Home

Results 1 - 10 of 399,426 for production. Search took 1.703 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
On 16 October 2020, the Applicant filed a motion for production of documents. In the said motion, the Applicant seeks the production of all documents related to the disciplinary sanction imposed on three other staff members investigated in connection with the Applicant’s case “in order to reassess what is alleged against him, for his defence”. (...) UNDT/NBI/2019/108 Order No. 212 (NBI/2020) Page 3 of 5 c. the requested documentation is confidential and its production would violate the rights of individuals who are not party to the present proceedings. (...) Pursuant to art 9.1 of the UNDT Statute, the UNDT may “order production of documents or such other evidence as it deems necessary”.
Language:English
Score: 434567.5 - www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2020-212.pdf
Data Source: oaj
If there were such an entitlement, he or she would not need to request the Tribunal to order production and could simply rely on the legal right. (...) Sometimes the party seeking production will not know its contents though it appears to belong to a class of documents likely to be relevant. In such a case it will very likely be “fair” to require production. In cases of sensitivity it may be that production in the first instance is made to the Tribunal and the judge order access to be given or refused after he or she has inspected the document.
Language:English
Score: 424906.5 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2009-024.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The Applicant’s principal contentions regarding circumstances for the production of the Further Information may be summarized as follows: a. (...) Arrangements will be made for the secure and in-person transmittal of the final work product to OHRM at Headquarters in New York; l. (...) An order concerning the production of any document over which confidentiality is sought Case No.
Language:English
Score: 421637.84 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2011-069.pdf
Data Source: oaj
SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS ORDER ON APPLICANT’S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE Counsel for the Applicant: Monika Bileris Counsel for the Respondent: Susan Maddox, ALS/OHRM Case No. (...) In his submissions, the Applicant also requested the Tribunal to make three orders requiring the production of additional evidence. 5. In light of the Tribunal’s decisions on these requests the Respondent was not called on to respond. (...) As its probative value is unclear the Tribunal will order its production, initially on an ex parte basis for the Tribunal to evaluate and make a final decision on its admissibility. 16.
Language:English
Score: 417523.1 - www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2015-309.pdf
Data Source: oaj
A problem with the definition of “judgment” adopted by the respondent is that it clearly does not cover all interlocutory orders, such as orders for production of documents. An order for production is not an interim judgment on the issues in the case in the sense in which that phrase is used in the Dictionary cited. (...) Nor does it suggest that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to order the production of documents is limited in the way suggested. (...) The DTS in art 9 gives power in unqualified language to require the production of documents – [9] 1. The Dispute Tribunal may order production of documents or such other evidence as it deems necessary
Language:English
Score: 415415.97 - www.un.org/en/internalj...es/undt/orders/ny-2010-059.pdf
Data Source: oaj
SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS ORDER ON THE APPLICANT’S APPLICATION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE Counsel for Applicant: Adolph Bishanga Counsel for Respondent: Stephen Margetts, ALS/OHRM, UN Secretariat. (...) Introduction 1.1 By Application dated 18 May 2010, the Applicant requests the Tribunal to order the production of the following documents which are in the possession of the Respondent. (...) Considerations 2.1 The Tribunal, having considered the parties’ submissions and pursuant to Article 18(1) of the UNDT Rules of Procedure, finds that the documents sought by the Applicant are not relevant to any issue in the proceeding and, REJECTS the Applicant’s Motion requesting the Tribunal to order the production of the evidence.
Language:English
Score: 412381.93 - www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2010-084.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 23 June 2015, before the reply was filed, the Applicant filed a motion requesting leave of the Tribunal to file a 16-page motion for production of evidence by the Respondent, attaching the said 16-page motion. 4. (...) On 7 July 2015, the Tribunal issued Order No. 133 (NY/2015) directing that the Applicant file a response to the Respondent's reply by 6 August 2015, and placing the Applicant's motion for production of evidence in abeyance until further notice. 6. (...) Furthermore, the Applicant's motions for production and for discovery and disclosure, shall be deferred to be dealt with by the Judge assigned the case in due course.
Language:English
Score: 412381.93 - www.un.org/en/internalj...es/undt/orders/ny-2015-223.pdf
Data Source: oaj
According to the Secretary-General, the Dispute Tribunal erred on a question of law and exceeded its competence in ordering the production of documents concerning the selection process when Mr. (...) Article 9, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the UNDT reads as follows: “The Dispute Tribunal may order production of documents or such other evidence as it deems necessary.” (...) The Tribunal is entitled to order the production of any document relevant to that end. 40.
Language:English
Score: 412362.3 - www.un.org/en/internalj...tucci) English Translation.pdf
Data Source: oaj
According to the Secretary-General, the Dispute Tribunal erred on a question of law and exceeded its competence in ordering the production of documents concerning the selection process when Mr. (...) Article 9, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the UNDT reads as follows: “The Dispute Tribunal may order production of documents or such other evidence as it deems necessary.” (...) The Tribunal is entitled to order the production of any document relevant to that end. 40.
Language:English
Score: 412362.3 - www.un.org/en/internalj...t/judgments/2011-unat-121e.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The Applicant on 4 October 2012 filed a motion for production of documents. On 8 February 2013, the Respondent was instructed to respond to the Applicant’s motion and on 5 March 2013, the Respondent filed a response. 4. (...) The Respondent is of the view that the Applicant was not prejudiced in any way and that the production of the written test is unnecessary, because there is no causal link between the scores and the selection decision. (...) Therefore, the Tribunal finds that the production of the written tests to the Applicant is not necessary for a fair disposal of this case.
Language:English
Score: 412179.8 - www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/gva-2013-051.pdf
Data Source: oaj