In this relationship, the response monitor role object monitors the response request sent from the response requester role object and the response received by the response confirmation role object. The response monitor role object may summarize the response times between the response requester role object and the response confirmation role object. (...) If this request/response length package is supported, response request length and response length are carried by response confirmation notification.
Language:English
Score: 306574.27
-
https://www.itu.int/wftp3/Publ.../fl/itu-t/x/x748/1999/x748.gdm
Data Source: un
In this relationship, the response monitor role object monitors the response request sent from the response requester role object and the response received by the response confirmation role object. The response monitor role object may summarize the response times between the response requester role object and the response confirmation role object. (...) If this request/response length package is supported, response request length and response length are carried by response confirmation notification.
Language:English
Score: 306574.27
-
https://www.itu.int/wftp3/Publ...fl/itu-t/x/x748/1999/x748.html
Data Source: un
The typology of disinformation responses distinguishes four top-level categories (see Figure 1 below):
Identification responses
Responses aimed at producers and
distributors
Responses aimed at the production and distribution
mechanisms
Responses aimed at the target audiences of
disinformation campaigns
Disinformation Responses
Figure 1. (...) C h
ap ter 2
Typology of Disinformation Responses38
Identification responses
z Monitoring and fact- checking responses
z Investigative responses
Responses aimed at producers and distributors
z Legislative, pre- legislative, and policy responses
z National and international counter-disinformation campaigns
z Electoral responses
Responses aimed at the production and distribution mechanisms
z Curatorial responses
z Technical and algorithmic responses
z De-monetisation responses
Responses aimed at the target audiences of disinformation campaigns
z Ethical and normative responses
z Educational responses
z Empowerment and credibility labelling efforts
Disinformation responses
Figure 2. (...) _Hlk47960796
Foreword
Executive Summary
1
Introduction
2
Typology of Disinformation Responses
3
Research Context and Gaps
4
Identification Responses
4.1 Monitoring and fact-checking responses
4.2 Investigative responses
Ecosystem Responses Aimed at Producers and Distributors
5.1 Legislative, pre-legislative, and policy responses
5.2 National and international counter-disinformation campaigns
5.3 Electoral-specific responses
6
Responses within Production and Distribution
6.1 Curatorial responses
6.2 Technical / algorithmic responses
6.3 Demonetisation and advertising-linked responses
7
Responses Aimed at The Target Audiences of Disinformation Campaigns
7.1 Normative and ethical responses
7.2 Educational responses
7.3 Empowerment & credibility labelling responses
8
Challenges and Recommended Actions
List of Sources Consulted
Appendix A
Figure 1.
Language:English
Score: 306470.46
-
https://en.unesco.org/sites/de...6_40_balancing_act_disinfo.pdf
Data Source: un
ITU-R SURVEY.WP6A SP
Français Español
Home : ITU-R : SURVEY.WP6A : Other documents
Recently posted - Search Meeting Documents
ITU-R SURVEY.WP6A SP
ITU-R SURVEY.WP6A
Max # of documents displayed/page:
Responses to Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for terrestrial television broadcasting in connection with WRC-15 Agenda item 1.2 - Circular Letter 6/LCCE/78
Results: 86 total items.
