
316.49
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=0)
316.6
11.98
328.58
316.49
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=1)
12.35
0.98
13.34
12.51
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=0)
314.48
11.86
326.34
316.49
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=1)
14.51
1.01
15.52
12.51
0.49
13
E(# of Dep=1)
12.4
1.02
13.42
12.51
0.49
13
Total
329
13
342
329
0.49
13
E(# of Dep=1)
14.52
1.14
15.66
12.51
0.49
13
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Correct
316.65
0.98
317.63
316.49
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Correct
314.49
1.01
315.5
316.49
0.49
316.99
Correct
316.6
1.02
317.62
316.49
0.49
316.99
% Correct
96.25
7.56
92.87
96.2
0.49
316.99
Correct
314.48
1.14
315.62
316.49
0.49
316.99
% Correct
95.59
7.74
92.25
96.2
3.8
92.69
% Correct
96.23
7.84
92.87
96.2
3.8
92.69
% Incorrect
3.75
92.44
7.13
3.8
3.8
92.69
% Correct
95.59
8.75
92.29
96.2
3.8
92.69
% Incorrect
4.41
92.26
7.75
3.8
96.2
7.31
% Incorrect
3.77
92.16
7.13
3.8
96.2
7.31
Total Gain*
0.05
3.76
0.19
96.2
7.31
% Incorrect
4.41
91.25
7.71
3.8
96.2
7.31
Total Gain*
-0.61
3.94
-0.44
Total Gain*
0.03
4.04
0.18
Percent Gain**
1.22
3.91
2.57
Total Gain*
-0.61
4.95
-0.4
Percent Gain**
-16.03
4.1
-5.96
Percent Gain**
0.85
4.2
2.52
Percent Gain**
-16.12
5.15
-5.48
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
new2
Dependent Variable: _5BANK
Dependent Variable: LERNER
Dependent Variable: BOONE
Method: Panel Least Squares
Method: Panel Least Squares
Method: Panel Least Squares
Date: 06/09/19 Time: 11:49
Date: 05/05/19 Time: 17:30
Date: 05/05/19 Time: 17:28
Sample (adjusted): 1995 2016
Sample (adjusted): 1995 2016
Sample (adjusted): 1995 2016
Periods included: 22
Periods included: 22
Periods included: 20
Cross-sections included: 19
Cross-sections included: 19
Cross-sections included: 19
Total panel (balanced) observations: 418
Total panel (balanced) observations: 418
Total panel (balanced) observations: 380
Variable
Coefficient
Std. (...) Lerner(-1)
2.669
0.355
URW_(-1)
-0.303381
0.143294
-2.1172
0.0342
URW_(-1)
-0.267395
0.121881
-2.193902
0.0282
URW_(-1)
-0.258462
0.123532
-2.092276
0.0364
URW_(-1)
-0.248859
0.121974
-2.040252
0.0413
Lerner
-2.816
-2.296
-2.032
RRHPG_(-3)
15.05243
4.929786
3.053363
0.0023
RRHPG_(-3)
14.29347
4.875007
2.931989
0.0034
RRHPG_(-3)
15.35146
4.98456
3.079802
0.0021
RRHPG_(-3)
14.93972
4.882185
3.060047
0.0022
0.015
0.019
0.031
Boone(-1)
0.795
0.195
Boone
-1.327
-0.791
0.114
0.289
_5BANK(-1)
-0.027754
0.009823
-2.825503
0.0047
_5BANK(-1)
-0.030247
0.009238
-3.274005
0.0011
_5BANK(-1)
-0.026335
0.009577
-2.749887
0.006
_5BANK(-1)
-0.026837
0.009456
-2.838001
newtab4
Area Under Curve (AUC)
LERNER(-1)
2.669226
2.886136
0.924844
0.355
BOONE(-1)
0.79459
0.613244
1.295715
0.1951
LERNER
-2.29624
0.981724
-2.338987
0.0193
LERNER
-2.032165
0.942478
-2.156193
0.0311
Direct Call Ratio (DCR)
10 of 13
9 of 13
9 of 13
9 of 13
LERNER
-2.815504
1.156062
-2.435426
0.0149
BOONE
-1.327243
0.839931
-1.580181
0.1141
BOONE
-0.79118
0.745733
-1.060943
0.2887
False Call Ratio % (FCR)
23.08
30.7
27.66
28.27
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
Mean dependent var
0.038012
S.D. dependent var
0.191505
S.E. of regression
0.190344
Akaike info criterion
0.313
S.E. of regression
0.187729
Akaike info criterion
0.316544
S.E. of regression
0.189146
Akaike info criterion
0.311182
S.E. of regression
0.189216
Akaike info criterion
0.310503
Sum squared resid
12.20982
Schwarz criterion
0.369064
Sum squared resid
11.87664
Schwarz criterion
0.372608
Sum squared resid
12.05663
Schwarz criterion
0.367247
Sum squared resid
12.10135
Schwarz criterion
0.355354
Log likelihood
-48.52294
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.335334
Log likelihood
-49.12897
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.338878
Log likelihood
-48.21217
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.333517
Log likelihood
-49.09595
Hannan-Quinn criter.
