Senior Protection Officer in Quetta, Pakistan (P-4) (JO 8647, Position
No. 10018015) (“Position 4”) (...) It required, inter alia, a strong protection background, as well as
experience in protection matters relating to the reintegration of returning refugees and
protection needs of IDPs, in addition to good management, coordination and
diplomatic skills.
... (...) Position 3 required, inter alia, a strategic protection
background and supervisory experience, as well as experience with protection standards,
operational procedures and protection delivery at the country level for matters relating
to IDPs.
...
Language:English
Score: 317237.4
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...at/judgments/2017-UNAT-714.pdf
Data Source: oaj
In her view there was no link between the protected action and the negative PAR
because there was no protected activity.
(...) The Ethics Office failed to provide her with an adequately
reasoned decision for rejecting her application for protection for engaging
in protected activity;
g. (...) A report of misconduct is the protected activity which
is the very foundation of a claim for protection without which a claim cannot
be considered.
53.
Language:English
Score: 315394.12
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2013-085.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Senior Protection Officer in Quetta, Pakistan (P-4) (JO 8647, Position
No. 10018015) (“Position 4”).
(...) It required, inter alia, a strong protection background, as well as
experience in protection matters relating to the reintegration of returning refugees
and protection needs of IDPs, in addition to good management, coordination and
diplomatic skills.
10. (...) Position 3 required, inter alia, a strategic
protection background and supervisory experience, as well as experience with
protection standards, operational procedures and protection delivery at the country
level for matters relating to IDPs.
Language:English
Score: 313023.4
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2016-067.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The Applicant requests rescission of the decision dated 26 March 2012 by
which the Ethics Office refused to consider that the settlement agreement she had
concluded on 29 June 2011 with the International Trade Centre (ITC), following
mediation, constituted a protected activity within the scope of the
Secretary-General’s bulletin ST/SGB/2005/21 (Protection against retaliation for
reporting misconduct and for cooperating with duly authorized audits or
investigations).
2. (...) On 26 March 2012, the Ethics Office refused to grant protection to the
Applicant on the grounds that the settlement agreement concluded with ITC on
29 June 2011 did not constitute a protected activity within the scope of the
Secretary-General’s bulletin ST/SGB/2005/21.
13. (...) The Secretary-General’s bulletin ST/SGB/2005/21 on protection against
retaliation for reporting misconduct and for cooperating with duly authorized
audits or investigations entitles staff members to make complaints of retaliation to
the Ethics Office and directs that Office to conduct a preliminary review to
determine if the staff member engaged in a protected activity.

Language:English
Score: 312898.6
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...t/judgments/undt-2012-195e.pdf
Data Source: oaj
In December 2013, the Applicant submitted a request for protection against
retaliation to the Ethics Office. (...) All managers in the Applicant’s section be provided with appropriate
training on the Organization’s policy on protection against retaliation (the
third recommendation);
d. (...) UNDT/2020/057/Corr.1
Page 6 of 11
command, no steps were taken to ensure protection from further retaliation by other
managers in his section.
18.
Language:English
Score: 312068.21
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2020-057.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The Applicant is moving the court to order protective measures to ensure that
his witnesses are not prejudiced, intimidated or retaliated against for testifying
in the present case. (...) The Tribunal notes that the Statute and Rules of Procedure of the Dispute
Tribunal are silent on the protective measures which may be ordered for the
purposes of witness protection. (...) The issue of witness protection has been raised at international level mostly in
the context of criminal trials.
Language:English
Score: 312059.99
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2010-025.pdf
Data Source: oaj
By application filed on 11 September 2018, the Applicant, a Human Rights
Officer (P-3) working for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human
Rights (“OHCHR”), challenges “the procedure by which her request for protection
from retaliation was processed, the failure to protect her from retaliation and the
failure to follow up on Ethics Office recommendations subsequent to her request
for protection from retaliation”.
2. (...) The Applicant’s request for protection has been incorrectly
referred between Ethics Offices. (...) UNDT/2020/097
Page 24 of 34
made aware of her situation and the “alleged” procedural flaws in the treatment of
her request for protection, had an independent duty to protect her from retaliation.
96.
Language:English
Score: 310734.8
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2020-097.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 14 December 2010, the Applicant submitted to the Ethics Office a
request for protection from retaliation based on ST/SGB/2005/21 (Protection
Against Retaliation for Reporting Misconduct and for Cooperating with Duly
Authorized Audits or Investigations). (...) In
order to receive protection, the report should be made as soon as
possible and not later than six years after the individual becomes
aware of the misconduct. (...) Applications before the Tribunal and requests for
management evaluation do not constitute a protected activity under the terms of
sec. 2.1 of ST/SGB/2005/21.
50.
Language:English
Score: 307415.82
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2013-127.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 7 June 2019, she
submitted to the Ethics Office a request for protection against retaliation (in terms of
ST/SGB/2017/2/Rev.1 (Protection against retaliation for reporting misconduct and for
cooperating with duly authorized audits or investigations).
5. (...) Fosse’s cooperation constitutes a protected
activity in terms of Section 2 of ST/SGB/2017/2/Rev.1.
6. (...) It provides that individuals who make such reports in good faith have the right to
be protected against retaliation. The right to protection is thus a term of the contract of
staff members of the Organization as constituted by the relevant administrative issuance.
43.
Language:English
Score: 307415.82
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...t/judgments/2022-UNAT-1305.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Reinstatement as a Protection Officer at the P-3 level on a
probationary basis;
b. (...) In January 2000, she was given an indefinite appointment as Senior
Protection Clerk at the GL4 level. In July 2000, she was promoted to the GL5
level. (...) By memorandum of 13 February 2007 to the UNHCR Representative in
Iran, the Deputy Representative (Protection) expressed reservations about the
Applicant’s performance and competencies and stressed her reluctance to accept
comments by more experienced Protection Officers on her performance.
11.
Language:English
Score: 306975.66
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...t/judgments/undt-2011-057e.pdf
Data Source: oaj