Result page: 1 - 2 - Next
Other documents
Number
Title
Source
Date
[ 86 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Russian Federation
2014-03-26
[ 85 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Portugal
2014-03-03
[ 84 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Latvia (Republic of)
2014-03-19
[ 83 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Hungary
2014-03-03
[ 82 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Estonia (Republic of)
2014-04-01
[ 81 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Denmark
2014-04-01
[ 80 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
United Arab Emirates
2013-07-09
[ 79 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Turkey
2013-11-12
[ 78 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Niger (Republic of the)
2013-07-09
[ 77 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Malawi
2013-07-09
[ 76 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements (Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Sierra Leone, Togo)
ECOWAS
2013-07-09
[ 75 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Cyprus (Republic of)
2013-07-09
[ 74 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Arab States Broadcasting Union
2013-07-09
[ 73 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Zimbabwe (Republic of)
2013-02-19
[ 72 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Zambia (Republic of)
2013-04-04
[ 71 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Uzbekistan (Republic of)
2013-04-19
[ 70 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Tanzania (United Republic of)
2013-04-04
[ 69 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Sweden
2013-03-29
[ 68 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Swaziland (Kingdom of)
2013-02-14
[ 67 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Sudan (Republic of the)
2013-02-14
[ 66 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
South Africa (Republic of)
2013-02-14
[ 65 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Senegal (Republic of)
2013-04-04
[ 64 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Rwanda (Republic of)
2013-04-04
[ 63 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Oman (Sultanate of)
2013-02-14
[ 62 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Namibia (Republic of)
2013-02-14
[ 61 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Morocco (Kingdom of)
2013-02-14
[ 60 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Moldova (Republic of)
2013-04-04
[ 59 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Mali (Republic of)
2013-04-04
[ 58 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Libya
2013-04-04
[ 57 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Lebanon
2013-02-14
[ 56 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Kyrgyz Republic
2013-03-29
[ 55 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Kazakhstan (Republic of)
2013-04-04
[ 54 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Israel (State of)
2013-03-04
[ 53 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Egypt (Arab Republic of)
2013-03-18
[ 52 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Cameroon (Republic of)
2013-04-04
[ 51 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Belarus (Republic of)
2013-04-04
[ 50 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Azerbaijani Republic
2013-04-04
[ 49 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
African Telecommunications Union
2013-04-04
[ 48 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Armenia (Republic of)
2013-03-29
[ 47 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Angola (Republic of)
2013-04-04
[ 46 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen
2012-07-28
[ 45 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Teracom AB
2012-08-21
[ 44 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
TDF Group
2012-08-21
[ 43 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Rai Way S.p.A.
2012-08-21
[ 42 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Norddeutscher Rundfunk (NDR)
2012-08-21
[ 41 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Media Broadcast
2012-08-21
[ 40 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
European Broadcasting Union
2012-08-21
[ 39 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Broadcast Networks Europe
2012-08-21
[ 38 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
2012-08-21
[ 37 ]
Response to Questionnaire on Spectrum Requirements
Abertis Telecom
2012-08-21
Results: 86 total items.
Language:English
Score: 306438.62
-
https://www.itu.int/md/R12-SURVEY.WP6A-SP/_page.print
Data Source: un
Information Documents
Number
Title
Source
Date
[ 40 ]
Response from Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan (Republic of)