0.32837
Deviance
97.04589
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Deviance
98.25794
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Deviance
96.42434
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Deviance
98.19191
Restr. deviance
110.5159
Avg. log likelihood
-0.14188
Avg. log likelihood
-0.143652
Avg. log likelihood
-0.140971
Avg. log likelihood
-0.143555
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=0
329
Total obs
342
Obs with Dep=1
13
Obs with Dep=1
13
Obs with Dep=1
13
Obs with Dep=1
13
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Expectation-Prediction Evaluation for Binary Specification
Equation: T3C1
Equation: T3C2
Equation: T3C3
Equation: T3C4
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:00
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:03
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:05
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 12:08
Success cutoff: C = 0.038
Success cutoff: C = 0.038
Success cutoff: C = 0.038
Success cutoff: C = 0.038
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
P(Dep=1)<=C
229
3
232
0
0
0
P(Dep=1)<=C
228
4
232
0
0
0
P(Dep=1)<=C
238
4
242
0
0
0
P(Dep=1)<=C
236
4
240
0
0
0
P(Dep=1)>C
100
10
110
329
13
342
P(Dep=1)>C
101
9
110
329
13
342
P(Dep=1)>C
91
9
100
329
13
342
P(Dep=1)>C
93
9
102
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Correct
229
10
239
0
13
13
Correct
228
9
237
0
13
13
Correct
238
9
247
0
13
13
Correct
236
9
245
0
13
13
% Correct
69.6
76.92
69.88
0
100
3.8
% Correct
69.3
69.23
69.3
0
100
3.8
% Correct
72.34
69.23
72.22
0
100
3.8
% Correct
71.73
69.23
71.64
0
100
3.8
% Incorrect
30.4
23.08
30.12
100
0
96.2
% Incorrect
30.7
30.77
30.7
100
0
96.2
% Incorrect
27.66
30.77
27.78
100
0
96.2
% Incorrect
28.27
30.77
28.36
100
0
96.2
Total Gain*
69.6
-23.08
66.08
Total Gain*
69.3
-30.77
65.5
Total Gain*
72.34
-30.77
68.42
Total Gain*
71.73
-30.77
67.84
Percent Gain**
69.6
NA
68.69
Percent Gain**
69.3
NA
68.09
Percent Gain**
72.34
NA
71.12
Percent Gain**
71.73
NA
70.52
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Estimated Equation
Constant Probability
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
Dep=0
Dep=1
Total
E(# of Dep=0)
317
11.94
328.94
316.49
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=0)
316.97
11.75
328.72
316.49
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=0)
317.12
11.88
329
316.49
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=0)
317
11.96
328.96
316.49
12.51
329
E(# of Dep=1)
12
1.06
13.06
12.51
0.49
13
E(# of Dep=1)
12.03
1.25
13.28
12.51
0.49
13
E(# of Dep=1)
11.88
1.12
13
12.51
0.49
13
E(# of Dep=1)
12
1.04
13.04
12.51
0.49
13
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Total
329
13
342
329
13
342
Correct
317
1.06
318.06
316.49
0.49
316.99
Correct
316.97
1.25
318.23
316.49
0.49
316.99
Correct
317.12
1.12
318.24
316.49
0.49
316.99
Correct
317
1.04
318.04
316.49
0.49
316.99
% Correct
96.35
8.13
93
96.2
3.8
92.69
% Correct
96.34
9.63
93.05
96.2
3.8
92.69
% Correct
96.39
8.6
93.05
96.2
3.8
92.69
% Correct
96.35
7.99
92.99
96.2
3.8
92.69
% Incorrect
3.65
91.87
7
3.8
96.2
7.31
% Incorrect
3.66
90.37
6.95
3.8
96.2
7.31
% Incorrect
3.61
91.4
6.95
3.8
96.2
7.31
% Incorrect
3.65
92.01
7.01
3.8
96.2
