Home

Results 31 - 40 of 1,060,194 for publicity. Search took 5.655 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
He sought the removal of the Order from the Dispute Tribunal’s website or, in the alternative, its publication in the same way as other decisions issued in relation to requests for recusal. 4. (...) Gehr also submits that the UNDT failed to differentiate between the publication of a judgment and the publication of a decision regarding recusal. (...) We are satisfied that the Dispute Tribunal, in assessing whether the publication complained of constituted an administrative decision for the purpose of Article 2(1) of the UNDT Statute, correctly determined that Mr.
Language:English
Score: 322417.29 - www.un.org/en/internalj...at/judgments/2013-UNAT-365.pdf
Data Source: oaj
What the exact meaning of “Public International Organization” as used in question 18 of the PHP is. (...) Is the exact definition of “Public International Organization” as used in question 18 clear enough for the Applicant to have understood what was expected of her? (...) To this, the Respondent submitted that, the term Public International Organization is intended to mean the United Nations Common System.
Language:English
Score: 322271.73 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2012-142.pdf
Data Source: oaj
In February 2018, the case of Mr. PN became public while the Applicant was attending the “End Violence Solutions” summit. (...) PN, whose case became public knowledge, became known to some individuals as she discussed this matter openly at a meeting. 29. (...) PN were to be made public, this information could cause a potential damage to UNICEF.
Language:English
Score: 322271.73 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2020-084.pdf
Data Source: oaj
In 2007 she began a sustained campaign against the applicant and UNICEF in India in which she made serious public allegations including making a complaint to the Indian Page 2 of 5 Case No. (...) In reply to the request that he be cleared of wrong doing the letter stated that the investigation did not clear him of all of the allegations and that he had been formally reprimanded for inappropriate behaviour including public jokes and comments with sexual connotations that made some staff feel uncomfortable in the workplace. (...) I find that the letter of 19 December 2007 resulted in three administrative decisions: the refusal to release the investigation report, the refusal to pay the applicant’s legal expenses and the refusal to issue internal and public announcements acknowledging his exoneration. 17.
Language:English
Score: 322056.23 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2009-012.pdf
Data Source: oaj
(Not an official document. For public information purposes only.) 2018-1191 EL SADEK against Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East Appeal dismissed. (...) (Not an official document. For public information purposes only.) 2018-1201 ROCKCLIFFE against United Nations Joint Staff Pension Board Application for execution granted, in part. (...) (Not an official document. For public information purposes only.) 2018-1211 SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS against Agha Appeal granted.
Language:English
Score: 321516.14 - www.un.org/en/internalj...UNAT's 2019 Spring Session.pdf
Data Source: oaj
.: 234 (NBI/2021) Page 3 of 4 [t]he oral proceedings shall be held in public unless the judge hearing the case decides, at his or her own initiative or at the request of one of the parties, that exceptional circumstances require that the oral proceedings be closed. (...) It allows for openness, accountability and good governance, which indeed are the overarching principles of this Organization. Public hearings aid the aim of transparency and accountability of the internal justice system and therefore any need to hold private hearings must be grounded on legitimate grounds. In the present case, the Applicants’ concerns must be weighed against the public interest of having a public hearing. 8. The Tribunal considers that the observation by interns working in the legal offices of the Respondent does not pose a threat to the integrity of the proceedings being compromised by leaks to the press or that their observation amounts to exceptional circumstances that would require the oral proceedings in these two cases to be closed.
Language:English
Score: 321516.14 - www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2021-234.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The first is related to the factual circumstances leading to the hearing while the second one derives from the publication of Order No. 213 (NBI/2019). 3. On 14 January 2020 the Tribunal issued Order No. 005 (NBI/2020) which required: a. (...) The Order having been issued, it is difficult to see the value of any response on the request for availability, especially when Counsel has taken steps to be available. 24. As to the publication of the Order on the website, the submissions of the Registry brought in a self-serving justification for the publication. (...) The new policy does not fully justify the publication of Order No. 213 (NBI/2019) and the argument on the harm to the case of the Applicant and to his Counsel remains. 29.
Language:English
Score: 321437.65 - www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2020-031.pdf
Data Source: oaj
It was agreed that UNSD would assist ECOWAS in the technical preparation of the publication as the latter did not have the necessary technical expertise. (...) The front page of the Profile acknowledged that the publication was prepared by the ECOWAS Commission and UNSD. (...) The second page of the publication contained the following notation: “Copyright @Economic Community of West African States Commission … Printed by the United Nations New York.” 12.
Language:English
Score: 320976.12 - www.un.org/en/internalj...at/judgments/2011-unat-113.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Waugh for one available P-3 post of Public Information Officer which was in the Outreach Unit of the Public Information Office in UNMISS. 22. (...) He was not privy to how the recruitment for the second Public Information Officer post in UNMISS was done. (...) In his evidence before the Dispute Tribunal, the Applicant claimed that there were four P-3 Public Information Officers in UNMIS, and four P-3 Public Information Officer posts available in UNMISS.
Language:English
Score: 320361.18 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2012-202.pdf
Data Source: oaj
An online link for the public’s access was posted on the hearing calendar on the UNDT’s website beforehand. (...) Lee in contempt of court and prohibited him from attending any future public hearings conducted by Judge Adda, until he has demonstrated that the recordings from the 3 November 2020 hearing have been removed from the public domain and destroyed. 2 See Contempt Order. (...) Lee has demonstrated to the Tribunal that all illegal recordings have been removed from the public domain and destroyed, it will hold Mr. Lee in contempt of court and prohibit him from attending any of its future public hearings. 11.
Language:English
Score: 320361.18 - www.un.org/en/internalj...t/judgments/2021-UNAT-1170.pdf
Data Source: oaj