2014-03-18
[ 39 ]
Compilation of responses received on Questionnaire to Member States
N/A
2014-02-24
[ 38 ]
Response from Brazil
Brazil (Federative Republic of)
2014-02-13
[ 37 ]
Response from India
India (Republic of)
2014-02-13
[ 36 ]
Response from Bulgaria
Bulgaria (Republic of)
2014-02-11
[ 35 ]
Response from Norway
Norway
2014-02-10
[ 34 ]
Response from New Zealand
New Zealand
2014-02-10
[ 33 ]
Response from the United States
United States of America
2014-02-10
[ 32 ]
Response from Morocco
Morocco (Kingdom of)
2014-02-10
[ 31 ]
Response from Saudi Arabia and Bahrain
Saudi Arabia (Kingdom of) , Bahrain (Kingdom of)
2014-02-10
[ 30 ]
Response from Canada
Canada
2014-02-10
[ 29 ]
Response from Paraguay
Paraguay (Republic of)
2014-02-10
[ 28 ]
Response from Sweden
Sweden
2014-02-10
[ 27 ]
Response from the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
2014-02-10
[ 26 ]
Response from Australia
Australia
2014-02-10
[ 25 ]
Response from the Republic of Korea
Korea (Republic of)
2014-02-10
[ 24 ]
Response from Turkey
Turkey
2014-02-07
[ 23 ]
Response from Japan
Japan
2014-02-04
[ 22 ]
Response from the United Kingdom
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2014-02-03
[ 21 ]
Response from Uruguay
Uruguay (Eastern Republic of)
2014-02-03
[ 20 ]
Response from Mauritius
Mauritius (Republic of)
2014-02-03
[ 19 ]
Response from Denmark
Denmark
2014-01-31
[ 18 ]
Response from Belarus
Belarus (Republic of)
2014-01-31
[ 17 ]
Response from Poland
Poland (Republic of)
2014-01-31
[ 16 ]
Response from Zambia
Zambia (Republic of)
2014-01-31
[ 15 ]
Response from Ukraine
Ukraine
2014-01-31
[ 14 ]
Response from Qatar
Qatar (State of)
2014-01-31
[ 13 ]
Response from Rwanda
Rwanda (Republic of)
2014-01-31
[ 12 ]
Response from Moldova
Moldova (Republic of)
2014-01-31
[ 11 ]
Response from Lithuania
Lithuania (Republic of)
2014-01-31
[ 10 ]
Response from Oman (Telecommunications Regulatory Authority)
Oman (Sultanate of)
2014-01-30
[ 9 ]
Response from Iraq
Iraq (Republic of)
2014-01-30
[ 8 ] (Rev.1)
Response from the Czech Republic
Czech Republic
2014-01-29
[ 7 ]
Response from Botswana
Botswana (Republic of)
2014-01-29
[ 6 ]
Response from Singapore
Singapore (Republic of)
2014-01-29
[ 5 ]
Response from Portugal
Portugal
2014-01-28
[ 4 ]
Response from Switzerland
Switzerland (Confederation of)
2014-01-28
[ 3 ]
Response from Sudan
Sudan (Republic of the)
2014-01-26
[ 2 ]
Response from Oman (Information Technology Authority)
Oman (Sultanate of)
2013-12-25
[ 1 ]
Circular Letter No 168
SG
2014-02-12
Results: 40 total items.
Language:English
Score: 305802.69
-
https://www.itu.int/md/S14-RCLINTPOL4-INF
Data Source: un
Research report of the Working Group on Epidemic Management Acknowledgements Table of contents List of figures and tables Foreword Executive Summary 1 Background 1.1 Overview of COVID-19 1.2 Strategies for Responding to New Infectious Diseases: PI and NPI 1.3 ICT’s Contribution to the Infectious Disease Response 1.4 Framework for Response to Future Pandemics 2 Global Response Strategies and their Effectiveness 2.1 COVID-19 Response Strategies of Countries in North America, Europe/ Asia/ Africa and Their Impact 2.1.1 Comparison of COVID-19 responses by country 2.1.2 Mexico’s response strategy 2.1.3 United States’s response strategy 2.1.4 Germany’s response strategy 2.1.5 Spain´s response strategy 2.1.6 Sweden’s response strategy 2.1.7 United Kingdom’s response strategy 2.1.8 China’s response strategy 2.1.9 India’s response strategy 2.1.10 Japan’s response strategy 2.1.11 Republic of Korea’s response strategy 2.1.12 Malaysia’s response strategy 2.1.13 Kenya’s response strategy 2.1.14 Liberia’s response strategy 2.1.15 Mauritius’ response strategy 2.2 Role of International Organizations 2.2.1 COVID-19 response of the United Nations 2.2.2 Vaccine distribution efforts of international organizations 2.2.3 ITU’s contribution to the COVID-19 response 2.2.4 UNESCO’s contribution to the COVID-19 response 2.2.5 The CoMo Consortium’s COVID-19 modelling support for LMICs 2.2.6 UN Global Pulse’s COVID-19 modelling of refugee and internally-displaced-person (IDP) settlements 3 Role of ICT in COVID-19 Management 3.1 Importance of ICT Responses to New Infectious Diseases 3.2 Examples of ICT-based Responses to COVID-19 3.2.1 Digital Epidemiological Surveillance 3.2.2 Rapid case identification 3.2.3 Interruption of community transmission 3.2.4 Public service delivery, communication and socio-economic engagement 3.2.5 Clinical care 3.2.6 Pharmaceutical intervention 4 Key Insights 4.1 Preparedness and Rapid Response for Socio-Economic Resilience 4.2 Growing Role of ICT in Disease Response 4.3 Importance of ICT Infrastructure and Legal System in the Disease Response 4.4 Heightened International Coordination in Response to Future Pandemics 5 Considerations / Conclusions 5.1 Enabling Environment: Flexible Regulation, Policy to Foster ICT 5.2 ICT to Prevent Pandemics: Pre-emptive Investment 5.3 Enhancing Global Cooperation References