7.31
Total Gain*
0.15
4.33
0.31
Total Gain*
0.15
5.83
0.36
Total Gain*
0.19
4.8
0.37
Total Gain*
0.15
4.19
0.31
Percent Gain**
4.05
4.5
4.28
Percent Gain**
3.83
6.06
4.95
Percent Gain**
5
4.99
4.99
Percent Gain**
4.04
4.36
4.2
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
*Change in "% Correct" from default (constant probability) specification
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
**Percent of incorrect (default) prediction corrected by equation
newtab3
nt3c1
nt3c2
t2c3
t2c3
Dependent Variable: CRISLV
Dependent Variable: CRISLV
Dependent Variable: CRISLV
Dependent Variable: CRISLV
0.0380116959
Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps)
Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps)
Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps)
Method: ML - Binary Logit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps)
Sample: 1999 2016
Base
Concentration
Preferred
No Capital
0.0380116959
Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:05
Date: 06/09/19 Time: 15:11
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:49
Date: 03/15/19 Time: 11:53
Capital(-1)
-0.668
-0.284
-0.266
Sample: 1999 2016
Sample: 1999 2016
Sample: 1999 2016
Sample: 1999 2016
0.000
0.023
0.026
Included observations: 342
Included observations: 342
Included observations: 342
Included observations: 342
Real House Price Growth (-3)
10.990
14.441
14.454
12.300
Convergence achieved after 9 iterations
Convergence achieved after 9 iterations
Convergence achieved after 7 iterations
Convergence achieved after 8 iterations
0.013
0.003
0.002
0.006
Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian
Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian
Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian
Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian
Bank
Language:English
Score: 719128.6
-
https://www.un.org/development...2019LINK-Monday-Session4-A.pdf
Data Source: un
LIBYE, MAROC et TUNISIE Aucun développement significatif n'est probable.
SOUDAN Des criquets épars sont probablement présents dans quelques zones des provinces du Nord Darfour, Nord Kordofan et Nil Blanc, et ils se reproduiront dans les zones recevant des pluies.
(...) YÉMEN Il est probable que des adultes isolés persistent dans le Wadi Hadramaut et se reproduisent si des pluies arrivent. (...) AFGHANISTAN et IRAN Aucun développement significatif n'est probable.
4 juillet 1991
6
Language:English
Score: 718980.37
-
https://www.fao.org/ag/locusts/common/ecg/1399/fr/DL154f.pdf
Data Source: un
relation: http://en.unesco.org/mediabank/21346/ title: This Phoenician city was probably abandoned during the First Punic War (c. 250 creator: Fruneau, Yvon subject: Culture subject: World Heritage description: This Phoenician city was probably abandoned during the First Punic War (c. 250 B.C.) and as a result was not rebuilt by the Romans. (...) The houses were built to a standard plan in accordance with a sophisticated notion of town planning. date: 2008 type: Image type: NonPeerReviewed format: image language: none rights: cc_by_sa_3_igo identifier: http://en.unesco.org/mediabank/21346/1/30208663.jpg identifier: This Phoenician city was probably abandoned during the First Punic War (c. 250.