Language:English
Score: 305617.63
-
https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/it...ROADBAND.25-2022-TOC-HTM-E.htm
Data Source: un
ITU-R SURVEY.SG6 SP
Français Español
Home : ITU-R : SURVEY.SG6 : Other documents
Recently posted - Search Meeting Documents
ITU-R SURVEY.SG6 SP
ITU-R SURVEY.SG6
Max # of documents displayed/page:
The following responses to Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting were taken into consideration in a new Report ITU-R BT. (...) [SPECTRUM-REQMTS] - Spectrum / frequency requirements for bands allocated to broadcasting on a primary basis - approved by SG 6 at its meeting on 24 July 2015. Responses that are received after 24 July 2015 can be found at "http://www.itu.int/md/R12-SURVEYSG6AFT-SP"
Results: 72 total items.
Result page: 1 - 2 - Next
Other documents
Number
Title
Source
Date
[ 72 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Ireland
2015-07-12
[ 71 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Tunisia
2015-06-26
[ 70 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Armenia (Republic of)
2015-06-03
[ 69 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Burkina Faso
2015-05-22
[ 68 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Kenya (Republic of)
2015-05-22
[ 67 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Cambodia (Kingdom of)
2015-05-22
[ 66 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Uzbekistan (Republic of)
2015-05-21
[ 65 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Egypt (Arab Republic of)
2015-05-21
[ 64 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Tanzania (United Republic of)
2015-05-21
[ 63 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Algeria (People's Democratic Republic of)
2015-05-20
[ 62 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Bahrain (Kingdom of)
2015-05-19
[ 61 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Lithuania (Republic of)
2015-05-15
[ 60 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Russian Federation
2015-05-14
[ 59 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Malaysia
2015-05-14
[ 58 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Kyrgyz Republic
2015-04-28
[ 57 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Mauritius (Republic of)
2015-04-24
[ 56 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Estonia (Republic of)
2015-04-02
[ 55 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Bulgaria (Republic of)
2015-03-26
[ 54 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Ethiopia (Federal Democratic Republic of)
2015-03-04
[ 53 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Liechtenstein (Principality of)
2015-02-26
[ 52 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
International Association of Broadcasting
2015-02-10
[ 51 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Colombia (Republic of)
2014-11-18
[ 50 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
France
2014-11-17
[ 49 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2014-11-17
[ 48 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
North American Broadcasters Association (NABA)
2014-11-11
[ 47 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Romania
2014-11-07
[ 46 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Korea (Republic of)
2014-11-07
[ 45 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Czech Republic
2014-10-30
[ 44 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2014-10-27
[ 43 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Brazil (Federative Republic of)
2014-10-24
[ 42 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Belize
2014-10-23
[ 41 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Jamaica
2014-10-22
[ 40 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Suriname (Republic of)
2014-10-21
[ 39 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Slovak Republic
2014-10-21
[ 38 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Palestine(*)
2014-10-20
[ 37 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Serbia (Republic of )
2014-10-20
[ 36 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Norway
2014-10-20
[ 35 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Madagascar (Republic of)
2014-10-20
[ 34 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Portugal
2014-10-20
[ 33 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2014-10-17
[ 32 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Italy
2014-10-17
[ 31 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Rai Way S.p.A.
2014-10-17
[ 30 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Hungary
2014-10-16
[ 29 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
ABERTIS TELECOM S.A.
2014-10-17
[ 28 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Vatican City State
2014-10-17
[ 27 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Germany (Federal Republic of)
2014-10-17
[ 26 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Japan
2014-10-17
[ 25 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Sweden
2014-10-17
[ 24 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Nippon Hoso Kyokai (NHK) (Japan Broadcasting Corporation)
2014-10-17
[ 23 ]
Response to the Questionnaire on spectrum requirements for the future of sound and television broadcasting
Papua New Guinea
2014-10-17
Results: 72 total items.
Language:English
Score: 305204.08
-
https://www.itu.int/md/R12-SURVEY.SG6-SP/en
Data Source: un
.) + ISO8571-FTAM + information object set Extension-attribute-Patterns
Extension-Attributes + type Abstract-Syntax-Name
Access-Context
Access-Control-Attribute
Access-Control-Change-Attribute
Access-Control-Element
Access-Passwords
Access-Request
Account
Account-Attribute
Action-Result
Activity-Identifier
AE-qualifier
AE-title
AND-Set
AP-title
Application-Entity-Title
Attribute-Extension-Names
Attribute-Extension-Set
Attribute-Extension-Set-Name
Attribute-Extensions
Attribute-Extensions-Pattern
Attribute-Groups
Attribute-Names
Attribute-Value-Assertions
Bitstring-Pattern
Boolean-Pattern
Bulk-Data-PDU
Change-Attributes
Charging
Child-Objects-Attribute
Concurrency-Access
Concurrency-Control
Concurrency-Key
Constraint-Set-Name
Contents-Type-Attribute
Contents-Type-List
Contents-Type-Pattern
Create-Attributes
Date-and-Time-Attribute
Date-and-Time-Pattern
Degree-Of-Overlap
Destination-File-Directory
Diagnostic
Document-Type-Name
Entity-Reference
Equality-Comparision
Error-Action
Extension-Attribute
Extension-Attribute-identifier
Extension-Set-Identifier
F-BEGIN-GROUP-request
F-BEGIN-GROUP-response
F-CANCEL-request
F-CANCEL-response
F-CHANGE-ATTRIB-request
F-CHANGE-ATTRIB-response
F-CHANGE-LINK-ATTRIB-request
F-CHANGE-LINK-ATTRIB-response
F-CHANGE-PREFIX-request
F-CHANGE-PREFIX-response
F-CHECK-request
F-CHECK-response
F-CLOSE-request
F-CLOSE-response
F-COPY-request
F-COPY-response
F-CREATE-DIRECTORY-request
F-CREATE-DIRECTORY-response
F-CREATE-request
F-CREATE-response
F-DATA-END-request
F-DELETE-request
F-DELETE-response
F-DESELECT-request
F-DESELECT-response
F-END-GROUP-request
F-END-GROUP-response
F-ERASE-request
F-ERASE-response
F-GROUP-CHANGE-ATTRIB-request
F-GROUP-CHANGE-ATTRIB-response
F-GROUP-COPY-request
F-GROUP-COPY-response
F-GROUP-DELETE-request
F-GROUP-DELETE-response
F-GROUP-LIST-request
F-GROUP-LIST-response
F-GROUP-MOVE-request
F-GROUP-MOVE-response
F-GROUP-SELECT-request
F-GROUP-SELECT-response
F-INITIALIZE-request
F-INITIALIZE-response
F-LINK-request