Language:English
Score: 718873.9
-
https://en.unesco.org/mediaban.../DC/mediabank-eprint-21346.txt
Data Source: un
COFO 19 - Semana Forestal Mundial
Please note that this page is no longer being updated and it is available for historical reference only
العربية
中文
English
Français
русский
Español
Página principal de la FAO
Forestal
COFO 2009
Documentos
Discursos
Documentos de eventos especiales
Calendario provisional
Reseña de prensa
Earth Negotiations Bulletin reports
Estados Mienbros
COFO 19 - Semana Forestal Mundial
envíe por correo electrónico
Reseña de prensa
La FAO pide mejor gestión forestal mundial ante cambios medioambientales (16/03/09) Ecodiario http://ecodiario.eleconomista.es/internacional/noticias/1101926/03/09/La-FAO-pide-mejor-gestion-forestal-mundial-ante-cambios-medioambientales.html
La FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación (16/03/09) Soitu http://www.soitu.es/soitu/2009/03/16/info/1237207917_724709.html
La FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación (16/03/09) Terra http://actualidad.terra.es/ciencia/articulo/fao-latinoamerica-cree-probable-consiga-3127773.htm
África prevé mantener su actual ritmo de deforestación (16/03/09) Afrol News http://www.afrol.com/es/articulos/32690
La mejora de los bosques pasa por tener instituciones más competentes y más inversiones en I+D (16/03/09) diariodigitalagrario http://www.diariodigitalagrario.net/versiones/rc2/articulo2.asp?id=45555
La FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación (16/03/09) Periodista Digital http://www.periodistadigital.com/ciencia/object.php? (...) CodArt=62790
El 42% de la destrucción de selva en el Planeta entre el 200 y el 2006 se produjo en Brasil (17/03/09) El País http://www.elpais.com/articulo/sociedad/42/destruccion/selva/Planeta/200/2006/produjo/Brasil/elpepuintlat/20090316elpepusoc_10/Tes
La FAO presenta su último informe sobre la Situación de los Bosques del Mundo 2009 (17/03/09) Portal Medio Ambiente http://www.portaldelmedioambiente.com/noticias/4911/la_fao_presenta_su_ultimo_informe_sobre_la_situacion_de_los_bosques_del_mundo_2009/
La FAO presenta las claves para una mejor gestión de los bosques del mundo (17/03/09) Consumer http://www.consumer.es/web/es/medio_ambiente/2009/03/17/184090.php
La FAO advierte sobre el avance de la deforestación en América Latina (17/03/09) Madrid Digital http://www.madriddigital.info/5/13606/la-fao-advierte-sobre-avance-deforestacion-america-latina.html
El 42% de la destrucción de selva en el Planeta entre el 200 y el 2006 se produjo en Brasil El Pais - 16/03/09 23:52
Afectará crisis económica sector forestal mexicano: FAO Milenio - 16/03/09 18:53
Semana del lunes 16 al domingo 22 de marzo de 2009 MSN Latino - 16/03/09 14:33
FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación ADN.es - 16/03/09 14:00
FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación ADN.es - 16/03/09 14:00
La FAO pide mejor gestión forestal mundial ante cambios medioambientales Univision.com - 16/03/09 13:16
El Zaragoza participará en la campaña de la FAO El Periodico de Aragon - 17/03/09 03:37
E l mundo pierde 70 millones de hectáreas de bosques en 15 años: FAO Xinhuanet (ES) - 17/03/09 00:06
FAO: La FAO presenta su último informe sobre la Situación de los Bosques del Mundo 2009 Agrodigital, la web del campo - 17/03/09 00:04
CRISIS ES OPORTUNIDAD PARA EL SECTOR FORESTAL, SEGUN FAO ANSA.it - 16/03/09 23:58
El 42% de la destrucción de selva en el Planeta entre el 200 y el 2006 se produjo en Brasil
El 75% de la destrucción de la selva en América del Sur se ha dado en Brasil, según la FAO Noticiero Digital - 16/03/09 23:18
Informe de ONU: Crisis económica plantea difíciles consecuencias para bosques Xinhuanet (ES) - 16/03/09 23:16
Afectará crisis económica sector forestal mexicano: FAO Milenio - 16/03/09 18:53
'La menor demanda de madera y productos madereros como resultado Yahoo Mexico - 16/03/09 18:31
Registra Latinoamérica un tercio de la deforestación mundial: FAO EL Sendero del Peje - 16/03/09 18:22
La Fundación Global Nature celebrará el Día Forestal Mundial con diversos actos
Gente Digital - 16/03/09 16:46
FAO cree «poco probable» que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación Los Tiempos - 16/03/09 16:46
Impactará crisis económica mundial a bosques y silvicultura EL Sendero del Peje - 16/03/09 16:35
FAO cree "poco probable" que Latinoamérica consiga combatir la deforestación La Prensa - 16/03/09 16:32
FAO demanda mejor gestión forestal ante cambio medioambiental El Nuevo Diario - 16/03/09 15:20
La mejora de los bosques pasa por tener instituciones más competentes y más inversiones en I+D Diario Digital Agrario - 16/03/09 15:00
FAO pide mejor gestión forestal mundial ante cambios medioambientales El Comercio - 16/03/09 13:48
última actualización: viernes 20 de marzo de 2009
Contacte con nosotros | Política de privacidad | Alerta de estafa
© FAO, 2022
Language:English
Score: 717249.17
-
https://www.fao.org/forestry/cofo2009/54782/es/
Data Source: un
Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-Probability Sampling.
Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1 (2): 90–105.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008.
(...) A. 2018. Combining Probability and Nonprobability Samples to Form Efficient Hybrid
Estimates: An Evaluation of the Common Support Assumption. (...) Combining Data from Probability and Non-Probability Samples Using
Pseudo-Weights.
Language:English
Score: 717249.17
-
https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/S...atorsDuringCOVID-19_Brazil.pdf
Data Source: un
Articles that contain only extremely insensitive detonating substances and which demonstrate a negligible probability of accidental initiation or propagation (under normal conditions of transport).
Note.— An extremely insensitive detonating substance is a substance which although capable of sustaining a detonation has demonstrated through tests that it is so insensitive that there is very little probability of accidental initiation.
0486
. . .
AUXILIARY EXPLOSIVE COMPONENT, isolated An "isolated auxiliary explosive component" is a small device that explosively performs an operation related to the article’s functioning, other than its main explosive loads’ performance. (...) A substance which, although capable of sustaining a detonation, has demonstrated through tests that it is so insensitive that there is very little probability of accidental initiation.
—
EXPLOSIVE, EXTREMELY INSENSITIVE SUBSTANCE (EIS) A substance which has demonstrated through tests that it is so insensitive that there is very little probability of accidental initiation.
—
. . .
— END —
Language:English
Score: 716856.3
-
https://www.icao.int/safety/Da...011/DGPWG.2011.WP.010.2.en.pdf
Data Source: un
TUNISIE Une reproduction à petite échelle est probablement en cours dans les zones de végétation verte entre Kebili et Gafsa. (...) KENYA, OUGANDA et TANZANIE Aucun développement significatif n'est probable.
ÉGYPTE Quelques adultes épars peuvent être présents dans le Désert du Sud-Est.
(...) AFGHANISTAN Aucun développement significatif n'est probable.
3 avril 1991
7
Language:English
Score: 716308.9
-
https://www.fao.org/ag/locusts/common/ecg/1402/fr/DL151f.pdf
Data Source: un
Figure 3.c.2 plots the adult female probability of dying against the adult male probability of dying (ages 15-49) for the 35 countries in Africa with estimated HIV prevalence of 1.0 percent or greater. (...) Figures 3.c.3 and 3.c.4 plot the male and female median age-specific probability of dying by prevalence group.
These figures reveal a very strong association between the age-pattern of the probability of dying and adult HIV prevalence. For both sexes, as the HIV prevalence increases the probability of dying between ages 20 and 60 increases while the probability of dying at other ages remains little changed.
Language:English
Score: 715068.07
-
https://www.un.org/development...pd-egm-200309-clark_paper3.pdf
Data Source: un
--Risk is not simply a function of the probability of a given event, but is a function of probability times
consequences, or 'r= p X c'.
This means that even if the probability of a global nuclear exchange is relatively low, the consequences
are so grave that only a probability of zero or very close thereto can be acceptable.
(...) Statistically speaking we probably already shouldn't be here, and a study of those near misses
leads one to conclude that the only reason we ARE here is by what General Lee Butler terms 'Divine
Providence'.
Language:English
Score: 714521.3
-
https://www.un.org/en/conf/npt...tatements/pdf/individual_4.pdf
Data Source: un