F-LINK-response
F-LIST-request
F-LIST-response
F-LOCATE-request
F-LOCATE-response
F-MOVE-request
F-MOVE-response
F-OPEN-request
F-OPEN-response
F-P-ABORT-request
F-READ-ATTRIB-request
F-READ-ATTRIB-response
F-READ-LINK-ATTRIB-request
F-READ-LINK-ATTRIB-response
F-READ-request
F-RECOVER-request
F-RECOVER-response
F-RESTART-request
F-RESTART-response
F-SELECT-ANOTHER-request
F-SELECT-ANOTHER-response
F-SELECT-request
F-SELECT-response
F-TERMINATE-request
F-TERMINATE-response
F-TRANSFER-END-request
F-TRANSFER-END-response
F-U-ABORT-request
F-UNLINK-request
F-UNLINK-response
F-WRITE-request
FADU-Identity
FADU-Lock
File-PDU
FSM-PDU
FTAM-Quality-of-Service
FTAM-Regime-PDU
Functional-Units
Implementation-Information
Integer-Pattern
Legal-Qualification-Attribute
Lock
Node-Name
Object-Availability-Attribute
Object-Identifier-Pattern
Object-Size-Attribute
Object-Type-Attribute
Objects-Attributes-List
Operation-Result
OR-Set
Other-Pattern
Override
Pass-Passwords
Password
Path-Access-Passwords
Pathname
Pathname-Attribute
Pathname-Pattern
PDU
Permitted-Actions-Attribute
Private-Use-Attribute
Protocol-Version
Read-Attributes
Referent-Indicator
Relational-Comparision
Request-Operation-Result
Request-Type
Scope
Select-Attributes
Service-Class
Shared-ASE-Information
State-Result
String-Pattern
User-Identity
User-Identity-Attribute
User-Identity-Pattern
Language:English
Score: 304920.87
-
https://www.itu.int/wftp3/Publ...571-4/1988/list-by-module.html
Data Source: un
United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect
English
Français
Search
Search
Home
About Us
The Special Advisers
Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide
Special Adviser on the Responsibility to Protect
The Office
Mandate
Methodology
Strategy
Partners
FAQ
Employment
Contact Us
Our Work
Early Warning
Advising and Mobilising
Overview
Hate Speech Strategy
Enhancing Capacity
Raising Awareness
Advancing R to P implementation
Atrocity Crimes
Definitions
Genocide
Crimes Against Humanity
War Crimes
"Ethnic Cleansing"
Legal Framework
International Law
Genocide Convention
Prevention
Response
Accountability
Responsibility to Protect
About
15th Anniversary
Overview
High Level Event
UN
Secretary-General
General Assembly
Security Council
Human Rights Council
Member States
Regional Organisations
Civil Society
Key Documents
Media
Public Statements
Op-eds
News
Photo exhibition
Hate Speech
Strategy and Plan of Action
International Day
#NoToHate campaign
Events
Publications & Resources
Responsibility to Protect
About
15th Anniversary
United Nations
Member States
Regional Organisations
Civil Society
Key Documents
Key Documents
Founding Documents
2001 Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty on The Responsibility to Protect
2004 Report of the Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change on A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility ( A/59/565 ).
2005 Report of the Secretary-General on In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security, and Human Rights for All ( A/59/2005 )
2005 World Summit Outcome Document , A/RES/60/1 , paragraphs 138-140
Secretary-General’s Reports
2009 Report of the Secretary-General on Implementing the Responsibility to Protect ( A/63/677 )
2010 Report of the Secretary-General on Early Warning, Assessment, and the Responsibility to Protect ( A/64/864 )
2011 Report of the Secretary-General on The Role of Regional and Subregional Arrangements In Implementing the Responsibility to Protect ( A/65/877-S/2011/393 )
2012 Report of the Secretary-General on The Responsibility To Protect: Timely and Decisive Response ( A/66/874-S/2012/578 )
2013 Report of the Secretary-General on The Responsibility to Protect: State Responsibility and Prevention ( A/67/929-S/2013/399 )
2014 Report of the Secretary-General on Fulfilling Our Collective Responsibility: International Assistance and the Responsibility To Protect ( A/68/947-S/2014/449 )
2015 Report of the Secretary-General on A Vital and Enduring Commitment: Implementing the Responsibility to Protect ( A/69/981-S/2015/500 )
2016 Report of the Secretary-General on Mobilising collective action: the next decade of the responsibility to protect ( A/70/999–S/2016/620 )
2017 Report of the Secretary-General on Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: Accountability for Prevention ( A/71/1016-S/2017/556 )
2018 Report of the Secretary-General on Responsibility to protect: from early warning to early action ( A/72/884-S/2018/525 )
2019 Report of the Secretary-General on Responsibility to protect: lessons learned for prevention ( A/73/898-S/2019/463 )
2020 Report of the Secretary-General on Prioritizing prevention and strengthening response: women and the responsibility to protect ( A/74/964 - S/2020/501 )
2021 Report of the Secretary-General on Advancing atrocity prevention: work of the Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect ( A/75/863–S/2021/424 )
Resolutions by UN organs
General Assembly
The Responsibility to Protect ( A/RES/63/308 )
International Day of Commemoration and Dignity of the Victims of the Crime of Genocide and of the Prevention of This Crime ( A/RES/69/323 )
The responsibility to protect and the prevention of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity ( A/RES/75/277 )
Security Council
List compiled by the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect
Human Rights Council
2008 Resolution on Prevention of Genocide ( A/HRC/RES/7/25 )
2013 Resolution on Prevention of Genocide ( A/HRC/RES/22/22 )
2015 Resolution on Prevention of Genocide ( A/HRC/RES/28/34 )
2016 Resolution on Human Rights and Transitional Justice ( A/HRC/RES/33/19 )
2018 Resolution on Prevention of Genocide ( A/HRC/37/L.44 )
Fifteenth anniversary of the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, as enshrined in the 2005 World Summit Outcome - 2020 Resolution on the responsibility to protect (A/HRC/44/L.12)
A/HRC/RES/43/29 (2020) Prevention of genocide
List of country-specific resolutions compiled by the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect
Resolutions and reports by other organisations
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Resolution 117 (28 November 2007), on Strengthening the Responsibility to Protect in Africa
European Parliament Recommendation to the European Council (18 April 2013) on the UN principle of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (2012/2143(INI))
Inter-Parliamentary Union Resolution (27 March 2013) on Enforcing the Responsibility to Protect: The Role of Parliament in Safeguarding Civilians’ Lives
2011 Final Report of the Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia Pacific (CSCAP), Study Group on the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP)
2014 Report of the High-Level Panel on the Responsibility to Protect in Southeast-Asia on Mainstreaming the Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia: Pathway Towards a Caring ASEAN Community
Articles by the Special Advisers
"Protecting Vulnerable Populations from Genocide" by Adama Dieng (Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide). (...) LIII No. 4 2016, December 2016
"The Responsibility to Protect" by Ivan Šimonović (Special Adviser on the Responsibility to Protect). (...) LIII No. 4 2016, December 2016
“From Commitment to Action: The Enduring Importance of the Responsibility to Protect” by Adama Dieng (Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide) and Jennifer Welsh (Special Adviser on the Responsibility to Protect).
Language:English
Score: 304813.38
-
https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/key-documents.shtml
Data Source: un
Responsibilities and procedures for management responses and follow-up reports on evaluations
2
1 Responsibilities and procedures for management responses and follow-up reports on evaluations
OED GUIDANCE
Responsibilities and procedures for management responses and follow-up reports on evaluations
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
OFFICE OF EVALUATION
January 2015
Contents
Introduction 3
The management response 4
The follow-up report 6
Responsibilities and procedures for the management response and
the follow-up report 8
Introduction
1. (...) The response to each recommendation will have to be cleared at the level formally responsible for making decisions on the issues at stake. (...) The Management Response should be prepared using the following format:
Management response to the evaluation (title and date)
Overall response to the evaluation
8.
Language:English
Score: 304140.14
-
https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/...-up_reports_on_evaluations.doc
Data Source: un